Skip to main content
Log in

Implicit and Explicit Self-Esteem in Previously and Never Depressed Individuals: Baseline Differences and Reactivity to Rumination

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contrast to cognitive theories that emphasize negative self-views in depression, a recent study demonstrated that previously depressed individuals have higher implicit self-esteem (SE) than never depressed controls (Franck et al. in Cogn Emot 22(8):1588–1599, 2008). The present study was designed to extend this past work by measuring both implicit and explicit SE among previously and never depressed individuals and testing whether a rumination manipulation impacts SE more strongly among individuals with past depression. Previously (n = 28) and never depressed (n = 33) participants completed rumination and distraction conditions in sessions separated by 1 week. State explicit SE and implicit SE were measured both pre- and post-manipulation, whereas explicit trait SE was measured once at baseline. Previously depressed individuals had higher implicit SE, but lower explicit trait SE, at baseline compared to never depressed controls. Never depressed individuals experienced decreases in implicit SE following rumination relative to distraction, whereas previously depressed individuals experienced decreases in implicit SE following both rumination and distraction. Our findings demonstrate that previously depressed individuals have high implicit, but low explicit trait SE, compared to never depressed persons, and further suggest that they differ in either their response to repeated administrations of measures of implicit SE or to externally prompted shifts in attentional focus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The VAS also included 4 items reflecting state affect, which were not relevant to this particular study, and an item reflecting perceived competence. The competence item demonstrated substantively identical results as the worthlessness item, whereas there were no statistically significant effects of rumination on its own or in interaction with depression history on state affect (happy, nervous, calm, sad).

  2. Similar analyses could not be conducted on trait SE because the RSE was only completed once during baseline.

  3. We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting that both of these tasks could have exerted a cognitive load, which in turn diminished reflective processing.

References

  • Beevers, C. G. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: A dual process model. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(7), 975–1002. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B, Jr, & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect of measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 631–643. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.631.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A., Hokanson, J., & Flynn, H. (1994). A comparison of self-esteem lability and low trait self-esteem as vulnerability factors for depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 166–177. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, D. S., Tiffany, S. T., Coon, H., Scholan, M. B., McMahon, W. M., & Leppert, M. F. (2007). The PHQ-9 as brief assessment of lifetime major depression. Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 247–251. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ciesla, J. A., Felton, J. W., & Roberts, J. E. (2011). Testing the Cognitive Catalyst Model of depression: Does rumination amplify the impact of cognitive diatheses in response to stress? Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1349–1357.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ciesla, J. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2007). Rumination, negative cognition, and their interactive effects on depressed mood: Two laboratory studies. Emotion, 7, 555–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Raedt, R., Schacht, R., Franck, E., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Self-esteem and depression revisited: Implicit positive self-esteem in depressed patients? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(7), 1017–1028. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franck, E., & De Raedt, R. (2007). Self-esteem reconsidered: Unstable self-esteem outperforms level of self-esteem as vulnerability marker for depression. Behavior Research and Therapy, 45(10), 1531–1541. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franck, E., De Raedt, R., & De Houwer, J. (2007). Implicit but not explicit self-esteem predicts future depressive symptomatology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(10), 2448–2455. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.01.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franck, E., De Raedt, R., & De Houwer, J. (2008). Activation of latent self-schemas as a cognitive vulnerability factor for depression: The potential role of implicit self-esteem. Cognition and Emotion, 22(8), 1588–1599. doi:10.1080/02699930801921271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, S. A., Chronis-Tuscano, A., Roberts, J. E., Ciesla, J. A., & Pelham, W. E. (2013). Self-esteem reactivity among mothers of children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): The moderating role of depression history. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 37, 1233–1242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gemar, M., Segal, Z., Sagrati, S., & Kennedy, S. (2001). Mood-induced changes on the Implicit Association Test in recovered depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(2), 282–289. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.110.2.282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A., & Farnham, S. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1022–1038. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haeffel, G. J., Abramson, L. Y., Brazy, P. C., Shah, J. Y., Teachman, B. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2007). Explicit and implicit cognition: A preliminary test of a dual-process theory of cognitive vulnerability to depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(6), 1155–1167. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartlage, S., Arduino, K., & Alloy, L. B. (1998). Depressive personality characteristics: State dependent concomitants of depressive disorder and traits independent of current depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107(2), 349–354. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.107.2.349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoorens, V., Takano, K., Franck, E., Roberts, J. E., & Raes, F. (2015). Initial and noninitial name-letter preferences as obtained through repeated letter rating tasks continue to reflect (different aspects of) self-esteem. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 905–914. doi:10.1037/pas0000092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inquisit (version 3.0.5.0) [Computer software]. Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software LLC.

  • Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Luxton, D. D., & Wenzlaff, R. M. (2005). Self-esteem uncertainty and depression vulnerability. Cognition and Emotion, 19(4), 611–622. doi:10.1080/02699930441000355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., Caldwell, N. D., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1998). Effects of ruminative and distracting responses to depressed mood on retrieval of autobiographical memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 166–177. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(4), 569–582. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.100.4.569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1993). Effects of rumination and distraction on naturally occurring depressed mood. Cognition and Emotion, 7(6), 561–570. doi:10.1080/02699939308409206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives of Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Core Team (2014). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-117. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=nlme.

  • R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Remue, J., De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., Vanderhasselt, M., & De Raedt, R. (2013). Self-esteem revisited: Performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure as a measure of self- versus ideal self-related cognitions in dysphoria. Cognition and Emotion, 27(8), 1441–1449. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.786681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Risch, A. K., Buba, A., Birk, U., Morina, N., Steffens, M. C., & Stangier, U. (2010). Implicit self-esteem in recurrently depressed patients. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41(3), 199–206. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. E., & Monroe, S. M. (1994). A multidimensional model of self-esteem in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 14(3), 161–181. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(94)90006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, P., Lewinsohn, P., & Seeley, J. (1990). Are people changed by the experience of having an episode of depression? A further test of the scar hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99(3), 264–271. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.99.3.264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serretti, A., Cavallini, M. C., Macciardi, F., Namia, C., Franchini, L., Souery, D., et al. (1999). Social adjustment and self-esteem in remitted patients with mood disorders. European Psychiatry, 14(3), 137–142. doi:10.1016/S0924-9338(99)80731-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, B., Zislin, J., Gelfin, Y., Osher, Y., Gorfine, M., Souery, D., et al. (1999). Social adjustment and self-esteem in remitted patients with unipolar and bipolar affective disorder: A case–control study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 40(1), 24–30. doi:10.1016/S0010-440X(99)90072-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. W. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ Primary Care Study. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(18), 1737–1744. doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D. (1988). Cognitive vulnerability to persistent depression. Cognition and Emotion, 2(3), 247–274. doi:10.1080/02699938808410927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jan De Houwer for his insightful comments on a previous version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Roberts.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

John E. Roberts, Andrew Porter, and Chrystal Vergara-Lopez declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (national and institutional). Informed consent was obtained from all individual subjects participating in the study. If any identifying information is contained in the paper the following statement is also necessary—Additional informed consent was obtained from any subjects for whom identifying information appears in this paper.

Animal Rights

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roberts, J.E., Porter, A. & Vergara-Lopez, C. Implicit and Explicit Self-Esteem in Previously and Never Depressed Individuals: Baseline Differences and Reactivity to Rumination. Cogn Ther Res 40, 164–172 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-015-9732-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-015-9732-2

Keywords

Navigation