Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of interactive whiteboard training programs on teacher efficacy and student outcomes in kindergartens

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the information and communications technology (ICT) resource known as interactive whiteboards (IWB) and seeks to determine whether their effective use in Kuwaiti kindergartens generates better student outcomes. A review of the literature suggests that it is quite possible for IWB and ICT in general to further improve upon effective pedagogy. But the literature also indicates that this effectiveness is not a natural result, but is instead derived from effective training in how to utilize new resources. The study compares the ICT knowledge and skills of 30 kindergarten teachers before and after receiving relevant training. Comparing these to a control group, the study finds that the ability to implement IWBs in the classroom is greatly improved through training and that students who are instructed with these resources achieve a better grasp of scientific concepts. The study concludes with recommendations for future teacher training in other contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alshawareb, A., & Jaber, M. (2012). Teachers' attitudes toward using interactive white boards in the teaching and learning process in Jordan. International Journal of Instructional Media, 39(4), 319–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balta, N., & Duran, M. (2015). Attitudes of students and teachers towards the use of interactive whiteboards in elementary and secondary school classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology., 14(2), 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., & Martin, D. (2010). Interactive whiteboards and the first year experience: Integrating IWBs into pre-service teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Chiang, C., & Lin, W. (2013). Learning effects of interactive whiteboard pedagogy for students in Taiwan from the perspective of multiple intelligences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(2), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Divaharan, S., & Koh, J. (2010). Learning as students to become better teachers: Pre-service teachers’ IWB learning experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), –570.

  • Ersoy, A., & Bozkurt, M. (2015). Understanding an elementary school Teachers' journey of using Technology in the Classroom from sand table to interactive whiteboard. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(1), 469–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hur, J., & Suh, S. (2012). Making learning active with interactive whiteboards, podcasts, and digital storytelling in ELL classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 29(4), 320–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershner, R., Mercer, N., Warwick, P., & Staarman, J. (2010). Can the interactive whiteboard support young children's collaborative communication and thinking in classroom science activities? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 359–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakou, A., & Higgins, S. (2016). Systematic review of the studies examining the impact of the interactive whiteboard on teaching and learning: What we do learn and what we do not. Preschool and Primary Education, 4(2), 254–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, S., Samson, G., Gareau, A., & Brouillette, N. (2016). TPACK in elementary and high school teachers’ self-reported classroom practices with the interactive whiteboard. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42(5).

  • Lewin, C., Somekh, B., & Steadman, S. (2015). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technologies, 1(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Yang, S. (2016). The effect of the interactive functions of whiteboards on elementary students’ learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(5), 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, B. (2014). How mobile devices are saving IWBs. Theatre Journal, 41(5), 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcote, M., Mildenhall, P., Marshall, L., & Swan, P. (2010). Interactive whiteboards: Interactive or just whiteboards? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 494–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinsloo, M., & Sasman, F. (2015). Literacy and language teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards in early schooling. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 533–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raths, D. (2013). Hands-on experience. Theatre Journal, 40(3), 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman, C. & Vincent, J. (2014). Shared cognition facilitated by teacher use of interactive whiteboard technologies. International Conference e-Learning.

  • Turel, Y., & Johnson, T. (2012). Teachers' belief and use of interactive whiteboards for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society., 15(1), 381–394.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kawthar Habeeb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Habeeb, K. Effects of interactive whiteboard training programs on teacher efficacy and student outcomes in kindergartens. Educ Inf Technol 23, 2201–2212 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9712-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9712-8

Keywords

Navigation