Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 57–76 | Cite as

Examining early algebraic thinking: insights from empirical data

  • Maria Chimoni
  • Demetra Pitta-Pantazi
  • Constantinos Christou
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study is to better understand the notion of early algebraic thinking by describing differences in grade 4–7 students’ thinking about basic algebraic concepts. To achieve this goal, one test that involved generalized arithmetic, functional thinking, and modeling tasks, was administered to 684 students from these grades. Quantitative analysis of the data yielded four distinct groups of students demonstrating a wide range of performance in these tasks. Qualitative analysis of students’ solutions provided further insight into their understanding of basic algebraic concepts, and the nature of the processes and forms of reasoning they utilized. The results showed that students in each group were able to solve different number and types of tasks, using different strategies. Results also indicated that students from all grades were present in each group. These findings suggest the presence of a consistent trend in the difficulty level across early algebraic tasks which may support the existence of a specific developmental trend from more intuitive types of early algebraic thinking to more sophisticated ones.

Keywords

Early algebraic thinking Generalized arithmetic Functional thinking Modeling Concepts Processes Reasoning forms 

References

  1. Altieri, M. B., et al. (2008). California mathematics. Concepts, skills, and problem solving 4. Glencoe: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Bastable, V., & Schifter, D. (2008). Classroom stories: Examples of elementary students engaged in early algebra. In J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 165–184). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 412–446.Google Scholar
  4. Blanton, M., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2015). A learning trajectory in 6-year-olds' thinking about generalizing functional relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(5), 511–558.  https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.5.0511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanton, M., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2017). A progression in first-grade children’s thinking about variable and variable notation in functional relationships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(2), 181–202.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9745-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanton, M., Levi, L., Crites, T., & Dougherty, B. (2011). Developing essential understanding of algebraic thinking for teaching mathematics in grades 3-5. In B. J. Dougherty & R. M. Zbieck (Eds.), Essential understandings series. Reston: National Council of Teachers of mathematics.Google Scholar
  7. Cai, J., & Knuth, E. (2005). Developing algebraic thinking: Multiple perspectives. ZDM, 37(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
  8. Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., Brizuela, B. M., & Earnest, D. (2006). Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(2), 87–115.Google Scholar
  9. Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (Vol. II, pp. 669–705). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Carraher, D., & Schliemann, A. D. (2014). Early algebra teaching and learning. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 193–196). Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_5 Google Scholar
  11. Chester, M. D. (2012). Release of spring 2012 MCAS test items. Massachussets Department of Elementary & Secondary Education.Google Scholar
  12. Driscoll, M. (1999). Fostering algebraic thinking: A guide for teachers, grades 6–10. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, A. B. (2007). Connections between generalizing and justifying students’ reasoning with linear relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 194–229.Google Scholar
  14. Grove, R. (1988). An analysis of the constant comparative method. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1(3), 273–279.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839900030105a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IEA. (2013). Timss 2011 user guide for the international database. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.Google Scholar
  16. Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9761-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaput, J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5–17). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Kieran, C. (2007). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 11–50). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  19. Kieran, C., Pang, J., Schifter, D., & Ng, S. F. (2016). Early algebra: Research into its nature, its learning, its teaching. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), ICME-13 Topical surveys. Springer Open.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32258-2
  20. Mason, J. (1989). Mathematical abstraction as the result of a delicate shift of attention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 2–8.Google Scholar
  21. Mason, J., Graham, A., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2005). Developing thinking in algebra. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Matthews, P. G., Rittle-Johnson, B., McEldoon, K. L., & Taylor, R. T. (2012). Measure for measure: What combining diverse measures reveals about children’s understanding of the equal sign as an indicator of mathematical equality. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 316–350.  https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.3.0316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  25. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.Google Scholar
  26. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Social Work: A Personal, Experiential Perspective, 1(3), 2261–2283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Radford, L. (2000). Sings and meanings in students’ emergent algebraic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(3), 237–268.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017530828058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0501_02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and contraction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts. ZDM, 40(1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Radford, L. (2012). On the development of early algebraic thinking. PNA, 6(4), 117–133.Google Scholar
  31. Radford, L. (2014). The progressive development of early embodied algebraic thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(2), 257–277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0087-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rivera, F., & Becker, J. (2007). Abduction—Induction (generalization) processes of elementary majors on figural patterns of algebra. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(2), 140–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.05.00 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2008). Proof in school mathematics: Insights from psychological research into students’ ability for deductive reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(2), 103–133.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2001_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2008). Generalising the pattern rule for visual growth patterns: Actions that support 8 year olds’ thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 171–185.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9092-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Chimoni
    • 1
  • Demetra Pitta-Pantazi
    • 1
  • Constantinos Christou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations