The Forecasting Performance of Corridor Implied Volatility in the Italian Market
- 181 Downloads
Corridor implied volatility introduced in Carr and Madan (Volatility: new estimation techniques for pricing derivatives, 1998) and recently implemented in Andersen and Bondarenko (Volatility as an asset class, 2007) is obtained from model-free implied volatility by truncating the integration domain between two barriers. Corridor implied volatility is implicitly linked with the concept that the tails of the risk-neutral distribution are estimated with less precision than central values, due to the lack of liquid options for very high and very low strikes. However, there is no golden choice for the barrier levels, which are likely to change depending on the underlying asset risk neutral distribution. The latter feature renders its forecasting performance mainly an empirical question. The aim of the paper is to investigate the forecasting performance of corridor implied volatility by choosing different corridors with symmetric and asymmetric cuts, and compare the results with the preliminary findings in Muzzioli (CEFIN working paper no 23, 2010b). Moreover, we shed light on the information content of different parts of the risk neutral distribution of the stock price, by using a model-independent approach based on corridor measures. To this end we compute both realized and model-free variance measures accounting for both falls and increases in the underlying asset price. The forecasting performance of volatility measures is evaluated both in a statistical and an economic setting. The economic significance is assessed by employing trading strategies based on delta-neutral straddles. The comparison is pursued by using intra-day synchronous prices between the options and the underlying asset.
KeywordsCorridor implied volatility Model-free implied volatility Variance swap Corridor variance swap
JEL ClassificationG13 G14
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Andersen T. G., Bondarenko O. (2007) Construction and interpretation of model-free implied volatility. In: Nelken I. (eds) Volatility as an asset class. Risk Books, London, pp 141–181Google Scholar
- Andersen, T. G., & Bondarenko, O. (2010). Dissecting the market pricing of volatility. Working paper, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
- Carr P., Lewis K. (2004) Corridor variance swaps. Risk 17(2): 67–72Google Scholar
- Carr P., Madan D. (1998) Towards a theory of volatility trading. In: Jarrow R. (eds) Volatility: New estimation techniques for pricing derivatives. Risk Books, London, pp 417–427Google Scholar
- Demeterfi, K., Derman, E., Kamal, M., & Zou, J. (1999). More than you ever wanted to know about volatility swaps. Goldman Sachs quantitative strategies research notes. New York: Goldman Sachs.Google Scholar
- Derman E., Kani I. (1994) Riding on a smile. Risk 7(2): 32–39Google Scholar
- Diebold F. X., Mariano R. S. (1995) Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 13(3): 253–263Google Scholar
- Hansen, C., Christensen, B., & Prabhala, N. (2001). Accounting for the overlapping data problem in the implied-realized volatility regression. Center for analytical finance working paper. University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
- Muzzioli, S. (2010b). Towards a volatility index for the Italian stock market. CEFIN working paper No 23, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.Google Scholar
- Patton, A. (2010). Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies. Journal of Econometrics. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.034.
- Patton, A., Sheppard, K. (2009) Evaluating volatility and correlation forecasts. , Handbook of Financial Time Series.Google Scholar
- Rompolis, L. S., & Tzavalis, E. (2010). Retrieving risk neutral moments and expected quadratic variation from option prices. Working paper, University of Cyprus.Google Scholar
- Tsiaras, L. (2009). The forecast performance of competing implied volatility measures: The case of individual stocks. Finance research group working papers.Google Scholar