Advertisement

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 427–441 | Cite as

Feminism and Sex Trafficking: Rethinking Some Aspects of Autonomy and Paternalism

  • Diana Tietjens Meyers
Article

Abstract

This paper argues that potential cases of oppression, such as sex trafficking, can sometimes comprise autonomous choices by the trafficked individuals. This issue still divides radical from liberal feminists, with the former wanting to ‘rescue’ the ‘victims’ and the latter insisting that there might be good reasons for ‘hiding from the rescuers.’ This article presents new arguments for the liberal approach and raises two demands: first, help organizations should be run by affected women and be open-minded about whether or not the trafficked individuals should remain in the sex industry. Second, the career choices of trafficked individuals should be expanded by the introduction of an opportunity-extending right to asylum.

Keywords

Autonomy Paternalism Oppression Sex trafficking Sexism Asylum 

References

  1. Abramson K (2003) Beyond consent, toward safeguarding human rights: implementing the United Nations trafficking protocol. Harv Int Law J 44(2):473–502Google Scholar
  2. Ackerly B, Okin SM (1999) Feminist social criticism and the international movement for women’s rights as human rights. In: Shapiro I, Hacker-Cordón C (eds) Democracy’s edges. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcoff L (2009) Discourses of sexual violence in a global framework. Philos Top 37(2):123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson S (2002) Prostitution and sexual autonomy: making sense if the prohibition of prostitution. Ethics 112:748–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey A (2011) Reconceiving surrogacy: toward a reproductive justice account of surrogacy work in India. Hypatia 26(4):715–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benson P (1991) Autonomy and oppressive socialization. Soc Theory Pract 17(3):385–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernstein E (2010) Militarized humanitarianism meets carceral feminism: the political of sex, rights, and freedom in contemporary antitrafficking campaigns. Signs 36(1):45–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Briones L (2010) Capabilities and livelihood in Filipina experiences of domestic work in Paris and Hong Kong. In: Zheng T (ed) Sex trafficking, human rights, and social justice. Routledge, New York, pp 62–83Google Scholar
  9. Chapkis W (2003) Trafficking, migration, and the law: protecting innocents, punishing immigrants. Gend Soc 17:923–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chew L (2005) “Reflections by an Anti-trafficking Activist.” In Trafficking and Prostitution Reconsidered: New Perspectives on Migration, Sex Work, and Human Rights. Boulder CO: Paradigm PublishersGoogle Scholar
  11. Christman J (2009) The politics of persons:Individual autonomy and socio-historical selves. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Marneffe P (2010) Liberalism and prostitution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Doezma J (1998) Forced to choose: Beyond the voluntary v. Forced prostitution dichotomy. In: Kempadoo K, Doezma J (eds) Global sex workers: Rights, resistance, redefinition. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. E.W. (2012) Published email response to “Character Study: 52 and Still Working on the Streets.” New York Times, Metropolitan Section. January 8, 2012. p. 4Google Scholar
  15. Foster M (2007) International refugee law and socio-economic rights: Refuge from deprivation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman M (2003) Autonomy, gender, politics. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gauthier J (2011) Prostitution, sexual autonomy, and sex discrimination. Hypatia 26(1):166–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartsough T (2002) Asylum for trafficked women: escape strategies beyond the T visa. Hast Women’s Law J 13:77–116Google Scholar
  19. Haynes DF (2006) Used, abused, arrested, and deported: Extending immigration benefits to protect the victims of trafficking and to secure the prosecution of traffickers. In: Lockwood BB (ed) Women’s rights: A human rights quarterly reader. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacobsen CM, Skilbrei M-L (2010) Reproachable victims? Representations and self-representations of Russian women in transnational prostitution. Ethnos 75(2):190–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaggar A (2005) ‘Saving Amina’: global justice for women and intercultural dialogue. Ethics Int Aff 19(3):55–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kempadoo K (1998a) Introduction: Globalizing sex workers’ rights. In: Kempadoo K, Doezma J (eds) Global sex workers: Rights, resistance, and redefinition. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Kempadoo K (1998b) The migrant tightrope: Experiences from the Carribean. In: Kempadoo K, Doezma J (eds) Global sex workers: Rights, resistance, and redefinition. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Kempadoo K (2005) Trafficking and prostitution reconsidered: New perspectives on migration, sex work, and human rights. Paradigm Publishers, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  25. Kempadoo K, Doezema J (1998) Global sex workers: Rights, resistance, redefinition. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Khader S (2011) Adaptive preferences and women’s empowerment. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knight S (2007) “Asylum from Trafficking: A Failure of Protection.” Immigration Briefings: Practical Analysis of Immigration and Nationality Issues. No. 07-07 Thomson/West. http://cgrs.uchastings.edu/documents/cgrs/advisories/Knight_%20ImmigBriefings_Trafficking_Asylum.pdf (accessed 11/6/11)
  28. Koggel C (2009) Agency and empowerment: Embodied realities in a globalized world. In: Campbell S et al (eds) Embodiment and agency. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, pp 250–268Google Scholar
  29. Liberto HR (2009) Normalizing prostitution versus normalizing the alienability of sexual rights. Ethics 120(1):138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luopajärvi K (2003) Gender-related persecution as basis for refugee status: Comparative perspectives. Institute for Human Rights, Åbo Academi University, TurkuGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyers DT (1989) Self, society, and personal choice. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyers DT (2000) Feminism and women’s autonomy: the challenge of female genital cutting. Metaphilosophy 31:469–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meyers DT (2002) Gender in the mirror: Cultural imagery and women’s agency. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyers DT (2004) Being yourself: Essays on identity, action, and social life. Rowman and Littlefield, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyers DT (2011) Two victim paradigms and the problem of ‘Impure’ Victims. Humanity: Int J Hum Rights Humanitarianism Dev 2(2):255–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miriam K (2005) Stopping the traffic in women: power, agency, and abolition in feminist debates over sex-trafficking. J Soc Philos 36(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Musto JL (2010) The NGO-ification of the anti-trafficking movement in the United States. In: Zheng T (ed) Sex trafficking, human rights, and social justice. Routledge, New York, pp 23–35Google Scholar
  38. Narayan U (1997) Dislocating cultures, Chapters 1–3. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Narayan U (2001) Minds of their own: Choices, autonomy, cultural practices, and other women. In: Antony L, Witt C (eds) In a mind of one’s own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  40. Nussbaum MC (1999) ‘Whether from reason or prejudice’: Taking money for bodily services. In: Nussbaum MC (ed) Sex and social justice. Oxford University Press, New York CityGoogle Scholar
  41. Peach LJ (2006) Victims or agents: female cross-border migrants and anti-trafficking discourse. Radic Philos Today 4:101–118Google Scholar
  42. Sassen S (2002) Women’s burden: counter-geographies of globalization and the feminization of survival. Nordic J Int Law 71:255–274Google Scholar
  43. Satz D (2010) Why some things should not be for sale. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shrage L (1996) Prostitution and the case for decriminalization. Dissent 43:41–50Google Scholar
  45. Schwarzenbach SA (1990–91) “Contractarians and Feminists Debate Prostitution.” NY Univ Rev Law Socl Chang 18: 103–130Google Scholar
  46. Schwarzenbach SA (2011) Review of liberalism and prostitution. Ethics 121:439–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Soderlund G (2005) Running from the rescuers: new U.S. crusades against sex trafficking and the rhetoric of abolition. Fem Form 17(3):64–87Google Scholar
  48. Waugh L (2007) Selling Olga: Stories of human trafficking and resistance. Orion Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Yankah EN (2010) “Review of Liberalism and Prostitution.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/24323-liberalism-and-prostitution/ (accessed 12/6/2011)
  50. Zheng T (2010) SexTrafficking, human rights, and social justice. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations