Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Wrongfully Convicting the Innocent: A State Crime?

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although there is evidence of its occurrence in most criminal justice systems, wrongful conviction remains underdeveloped from a criminological perspective. The result of a confluence of factors and actors, wrongful conviction stands as evidence that criminal justice systems are not immune to error. Amongst the different circumstances in individual cases, the state (or those acting on its behalf) is one constant actor implicated in wrongful conviction of the innocent. Recognizing this consistency, wrongful conviction has the potential to be examined through existing understandings of state crime and enter more robust discussions within critical and orthodox criminology. By expanding upon existing arguments relevant to state crime, this article suggests a typology of wrongful conviction by placing it on a continuum of state crime from acts of omission to commission. In doing so, this article further develops a theoretical argument demonstrating the relevance of wrongful conviction within the state crime ‘spectrum’, adding to the understanding of the problem of wrongful conviction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aulette, J. R., & Michalowski, R. (1993). Fire in hamlet: A case study of state-corporate crime. In K. Tunnell (Ed.), Political crime in contemporary america: A critical approach (pp. 171–206). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandes, S. (2005). Loyalty to one’s convictions: The prosecutor and tunnel vision. Howard Law Journal, 49(2), 475–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, G. (1991). Resisting state criminality and the struggle for justice. In G. Barak (Ed.), Crimes by the capitalist state: An introduction to state criminality (pp. 273–282). Albany: State of New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baude, W. (2010). Last chance on death row. The Wilson Quarterly, 34(4), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchard, E. (1932). Convicting the innocent: Sixty-five actual errors of criminal justice. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W. J. (1989). State organized crime—The American Society of Criminology, 1988 Presidential address. Criminology, 27(2), 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W. J. (1995). Commentary. Society For the Study of Social Problems Newsletter.

  • Cole, S. A. (2003). Fingerprinting: The first junk science. Oklahoma City Univeristy Law Review, 28(1), 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. M., & Jarvis, J. (2009). The wrongful conviction of forensic science. Forensic Science Policy and Management, 1(1), 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denov, M. S., & Campbell, K. M. (2005). Criminal injustice: Understanding the causes, effects, and responses to wrongful conviction in Canada. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(3), 224–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. M. (2013). An etiology of wrongful convictions. In M. Zalman & J. Carrano (Eds.), Wrongful conviction and criminal justice reform: Making justice (pp. 56–72). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J., Scheck, B., & Neufeld, P. (2003). Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K. (2005). Ten things about DNA contamination that lawyers should know. Criminal Law Journal, 29(2), 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, K. L. (2013). Toward a Bayesian analysis of recanted eyewitness identification testimony. New York University Law Review, 88(4), 1769–1801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley, K. A. (2010). Defining innocence. Albany Law Review, 74(3), 1157–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley, K. A., & Scott, M. S. (2006). The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases. Wisconsin Law Review, 2006(2), 291–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, B. (2004). Errors of justice: Nature, sources and remedies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, D. (2004). Trusted criminals: White collar crime in contemporary society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, B. L., & Neufeld, P. J. (2009). Invalid forensic science testimony and wrongful conviction. Virginia Law Review, 95(1), 1–97.

  • Garrett, B. L. (2007). Aggregation in criminal law. California Law Review, 95(2), 383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grann, D. (2009). Trial by fire: Did texas execute an innocent man. The New Yorker, September 29, 2009. http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/06/the-ghost-of-cameron-todd-willingham/240901/.

  • Greer, S. (1994). Miscarriages of criminal justice reconsidered. The Modern Law Review, 57(1), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grometstein, R., & Balboni, J. M. (2012). Backing out of a constitutional ditch: Constitutional remedies for gross prosecutorial misconduct post thompson. Albany Law Review, 75(3), 1243–1281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, S.R., & Shaffer M. (2012) Exonerations in the United States, 1989–2012. University of Michigan Public Law Working Paper.

  • Gross, S. R., Jacoby, K., Matheson, D. J., et al. (2005). Exonerations in the United States 1989 through 2003. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 95(2), 523–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, K. (2009). DNA fiasco: Rape conviction quashed. Melbourne: The Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, S. (1991). The informal economy: A crime of omission by the state. In G. Barak (Ed.), Crimes by the capitalist state: An introduction to state criminality (pp. 253–272). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, C. R. (2004). Wrongful convictions: The american experience. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46(2), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff, C. R., Rattner, A., Sagarin, E., & MacNamara, D. E. J. (1986). Guilty until proved innocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. Crime & Delinquency, 32(4), 518–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innocence Project. (2014). Understaning the casues: Unreliable or improper forensic science. http://www.innocenceproject.org/understand/Forensic-Science-Misconduct.php.

