European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 399–445 | Cite as

Corporate governance and financial development: a study of the French case

  • Régis Blazy
  • Afef Boughanmi
  • Bruno Deffains
  • Jean-Daniel Guigou
Article

Abstract

This paper belongs to the growing body of the “Law and finance” literature based on time-series study. It carries out an empirical investigation of the role of corporate governance in financial development. We focus on French corporate governance reforms in order to examine whether these reforms are consistent with the reorganization of the French financial system, which took place during the period 1977–2004. This research aims at evaluating one proposition of the legal origin claims based on the idea that there is a strong and stable relationship between legal origin, investor protection and financial system. A key question the study addresses is how corporate governance rules and the French financial development have changed over time. Our study suggests that indicators related to investors’ rights (shareholders, employees, and bondholders) have been increasing over time, despite the specific legal origin of the French system. On the contrary the creditors’ rights have followed a less clear trend. Our econometric investigation is fairly new as the Law and finance literature has not until now provided corporate governance indicators suitable for French legislation. From that perspective, our work undergoes a multiple criteria analysis of corporate governance reforms. Following this approach, we suggest that the causality links between changes in the French legal environment and financial growth in France are more bidirectional than unidirectional.

Keywords

Corporate governance Investor protection Financial development Causality Law and finance Multi-criteria approach 

JEL classification

G30 K10 K22 C12 

References

  1. Blazy, R., Chopard, B., Fimayer, A., & Guigou, J. D. (2009). How do the courts choose between different bankruptcy outcomes? the results of a french survey. In W. G. Ringe, L. Gullifer, & P. Théry (Eds.), Current issues in european financial and insolvency law: Perspectives from France and the UK. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Charreaux, G. (1997). Le gouvernement des entreprises, Corporate Governance: Théories et faits. Economica.Google Scholar
  3. Charreaux, G. (2000). Le gouvernement des entreprises. Encyclopedia Universalis.Google Scholar
  4. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haravon, M. (2005). Le rapport doing business de la Banque mondiale: Mythes et réalités d’un rapport sans nuance. La Semaine Juridique, Édition Entreprise et Affaires 41: 1680–1682.Google Scholar
  6. Hyytinen, A., Kuosa, L., & Takalo, T. (2003). Law or finance: Evidence from Finland. European Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, 52(juillet), 1131–1150.Google Scholar
  8. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ménard, C., & Du Marais, B. (2008). Can we rank legal systems according to their economic efficiency? Journal of Law and Policy, 26, 55–80.Google Scholar
  11. Pistor, K. (2000). Patterns of legal change: shareholder and creditor rights in transition economies. European Business Organization Law Review, 1, 59–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pistor, K., Raiser, M., & Gelfer, S. (2000). Law and finance in transition economies. Economics of Transition, 8, 325–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Roy, B. (1985). Méthodologie multicritère d’aide à la décision. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  14. Roy, B. (1992). Decision science or decision-aid science? Revue Internationale de Systémique, 6(5), 497–529.Google Scholar
  15. Roy, B., & Bouyssou, D. (1993). Aide multicritère d’aide à la décision: Méthodes et cas. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  16. Vienot, M. (1995). Le conseil d’administration des sociétés cotées. Rapport du groupe de travail Association Française des Entreprises Privées (A.F.E.P.) et du Conseil National du Patronat Français (C.N.P.F). http://www2.eycom.ch/corporate-governance/reference/pdfs/12/fr.pdf.
  17. Vienot, M. (1999). Rapport du comité sur le gouvernement d’entreprise. Rapport de l’Association Française des Entreprises Privées (A.F.E.P) et du Mouvement des Entreprises de France (M.E.D.E.F). http://www.medef.fr/medias/upload/511_FICHIER.pdf.
  18. Voigt, S. (2005). Are international merchants stupid?—A natural experiment refutes the legal origin theory. International Center for Economic Research. Working paper no. 21 / 2005.Google Scholar
  19. World Bank (2009) Reforming through difficult times, doing business annual report 2010. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Régis Blazy
    • 1
  • Afef Boughanmi
    • 2
  • Bruno Deffains
    • 3
  • Jean-Daniel Guigou
    • 4
  1. 1.LARGE, Institut d’Etudes Politiques, Ecole de Management StrasbourgUniversity of StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
  2. 2.Beta, University of Nancy, IUP Finance de NancyNancyFrance
  3. 3.Université Paris 2 Panthéon Assas 12ParisFrance
  4. 4.LSF-Research, Luxembourg School of FinanceUniversity of LuxembourgLuxembourgLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations