Abstract
The testing effect occurs when students, given information to learn and then practice during a test, perform better on a subsequent content post-test than students who restudy the information as a substitute for the practice test. The effect is often weaker or reversed if immediate rather than delayed post-tests are used. The weakening may be due to differential working memory resource depletion on immediate post-tests with resource recovery due to rest following a delayed post-test. In three experiments, we compared an immediate post-test with a 1-week delayed post-test. Experiment 1 required the students to construct a puzzle poem and found working memory resource depletion occurred immediately after learning compared to a delay. Experiment 2 using text-based material tapping lower element interactivity information and experiment 3, again using a puzzle poem, compared study-only with the study and test groups. A disordinal interaction was obtained in both experiments with the study-only groups superior to the study–test groups on immediate content post-tests and reverse results on delayed tests. Working memory capacity tests indicated a non-significant increase in capacity after a delay compared to immediately after learning with medium size effects, but in experiment 2, there were no working memory differences between the study-only and the study and test groups. Experiment 3 increased element interactivity and found an increased memory capacity for the study-only group compared to the study and test group with the immediate test contributing more of the difference than the delayed test. It was concluded that increased working memory depletion immediately following learning with a test contributes to the failure to obtain a testing effect using immediate tests.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4-5), 514–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326097.
Carpenter, S. K., & De Losh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory and Cognition, 34(2), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193405.
Carpenter, S. K., & Pashler, H. (2007). Testing beyond words: using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(3), 474–478. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194092.
Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J. T., & Vul, E. (2008). The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 36, 438–448. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.438.
Chen, O., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2018). Extending cognitive load theory to incorporate working memory resource depletion: evidence from the spacing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9426-2.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01003922.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466.
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.211.
Gates, A. I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in memorizing. Archives of Psychology, 6(40).
Geary, D. C. (2012). Application of evolutionary psychology to academic learning. Applied Evolutionary Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199586073.003.0006.
Geary, D. C., & Berch, D. B. (2016). Chapter 9: Evolution and children's cognitive and academic development. Evolutionary Psychology, 217–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29986-0_9.
Hanham, J., Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2017). Cognitive load theory, element interactivity, and the testing and reverse testing effects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3324.
Healey, M. K., Hasher, L., & Danilova, E. (2011). The stability of working memory: do previous tasks influence complex span? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024587.
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). A testing effect with multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 621–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/e527342012-537.
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781605660486.ch003.
Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar: technologies for teaching and assessing writing. Sydney: UNSW Press doi not available.
Kühn, A. (1914). Über Einprägung durch Lesen und durch Rezitieren [On imprinting through reading and reciting]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 68, 396–481 doi not available.
Leahy, W., Hanham, J., & Sweller, J. (2015). High element interactivity information during problem solving may lead to failure to obtain the testing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9296-4.
McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4-5), 494–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326154.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number of seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158.
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2.
Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.3.
Peterson, L. R., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term memory retention of verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(3), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049234.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.
Roediger, H. L., Putnam, A. L., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 55, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-387691-1.00001-6.
Roediger, H. L., & Nestojko, J. F. (2015). The relative benefits of studying and testing on long-term retention. In J. G. W. Raaijmakers, A. H. Criss, R. L. Goldstone, R. M. Nosofsky, & M. Styvers (Eds.), Cognitive modeling in perception and memory: a festschrift for Richard M. Shiffrin (pp. 99–111). New York: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/e633262013-206.
Schmeichel, B. J. (2007). Attention control, memory updating, and emotion regulation temporarily reduce the capacity for executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.241.
Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Intellectual performance and ego depletion: role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.33.
Sweller, J. (2009). Cognitive bases of human creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9091-6.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. Mestre & B. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: cognition in education (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Oxford: Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8.
Sweller, J. (2012). Human cognitive architecture: why some instructional procedures work and others do not. In K. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 295–325). Washington: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-011.
Sweller, J. (2015). In academe, what is learned and how is it learned? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415569570.
Sweller, J. (2016a). Cognitive load theory, evolutionary educational psychology, and instructional design. In D. Geary & D. Berch (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on child development and education (pp. 291–306). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29986-0_12.
Sweller, J. (2016b). Working memory, long-term memory and instructional design. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(4), 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.12.002.
Sweller, J., & Sweller, S. (2006). Natural information processing systems. Evolutionary Psychology, 4(1), 434–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490600400135.
Sweller, J., Kirschner, P., & Clark, R. E. (2007). Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: a reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263426.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4.
Tricot, A., & Sweller, J. (2014). Domain-specific knowledge and why teaching generic skills does not work. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9243-1.
Van Gog, T., & Kester, L. (2012). A test of the testing effect: acquiring problem-solving skills from worked examples. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1532–1541. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12002.
Van Gog, T., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2011). Effects of worked examples, example-problem, and problem-example pairs on novices’ learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(3), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.004.
Van Gog, T., Kester, L., Dirkx, K., Hoogerheide, V., Boerboom, J., & Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L. (2015). Testing after worked example study does not enhance delayed problem-solving performance compared to restudy. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9297-3.
Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2015). Not new, but nearly forgotten: the testing effect decreases or even disappears as the complexity of learning materials increases. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9310-x.
Wheeler, M. A., Ewers, M., & Buonanno, J. F. (2003). Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials. Memory, 11(6), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000414.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leahy, W., Sweller, J. Cognitive Load Theory, Resource Depletion and the Delayed Testing Effect. Educ Psychol Rev 31, 457–478 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09476-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09476-2