, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 267–278 | Cite as

Changing of the guards: New coaches in Austria’s premier football league

Original Paper


Professional team sports provide an ideal real world experiment to explore the effect of top executive replacement due to the availability of excellent performance data. This paper investigates how replacing the coach affects the performance of football teams. Analyzing almost 2,000 matches of the Austrian premier football league by ordinal (probit) regression techniques we find that a new coach tends to enhance team performance in home matches but to weaken it in away matches. However, neither of these effects turns out to be statistically significant. Nevertheless, the much discussed coach effect—ousting an underperforming coach in order to improve team performance at least temporarily—may make sense despite the costs involved by providing stronger ex-ante incentives for effort.


Corporate governance Impact of new management (coaches) Soccer Bundesliga 


  1. Allen MP, Panian SK, Lotz RE (1979) Managerial succession and organizational performance: a recalcitrant problem revisited. Adm Sci Q 24:167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audas R, Dobson S, Goddard J (2002) The impact of managerial change on team performance in professional sports. J Econ Bus 54:633–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernstein PL (1998) Are networks driving the economy? Harvard business review November–December 1998, pp 159–166Google Scholar
  4. Bonnier K, Bruner RF (1986) An analysis of the stock price reaction to management change in distressed firms. J Account Econ 11:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown CM (1982) Administrative succession an organizational performance: the succession effect. Adm Sci Q 27:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiappori PA, Levitt S, Groseclose T (2002) Testing mixed-strategy equilibria when players are heterogeneous: the case of penalty kicks in soccer. Am Econ Rev 92:1138–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cools K, van Praag M (2003) The value relevance of forced top management departures: Dutch evidence, Tinbergen institute discussion papers 03–051/3. http://www.tinbergen.nl/discussionpapers/03051.pdf, (02.12.2003)
  8. Dedman E, Lin S (2001) Shareholder wealth effects of CEO departures: evidence from the UK. J Corp Finance 8:81–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Denis DJ, Denis DK (1995) Performance changes following top management dismissals. J Finance 1:1029–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forbes (2006), Soccer team valuations. http://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/34/Rank_1.html
  11. Gaede N, Kleist S, Schaeke M (2002) Elf Freunde müsst ihr sein: Die strategische Entscheidung der Teamzusammensetzung. In: Schewe G, Littkemann J (eds) Sportmanagement: Der Profifußball aus sportökonomischer Perspektive. Schorndorf, pp 99–114Google Scholar
  12. Gres A (2002) Gibt es einen Heimvorteil in der österreichischen Fußballbundesliga? Diplomarbeit an der Wirtschaftsuniversität WienGoogle Scholar
  13. Gruppe Fischer Gärtner Management Consulting, Spektrum (1997) Eine neue Führung ist Spitze. http://www.spektrum-online.de/fuehrungswechsel/spitze.pdf, (Nov. 2nd 2003)
  14. Grusky O (1963) Managerial succession and organizational effectiveness. Am J Sociol 69:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Höffler F, Sliwka D (2003) Do new brooms sweep clean? When and why dismissing a manager increases the subordinates performances. Eur Econ Rev 47:877–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaplan SN (1994) Top executives, turnover & firm performance in Germany. J Law, Econ Organ 10:142–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khanna N, Poulsen AB (1995) Managers in financially distressed firms: villains or scapegoats? J Finance 50:919–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kicker Sportmagazin, 30.7.2001, 20Google Scholar
  19. Koning RH (2000) An econometric evaluation of the firing of a coach on team performance. Appl Econ 35:555–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kreps DM, Wilson R (1982) Reputation and imperfect information. J Econ Theory 27:253–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Madden Janice Fanning (2004) Differences in the success of NFL coaches by race, 1990–2002: evidence of last hire, first fire. J Sports Econ 5:6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McClosekey DN, Ziliak ST (1997) The standard error of regressions. J Econ Lit 34:97–114Google Scholar
  23. Milgrom P, Roberts J (1982) Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence. J Econ Theory 27:280–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mulherin K, Poulsen A (1998) Proxy contest and corporate change: implication for shareholder wealth. J Financ Econ 47:279–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Palomino F, Rigotti L, Rustichini A (2000) Skill, strategy and passion: an empirical analysis of soccer, mimeo. University of TilburgGoogle Scholar
  26. Porter PK, Scully GW (1982) Measuring managerial efficiency: the case of baseball. South Econ J 48:642–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salomo S, Teichmann K (1999) Team performance and management change: some evidence from the German Premier Soccer League, in Proceedings to the 7th congress of the European association for sport management, Thessalonica 1999, 1–5. http://www.bwl.uni-kiel.de/bwlinstitute/Organisation/pdf/teichmann/artikel3.pdf (Nov. 4th 2003)
  28. Schrader S, Lüthje C (1995) Das Ausscheiden der Spitzenführungskraft aus dem Unternehmen: Eine empirische Analyse. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftslehre 5/64:467–493Google Scholar
  29. Schewe G (2002) Der Fußball-Verein als Kapitalgesellschaft: Eine kritische Analyse der Corporate Governance. In: Schewe G, Littkemann J (Hrsg.) Sportmanagement: Der Profifußball aus sportökonomischer Perspektive., Schorndorf, pp 163–176Google Scholar
  30. Sport1.at 2003: http://www.sport1.at (Dec. 12th 2003)
  31. Szymanski S (2000) A market test for discrimination in the English Professional Soccer Leagues. J Polit Econ 108:590–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Szymanski S (2003) The economic design of sporting contests. J Econ Lit XLI:1137–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. The Economist (2002) Passion, pride and profit. A survey of football. June 1st, 2002, 10Google Scholar
  34. Warner J, Watts R, Wrack K (1988) Stock prices and top management change. J Financ Econ 20:461–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Business StudiesUniversity of ViennaWienAustria

Personalised recommendations