Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors that Promote Knowledge Sharing on Academic Social Networking Sites: An Empirical Study

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies into Knowledge Sharing continues to attract attention. This is because it has been identified as an effective learning and researching approach. Perhaps this is due to the proliferation and enhanced interaction of modern social networks. Although previous literature argues for a relationship between the use of Social Networking Sites, Engagement and Knowledge Sharing, some recent studies disagree. This paper, therefore, seeks to validate the relationship between the use of social networking sites, academic Engagement and Knowledge Sharing using websites solely designed for academic activities. A modified version of the Social Capital Theory was used to design a questionnaire and data was collected from 336 participants and analyzed. The findings provided evidence that Academic Social Networking Sites support all the indicators of the Social Capital dimensions: Social Interaction Ties, Trust, Reciprocity, Identification, Shared Language and Shared Vision. However, Identification was the only significant predictor of Engagement, whereas Engagement supported Knowledge Sharing. Considering that studies on generic SNS have found significant relationship between other Social Capital dimensions and Engagement, future work needs to focus on the causation of the non-significant relationship observed in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdillah, L. (2017). Enriching Information Technology Course Materials by Using Youtube. In E-Proceeding Of The 5th International Conference On Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science & Information Technology (Vol. 2017, pp. 75–82).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, F., Manrique, D., Martinez, L., & Vines, J. M. (2015). Study of the influence of social relationships among students on knowledge building using a moderately constructivist learning model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(4), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.51.4.c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alt, D. (2015). College students’ academic motivation, media engagement and fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behaviour, 49, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J.-S., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 651–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arteaga Sánchez, R., Cortijo, V., & Javed, U. (2014). Students’ perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Computers and Education, 70, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam, M. M. H., Shahzad, K., Syed, A. R., & Ramish, A. (2013). Social capital and knowledge sharing as determinants of academic performance. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 15(1), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1984). Student Involvement : A Development Theory for Higher Education Student Involvement : A Developmental Theory for Higher Education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azeta, A. A., Eweoya, I. O., & Ojumah, S. (2014). Enhancing educational learning with social network platform. In 6th International Conference onAdaptive Science and Technology, 1–4.

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2002). Intentional social action in virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 2–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dr. Manju Bala. (2018). Use of ICT in Higher Education. Bala, Manju. “Use of ICT in Higher Education.” Multidisciplinary Higher Education, Research, Dynamics & Concepts: Opportunities & Challenges For Sustainable Development, 368–376. Retrieved from http://conference.nrjp.co.in/index.php/MHERDC/article/view/64/65

  • Barbour, K., & Marshall, D. (2012). The academic online: Constructing persona through the World Wide Web. First Monday, 17(9).

  • Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (pls) Approach to Casual Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption Ans Use as an Illustration.

  • Bardakc, I. S., Arslan, Ö., & Ünver, T. K. (2017). How scholars use academic social networking services. Information Development, 266666917712108.

  • Bloomberg, L. D., & Volpe, M. (2012). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A road map from beginning to end. Sage Publications.

  • Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 505–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, L. F., Kleiser, S. B., & Grau, S. L. (2015). Too much Facebook? An exploratory examination of social media fatigue. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 148–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M., & Kraut, R. E. (2014). Growing closer on facebook: changes in tie strength through social network site use. In SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4187–4196).

  • Cao, Q., Simsek, Z., & Jansen, J. J. P. (2015). CEO social capital and entrepreneurial orientation of the firm: Bonding and bridging effects. Journal of Management, 41(7), 1957–1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education: University connections. Routledge.

  • Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

  • Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Harvard Business School Press (1st ed.).

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, (94), S95-S120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K., Shiffman, D., & Rock, J. (2016). How are scientists using social media in the workplace? PloS One, 11(10), e0162680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltman, T., Devinney, T. M., Midgley, D. F., & Venaik, S. (2008). Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1250–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., Cheshire, C., Rice, E. R. W., & Nakagawa, S. (2013). Social exchange theory. In Handbook of social psychology (pp. 61–88). Springer.

  • Curry, R., Kiddle, C., & Simmonds, R. (2009). Social networking and scientific gateways. In 5th Grid Computing Environments Workshop (p. 4).

  • Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domingo, M. G., & Garganté, A. B. (2016). Exploring the use of educational technology in primary education: Teachers’ perception of mobile technology learning impacts and applications’ use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M. I. M., & Al-Jabri, I. M. (2016). Social networking, knowledge sharing, and student learning: the case of university students. Computers & Educationand Education, 99, 14–27 Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2780765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Jaap, W. O. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group and social self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2–3), 371–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsayed, A. M. (2016). The use of academic social networks among Arab researchers: A survey. Social Science Computer Review, 34(3), 378–391.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M Wensley, A. F. L. (2015). The Mediating Effects of Trustworthiness on Social-Cognitive Factors and Knowledge Sharing in a Large Professional Service Firm. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 240–253. Retrieved from file: http://www.ejkm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=685

  • Fornell, C., & Lacker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transportation Research Part B, University of Michigan, 37, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J., & Moreland, J. J. (2015). The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 168–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, W., Liu, Z., & Li, J. (2017). How does social presence influence SNS addiction? A belongingness theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 347–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., Conde, M. Á., Alier Forment, M., & Casany, M. J. (2011). Opening Learning Management Systems to Personal Learning Environments. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(9), 1222–1240. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-017-09-1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., & Straub, D. (2011). Editor’s comments: an update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. Mis Quarterly, iii--xiv.

  • Glanville, J. L., & Wildhagen, T. (2007). The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(6), 1019–1041.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruzd, A. (2012). Non-academic and academic social networking sites for online scholarly communities. In Social Media for Academics (pp. 21–37). Elsevier.

  • Guan, T., Wang, L., Jin, J., & Song, X. (2018). Knowledge contribution behavior in online Q&A communities: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

  • Harzing, A.-W., & Feely, A. J. (2008). The language barrier and its implications for HQ-subsidiary relationships. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Hond, M., & Rood, T. (2017). Flip the School, Forget the Classroom; How to Enable Personalised Learning with the Help of Information Technology. In Handbook on Digital Learning for K-12 Schools (pp. 317–328). Springer.

  • Howard, M. M., & Gilbert, L. (2008). A Cross-National Comparison of the Internal Effects of Participation in Voluntary Organizations. Political Studies, 56(1), 12–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeng, W., He, D., Jiang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Groups in Mendeley: Owners’ descriptions and group outcomes. In Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (Vol. 49, pp. 1–4). Wiley Online Library.

  • Jeng, W., He, D., & Jiang, J. (2015). User participation in an academic social networking service: A survey of open group users on Mendeley. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 890–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeng, W., DesAutels, S., He, D., & Li, L. (2017). Information exchange on an academic social networking site: A multidiscipline comparison on researchgate Q&A. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, W. (2004). Unbreakable ethnic bonds: Information-seeking behavior of Korean graduate students in the United States. Library & Information Science Research, 26(3), 384–400.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K. (2014). Academics and their online networks: Exploring the role of academic social networking sites. First Monday, 19(11).

  • Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N. (2011). Using WarpPLS in e-collaboration studies: An overview of five main analysis steps. Advancing Collaborative Knowledge Environments: New Trends in E-Collaboration: New Trends in E-Collaboration, 180.

  • Koranteng, F. N., Wiafe, I., & Kuada, E. (2018). An Empirical Study of the Relationship Between Social Networking Sites and Students ’ Engagement in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118787528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2007). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on college grades and persistence. In Indiana University Bloomington: Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S. J., Park, E., & Kim, K. J. (2014). What drives successful social networking services? A comparative analysis of user acceptance of Facebook and Twitter. The Social Science Journal, 51(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, K. (2012). Pros and cons of social media in the classroom. Campus Technology, 25(5), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehto, T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., & Drozd, F. (2012). Factors affecting perceived persuasiveness of a behavior change support system.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Giustini, D. (2011). Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics, 91(2), 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J., & Richardson, J. C. (2016). Exploring the effects of students’ social networking experience on social presence and perceptions of using SNSs for educational purposes. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K.-Y., & Lu, H.-P. (2011). Intention to continue using Facebook fan pages from the perspective of social capital theory. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(10), 565–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malatesh, G. A., & Dhanasree, K. (2018). Purpose and Preference of Using Social Networking Sites by Adolescents. Scientists Joined as Life Member of Society of Krishi Vigyan, 193.

  • Mbodila, M., Isong, B., & Muhandji, K. (2014). The Effect of Social Media on Student ’ s Engagement and Collaboration : a case study of University of Venda using Facebook. Journal of Communication, 5(2), 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6).

  • McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory. Sage publications.

  • Meishar-Tal, H., & Pieterse, E. (2017). Why do academics use academic social networking sites? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1).

  • Menendez, M., de Angeli, A., & Menestrina, Z. (2012). Exploring the virtual space of academia. In From research to practice in the design of cooperative systems: Results and open challenges (pp. 49–63). Springer.

  • Mott, J., & Wiley, D. (2013). Open for learning: The CMS and the open learning network. In Education, 15(2).

  • Mu, J., Peng, G., & Love, E. (2008). Interfirm networks, social capital, and knowledge flow. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(4), 86–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23 (2): 242‑266.

  • Nández, G., & Borrego, Á. (2013). Use of social networks for academic purposes: a case study. The Electronic Library, 31(6), 781–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, K., Heavin, C., & Walsh, E. (2005). A case in customizing e-learning. Journal of Information Technology, 20(2), 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, J. S., & Jeng, W. (2011). Groups in academic social networking services--an exploration of their potential as a platform for multi-disciplinary collaboration. In Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third Inernational Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on (pp. 545–548).

  • Oinas-Kukkonen, H., & Harjumaa, M. (2009). Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24(1), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omotayo, F. O., & Babalola, S. O. (2016). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among information and communication technology artisans in Nigeria. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 18(2), 148–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou, C. X. J., Davison, R. M., & Wong, L. H. M. (2016). Using interactive systems for knowledge sharing: The impact of individual contextual preferences in China. Information & Management, 53(2), 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovadia, S. (2013). When social media meets scholarly publishing. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 32(3), 194–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media & Society, 11(1–2), 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, K., McCormac, A., & Butavicius, M. (2011). Don’t Judge a (Face) Book by its Cover: A critical review of the implications of social networking sites.

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. J. (2017). Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priem, J., & Costello, K. L. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A., & Asgari-Targhi, M. (2010). Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1926), 4039–4056. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.

  • Rambe, P. (2011). Exploring the impacts of social networking sites on academic relations in the university. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 10, 271–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3–4), 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajuria, J., vanHeerde-Hudson, J., Hudson, D., Dasandi, N., & Theocharis, Y. (2015). Tweeting alone? An analysis of bridging and bonding social capital in online networks. American Politics Research, 43(4), 708–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheufele, D. A., & Shah, D. V. (2000). Personality strength and social capital: The role of dispositional and informational variables in the production of civic participation. Communication Research, 27(2), 107–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, T. (2016). Involvement, Collaboration and Engagement – Social Networks through a Pedagogical Lens. Journal of Learning Design, 9(2), Acevedo-Gil, N., Santos, R. E., Alonso, Ll., Sol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sin, S.-C. J., & Kim, K.-S. (2013). International students’ everyday life information seeking: The informational value of social networking sites. Library & Information Science Research, 35(2), 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W. (2017). The social psychology of groups. Routledge.

  • Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veletsianos, G. (2013). Open practices and identity: Evidence from researchers and educators’ social media participation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 639–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. L., Jackson, L. A., Gaskin, J., & Wang, H. Z. (2014). The effects of Social Networking Site (SNS) use on college students’ friendship and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 37(October 2017), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 35–57.

  • Zarlis, M., Mawengkang, H., & Sembiring, R. W. (2017). The role of information and communication technology in developing smart education. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 890, p. 12091).

  • Zhao, C.-M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115–138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems and Innovation, Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration, P O Box AH50, Achimoto-Accra, Ghana

    Felix Nti Koranteng

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Ghana, P O Box LG163, Legon-Accra, Ghana

    Isaac Wiafe

Authors
  1. Felix Nti Koranteng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isaac Wiafe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isaac Wiafe.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 8 Measurement items and variables
Full size table

Appendix 2

Table 9 Loadings and cross loadings of items
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koranteng, F.N., Wiafe, I. Factors that Promote Knowledge Sharing on Academic Social Networking Sites: An Empirical Study. Educ Inf Technol 24, 1211–1236 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9825-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9825-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation