, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 203–221 | Cite as

Regional output growth synchronisation with the Euro Area

  • Iulia Siedschlag
  • Gabriele Tondl
Original Paper


This paper investigates the patterns and determinants of the co-movement of economic activity between regions in the European Union and the Euro Area. We use a panel dataset of 208 regions over the period 1989–2002 and estimate a system of simultaneous equations to analyse the impact of regional trade integration, industry specialisation and exchange rate volatility on regional output growth synchronisation with the Euro Area. We find that deeper trade integration with the Euro Area had a strong direct positive effect on the synchronisation of regional output growth with the Euro Area. Industrial specialisation and exchange rate volatility were sources of cyclical divergence. Industrial specialisation had however an indirect positive effect on regional output growth synchronisation via its positive effect on trade integration, while exchange rate volatility had an indirect additional negative effect on regional output growth synchronisation by reducing trade integration.


European economic and monetary union Business cycles Regional growth 

JEL Classification

E32 F33 F42 



We thank Ray Barrell, Fritz Breuss, David Bell, Xiaoheng Zhang, Konstantinos Angeloupoulos, two anonymous referees and participants at the Congress of the European Regional Science Association in Amsterdam, the Irish Economics Association Conference in Bunclody, the EUROFRAME Conference in Berlin, and the European Trade Study Group Conference in Vienna for helpful comments and suggestions. Iulia Siedschlag gratefully acknowledges financial support from the 5th RTD Framework Programme of the European Communities (Contract No. HPSE-CT-2002-00118).


  1. Alesina A, Barro R (2002) Currency unions. Q J Econ 117(2):409–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artis M, Zhang W (1997) The international business cycle and the ERM: is there a “European” cycle? Int J Finance Econ 2:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Artis M, Galvao AB, Marcellino M (2003) The transmission mechanism in a changing world. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4014, CEPR, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Artis M, Marcellino M, Proietti T (2004) Characterising the business cycles for accession countries. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4457, CEPR, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrios S, de Lucio J (2003) Economic integration and regional business cycles: evidence from the Iberian regions. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 65:497–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrios S, Brülhart M, Elliott R, Sensier M (2003) A tale of two cycles: co-fluctuations between UK regions and the Euro Zone. Manchester Sch 71(3):265–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baxter M, Kouparitsas M (2003) Trade structure, industrial structure, and international business cycles. Am Econ Rev 93(2):51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baxter M, Kouparitsas M (2005) Determinants of business cycle co-movement: a robust analysis. J Monetary Econ 52:113–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bayoumi T, Eichengreen B (1997) Ever closer to heaven? An optimal currency area index for European Countries. Eur Econ Rev 41:761–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belke A, Heine JA (2006) Specialisation patterns and the synchronicity of regional employment cycles in Europe. Int Econ Econ Policy 3(2):91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergman M (2005) How synchronized are European business cycles? In: Jonung L (ed) Proceedings of the 2004 first annual DG ECFIN research conference on “business cycles and growth in Europe. European Economy No. 227, European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  12. Bordo M, Helbling T (2003) Have national business cycles become more synchronized? NBER Working Papers No. 10130Google Scholar
  13. Broda C, Romalis J (2009) Identifying the relationship between trade and exchange rate volatility. In: Takatoshi I, Rose AK (eds) Commodity prices and markets, East Asia seminar on economics 20. NBER, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Buiter W (2000) Optimal currency areas: why does the exchange rate regime matter? Scot J Polit Econ 47:213–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Calderón C, Chong A, Stein E (2007) Trade intensity and business cycle synchronization: are developing countries any different? J Int Econ 71(1):2–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canova F, Marrinan J (1998) Sources and propagation of international output cycles: common shocks or transmission? J Int Econ 46(1):133–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark TE, van Wincoop E (2001) Borders and business cycles. J Int Econ 55(1):59–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cushman DO (1983) The effects of real exchange rate risk on international trade. J Int Econ 15(1–2):45–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Grauwe P, Mongelli F (2005) Endogeneities of optimum currency areas. What brings countries sharing a single currency closer together? ECB Working Paper No. 468, ECB, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  20. De Nardis S, Goglio A, Malgarini M (1996) Regional specialization and shocks in Europe: some evidence from regional data. Rev World Econ 132(2):197–214Google Scholar
  21. Fatás A (1997) EMU: countries or regions? Lessons from the EMS experience. Eur Econ Rev 41:743–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fidrmuc J (2004) The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria, intra-industry trade, and EMU enlargement. Contemp Econ Policy 22:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forni M, Reichlin L (2001) Federal policies and local economies: Europe and the US. Eur Econ Rev 45(1):109–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frankel F, Rose A (1998) The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria. Econ J 108:1009–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giannone D, Lenza M, Reichlin L (2009) Business cycles in the Euro Area. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 7124Google Scholar
  26. Greene WM (2000) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall International, Inc, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  27. Haan J, Inklaar R, Jong-A-Pin R (2008) Will business cycles in the Euro Area converge? A critical survey of empirical research. J Econ Surv 22(2):234–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Imbs J (2004) Trade, finance, specialisation and synchronisation. Rev Econ Stat 86(3):23–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Imbs J, Wacziarg R (2003) Stages of diversification. Am Econ Rev 93(1):63–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Inklaar R, Jong-A-Pin R, Haan J (2008) Trade and business cycle synchronization in OECD countries—A re-examination. Eur Econ Rev 52:646–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kenen P (1969) The theory of optimum currency areas: an eclectic view. In: Mundell R, Swoboda AK (eds) Monetary problems of the international economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 41–60Google Scholar
  32. Kose A, Otrock C, Whiteman C (2003) International business cycles: world, region, and country-specific factors. Am Econ Rev 93(4):1216–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krugman P (1993) Lessons of Massachusetts for EMU. In: Giavazzi T, Torres F (eds) Adjustment and growth in the economic and monetary union in Europe. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 241–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKinnon R (1963) Optimum currency areas. Am Econ Rev 52:717–725Google Scholar
  35. Micco A, Stein E, Ordonez G (2003) The currency union effect on trade: early evidence from EMU. In: Baldwin R, Bertola G, Seabright P (eds) EMU: assessing the impact of the Euro. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 23–51Google Scholar
  36. Mundell R (1961) A theory of optimum currency area. Am Econ Rev 51:657–665Google Scholar
  37. Mundell R (1973a) A plan for a European currency. In: Johnson H, Swoboda A (eds) The economics of common currencies. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 143–173Google Scholar
  38. Mundell R (1973b) Uncommon arguments for common currencies. In: Johnson H, Swoboda A (eds) The economics of common currencies. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 114–132Google Scholar
  39. Schiavo S (2008) Financial integration, GDP correlation and the endogeneity of optimum currency areas. Economica 75:168–189Google Scholar
  40. Stockman A (1988) Sectoral and national aggregate disturbances to industrial output in seven European countries. J Monetary Econ 21(2–3):387–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Traistaru I (2004) Transmission channels of business cycles synchronisation in an enlarged EMU. ZEI Working Paper No B04-18, Center for European Integration Studies, University BonnGoogle Scholar
  42. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Economic and Social Research InstituteDublinIreland
  2. 2.Research Institute For European AffairsVienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations