Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhanced oncolysis mediated by Coxsackievirus A21 in combination with doxorubicin hydrochloride

  • PRECLINICAL STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Virotherapy is an emerging strategy for the treatment of cancer that utilizes both replication-competent and genetically modified viruses to selectively kill tumor cells. We have previously shown that Coxsackievirus A21 (CVA21), a common-cold producing enterovirus, is an effective oncolytic agent against human melanoma, prostate, and breast cancer xenografts in vivo. CVA21 specifically targets and lytically infects susceptible cells expressing the CVA21 cellular receptors, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and decay-accelerating factor (DAF). Herein, the efficacy of CVA21 administered in combination with doxorubicin hydrochloride as a new therapeutic regimen for cancer was investigated. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that the human breast, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer cell lines examined expressed moderate levels of surface ICAM-1 and DAF, whilst a normal breast cell line expressed only minimal levels. When CVA21 was combined with doxorubicin hydrochloride, synergistically enhanced cell death was observed when CVA21 was administered both simultaneously or 24 h prior to doxorubicin hydrochloride exposure. Doxorubicin hydrochloride had no effect on CVA21 replication. Through the use of an orthotopic (MDA-MB-231-luc) xenograft SCID mouse model of human breast cancer we showed that a single intravenous injection of CVA21 in combination with an intraperitoneal injection of doxorubicin hydrochloride resulted in significantly greater tumor reduction compared to either agent alone. Overall, these findings highlight the exciting potential of CVA21, administered in combination with doxorubicin hydrochloride, as a new therapeutic regimen for cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

One-way analysis of variance

CI:

Combination index

CVA21:

Coxsackievirus A21

DAF:

Decay-accelerating factor

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

5-FU:

5-fluorouracil

HSV-1:

Herpes Simplex Virus-1

ICAM-1:

Intercellular adhesion molecule-1

MOI:

Multiplicity of infection

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

SCID:

Severe combined immunodeficient

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

SPF:

Specific-pathogen-free

TCID50 :

50% tissue culture infective dose

UV:

Ultraviolet

References

  1. Parkin DM (2001) Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol 2(9):533–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenberg PA, Hortobagyi GN, Smith TL et al (1996) Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 14(8):2197–2205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fazal S, Saif MW (2007) Supportive and palliative care of pancreatic cancer. J Pancreas 8:240–253

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pecora AL, Rizvi N, Cohen GI et al (2002) Phase I trial of intravenous administration of PV701, an oncolytic virus, in patients with advanced solid cancers. J Clin Oncol 20(9):2251–2266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirasawa K, Nishikawa SG, Norman KL et al (2002) Oncolytic reovirus against ovarian and colon cancer. Cancer Res 62(6):1696–1701

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stojdl DF, Lichty B, Knowles S et al (2000) Exploiting tumor-specific defects in the interferon pathway with a previously unknown oncolytic virus. Nat Med 6(7):821–825

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckland FE, Bynoe ML, Tyrrell DA (1965) Experiments on the spread of colds. II. Studies in volunteers with Coxsackievirus A21. J Hyg (Lond) 63:327–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Couch RB, Cate TR, Gerone PJ et al (1965) Production of illness with a small-particle aerosol of Coxsackie A21. J Clin Invest 44:535–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spickard A, Evans H, Knight V et al (1963) Acute respiratory disease in normal volunteers associated with Coxsackie A-21 viral infection. III. Response to nasopharyngeal and enteric inoculation. J Clin Invest 42:840–852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shafren DR, Au GG, Nguyen T et al (2004) Systemic therapy of malignant human melanoma tumors by a common cold-producing enterovirus, Coxsackievirus A21. Clin Cancer Res 10(1 Pt 1):53–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Au GG, Lindberg AM, Barry RD et al (2005) Oncolysis of vascular malignant human melanoma tumors by Coxsackievirus A21. Int J Oncol 26(6):1471–1476

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berry LJ, Au GG, Barry RD et al (2008) Potent oncolytic activity of human enteroviruses against human prostate cancer. Prostate 68(6):577–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Skelding KA, Barry RD, Shafren DR (2009) Systemic targeting of metastatic human breast tumor xenografts by Coxsackievirus A21. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113:21–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Au GG, Lincz LF, Enno A et al (2007) Oncolytic Coxsackievirus A21 as a novel therapy for multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 137:133–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Garber K (2006) China approves world’s first oncolytic virus therapy for cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:298–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sung C-K, Choi B, Wanna G et al (2008) Combined VSV oncolytic virus and chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 118:237–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Watanabe I, Kasuya H, Nomura N et al (2008) Effects of tumor selective replication-competent herpes viruses in combination with gemcitabine on pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 61:875–882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Heise C, Lemmon M, Kirn D (2000) Efficacy with a replication-selective adenovirus plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy: dependence on sequencing but not p53 functional status or route of administration. Clin Cancer Res 6:4908–4914

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Y, Yu DC, Chen Y et al (2001) A hepatocellular carcinoma-specific adenovirus variants, CV890, eliminates distant human liver tumors in combination with doxorubicin. Cancer Res 61:6428–6436

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dias JD, Guse K, Nokisalmi P et al (2010) Multimodal approach using oncolytic adenovirus, cetuximab, chemotherapy and radiotherapy in HNSCC low passage tumour cell cultures. Eur J Cancer 46:625–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chahlavi A, Todo T, Martuza RL et al (1999) Replication-competent herpes simplex virus vector G207 and cisplatin combination therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Neoplasia 1:162–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffmann D, Bayer W, Wildner O (2007) Local and distant immune-mediated control of colon cancer growth with fusogenic membrane glycoproteins in combination with viral oncolysis. Hum Gene Ther 18:435–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Angelova AL, Aprahamian M, Grekova SP et al (2009) Improvement of gemcitabine-based therapy of pancreatic carcinoma by means of oncolytic parvovirus H-IPV. Clin Cancer Res 15(2):511–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sei S, Mussio JK, Yang Q et al (2009) Synergistic antitumor activity of oncolytic reovirus and chemotherapeutic agents in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer 8:47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shafren DR, Bates RC, Agrez MV et al (1995) Coxsackieviruses B1, B3, and B5 use decay accelerating factor as a receptor for cell attachment. J Virol 69(6):3873–3877

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Coyne KE, Hall SE, Thompson S et al (1992) Mapping of epitopes, glycosylation sites, and complement regulatory domains in human decay accelerating factor. J Immunol 149(9):2906–2913

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Boyd AW, Wawryk SO, Burns GF et al (1988) Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) has a central role in cell-cell contact-mediated immune mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85(9):3095–3099

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Andersson P, Alm S, Edman K et al (2005) A novel and rapid method to quantify cytolytic replication of picornaviruses in cell culture. J Virol Methods 130:117–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ling YH, El-Naggar AK, Priebe W et al (1996) Cell cycle-dependent cytotoxicity, G2/M phase arrest, and disruption of p34cdc2/cyclin B1 activity induced by doxorubicin in synchronized P388 cells. Mol Pharmacol 49:832–841

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Piso P, Dahlke MH, Ghali N et al (2007) Multimodality treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: first results of a new German centre for peritoneal surface malignancies. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1295–1300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kouvaraki MA, Ajani JA, Hoff P et al (2004) Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and streptozocin in the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 22:4762–4771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gurnani M, Lipari P, Dell J et al (1999) Adenovirus-mediated p53 therapy has greater efficacy when combined with chemotherapy against human head and neck, ovarian, prostate, and breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 44:143–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kambara H, Saeki Y, Chiocca EA (2005) Cyclophosphamide allows for in vivo dose reduction of a potent oncolytic virus. Cancer Res 65:11255–11258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ichihara S, Yamada Y, Kawai Y et al (2007) Roles of oxidative stress and Akt signaling in doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 359:27–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Palmieri FM, Perez EA (2003) Recent advances in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs 19:10–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Aapro MS (2001) Adjuvant therapy of primary breast cancer: a review of key findings from the 7th international conference, St Gallen, February 2001. Oncologist 6:376–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge those investigators mentioned in the text for the provision of monoclonal antibodies, cell lines and virus that enabled this study to be undertaken. We would like to thank Dr Gough Au, Dr Susanne Johansson, Dr Linda Berry, Dr Erin Haley, and Ms Catherine Delahunty for scientific advice and technical assistance throughout this project. Funding for this work was derived from grants received from the Biotechnology Innovation Fund and Hunter Medical Research Institute. Kathryn Skelding is a National Breast Cancer Foundation Scholar.

Declaration of competing interests

Darren Shafren and Richard Barry hold shares in Viralytics Ltd and are currently conducting research sponsored by this company.

Authors’ contributions

KS participated in the design of the study, carried out the in vitro and in vivo work, and drafted the manuscript. RB participated in the design of the study. DS participated in the design of the study, and was involved in the revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darren R. Shafren.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Table 1

Combination index for MDA-MB-231 cells simultaneously treated with a combination of CVA21 and paclitaxel, tamoxifen, or 5-FU. Combination indices (CI) were calculated using CalcuSyn, as described in the Materials and methods. CI values less than 0.9 were determined to be synergistic, between 0.9 and 1.1 to be additive, and greater than 1.1 to be antagonistic. (GIF 56 kb)

High resolution image (TIFF 9597 kb)

Supplementary Figure 1

Effect of doxorubicin hydrochloride, paclitaxel, 5-FU, and tamoxifen on CVA21 replication. MDA-MB-231 cell monolayers were inoculated with CVA21 (MOI = 10 TCID50/cell). Following the removal of unbound virus, the cell monolayers were incubated with (A) 2.5 or 0.32 μM doxorubicin hydrochloride, (B) 8 or 2 nM paclitaxel, (C) 10 nM or 10 μM 5-FU, or (D) 10 μM or 313 nM tamoxifen for 48 h. At selected time points (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24, and 48 h), cell suspensions were freeze-thawed, clarified, and virus yield was determined by viral lytic assay on SK-Mel-28 cells. (GIF 40 kb)

High resolution image (TIFF 2140 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skelding, K.A., Barry, R.D. & Shafren, D.R. Enhanced oncolysis mediated by Coxsackievirus A21 in combination with doxorubicin hydrochloride. Invest New Drugs 30, 568–581 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-010-9614-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-010-9614-0

Keywords

Navigation