Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the long-term effects of appointment scheduling policies in a magnetic resonance imaging setting

  • Published:
Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study addresses the problem of scheduling magnetic resonance imaging examinations to reduce indirect waiting time—that is, the time that elapses between the patient’s call for an appointment and the scheduled appointment time. Two alternative scheduling approaches are proposed: online and offline characterized, respectively, by the absence or presence of a batch of patients waiting for an appointment. Specifically, with an online approach, patients are scheduled when they call for an appointment, and consequently there is no need to have a batch of patients. On the contrary, the offline approach assumes that patients are given an expected waiting time when they call; they are subsequently called back and assigned an appointment within few days. With an offline approach, patients are thus collected in a batch until a scheduling policy is run; clearly, the batch size or equivalently the frequency according to which patients are scheduled impacts on the performance of the scheduling policy. The offline approach allows a better planning with respect to the online approach where the decision regarding a patient is greatly affected by the schedule of patients who called before him. On the other side, the online approach allows a prompt accommodation of the patient. In an attempt at trade-off these two approaches, the offline one is experimented with three different scheduling frequencies: once per week, two times per week, and three times per week. The paper describes a novel MIP model for implementation of the offline approach and a greedy heuristic for implementation of the online one. Online and offline approaches are then compared in terms of effectiveness, equity, efficiency and discrimination power, using a rolling horizon of 52 weeks and assuming different demand patterns. The comparison includes an evaluation of the impact of two managerial practices—examination overlapping and radiologist cross-training—when using the two forms of scheduling. The key findings are that the offline approach achieves smaller, less variable values for tardiness and enables scheduling of a higher number of patients in situations where capacity is scarce. As to managerial practices, overlapping is found to be relatively more effective than cross-training when an offline approach is adopted, while for online scheduling, cross-training is more effective than overlapping. The results presented are based on an extensive experimental campaign based on real data coming from a leading Italian hospital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: OECD (2014)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi-Javid A, Jalali Z, Klassen KJ (2017) Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: a review of optimization studies. Eur J Oper Res 258(1):3–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.064

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey NTJ (1952) A study of queues and appointment systems in hospital out-patient departments, with special reference to waiting-times. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 14(2):185–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian H et al (2014) Dynamic allocation of same-day requests in multi-physician primary care practices in the presence of prescheduled appointments. Health Care Manag Sci 17(1):31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begen MA, Queyranne M (2011) Appointment scheduling with discrete random durations. Math Oper Res 36(2):240–257

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Association of Radiologists (2013) National maximum wait time access targets for medical lmaging

  • Carpenter AP et al (2011) Managing magnetic resonance imaging machines: support tools for scheduling and planning. Health Care Manag Sci 14(2):158–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayirli T, Veral E (2003) Outpatient scheduling in health care: a review of literature. Prod Oper Manag 12(4):519–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayirli T, Veral E, Rosen H (2006) Designing appointment scheduling systems for ambulatory care services. Health Care Manag Sci 9(1):47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çinlar E (1975) Introduction to stochastic processes. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Denton B, Gupta D (2003) A sequential bounding approach for optimal appointment scheduling. IIE Trans 35(11):1003–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan SA, Gose A, Denton BT (2015) On-line appointment sequencing and scheduling. IIE Trans. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1011355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman J, Liu N, Topaloglu H, Ziya S (2014) Appointment scheduling under patient preference and no-show behavior. Oper Res 62(4):794–811

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 3rd edn. SAGE Publication Inc, Thousand Oaks

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fries BE, Marathe VP (1981) Determination of optimal variables-sized multiple-block appointment systems. Oper Res 29(2):324–345

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gallucci G, Swartz W, Hackerman F (2005) Impact of the wait for an initial appointment on the rate of kept appointments at a mental health center. Psychiatr Serv 56(3):344–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng N, Xie X (2012) Optimizing contracted resource capacity with two advance cancelation modes. Eur J Oper Res 221(3):501–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.017

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Geng N, Xie X (2016) Optimal dynamic outpatient scheduling for a diagnostic facility with two waiting time targets. IEEE Trans Autom Control 61(12):3725–3739

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Geng N, Xie X, Augusto V et al (2011a) A monte carlo optimization and dynamic programming approach for managing MRI examinations of stroke patients. IEEE Trans Autom Control 56(11):2515–2529

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Geng N, Xie X, Jiang Z (2011b) Capacity reservation and cancellation of critical resources. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 8(3):470–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng N, Xie X, Jiang Z (2013) Implementation strategies of a contract-based MRI examination reservation process for stroke patients. Eur J Oper Res 231(2):371–380

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Granja C et al (2014a) An optimization based on simulation approach to the patient admission scheduling problem: diagnostic imaging department case study. J Digit Imaging 27(1):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granja C et al (2014b) An optimization based on simulation approach to the patient admission scheduling problem using a linear programing algorithm. J Biomed Inform 52:427–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2014.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green LV, Savin S (2008) Reducing delays for medical appointments: a queueing approach. Oper Res 56(6):1526–1538

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Green LV, Savin S, Wang B (2006) Managing patient service in a diagnostic medical facility. Oper Res 54(1):11–25

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta D, Denton B (2008) Appointment scheduling in health care: challenges and opportunities. IIE Trans 40(9):800–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta D, Wang L (2008) Revenue management for a primary-care clinic in the presence of patient choice. Oper Res 56(3):576–592

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hendel RC (2008) Utilization management of cardiovascular imaging. Pre-certification and appropriateness. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1(2):241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho CJ, Lau HS (1992) Minimizing total cost in scheduling outpatient appointments. Manag Sci 38(12):1750–1764

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huh WT, Liu N, Truong V (2013) Multiresource allocation scheduling in dynamic environments. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 15(2):280–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isken MW, Ward TJ, Mckee TC (1999) Simulating outpatient obstetrical clinics. In: Proceedings of the 1999 winter simulation conference, pp 1557–1563

  • Jansson B (1966) Choosing a good appointment system-a study of queues of the type (D, M, 1). Oper Res 14(2):292–312

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaandorp GC, Koole G (2007) Optimal outpatient appointment scheduling. Health Care Manag Sci 10(3):217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper B, Klaassen CAJ, Mandjes M (2014) Optimized appointment scheduling. Eur J Oper Res 239(1):243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.05.027

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen KJ, Rohleder TR (1996) Scheduling outpatient appointments in a dynamic environment. J Oper Manag 14(2):83–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen KJ, Rohleder TR (2004) Outpatient appointment scheduling with urgent clients in a dynamic, multi-period environment. Int J Serv Ind Manag 15(2):167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen KJ, Yoogalingam R (2009) Improving performance in outpatient appointment services with a simulation optimization approach. Prod Oper Manag 18(4):447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen KJ, Yoogalingam R (2014) Strategies for appointment policy design with patient unpunctuality. Decis Sci 45(5):881–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolisch R, Sickinger S (2008) Providing radiology health care services to stochastic demand of different customer classes. OR Spectr 30(2):375–395

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamoorthy A, Pramod PK, Chakravarthy SR (2014) Queues with interruptions: a survey. Top 22(1):290–320

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper A, Kemper B, Mandjes M (2015) A Computational approach to optimized appointment scheduling. Queueing Syst 79(1):5–36

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kutner MH et al (2005) Applied linear statistical models, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York, NY, US. http://books.google.fr/books?id=0xqCAAAACAAJ&dq=intitle:Applied+linear+statistical+models+djvu&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api

  • Law AM, Kelton WD (2000) Simulation modeling and analysis. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York,NY,US. http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike09-20&path=ASIN/0071165371

  • Leemis LM (1991) Nonparametric estimation of the cumulative intensity function for a nonhomogeneous poisson process. Manag Sci 37(7):886–900

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leemis LM, Park SK (2006) Discrete-event simulation: a first course. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Benton WC (2003) Hospital capacity management decisions: emphasis on cost control and quality enhancement. Eur J Oper Res 146(3):596–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00225-4

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu N, Ziya S, Kulkarni VG (2010) Dynamic scheduling of outpatient appointments under patient no-shows and cancellations. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 12(2):347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo J, Kulkarni VG, Ziya S (2012) Appointment scheduling under patient no-shows and service interruptions. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 14(4):670–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysdahl KB, Børretzen I (2007) Geographical variation in radiological services: a nationwide survey. BMC Health Serv Res 7:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysdahl KB, Hofmann BM (2009) What causes increasing and unnecessary use of radiological investigations? A survey of radiologists’ perceptions. BMC Health Serv Res 9:155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahar S, Bretthauer KM, Salzarulo PA (2011) Locating specialized service capacity in a multi-hospital network. Eur J Oper Res 212(3):596–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mak H-Y, Rong Y, Zhang J (2014) Sequencing appointments for service systems using sequencing appointments for service systems using inventory approximations. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 16(2):251–262. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2013.0470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministero della Salute (2010) Piano Nazionale di Governo delle Liste di Attesa (PNGLA 2010-2012)

  • Nuti S, Vainieri M (2012) Managing waiting times in diagnostic medical imaging. Br Med J (open) 2(6):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuti S, Seghieri C, Vainieri M (2013) Assessing the effectiveness of a performance evaluation system in the public health care sector: some novel evidence from the Tuscany region experience. J Manag Gov 17(1):59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams, total 2014/1

  • Patrick J, Puterman ML (2007) Improving resource utilization for diagnostic services through flexible inpatient scheduling: a method for improving resource utilization. J Oper Res Soc 58:235–245

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick J, Puterman ML (2008) Reducing wait times through operations research: optimizing the use of surge capacity. Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante 3(3):75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick J, Puterman ML, Queyranne M (2008) Dynamic multipriority patient scheduling for a diagnostic resource. Oper Res 56(6):1507–1525

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Qu X, Shi J (2009) Effect of two-level provider capacities on the performance of open access clinics. Health Care Manag Sci 12(1):99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauner MS, Vissers JMH (2003) OR applied to health services: planning for the future with scarce resources. Eur J Oper Res 150(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00775-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiner B, Siegel E, Carrino JA (2002) Workflow optimization: current trends and future directions. J Digit Imaging 15(3):141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson LW, Chen RR (2003) Scheduling doctors’ appointments: optimal and empirically-based heuristic policies. IIE Trans 35(3):295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salemi Parizi M, Ghate A (2016) Multi-class, multi-resource advance scheduling with no-shows, cancellations and overbooking. Comput Oper Res 67:90–101

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Samorani M, Ganguly S (2016) Optimal sequencing of unpunctual patients in high-service-level clinics. Prod Oper Manag 25(2):330–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samorani M, Laganga LR (2015) Outpatient appointment scheduling given individual day-dependent no-show predictions. Eur J Oper Res 240(1):245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.034

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sickinger S, Kolisch R (2009) The performance of a generalized Bailey–Welch rule for outpatient appointment scheduling under inpatient and emergency demand. Health Care Manag Sci 12(4):408–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB (2008) Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff (Project Hope) 27(6):1491–1502. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soriano A (1966) Comparison of two scheduling systems. Oper Res 14(3):388–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testi A, Tànfani E (2009) Tactical and operational decisions for operating room planning: efficiency and welfare implications. Health Care Manag Sci 12(4):363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truong V-A (2015) Optimal advance scheduling. Manag Sci 61(7):1584–1597. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lent WAM et al (2012) Reducing the throughput time of the diagnostic track involving CT scanning with computer simulation. Eur J Radiol 81(11):3131–3140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Sambeek JRC et al (2011) Reducing MRI access times by tackling the appointment-scheduling strategy. BMJ Qual Saf 20(12):1075–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen IB et al (2009) Adaptive resource allocation for efficient patient scheduling. Artif Intell Med 46(1):67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang PP (1997) Optimally scheduling N customer arrival times for a single-server system. Comput Oper Res 24(8):703–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(96)00093-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J et al (2012) Modeling and analysis of work flow and staffing level in a computed tomography division of University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation. Health Care Manag Sci 15(2):108–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch J, Bailey NT (1952) Appointment systems in hospital outpatient departments. Lancet 1(6718):1105–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White M, Pike M (1964) Appointment systems in out-patients’ clinics and the effect of patients’ unpunctuality. Med Care 2(3):133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Meyer University Children’s Hospital, and in particular to Dr. Alberto Zanobini, Dr. Francesca Bellini, Dr. Claudio De Filippi and Dr. Giuseppe Brancato, for supporting the research project that inspired this study. The authors also thank Dr. Niccolò Montigiani for the preliminary results obtained during his Master’s Thesis. Finally, we warmly thank the Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful critical comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IBIS Lab., Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione, University of Florence, PO Box 50139, Via Santa Marta 3, Florence, Italy

    Paola Cappanera

  2. IBIS Lab., Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, University of Florence, PO Box 50134, Viale Morgagni 40/44, Florence, Italy

    Filippo Visintin & Carlo Banditori

  3. Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Meyer, Viale Pieraccini 24, 50139, Florence, Italy

    Daniele Di Feo

Authors
  1. Paola Cappanera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Filippo Visintin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlo Banditori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniele Di Feo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippo Visintin.

Appendices

Appendix A

See Fig. 12.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Heuristic for online scheduling

Full size image

Appendix B

See Tables 8 and 9.

Table 8 Mean M, standard deviation SD/standard error SE of the KPIs after 52 weeks, stratified by operating conditions and priority class
Full size table
Table 9 Mean M, standard deviation SD/standard error SE of the KPIs after 52 weeks, stratified by operating conditions and priority class
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cappanera, P., Visintin, F., Banditori, C. et al. Evaluating the long-term effects of appointment scheduling policies in a magnetic resonance imaging setting. Flex Serv Manuf J 31, 212–254 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-018-9306-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-018-9306-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation