Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 406–415 | Cite as

Interpretation in Social Anxiety: When Meaning Precedes Ambiguity

  • Courtney Beard
  • Nader Amir
Original Article

Abstract

Cognitive models of anxiety posit that negative beliefs influence socially anxious individuals’ interpretation of ambiguous social cues. However, paradigms used to assess interpretation bias in social anxiety have not addressed such beliefs. Furthermore, studies have assessed interpretation with either self-report or reaction time paradigms, rather than using both methods. In the current study, socially anxious and non-anxious participants completed the Word Sentence Association Paradigm (WSAP). In the WSAP, participants decide whether or not a word (implying a threat or benign interpretation) is related to an ambiguous sentence. Threat or benign meanings preceded the ambiguity in order to examine the influence of positive and negative beliefs on interpretation of ambiguous information. The WSAP results in two types of interpretation indices: (1) response latency to make relatedness decisions for threat and benign interpretations, and (2) endorsement rates of the relatedness of threat and benign interpretations to ambiguous sentences. Results revealed a threat interpretation bias and a lack of a benign interpretation bias in both reaction time and self-report data. Threat and benign biases were not strongly correlated. These findings support the distinction between threat and benign interpretation biases.

Keywords

Interpretation bias Social anxiety Information processing 

References

  1. Amir, N., Foa, E. B., & Coles, M. E. (1998). Negative interpretation bias in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 945–958. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00060-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amir, N., Beard, C., & Bower, E. (2005a). Interpretation bias and social anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 433–443. doi: 10.1007/s10608-005-2834-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amir, N., Beard, C., & Przeworksi, A. (2005b). Resolving ambiguity: The Effect of experience on interpretation of ambiguous events in social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 402–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beard, C., & Amir, N. (2008). A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 1135–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.05.012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Manual for Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, D., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneider (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Constans, J., Penn, D., Ihen, G., & Hope, D. (1999). Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 643–651. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00180-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Franklin, M., Huppert, J., Langner, R., Leiberg, S., & Foa, E. (2005). Interpretation bias: A comparison of treated social phobics, untreated social phobics, and controls. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 289–300. doi: 10.1007/s10608-005-2412-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillis, M. M., Haaga, D. A. F., & Ford, G. T. (1995). Normative values for the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Fear Questionnaire, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, and Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 7, 450–455. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hazlett-Stevens, H., & Borkovec, T. D. (2004). Interpretive cues and ambiguity in generalized anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 881–892. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00204-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herbert, J., Bellack, A., & Hope, D. (1991). Concurrent validity of the Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 13, 357–368. doi: 10.1007/BF00960447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hirsch, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Interpretive inferences when reading about emotional events. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 1123–1132. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00069-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hirsch, C., & Mathews, A. (2000). Impaired positive inferential bias in Social Phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 705–712. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.109.4.705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hofmann, S. G., Moscovitch, D. A., Kim, H., & Taylor, A. N. (2004). Changes in self-perception during treatment of Social Phobia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 588–596. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.4.588.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huppert, J., Foa, E., Furr, J., Filip, J., & Mathews, A. (2003). Interpretation bias in social anxiety: A dimensional perspective. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 569–577. doi: 10.1023/A:1026359105456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huppert, J., Pasupuleti, R. V., Foa, E., & Mathews, A. (2007). Interpretation biases in social anxiety: Response generation, response selection, and self-appraisals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1505–1515. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.01.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 40–48. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.110.1.40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murphy, R., Hirsch, C. R., Mathews, A., Smith, K., & Clark, D. M. (2007). Facilitating a benign interpretation bias in a high socially anxious population. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1517–1529. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.01.007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 741–756. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00022-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Richards, A. & French, C. C. (1992). An anxiety-related bias in semantic activation when processing threat/neutral homographs. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 503–525.Google Scholar
  21. Simpson, G. B., & Kang, H. (1994). Inhibitory processes in the recognition of homograph meanings. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 359–382). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
  23. Stopa, L., & Clark, D. (2000). Social Phobia and interpretation of social events. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 273–283. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00043-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Turner, S. M., Beidel, D. C., Dancu, C. V., & Stanley, M. A. (1989a). An empirically derived inventory to measure social fears and anxiety: The Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 1, 35–40. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.1.1.35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Turner, S. M., Stanley, M. A., Beidel, D. C., & Bond, L. (1989b). The Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory: Construct validity. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 33, 448–457.Google Scholar
  26. Vassilopoulos, S. P. (2006). Interpretation and judgmental biases in socially anxious and nonanxious individuals. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34, 243–254. doi: 10.1017/S1352465805002687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Voncken, M., & Bögels, S. (2006). Changing interpretation and judgmental biases in Social Phobia: A pilot study of a short, highly structured cognitive treatment. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 20, 59–73. doi: 10.1891/jcop.20.1.59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Voncken, M. J., Bögels, S. M., & de Vries, K. (2003). Interpretation and judgemental biases in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 1481–1488. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00143-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Voncken, M. J., Bögels, S. M., & Peeters, F. (2007). Specificity of interpretation and judgemental biases in social phobia versus depression. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory. Research and Practice, 80, 443–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilson, E., MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Rutherford, E. (2006). The causal role of interpretive bias in anxiety reactivity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 103–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yoon, K. L., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2007). Threat is in the eye of the beholder: Social anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguous facial expressions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 839–847.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Human BehaviorAlpert Medical School of Brown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologySDSU/UCSD Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical PsychologySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations