Does a Dieting Goal Affect Automatic Cognitive Processes and Their Trainability?
- 393 Downloads
This study investigated implicit self-control dispositions—implicit approach tendencies towards low-caloric food rather than towards high-caloric food—in dieters. Action tendencies were assessed and trained using the Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT). Additionally, positive/negative affective associations [Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT)], approach/avoidance associations (BIAT), and attentional biases [Dot Probe Task (DPT)] were assessed before and after training. Before training, dieters showed a more negative affective association with high-caloric food than non-dieters (positive/negative BIAT), consistent with the presence of self-control dispositions. On the AAT, all participants, not just dieters, showed more approach of low-caloric food than of high-caloric food. Results of neither the approach/avoidance BIAT nor the DPT showed any indication of implicit self-control dispositions. This study also investigated whether implicit self-control dispositions interfered with AAT training effects. This did not seem to be the case, as action tendencies could be strengthened even further. Moreover, training effects generalized to the DPT.
KeywordsImplicit self-control dispositions Dieting goal Action tendencies Associations Attentional bias
Conflict of Interest
Joyce Maas, Ger P. J. Keijsers, Mike Rinck, Jorg Tanis, and Eni S. Becker declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this paper.
- Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 940–958.Google Scholar
- Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.Google Scholar
- Houben, K., Havermans, R.C., & Wiers, R.W. (2010). Learning to dislike alcohol: Conditioning negative implicit attitudes towards alcohol and its effect on drinking behaviour. Psychopharmacology, 211, 79-86.Google Scholar
- Jeffery, R. W., Adlis, S. A., & Forster, J. L. (1991). Prevalence of dieting among working men and women: The healthy worker project. Health Psychology, 10, 274–281.Google Scholar
- Lee, H., Franklin, S. A., Turkel, J. E., Goetz, A. R., & Woods, D. W. (2011). Facilitated attentional disengagement from hair-related cues among individuals diagnosed with trichotillomania: An investigation based on the exogenous cueing paradigm. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 1, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007). Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 105–120.Google Scholar