Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of Dropout in Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT), provided with guidance, has been shown to outperform wait-list control conditions and appears to perform on par with face-to-face psychotherapy. However, dropout remains an important problem. Dropout rates for iCBT programs for depression have ranged from 0 to 75%, with a mean of 32%. Drawing from a recent study in which 117 people participated in iCBT with support, we examined participant characteristics, participants’ use of iCBT skills, and their experience of technical difficulties with iCBT as predictors of dropout risk. Educational level, extraversion, and participant skill use predicted lower risk of dropout; technical difficulties and openness predicted higher dropout risk. We encourage future research on predictors of dropout in the hope that greater understanding of dropout risk will inform efforts to promote program engagement and retention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Pending IRB approval for sharing, the dataset described in this paper is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Dropout rates across study segments were: 39% (23 of 59) among those randomized to BtB, 65% (13 of 20) among those randomized to wait-list and subsequently offered BtB, and 45% (17 of 38) among non-randomized participants offered BtB. The 20 participants who had initially been assigned to wait-list were a subset of a larger group of 30, as 10 opted to not continue participation. An initial test suggested that study segment was associated with differential dropout risk (RR = 1.67; 95% CI 1.06–2.62, p = 0.03). However, study segment failed to predict dropout in our multivariate model (see Table 4).

  2. We included the number of contacts as a covariate out of concern for the possibility that our measure of CBT skills could have been confounded with clients who had more contact with their coach and thus more opportunities to convey their use of CBT skills. There was an average of 2.6 (SD = 1.54; range = 0–9) calls completed between participants and their coaches and an average of 5.05 (SD = 2.72; range  0–12) emails exchanged between participants and their coaches.

References

Download references

Funding

This study was funded in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Award Number Grant KL2TR001068, awarded to NRF. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences or the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel R. Strunk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Iony D. Schmidt, Nicholas R. Forand, and Daniel R. Strunk declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmidt, I.D., Forand, N.R. & Strunk, D.R. Predictors of Dropout in Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression. Cogn Ther Res 43, 620–630 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9979-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9979-5

Keywords

Navigation