Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 277–281 | Cite as

A case for intellectual property rights

Michele Boldrin and David Levine: Review of against intellectual monopoly. Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. viii+298, ISBN: 978-0-521-87928-6
Book Review


  1. Becker, L. (1977). Property rights. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  2. Coombe, R. (1991). Objects of property and subjects of politics: Intellectual property laws and democratic dialogue. 69 Texas Law Review 1853.Google Scholar
  3. Fishman v. Estate of Wirtz. (1986). 807 F. 2d 520 (7th Cir.).Google Scholar
  4. Hughes, J. (1999). ‘Recoding’ intellectual property and overlooked audience interests. 77 Texas Law Review 923.Google Scholar
  5. Kwall, R. (1985). Copyright and the moral right: Is an American marriage possible. 38 Vanderbilt Law Review 4.Google Scholar
  6. Lemley, M. (1997). The Economics of improvement in intellectual property law. 75 Texas law Review 989.Google Scholar
  7. Lemley, M. (2005). Property, intellectual property, and free riding. 83 Texas Law Review 1031.Google Scholar
  8. Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government, P. Laslett (ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1698).Google Scholar
  9. Seshadri v. Kasraian. (1997). 130 F. 3d 798 (7th Cir.).Google Scholar
  10. Spinello, R., & Bottis, M. (2009). A defense of intellectual property rights. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Strauss, L. (1950). Natural right and history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Yen, A. (1990). Restoring the natural law: Copyright as labor and possession. 51 Ohio State Law Journal 517.Google Scholar
  13. Zycher, B., & DiMasi, J. (2006). The truth about drug innovation. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research; available at http:

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carroll School of Management, Boston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations