Skip to main content
Log in

Situated Learning: What Ever Happened To Educational Psychology?

  • Reflections on the Field
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to explore the diminishing contributions of psychology in teacher preparation programs. Using situated learning as a basis for discussion, I have argued that a student may take a course in educational psychology and then subsequently discover that subsequent preparation may ignore those psychological caveats regarding the efficacy of proposed instructional methodology such as situated learning. These include cognition, group processes, and transfer of training. However, the presence of such concerns is not confined to situated learning specifically. It may be time for educators to reconsider psychological findings as necessary contributions to the efficacy of their proposals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3–56). Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Situative versus cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdinin, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2008). Experimental evaluation of the effects of a research-based preschool mathematics curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 443–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, J. R. (1996). Response: Setbacks in “The Advancement of Learning”. Educational Researcher, 25(7), 37–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R., Baker, B., & Pugach, M. (2001). Contemporary research on special education teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 695–748). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1997). Response: On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning as activity. In R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–86). New York: The Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, A. F. (2007). Transfer: Specificity and generality. In H. L. Roediger III, Y. Dudai & S. M. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Science of memory: Concepts (pp. 271–275). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, A. F., & McNamara, D. S. (1996). Verbal learning and memory: Does the modal model still work? Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 143–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. J. (1979). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 429–446). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S., Fein, S., & Markus, H. R. (2008). Social psychology (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. T. (2007). Fundamentals of cognitive psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2004). Teaching of subject matter. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 215–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A. (1988). Transfer: Rediscovering a central concept. In H. L. Roediger III, Y. Dudai & S. M. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Science of memory: Concepts (pp. 267–270). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palinscar, A. S. (1989). Less charted waters: A response to Seely-Brown, Collins, & Duguid’s “Situated cognition and the culture of learning”. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Relativity of remembering: Why the laws of memory vanished. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 225–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, E. Z. (2008). Reflections on the field: Aspirations of learning science and the practical logic of instructional enterprises. Educational Psychological Review, 20, 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1950). Management and the worker. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santrock, J. (2008). Educational psychology (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, C. M. (1999). Situated learning and cognition. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 767–768). Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmel, J., & Langer, P. (2001). Raising the graduation bar for the schools: Expectations versus outcomes. Psychological Reports, 89, 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2009). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Boston: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning. In A. Goodesell, M. Maher, V. Tinto, B. L. Smith & J. Macgregor (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (pp. 10–30). University Park: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. (1969). Industrial social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 5, pp. 196–268). Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (10th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Langer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langer, P. Situated Learning: What Ever Happened To Educational Psychology?. Educ Psychol Rev 21, 181–192 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9099-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9099-6

Keywords

Navigation