Advertisement

Critical Criminology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 91–106 | Cite as

The Knowing of Monstrosities: Necropower, Spectacular Punishment and Denial

Article

Abstract

This study examines how newspaper accounts of criminality conceal and illuminate particular types of monstrosity in the postbellum United States. The paper offers an analysis of Gothicism—which typically frames the criminality of marginalized groups—as a technique of racial domination in narrative sites that construct knowledge on criminality and punishment. Analysis reveals a paradoxical lens of Gothicism in which oppressive groups can conceal monstrosity within a colonial context. The analysis of gothic accounts of criminality challenges the ways in which denial shapes modern monstrosity.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agozino, B. (2003). Counter-colonial criminology: A critique of imperialist reason. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agozino, B. (2004). Imperialism, crime and criminology: Towards the decolonisation of criminology. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41(4), 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botting, F. (1996). Gothic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, M. (2009). The culture of punishment: Prison, society, and spectacle. New York and London: NYU press.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (2006). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Du Bois, W. E. B. (1992). Black reconstruction in America. 1935. Reprint, New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  8. Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1977/1995). Discipline and punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M., Bertani, M., Fontana, A., Ewald, F., & Macey, D. (2003). “Society must be defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976 (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Gabbidon, S. L. (2015). Criminological perspectives on race and crime. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Garland, D. (2005). Penal excess and surplus meaning: Public torture lynchings in twentieth-century America. Law & Society Review, 39(4), 793–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gordon, A. F. (2008). Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  14. Greek, C. (2007). The big city rogue cop as monster: Images of NYPD and LAPD. In C. Picart & C. E. Greek (Eds.), Monsters in and among us: Toward a gothic criminology (pp. 164–198). Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Greek, C. (2016). Globalization and the rise of the Behemoth. In S. Machura, M. Yar, S. Boyd, C. Menkel-Meadow, O. Kamir, P. Robson, & M. C. Niles (Eds.), Framing law and crime: An interdisciplinary anthology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  16. Hallsworth, S., & Young, T. (2008). Crime and silence: Death and life are in the power of the tongue (Proverbs 18: 21). Theoretical Criminology, 12(2), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halttunen, K. (1998). Murder most foul: The killer and the American gothic imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Holland, S. P. (2000). Raising the dead: Readings of death and (black) subjectivity. Durhma, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ingebretson, E. J. (1998). The monster in the home: True crime and the traffic in body parts. Journal of American Culture, 21(1), 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Linnemann, T. (2016). Proof of death: Police power and the visual economies of seizure, accumulation and trophy. Theoretical Criminology.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615622533.Google Scholar
  21. Linnemann, T., Wall, T., & Green, E. (2014). The walking dead and killing state: Zombification and the normalization of police violence. Theoretical Criminology.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480614529455.Google Scholar
  22. Lombroso, C. (1871). White man and colored man: Lectures on the origin and variety of the human races. Padua: F. Sacchetto.Google Scholar
  23. Lombroso, C., Gibson, M., & Rafter, N. H. (2006). Criminal man. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matza, D., & Sykes, G. (1961). Juvenile delinquency and subterranean values. American Sociological Review, 26(5), 712–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mbembe, J. A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), 11–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neocleous, M. (2005). Gothic fascism. Journal for Cultural Research, 9(2), 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Picart, C. (2006). Crime and the gothic: Sexualizing serial killers. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 13(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  28. Picart, C. (2012). Race and serial killing in the media: The case of Wayne Williams. Speaking of Monsters (pp. 173–191). Palgrave Macmillan US: New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Picart, C., & Greek, C. E. (2007). The compulsions of real/reel serial killers and vampires: Toward a gothic criminology. In C. Picart & C. E. Greek (Eds.), Monsters in and among us: Toward a gothic criminology (pp. 227–255). Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Pinedo, I. C. (2004). Postmodern elements of the contemporary horror film. In S. Price (Ed.), The horror film (pp. 85–117). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rafter, N. (2008). The criminal brain: Understanding biological theories of crime. New York and London: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rafter, N., & Ystehede, P. (2010). Here be dragons: Lombroso, the gothic, and social control. In M. Deflem (Ed.), Popular culture crime and social control (pp. 263–284). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seidman, S. (1991). Postmodern anxiety: The politics of epistemology. Sociological Theory, 9(2), 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seidman, S. (2012). Contested knowledge: Social theory today. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, P. (2003). Narrating the guillotine punishment technology as myth and symbol. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(5), 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sothcott, K. (2015). Late modern ambiguity and gothic narratives of justice. Critical Criminology, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-015-9287-2.
  37. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tatum, B. L. (2000). Toward a neocolonial model of adolescent crime and violence. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 16(2), 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tatum, B. (2002). The colonial model as a theoretical explanation of crime and delinquency. In S. L., Gabbidon, H. T. Greene & V. D. Young (Eds.), African American classics in criminology and criminal justice (pp. 307–322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Valier, C. (2002). Punishment, border crossings and the powers of horror. Theoretical Criminology, 6(3), 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Valier, C. (2004). Introduction: The power to punish and the power of the image. Punishment and Society, 6(3), 251–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wagner, B. (2010). Disturbing the peace: Black culture and the police power after slavery. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wright, M. W. (2011). Necropolitics, narcopolitics, and femicide: Gendered violence on the Mexico-US border. Signs, 36(3), 707–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations