Virtual learning communities (VLCs) rethinking: Collaboration between learning communities


Research in the field of collaboration in Virtual Learning Communities (VLCs) has mainly focused in learning and social interactions. At the same time, research related to cyberbullying mainly refers to social media contexts. In the current research, bullying behavior was examined through the collaboration process between learning communities. Two (K-12) learning communities, one VLC and one Physical Learning Community (PLC) that extended its hypostasis to the web, collaborated through the Wikispaces web-based collaborative platform in order to implement a cultural project. Taking into account the main aspects of the sociocultural learning theories, the collaboration process between the two (2) communities has been analyzed: the dialogues exchanged and the artifacts created were analyzed, focusing on i) the detection of the aggressive behavior (bullying), ii) the teacher’s role and iii) the inner speech. The key question was whether the communities had been emerged into a homogenized community. Results indicated that the attempted collaboration raised new questions about the interactions between the communities. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time such a linguistic and behavioral analysis for the collaboration process between communities is applied to VLCs. Another innovative challenge is the language targeted in the analysis, namely Greek.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1


  1. Akoumianakis, D. (2011). Recurrent Interactions, Acts of Communication, and Emergent Social Practice in Virtual Community Settings. In Daniel, B. K. (Ed.). (2010). Handbook of research on methods and techniques for studying virtual communities:Paradigms and phenomena. London: IGI Global, 34–60. DOI:

  2. Antoniadou, N., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2015). A review of research on cyber-bullying in Greece. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 20(2), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Artstein, R., & Poesio, M. (2008). Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 34(4), 555–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Avouris, N., Dimitracopoulou, A., & Komis, V. (2003). On analysis of collaborative problem solving: An object-oriented approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2), 147–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barana, A., Brancaccio, A., Esposito, M., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., Pardini, C., & Rabellino, S. (2017). Problem solving competence developed through a virtual learning environment in a European context. Proceedings of the 13th International Scientific Conference “eLearning and Software for Education”, 1, 455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Battistich, V., & Hom, A. (1997). The relationship between students' sense of their school as a community and their involvement in problem behaviors. American Journal of Public Health, 87(12), 1997–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanchard, A. L., & Markus, M. L. (2004). The experienced sense of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes. ACM Sigmis Database, 35(1), 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boughzala, I., Assar, S., & Romano Jr, N. C. (2010). An E-government field study of process virtualization modeling. In: de Vreede, G.J. (ed.), Group Decision and Negotiation, 154, 32-47.

  9. Chen, B., & Luppicini, R. (2017). The new era of bullying: A phenomenological study of university Students' past experience with Cyberbullying. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 7(2), 72–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen, L., Manion, K., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. UK: Routledge.

  11. Dawson, S. (2006). A study of the relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dinakar, K., Jones, B., Havasi, C., Lieberman, H., & Picard, R. (2012). Common sense reasoning for detection, prevention, and mitigation of cyberbullying. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 2(3), 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Engeström Y. et al. (Εds). Perspectives on Activity Theory: Learning in doing: Social, cognitive & computational perspective, Cambridge University Press: New York, 19-39.

  14. Englander, E. K., & Muldowney, A. M. (2007). Just Turn the Darn Thing Off: Understanding Cyberbullying. In White, D.L., Glenn, B. C, & Wimes, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of Persistently Safe Schools: The 2007 National Conference on safe schools. Washington, DC: Hamilton Fish Institute, George Washington University, 83–92.

  15. Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12(1), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Evans-Lacko, S., Takizawa, R., Brimblecombe, N., King, D., Knapp, M., Maughan, B., & Arseneault, L. (2017). Childhood bullying victimization is associated with use of mental health services over five decades: A longitudinal nationally representative cohort study. Psychological Medicine, 47(1), 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fan, S., Sia, C. L., & Zhai, J. L., (2012). Towards collaboration virtualization theory. In PACIS 2012 Proceedings, 1–8.

  18. Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2004). Bullying: Who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior. Health Education Research, 20(1), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Flor, M., Yoon, S. Y., Hao, J., Liu, L., von Davier, A. A. (2016). Automated classification of collaborative problem solving interactions in simulated science tasks. In Proceedings of the 11th workshop on innovative use of NLP for building educational applications, Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 31–41.

  20. García-García, C., Chulvi, V., & Royo, M. (2017). Knowledge generation for enhancing design creativity through co-creative virtual learning communities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hiltz, S. R. (1985). Online communities: A case study of the office of the future. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2017). Cultivating youth resilience to prevent bullying and cyberbullying victimization. Child Abuse & Neglect, 73, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ioannidis, J. P., Tarone, R., & McLaughlin, J. K. (2011). The false-positive to false-negative ratio in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology, 22(4), 450–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeong, H., Cress, U., Moskaliuk, J., et al. (2017). Joint interactions in large online knowledge communities: The A3C framework. ijcscl, 12(2), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klaus Ranta, Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino, Sari Fröjd, Mauri Marttunen, (2013) Peer victimization and social phobia: a follow-up study among adolescents. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 48(4), 533–544.