  • Kauzlarich, D., Mullins, C., & Matthews, R. (2003). A complicity continuum of state crime. Contemporary Justice Review, 6(3), 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppl, R., & Sacks, M. (2013). The criminal justice system creates incentives for false convictions. Criminal Justice Ethics, 32(2), 126–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. C., & Michalowski, R. (1990). Toward an integrated theory of state-corporate crime. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Baltimore, MD.

  • Kramer, R. C., & Michalowski, R. J. (2005). War, aggression and state crime: A criminological analysis of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. British Journal of Criminology, 45(4), 446–469.

  • Kramer, R. C., & Kauzlarich, D. (2011). Nuclear weapons, international law, and the normalization of state crime. In D. Rothe & C. W. Mullins (Eds.), State crime: Current perspectives (pp. 94–121). New Brunswick, New Jersey, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

  • Leo, R. A. (2005). Rethinking the study of miscarriages of justice: Developing a criminology of wrongful conviction. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(3), 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillquist, E. (2007). Improving accuracy in criminals cases. University of Richmond Law Review, 41(4), 897–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, E. (2005). System failure. American Criminal Law Review, 42(4), 1201–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medwed, D. S. (2006). Anatomy of a wrongful conviction: Theoretical implications and practical solutions. Villanova Law Review, 51(2), 337–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metze, P. S. (2012). Troy Davis, Lawrence Brewer, and Timothy McVeigh Should Still Be Alive: Certainty, innocence, and the high cost of death and immorality. Charleston Law Review, 6(2), 333–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski, R., & Kramer, R. C. (2006). The critique of power. In R. Michalowski & R. C. Kramer (Eds.), State-corporate crime: Wrongdoing at the intersection of business and government (pp. 1–17). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. (1988). The thin blue line. United States: Miramax Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, M. (2005). Redefining miscarriages of justice: A revived human-rights approach to unearth subjugated discourses of wrongful criminal conviction. British Journal of Criminology, 45(2), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, R. J. (2012). Assessing compensation statutes for the wrongly convicted. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 23(3), 352–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, R. J., & Bonventre C. L. (2013). Advancing wrongful conviction scholarship: Toward new conceptual frameworks. Justice Quarterly, 1-21. doi:10.1080/07418825.2013.827232.

  • Pilkington, E. (2011). Troy Davis execution: Repeated trips to death chamber ‘amount to torture’. The Guardian, September 21, 2011. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/sep/20/troy-davis-execution-room-torture.

  • Radelet, M. L., Lofquist, W. S., & Bedau, H. A. (1996). Prisoners released from death rows since 1970 because of doubts about their guilt. Thomas M. Cooley Law Review, 13(3), 907–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardelli, R., & Clow, K. A. (2011). The impact of an exonoree’s guest lecture on students’ attitudes toward wrongly convicted persons. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 23(2), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D., Ross, J., Mullins, C., et al. (2009). That was then, this is now, what about tomorrow? Future directions in state crime studies. Critical Criminology, 17(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, H. (2005). Violated trust: Conceptualizing prosecutorial misconduct. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(3), 250–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severson, K. (2011). Davis is executed in Georgia. New York Times, September 21, 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/22/us/final-pleas-and-vigils-in-troy-davis-execution.html.

  • Siegel, A. M. (2005). Moving down the wedge of injustice: A proposal for a third generation of wrongful convictions scholarship and advocacy. American Criminal Law Review, 42(4), 1219–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, G. (2012). Mystery, ethnicity, and the ideal victim: Phillip Walsham’s death. Communication, Culture & Critique, 5(2), 252–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, G. (2011). Structuration theory and wrongful imprisonment: From ‘victimhood’ to ‘survivorship’? Critical Criminology, 19(3), 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson-Cannino, J., Cotton, R., & Torneo, E. (2010). Picking cotton: Our memoir of injustice and redemption. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totenberg, N. (2009). Can prosecutors be sued by people they framed? NPR, November 04, 2009. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120069519.

  • Turvey, B. E. (2013). Forensic fraud: Evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct. Oxford: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartkessian, E. S., & Tyler, J. P. (2011). Legal and social exoneration: The consequences of Michael Toney’s wrongful conviction. Albany Law Review, 75(3), 1467–1498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, F. (2010). Report: Inquiry into the circumstances that led to the conviction of Mr Farah Abdulkadir Jama. Melbourne: Victorian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C. (1993). Introduction. In C. Walker & K. Starmer (Eds.), Justice in error (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westervelt, S., & Cook, K. (2010). Framing innocents: The wrongly convicted as victims of state harm. Crime, Law and Social Change, 53(3), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westervelt, S., & Cook, K. (2012). Life after death row: Exonerees’ search for community and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia

    Greg Stratton

Authors
  1. Greg Stratton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg Stratton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stratton, G. Wrongfully Convicting the Innocent: A State Crime?. Crit Crim 23, 21–37 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-014-9249-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-014-9249-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation