Skip to main content
Log in

Whose Agency Now?

  • Reply
  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 16 December 2015

The Original Article was published on 17 October 2015

Abstract

I agree with my readers on the necessary alliance of personal agency and collective agency. My point is to prioritize the former. The reasons to prioritize the latter were excellent, and it was undoubtedly a sound decision to start with this scenario: political and institutional improvement of the collectives, enlightened by progressive social sciences. My argument for suggesting a different priority—toward personal microactions and their emergent effects—relies on the opinion that we are stuck in a sustainability crisis due to our current approach. In the question “whose agency now?”, my stress is on “now”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. (2011). The master switch: The rise and fall of information empires. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Puech.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puech, M. Whose Agency Now?. Found Sci 22, 283–286 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9455-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9455-6

Keywords

Navigation