Strong Global Supervenience is Valuable
- 67 Downloads
It is generally assumed that everything that can be said about dependence with the notion of strong global supervenience can also be said with the notion of strong supervenience. It is argued here, however, that strong global supervenience has a metaphysically distinctive role to play. It is shown that when the relevant sets include relations, strong global supervenience and strong supervenience are distinct. It is then concluded that there are claims about dependence of relations that can be made with the global notion of strong supervenience but not with the “local” (individual) one.
KeywordsDistinctive Role Modal Relation Maximal Property Weak Version Extrinsic Property
Thanks to Ted Sider and two anonymous referees. This research was supported by The Israel Science Foundation, grant 725/08.
- Bennett, K., & McLaughlin, B. (2005). Supervenience. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience/.
- Horgan, T. (1982). Supervenience and microphysics. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 63, 29–43.Google Scholar
- Kim, J. (1993). “Postscripts on supervenience”, in his supervenience and mind (pp. 161–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- McLaughlin, B. (1997). Supervenience, vagueness, and determination. Philosophical Perspectives, 11, 209–230.Google Scholar
- Shagrir, O. (forthcoming). Concepts of supervenience revisited.Google Scholar
- Sider, T. R. (2008). Yet another paper on the supervenience argument against coincident entities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77, 613–624.Google Scholar
- Stalnaker, R. (1996). Varieties of supervenience. Philosophical Perspectives, 10, 221–241.Google Scholar