Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 199–214 | Cite as

Talking Law and Gender

  • Joanne Conaghan
  • Yvette Russell
Review Essay


On November 20, 2014, Professor Joanne Conaghan and Dr. Yvette Russell met at the University of Bristol Law School (UK) to discuss Conaghan’s most recent book Law and Gender (2013, Oxford University Press). This paper is an edited transcript of their discussion, the question and answer session with the audience that followed, and includes Conaghan’s reflections on her long and varied career as a feminist legal scholar. The discussion was chaired by Dr. Devyani Prabhat and organised as part of Bristol Law School’s Women in Law seminar series.


Conaghan Law and gender Legal education Legal reasoning Feminist legal studies 


  1. Auchmuty, Rosemary. 2008. What’s so special about marriage? The impact of Wilkinson v Kitzinger. Child and Family Law Quarterly 20(4): 475–498.Google Scholar
  2. Auchmuty, Rosemary. 2009. Beyond couples. Feminist Legal Studies 17(2): 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auchmuty, Rosemary. 2012. Law and the power of feminism: How marriage lost its power to oppress women. Feminist Legal Studies 20(2): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker, Nicola. 2006. Sex and the civil partnership act: The future of (non) conjugality? Feminist Legal Studies 14(2): 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, Nicola. 2012. Not the marrying kind: A feminist critique of same-sex marriage. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conaghan, Joanne. 2013. Law and gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conaghan, Joanne, and Yvette Russell. 2014. Rape myths, law, and feminist research: ‘Myths about myths’? Feminist Legal Studies 22(1): 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coggon, John, Clark Hobson, Richard Huxtable, Sheelagh McGuinness, Jose Miola, Mary Neal, and Stephen Smith (eds.). 2016, forthcoming. Ethical judgments: Re-writing medical law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  9. Douglas, Heather, Francesca Bartlett, Trish Luker, and Rosemary Hunter (eds.). 2015. Australian feminist judgments: Righting and rewriting law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  10. Enright, Máiréad, Julie McCandless, and Aoife O’Donoghue (eds.). 2016, forthcoming. Judgestroubles and the gendered politics of identity. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  11. Hunter, Rosemary, Claire McGlynn, and Erika Rackley (eds.). 2010. Feminist judgments: From theory to practice. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  12. MacKinnon, Catharine. 1983. Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: Toward a feminist jurisprudence. Signs 8(4): 635–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism unmodified. Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar
  14. MacKinnon, Catharine. 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar
  15. Russell, Yvette. 2013. Thinking sexual difference through the law of rape. Law and Critique 24(3): 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations