- 260 Downloads
According to reductive intellectualists about knowledge-how (e.g. Stanley and Williamson in J Philos 411–44, 2001; Stanley in Know how. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011; Brogaard in Grazer Philos Stud 77(1):147–190, 2008; Philos Phenomenol Res 78(2):439–467, 2009) knowledge-how is a kind of knowledge-that. To the extent that this is right, then insofar as we might conceive of ways knowledge could be extended with reference to active externalist (e.g. Clark and Chalmers in Analysis 58(1):7–19, 1998; Clark in Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press , Oxford, 2008) approaches in the philosophy of mind (e.g. the extended mind thesis and the hypothesis of extended cognition), we should expect no interesting difference between the two. However, insofar as anti-intellectualist approaches to knowledge-how (e.g. Ryle in Proc Aristot Soc 46, 1945; The concept of mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1949) are a viable option, there is an overlooked issue of how knowledge-how might be extended, via active externalism, in ways very differently from knowledge-that. This paper explores this overlooked space, and in doing so, illustrates how a novel form of extended knowledge-how emerges from a pairing of active externalism in the philosophy of mind with anti-intellectualism in the theory of knowledge. Crucial to our argument will be a new way of thinking about the extended mind thesis, as it pertains to the kinds of state one is in (on an anti-intellectualist construal) when one knows how to do something, and how this state connects with non-accidentally successful performance.
KeywordsParity Principle Propositional Attitude Dynamical System Theory Propositional Knowledge Extended Mind
- Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition. New Jersey: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Allen-Hermanson, S. (2013). Superdupersizing the mind: Extended cognition and the persistence of cognitive bloat. Philosophical studies, 164(3), 791–806.Google Scholar
- Bengson, J., & Moffett, M. (2011a). Nonpropositional intellectualism. In Knowing how: Essays on knowledge, mind, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bengson, J., & Moffett, M. (2011b). Two conceptions of mind and action: Knowing how and the philosophical theory of intelligence. Knowing how: Essays on knowledge, mind, and action (pp. 3–55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Brogaard, B. (2008). Knowledge-the and propositional attitude ascriptions. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 77(1), 147–190.Google Scholar
- Carter, J. A., Gordon, E. C., & Palermos, S. O. (forthcoming). Extended emotion. Philosophical Psychology, 1–24.Google Scholar
- Carter, J. A. & Kallestrup, J. (2015). Extended cognition and propositional memory. Philosophy and Phenomenolgogical Research. doi: 10.1111/phpr.12157.
- Carter, J. A. & Palermos, S. O. (2014). Active externalism and epistemic internalism. Erkenntnis. doi: 10.1007/s10670-014-9670-5.
- Carter, J. A. & Pritchard, D. (forthcoming). Extended entitlement. In P. Graham & N. Pedersen (Eds.), New essays on entitlement (pp. 1–19). Oxford: UP.Google Scholar
- Carter, J. A. & Pritchard, D. (2014). Knowledge-how and cognitive achievement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. doi: 10.1111/phpr.12094.
- Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, A. (2010). Memento's revenge: The extended mind, Extended. In R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (pp. 43–66). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Farkas, K. (forthcoming). Know-wh does not reduce to know-that. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1–18.Google Scholar
- Froese, T., Gershenson, C., & Rosenblueth, D.A. (2013). The dynamically extended mind. In Evolutionary computation (CEC), 2013 IEEE Congress on, pp. 1419–1426. IEEE, 2013.Google Scholar
- Hetherington, S. (2013). Knowledge can be lucky. In M. Steup, J. Turri & E. Sosa (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (pp. 164–177). Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jarvis, B. (forthcoming). Epistemology and radically extended cognition. Episteme, 1–29.Google Scholar
- Pritchard, D. & Lynch, M. (forthcoming). Neuromedia. In J. A. Carter, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S. O. Palermos & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Extended Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of ‘meaning’. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 7, 131–193.Google Scholar
- Rupert, R. D. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. The Journal of Philosophy, 101, 389–428.Google Scholar
- Ryle, G. (1945). Knowing how and knowing that. Proceedings from the Aristotelian Society, 46, 1–16.Google Scholar
- Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Snowdon, P. (2004). The Presidential address: Knowing how and knowing that: A distinction reconsidered. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 104, 1–29.Google Scholar
- Stanley, J., & Williamson, T. (2001). Knowing how. The Journal of Philosophy, 98(8), 411–44.Google Scholar
- Stout, R. (2005). Action. Chesham: Acumen Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilson, R. A. (2000). The mind beyond itself. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar