Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Spatial-Scale Effect of an Atmospheric Environmental Impact Assessment in Regional Strategic Environmental Assessment (R-SEA)

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When evaluating the atmospheric environment in regional strategic environment assessment (R-SEA), the variation and choice of the spatial scale have a substantial influence on the conclusions of the assessment. In this study, we used numerical simulation to investigate the spatial-scale effect. Two varying spatial extents and two varying spatial details of pollutant emission data (emission inventories in this case) were provided for numerical modeling, and output distributions of atmospheric pollutants at different air pollution levels were compared. The results show that the resolution and spatial range of data collection do indeed influence the atmospheric prediction and assessment results in R-SEA. The spatial-scale effect is more significant under the air pollution condition than under excellent and good air quality conditions. A comparison of varying spatial extents of emission inventory shows that narrowing the prediction area to a local scale is more conducive to identifying the impact of local pollution sources. A comparison of varying spatial details of emission inventory indicates that a higher resolution is favorable for identifying local high concentrations of pollutants and their locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gunn, J. H., & Noble, B. F. (2009). Integrating cumulative effects in regional strategic environmental assessment frameworks: lessons from practice. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 11(03), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1464333209003361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thérivel, R., & Partidário, M. R. (1996). The practice of strategic environmental assessment. London: Earthscan Publication Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer, T. B., & Onyango, V. (2012). Strategic environmental assessment-related research projects and journal articles: an overview of the past 20 years. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(4), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.740953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. João, E. (2002). How scale affects environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(2), 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. João, E. (2007). A research agenda for data and scale issues in strategic environmental assessment (SEA). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(5), 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodchild, M. F. (2011). Scale in GIS: an overview. Geomorphology, 130(1), 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tate, N. J., & Atkinson, P. M. (2001). Modelling scale in geographical information science. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodchild, M. F., & Quattrochi, D. A. (1997). Introduction: scale, multiscaling, remote sensing, and GIS. In D. A. Quattrochi & M. F. Goodchild (Eds.), Scale in remote sensing and GIS. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peterson, D. L., & Parker, T. V. (1998). Dimensions of scale in ecology, resource managements and society. In D. L. Peterson & T. V. Parker (Eds.), Ecological scale theory and applications. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gontier, M. (2007). Scale issues in the assessment of ecological impacts using a GIS-based habitat model—a case study for the Stockholm region. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(5), 440–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. João, E. (2007). The importance of data and scale issues for strategic environmental assessment (SEA). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(5), 361–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Partidário, M. R. (2007). Scales and associated data—what is enough for SEA needs? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 460–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, C. H. (2009). Impact of spatial scales on non-polluting ecological impact evaluation result—using environmental impact assessment of development area as an example. Channel Science(6), 14–15.

  14. Karstens, S. A. M., Bots, P. W. G., & Slinger, J. H. (2007). Spatial boundary choice and the views of different actors. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(5), 386–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dehkordi, F. A., Khazaei, N., & Minaei, T. D. (2008). Changing scale in environmental impact assessment (case studies: Sefid roud Dam, Iran and Haizuka Dam, Japan). Journal of Environmental Studies, 34(45), 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keshkamat, S. S., Kooiman, A., van Maarseveen, M. F. A. M., der Veen, A. V., & Zuidgeest, M. H. P. (2012). A boundary object for scale selection—moderating differences and synergising understanding. Ecological Economics, 76, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang, Y., Ma, W., & Yu, Q. (2003). Mathematical modeling for air quality prediction in environmental assessment of urban comprehensive transportation planning. Shanghai Environmental Sciences (5), 335–338.

  18. Seyfried, M. S., & Wilcox, B. P. (1995). Scale and the nature of spatial variability: field examples having implications for hydrologic modeling. Water Resources Research, 31(1), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1029/94wr02025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Trivedi, M. R., Berry, P. M., Morecroft, M. D., & Dawson, T. P. (2008). Spatial scale affects bioclimate model projections of climate change impacts on mountain plants. Global Change Biology, 14(5), 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01553.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heng, B. C. P., Scott, C. F., Sander, G. C., Wheatley, A. D., & Chandler, J. H. (2009). Modelling spatial and temporal scale effects in soil erosion. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 11.

  21. Stroh, E., Harrie, L., & Gustafsson, S. (2007). A study of spatial resolution in pollution exposure modelling. International Journal of Health Geographics, 6(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-6-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tan, J., Zhang, Y., Ma, W., Yu, Q., Wang, J., & Chen, L. (2015). Impact of spatial resolution on air quality simulation: a case study in a highly industrialized area in Shanghai, China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 6(2), 322–333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thompson, T. M., Saari, R. K., & Selin, N. E. (2014). Air quality resolution for health impact assessment: influence of regional characteristics. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(2), 969–978. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-969-2014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Skamarock, W. C., & Klemp, J. B. (2008). A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications. Journal of Computational Physics, 227(7), 3465–3485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, W., Bruyere, C., & Duda, M. (2011). Advanced research WRF (ARW) user’s guide version 3.2.

  26. Scire, J. S., Strimaitis, D. G., & Yamartino, R. J. (1999). A user’s guide for the CALPUFF dispersion model. Earth Technology, Concord, MA.

  27. Holmes, N. S., & Morawska, L. (2006). A review of dispersion modelling and its application to the dispersion of particles: an overview of different dispersion models available. Atmospheric Environment, 40(30), 5902–5928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tan, J. N., Yu, Q., Ma, W. C., Ma, J. L., Cheng, J., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Development of refined emission inventory of air pollutants: a case study of Shanghai Baoshan District. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 34(5).

  29. Tsai, Y. I., & Cheng, M. T. (1999). Visibility and aerosol chemical compositions near the coastal area in Central Taiwan. The Science of Total Environment, 231, 37–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu, H., Cao, J., Shen, Z., Liu, S., Zhang, T., & Zhou, J. (2015). Characterization of chemical composition for fine particle matter collected in different air quality grades in Xi’an in winter. Science & Technology Review, 33(6), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2015.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chio, C.-P., Cheng, M.-T., & Wang, C.-F. (2004). Source apportionment to PM10 in different air quality conditions for Taichung urban and coastal areas, Taiwan. Atmospheric Environment, 38(39), 6893–6905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sokhi, R. S., José, R. S., Kitwiroon, N., Fragkou, E., Pérez, J. L., & Middleton, D. R. (2006). Prediction of ozone levels in London using the MM5–CMAQ modelling system. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21(4), 566–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gardner, M. W., & Dorling, S. R. (2000). Statistical surface ozone models: an improved methodology to account for non-linear behaviour. Atmospheric Environment, 34(1), 21–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ma, W. C., Zhao, H. J., Li, L., Zhou, Y. D., Pan, H., & Bao, C. K. (2015). Spatial scale of regional plan environmental impact assessment: the Gaoqiao Town and Pudong New District cases in Shanghai, China. Progress in Geography, 34(6), 739–748. https://doi.org/10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao, Y., Qiu, L., Xu, R., Xie, F., Zhang, Q., Yu, Y., et al. (2015). Advantages of city-scale emission inventory for urban air quality research and policy: the case of Nanjing, a typical industrial city in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 15(21), 18691–18746. https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-18691-2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stroud, C. A., Makar, P. A., Moran, M. D., Gong, W., Gong, S., Zhang, J., et al. (2011). Impact of model grid spacing on regional- and urban- scale air quality predictions of organic aerosol. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(7), 3107–3118. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3107-2011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Markakis, K., Valari, M., Perrussel, O., Sanchez, O., & Honore, C. (2015). Climate forced air-quality modeling at urban scale: sensitivity to model resolution, emissions and meteorology. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 15(4), 4767–4821.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kooiman, A., & Keshkamat, S. S. (2012). Scale in regional environmental planning: the reconstruction of North-Brabant, the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 14(01), 1250004. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1464333212500044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA) (2003). Technical guidelines for plan environmental impact assessment (on trial). (HJ/T 130-2003). http://english.sepa.gov.cn/Resources/standards/others1/Technical_Guideline_EIA/200710/t20071024_112076.shtml Access date 1 September 2003

  40. State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA) (2003). Technical guidelines for environmental impact assessment of development area. (HJ/T 131-2003). http://english.sepa.gov.cn/Resources/standards/others1/Technical_Guideline_EIA/200710/t20071024_112077.shtml. Access date 1 September 2003

  41. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China (MEP) (2014). Technical guidelines for plan environmental impact assessment general principles. (HJ 130–2014). http://english.sepa.gov.cn/Resources/standards/others1/Technical_Guideline_EIA/201605/t20160516_337733.shtml. Access date 1 September 2014

  42. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China (MEP) (2008). Guidelines for environmental impact assessment atmospheric environment. (HJ 2.2-2008). http://english.sepa.gov.cn/Resources/standards/others1/Technical_Guideline_EIA/201102/t20110215_200731.shtml. Access date 1 April 2009

  43. Huang, S. F., Xia, D. X., Gao, J., & Jiang, J. H. (2012). Strategic environmental assessment of key industry development in the West Taiwan Straits Economic Zone: China Environmental Press.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71173049).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, 220# Handan Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, China

    Xinrui Chen, Yan Zhang, Yue Wang, Qi Yu & Weichun Ma

Authors
  1. Xinrui Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yue Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qi Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Weichun Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weichun Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y. et al. The Spatial-Scale Effect of an Atmospheric Environmental Impact Assessment in Regional Strategic Environmental Assessment (R-SEA). Environ Model Assess 23, 529–556 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-018-9590-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-018-9590-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation