European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 431–449 | Cite as

Self-regulation of the legal profession and quality in the market for legal services: an economic analysis of lawyers’ reputation

  • Camille Chaserant
  • Sophie Harnay


Our article intends to show that self-regulation of the legal profession helps to regulate the quality of legal services in a market characterized by strong information asymmetries. Our model highlights the role of the collective reputation of the profession jointly with the individual reputation of lawyers to sustain high quality. It shows that a high-quality steady state exists in a market for legal services and that the likelihood of high quality increases when the market is self-regulated by the legal profession as compared with the situation where there is no self-regulation. Moreover, the profession has an incentive to maintain a good collective reputation as this increases the clients’ willingness to pay for legal services and, therefore, the rent that accrues to lawyers as a whole.


Self-regulation Collective reputation Individual reputation Legal services 

JEL Classifications

K2 L14 L15 L44 L51 L84 



The authors gratefully acknowledge comments from the participants to the conferences of the European Association of Law and Economics (Paris, 2010), the Canadian Law and Economics Association (Toronto, 2010), the Journées de l’Association Française de Sciences Economiques (Besançon, 2011), the 23rd SASE Annual Conference (Madrid, 2011), the Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics (Firenze, 2013), and the workshop “The professions between regulation and competition: interdisciplinary approaches” held at the University Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense (Paris, 2013). We are also grateful to the Mission de recherche Droit et Justice, French Ministry of Justice, for financial support. We also thank Fabienne Llense and anonymous referees of the Journal for their helpful comments. All remaining errors are ours.


  1. Abel, R. L. (1989). Between market and state: The legal profession in turmoil. The Modern Law Review, 52(3), 285–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrianova, S. (2001). Corruption and reputation. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48(3), 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attanasio, J. B. (1984). Lawyer advertising in England and the United States. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 32(3), 493–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bar-Isac, H., & Tadelis, S. (2008). Seller reputation. Foundations and Ttrends in microeconomics, 4(4), 273–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson, B. L. (1989). The spontaneous evolution of commercial law. Southern Economic Journal, 55(3), 644–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr, J. L., & Mathewson, G. F. (1988). Unlimited liability as a barrier to entry. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 766–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, J. L., & Mathewson, G. F. (1990). The economics of law firms: a study in the legal organization of firms. Journal of Law and Economics, 33, 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaserant, C., & Harnay, S. (2010). Déréglementer la profession d’avocat en France? Les contradictions des analyses économiques. Revue Internationale de Droit Economique, 2010(2), 147–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaserant, C., & Harnay, S. (2013). La déontologie professionnelle en pratique : enquête sur l’activité disciplinaire de la profession d’avocat, mimeo.Google Scholar
  10. Cox, S., De Serpa, A. C., & Canby, W. C. (1982). Consumer information and the pricing of legal services. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 30(3), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danzon, P. (1983). Contingent fees for personal injury litigation. Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition, and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dulleck, U., & Kerschbamer, R. (2006). On doctors, mechanics, and computer specialists: The economics of credence goods. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(1), 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emons, W., & Garoupa, N. (2006). US-style contingent fees and UK-style conditional fees: agency problems and the supply of legal services. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27, 379–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galanter, M., & Palay, T. M. (1991). Tournament of lawyers: the transformation of the big law firm. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Garoupa, N. (2006). Regulation of professions in the US and Europe: A comparative analysis,
  18. Gehrig, T., & Jost, P. J. (1995). Quacks, lemons, and self-regulation: A welfare analysis. The Journal of Regulatory Economics, 7(9), 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gravelle, H., & Waterson, M. (1993). No win, no fee: some economics of contingent legal fees. The Economic Journal, 103, 1205–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greif, A. (1989). Reputation and coalitions in medieval trade: Evidence on the Maghribi traders. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 857–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karpik, L. (2010). Valuing the unique: the economics of singularities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kay, J. A., & Vickers, J. (1988). Regulatory reform in Britain. Economic Policy, 3(7), 285–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim, H. H. (2009). Market uncertainty and socially embedded reputation. American Journal of economics and sociology, 68(3), 679–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981). Non-governmental enforcement of contracts: the role of market forces in assuring quality. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 615–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kreps, D. M., & Wilson, R. (1982). Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(2), 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leland, H. E. (1979). Quaks, lemons and licensing: a theory of minimum quality standards. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 1328–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacLeod, W. B. (2007). Reputations, relationships, and contract enforcement. Journal of Economic Literature, 45, 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maks, J. A. H., & Philipsen, N. J. (2005). An economic analysis of the regulation of professions. In E. Crals & L. Vereeck (Eds.), The Regulation of Architects in Belgium in the Netherlands. Lannoo Campus: Leuwen.Google Scholar
  29. Milgrom, P. R., & Roberts, J. (1982). Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(2), 280–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Milgrom, P. R., North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1990). The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The Law Merchant, private judges, and the Champagne fairs. Economics and Politics, 2(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, J. (1985). The FTC and voluntary standards: maximizing the net benefits of self-regulation. The Cato Journal, 4, 897–903.Google Scholar
  32. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Núñez, J. (2001). A model of self-regulation. Economic Letters, 74, 91–97.Google Scholar
  34. Ogus, A. (1995). Rethinking self-regulation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 15, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ogus, A. (1999). Self-regulation. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  36. Ribstein, L. E. (2004). Lawyers as lawmakers: a theory of lawyer licensing. Missouri Law Review, 69, 299–366.Google Scholar
  37. Rubinfeld, D. F., & Scotchmer, S. (1993). Contingent fees for attorneys: An economic analysis. Rand Journal of Economics, 24(3), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schroeter, J. R., Smith, S. L., & Cox, S. R. (1987). Advertising and competition in routine legal service markets: An empirical investigation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(1), 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spence, M. (1974). Market signaling: informational transfer in hiring and related screening processes. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stephen, F. H., & Burns, C. (2007). Liberalization of legal services. Institute for Law: Economy and Global Governance, School of Law, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  41. Stephen, F.H., & Love, J.H. (1999). Regulation of the legal profession. In B. Bouckaert & G. De Geest (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Law and Economics, Vol. V: The regulation of contracts. Edward Elgar, 987-1017.Google Scholar
  42. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of economics and management science, 2, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tirole, J. (1996). A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality). Review of Economic Studies, 63(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van den Bergh, R. (2007). Mieux réglementer les professions juridiques. In OECD Competitive Restrictions in Legal Professions, DAF/COMP(2007)39, 73-136.Google Scholar
  45. Van den Bergh, R. (2008). Towards better regulation of the legal professions in the European Union. Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics (RILE) Working Paper Series 2008/07.Google Scholar
  46. Van den Bergh, R., & Faure, M. (1991). Self-regulation of the professions in Belgium. International Review of Law and Economics, 11, 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EDEHN, EA 7263, Université du HavreLe HavreFrance
  2. 2.EconomiX, CNRS UMR 7235, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La DéfenseNanterre CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations