Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized Weissinger’s L-method for prediction of curved wings operating above a free surface in subsonic flow

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The classical Weissinger’s L-method is generalized to the lifting problem for steadily advancing curved wings subject to the wing-in-ground (WIG) effect above a large body of water in subsonic flow, and the free surface defines the boundary between the air and water. Unlike the traditional analysis of the lifting problem, the essential techniques focus on finding the three-dimensional free surface Green’s function generated by the isolated horseshoe vortex in the upper layer of the stratified fluid where the air is regarded as weakly compressible and the water is incompressible. The numerical calculation is implemented using Weissinger’s L-method. Finally, the effects of the curved geometry on WIG effect in the vicinity of a free surface in subsonic flow are discussed. Extensive numerical examples are carried out to show the lift properties for three-dimensional swept and dihedral wings operating in the vicinity of a free surface as a function of the sweep or dihedral angle for different clearance-to-chord ratios and Mach numbers. Interestingly, for high Froude numbers, the free surface effectively becomes rigid, and it can safely be treated as a solid surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Han C, Cho J (2005) Unsteady trailing vortex evolution behind a wing in ground effect. J Aircr AIAA 42:429–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Raymond AE (1921) Ground influence on airfoils. NACA Technical Note 67

  3. Pozrikidis C (2009) Fluid dynamics: theory, computation, and numerical simulation, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed MR, Sharma SD (2005) An investigation on the aerodynamics of a symmetrical airfoil in ground effect. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 29:633–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang X, Zerihan J (2003) Off-surface aerodynamic measurements of a wing in ground effect. J Aircr AIAA 40:716–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmed MR, Takasaki T, Kohama Y (2007) Aerodynamics of a NACA 4412 airfoil in ground effect. AIAA J 45:37–47

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iosilevskii G (2008) Asymptotic theory of an oscillating wing section in weak ground effect. Eur J Mech B–Fluid 27:477–490

    Google Scholar 

  8. Widnall SE, Barrows TM (1970) An analytic solution for two- and three-dimensional wing in ground effect. J Fluid Mech 41:769–792

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Han C, Kim H, Cho J (2006) Steady aerodynamic characteristics of a wing flying over a nonplanar ground surface Part I: rail. J Mar Sci Tech 20:1043–1050

    Google Scholar 

  10. Han C, Kim H, Cho J (2006) Steady aerodynamic characteristics of a wing flying over a nonplanar ground surface Part II: channel. J Mar Sci Tech 20:1051–1058

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dragos L (1990) Subsonic flow past thick wing in ground effect, lifting line theory. Acta Mech 82:49–60

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Park K, Lee J (2008) Influence of endplate on aerodynamic characteristics of low-aspect-ratio wing in ground effect. J Mech Sci Tech 22:2578–2589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moryossef Y, Levy Y (2004) Effect of oscillations on airfoils in close proximity to ground. AIAA J 42:1755–1754

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rozhdestvensky K (2006) WIG vehicles. Prog Aerosp Sci 42:211–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Suzuki K, Ikehata M (1994) Free surface effect of wig advancing over the still water surface. Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydrodynamics (ICHD’94), pp 254–260

  16. Barber TJ (2007) A study of water surface deformation due to tip vortices of a WIG. J Ship Res 51:182–186

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zong Z, Liang H, Zhou L (2012) Lifting line theory for wing-in-ground effect in proximity to a free surface. J Eng Math 74:143–158

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang H, Zhou L, Zong Z, Sun L (2013) An analytical investigation of two-dimensional and three-dimensional biplanes operating in the vicinity of a free surface. To appear in J Mar Sci Tech. doi:0.1007/s00773-012-0187-9

  19. Katz J, Plotkin A (1991) Low-speed aerodynamics: from wing theory to panel method. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sachs G, Holzapfel F (2007) Flight mechanic and aerodynamic aspects of extremely large dihedral in birds. AIAA J 46:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  21. Phillips WF, Hansen AB, Nelson WM (2006) Effects of tail dihedral on static stability. J Aircr AIAA 43:1829–1837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalman TP, Rodden WP, Giesing J (1971) Application of the doublet-lattice method to nonplanar configurations in subsonic flow. J Aircr AIAA 8:406–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gulcat U (2010) Fundamentals of modern unsteady aerodynamics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  24. Milne-Thomson LM (1973) Theoretical aerodynamics. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Newman JN (1977) Marine hydrodynamics. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Scullen DC, Tuck EO (2011) Free-surface elevation due to moving pressure distributions in three dimensions. J Eng Math 70:29–42

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Yeung RW, Nguyen TC (1999) Waves generated by a moving source in a two-layer ocean of finite depth. J Eng Math 35:85–107

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1972) Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Noblesse F (1981) Alternative integral representations for the Green function of the theory of ship wave resistance. J Eng Math 15:241–265

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith AMO, Giesing JP, Hess JL (1963) Calculation of waves and wave resistance for bodies moving on or beneath the surface of the sea. Douglas Aircraft Co., Long Beach, Report No 31488a

  31. Faltinsen OM (2005) Hydrodynamics of high-speed marine vehicles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tuck EO (1984) A simple one-dimensional theory for air-supported vehicles over water. J Ship Res 28:290–292

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for their critical comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript considerably. The present work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50921001, 51279030, and 50909017), National Key Basic Research Special Foundation of China (2010CB832704 and 2013CB036101), and Scientific Project for High-Tech Ships: Key Technology Research on Semi-planning Fore-placed-outrigger Trimaran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. Zong.

Appendices

Appendix 1

In this part, we aim to verify that the elevation of a free surface is small. Based on the one-dimensional continuity equation, we have [32]

$$\begin{aligned} Uh=\left( {U+\frac{\partial \varphi _a }{\partial x}} \right) \left[ {h-t\left( {x,y} \right) -\zeta \left( {x,y} \right) } \right] . \end{aligned}$$
(72)

Thus, the free surface elevation can be obtained from Eq.(72):

$$\begin{aligned} \zeta \left( {x,y} \right) =h-t\left( {x,y} \right) -\frac{Uh}{U+\frac{\partial \varphi _a }{\partial x}}. \end{aligned}$$
(73)

Based on Bernoulli equation in (7), the free surface elevation can be expressed in the form

$$\begin{aligned} \zeta \left( {x,y} \right)&= -\frac{\rho _w }{g\left( {\rho _w -\rho _a } \right) }\left[ {U\frac{\partial \varphi _w }{\partial x}+\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{\partial \varphi _w }{\partial x}} \right) ^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{\partial \varphi _w }{\partial y}} \right) ^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{\partial \varphi _w }{\partial z}} \right) ^{2}} \right] \nonumber \\&+\frac{\rho _a }{g\left( {\rho _w -\rho _a } \right) }\left[ {U\frac{\partial \varphi _a }{\partial x}+\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{\partial \varphi _a }{\partial x}} \right) ^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{\partial \varphi _a }{\partial y}} \right) ^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{\partial \varphi _a }{\partial z}} \right) ^{2}} \right] . \end{aligned}$$
(74)

Due to the small density ratio of air to water, the density ratio can be expressed as

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\rho _a }{\rho _w }=\delta _1 \rho , \end{aligned}$$
(75)

where \(\rho \) is an \(O(1)\) quantity. By substituting asymptotic expansions of the velocity potentials in air and water in Eqs. (17) and (18) into Eq. (74) and preserving the first-order expression, we can obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \zeta (x)=-\frac{\delta _1 U\frac{\partial \varphi _w^{\left( 1 \right) } }{\partial x}}{g\left( {1-\delta _1 \rho } \right) }. \end{aligned}$$
(76)

From Eq. (76), it can be argued that the free surface deformation induced by the foil has the same order as \(\delta _{1}\).

Appendix 2

In this part, we aim to derive the perturbed velocity components induced by the vortex filament with an arbitrary contour in the subsonic regime using the Biot–Savart law, which reads

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf{u}=-\frac{\Gamma }{4\pi }\int \limits _C {\frac{\mathbf{R}\times \text{ d }\mathbf{l}}{R^{3}}}. \end{aligned}$$
(77)

Due to the scale stretching of the \(x\) coordinate in the subsonic flow, the vectors R and dl can be expressed as

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf{R}=\left( {\frac{x-\xi }{\beta },\;y-\eta ,\;z-\zeta } \right) \end{aligned}$$
(78)

and

$$\begin{aligned} \text{ d }\mathbf{l}=\left( {\frac{1}{\beta }\text{ d }\xi ,\;\text{ d }\eta ,\;\text{ d }\zeta } \right) . \end{aligned}$$
(79)

Thus, the perturbed velocity components in the Ox, Oy, and Oz directions are

$$\begin{aligned} u&= -\frac{\Gamma }{4\pi }\int \limits _C {\frac{\left( {y-\eta } \right) \text{ d }\zeta -\left( {z-\zeta } \right) \text{ d }\eta }{\left[ {\left( {\frac{x-\xi }{\beta }} \right) ^{2}+\left( {y-\eta } \right) ^{2}+\left( {z-\zeta } \right) ^{2}} \right] ^{3/2}}} =\frac{\Gamma }{4\pi }\int \limits _C {\frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left( {\frac{1}{R}} \right) \text{ d }\zeta -\frac{\partial }{\partial z}\left( {\frac{1}{R}} \right) \text{ d }\eta } ,\end{aligned}$$
(80)
$$\begin{aligned} v&= -\frac{\Gamma }{4\pi }\int \limits _C {\frac{\left( {z-\zeta } \right) \frac{\text{ d }\xi }{\beta }-\left( {\frac{x-\xi }{\beta }} \right) \text{ d }\zeta }{\left[ {\left( {\frac{x-\xi }{\beta }} \right) ^{2}+\left( {y-\eta } \right) ^{2}+\left( {z-\zeta } \right) ^{2}} \right] ^{3/2}}} =\frac{\Gamma }{4\pi }\int \limits _C {\frac{1}{\beta }\frac{\partial }{\partial z}\left( {\frac{1}{R}} \right) \text{ d }\xi -\beta \frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left( {\frac{1}{R}} \right) \text{ d }\zeta }, \end{aligned}$$
(81)

and

$$\begin{aligned} w=-\frac{\Gamma }{4\pi }\int \limits _C {\frac{\left( {\frac{x-\xi }{\beta }} \right) \text{ d }\eta -\left( {y-\eta } \right) \frac{\text{ d }\xi }{\beta }}{\left[ {\left( {\frac{x-\xi }{\beta }} \right) ^{2}+\left( {y-\eta } \right) ^{2}+\left( {z-\zeta } \right) ^{2}} \right] ^{3/2}}} =\frac{\Gamma }{4\pi }\int \limits _C {\beta \frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left( {\frac{1}{R}} \right) \text{ d }\eta -\frac{1}{\beta }\frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left( {\frac{1}{R}} \right) \text{ d }\xi }. \end{aligned}$$
(82)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, H., Zong, Z., Sun, L. et al. Generalized Weissinger’s L-method for prediction of curved wings operating above a free surface in subsonic flow. J Eng Math 83, 109–129 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-012-9611-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-012-9611-8

Keywords

Navigation