  26. Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., & Gould, M. S. (2011). Bullying and suicide: Detection and intervention. Psychiatric Times, 28(2), 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Koh, J., & Kim, Y. G. (2003). Sense of virtual community: A conceptual framework and empirical validation. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. K. Williams, M. Chambers, S. Logan, D. Robinson, (1996) Association of common health symptoms with bullying in primary school children. BMJ 313(7048), 17–19.

  29. Leontyev, A. (2009). Activity and consciousness. Marxists internet archive. Retrieved from

  30. Makri-Botsari, E., & Karagianni, G. (2014). Cyberbullying in Greek adolescents: The role of parents. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3241–3253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McInnerney, J. M., & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Online learning: Social interaction and the creation of a sense of community. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  32. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McCabe, R. E., Antony, M. M., Summerfeldt, L. J., Liss, A., & Swinson, R. P. (2003) Preliminary examination of the relationship between anxiety disorders in adults and self-reported history of teasing or bullying experiences. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 32(4), 187–193.

  34. Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., Palladino, B. E., Frisén, A., Berne, S., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Smith, P. K. (2012). Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: A comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(9), 455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mitchell, S., Foulger, T. S., Wetzel, K., & Rathkey, C. (2009). The negotiated project approach: Project-based learning without leaving the standards behind. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(4), 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ng, J. C. (2017). Interactivity in virtual learning groups: Theories, strategies, and the state of literature. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(1), 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nikiforos, S., & Kermanidis, K. L. (2014). Inner Speech, Dialogue Text and Collaborative Learning in Virtual Communities. Proceedings of the First Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2014 & the Fourth International Workshop EVALITA 2014, Pisa University Press srl, 9–11 December 2014, vol. I, pp. 275–280.

  38. Ortega, R., Elipe, P., Mora-Merchán, J. A., Genta, M. L., Brighi, A., Guarini, A., Smith, P. K., Thompson, F., & Tippett, N. (2012). The emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying on victims: A European cross-national study. Aggressive Behavior, 38(5), 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Overby, E. (2008). Process virtualization theory and the impact of information technology. Organization Science, 19(2), 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Overby, E. (2012). Migrating processes from physical to virtual environments: Process virtualization theory. In Y. Dwivedi, M. Wade, & S. Schneberger (Eds.), Information systems theory. Integrated Series in Information Systems (Vol. 28, pp. 107–124). New York: Springer.

  41. Preece, J., & Maloney-Krichmar, D. (2003). Online communities. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 596–620). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Randi E. McCabe, Martin M. Antony, Laura J. Summerfeldt, Andrea Liss, Richard P. Swinson, (2003) Preliminary Examination of the Relationship Between Anxiety Disorders in Adults and Self-Reported History of Teasing or Bullying Experiences. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 32(4), 187–193.

  43. Reynolds, K., Kontostathis, A., & Edwards, L. (2011, December). Using machine learning to detect cyberbullying. In 2011 10th International Conference on Machine learning and applications and workshops. Honolulu, HI, 2011, 241-244. DOI:

  44. Rheingold, Η. (1993). Virtual communities: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT press.

  45. Rovai, A. P. (2002a). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1).

  46. Rovai, A. P. (2002b). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2).

  48. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sokolov, A. (1972). Inner speech and thought. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tan, S. C., & Lee, A. V. Y. (2018). Online learning communities in K-12 settings. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K. W. Lai (Eds.), Handbook of information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 1–21). Cham: Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tzanavaris, S. P., Sepetis, A., & Tzanavaris, S. T. (2009). Collaboration in social networks: The problem solving activity leading to interaction – ‘Struggle’ Analysis Framework (SAF). In J. Bourdeau, R. Mizoguchi, S. Isotani, B. Wasson, W. Q. Chen, & J. Jovanovic (Eds.), Proceedings of Workshop on Intelligent and Innovative Support for Collaborative Learning Activities. 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2009) (pp. 27–36). Rhodes: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Vreeman, R. C., & Carroll, A. E. (2007). A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161(1), 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Vygotsky, L.S. (2008). Thought & language, (A. Rodi, Transl.). Athens: Gnosi.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanos Nikiforos.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

“All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.”

“This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.”

Informed consent

“Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.”

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikiforos, S., Tzanavaris, S. & Kermanidis, KL. Virtual learning communities (VLCs) rethinking: Collaboration between learning communities. Educ Inf Technol 25, 3659–3675 (2020).

Download citation


  • Virtual learning community-VLC
  • Discourse analysis
  • Bullying
  • Collaboration
  • Inner speech