An iterative global pressure solution for the semi-analytical simulation of geological carbon sequestration
- 162 Downloads
Successful large-scale implementation of geological CO2 sequestration (GCS) will require the preliminary assessment of multiple potential injection sites. Risk assessment and optimization tools used in this effort typically require large numbers of simulations. This makes it important to choose the appropriate level of complexity when selecting the type of simulation model. A promising multi-phase semi-analytical method proposed by Nordbotten et al. (Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 743–749 2009) to estimate key system attributes (i.e., pressure distribution, CO2 plume extent, and fluid migration) has been found to reduce computational run times by three orders of magnitude when compared to other standard numerical techniques. The premise of the work presented herein is that the existing semi-analytical leakage algorithm proposed by Nordbotten et al. (Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 743–749 2009) may be further improved in computational efficiency by applying a fixed-point-type iterative global pressure solution to eliminate the need to solve large sets of linear equations at each time step. Results show that significant gains in computational efficiency are obtained with this new methodology. In addition, this modification provides the same enhancement to similar semi-analytical algorithms that simulate single-phase injection into multi-layer domains.
KeywordsSemi-analytical modeling Iterative methods Geological carbon sequestration Injection site assessment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Anderson, E., Bai, Z., Bischof, C., et al.: LAPACK users guide. 3rd edn. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1999)Google Scholar
- 8.Cihan, A., Birkholzer, J.T., Zhou, Q.: Pressure buildup and brine migration during CO 2 storage in multilayered aquifers. Ground Water 51, 252–67 (2013)Google Scholar
- 9.Cihan, A., Zhou, Q., Birkholzer, J.T.: Analytical solutions for pressure perturbation and fluid leakage through aquitards and wells in multilayered-aquifer systems. Water Resour. Res. (2011). doi: 10.1029/2011WR010721
- 17.Gasda, S.E., Nordbotten, J.M., Celia, M.A.: Determining effective wellbore permeability from a field pressure test: a numerical analysis of detection limits. Environ. Geol. 54, 1207–1215 (2007). doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-0903-7
- 18.Hantush, M.S.: Modification of the theory of leaky aquifers. J Geophys Res 65(11), 3717–3725 (1960)Google Scholar
- 27.Lacombe, S., Sudicky, E.: Influence of leaky boreholes on cross-formational groundwater flow and contaminant transport. Water Resour. (1995)Google Scholar
- 33.Nordbotten, J., Celia, M.: An improved analytical solution for interface upconing around a well. Water Resour. Res. 42, 1–10 (2006a)Google Scholar
- 35.Nordbotten, J., Celia, M.: Geological storage of CO2. Wiley (2012)Google Scholar
- 36.Nordbotten, J., Celia, M., Bachu, S.: Analytical solutions for leakage rates through abandoned wells. Water Resour. Res. 40, 1–10 (2004)Google Scholar
- 40.Takahashi, W.: Nonlinear functional analysis: fixed point theory and its applications. Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama (2000)Google Scholar