Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 101–114 | Cite as

Genetic relationships of tui chub populations in the northwestern Great Basin and conservation implications for the Cow Head Tui Chub

  • Yongjiu Chen
  • Stewart Reid
  • Bernie May
Research Article

Abstract

The Cow Head Tui Chub, Siphateles thalassinus vaccaceps, is restricted to the small Cow Head basin in far northeastern California and northwestern Nevada. Using microsatellite DNA loci, we found extensive genetic variation among tui chub populations in the Cow Head and surrounding basins of the northwestern Great Basin. Our data support the systematic conclusions of earlier authors, while showing distinct intraspecific differences between populations in most subbasins within the pluvial basins examined. The Cow Head Tui Chub forms a distinctive population within S. thalassinus with greatest affinity to the tui chub in the Warner Valley into which the Cow Head Lake drains. Tui chubs from the Goose Lake and Pit River basins are genetically very similar. Warner, Abert, Summer Lake, Catlow and Guano basin tui chubs appear distinct, both from each other and from tui chubs in the other basins. However, genetic proximity and some overlap between populations in presumably isolated hydrologic basins (i.e. Summer–Goose–Warner) suggest the possibility of unrecognized hydrologic connections or anthropogenic transport across barriers. Current genetic diversity in the Cow Head Tui Chub population is similar to that of stream-associated populations. We suggest that the Cow Head Tui Chub should remain a species of conservation concern due to its highly restricted distribution in an arid environment. Successful conservation of this unique fish will depend on stewardship of its limited habitat and maintenance of connectivity between subpopulations in a manner that ensures its long-term viability.

Keywords

Tui chub Microsatellite DNA variation Genetic relationship Conservation Northwestern Great Basin 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Becky Miller, Jeannine Richey, and Paul Chappell (California Department of Fish and Game) for collection of Cow Head Tui Chub samples, and Douglas Markle for providing Summer Lake and Guano Valley tui chub samples, and part of Catlow Valley tui chub samples from the Oregon State University fish collection. Additional collections were made under OR2004-1979 and OR2005-2606 (Oregon) and SC-003849 (California). We also thank John Pedroia, Mandi Finger, and Neil Clipperton for technical support; Peter Moyle, Mark Schwartz, Amy Welsh, Josh Israel, Tasha Belfiore, Jan Cordes, William Bleier, Daniel Ruzzante and an anonymous referee for their critical and insightful feedback on the manuscript; and numerous landowners for graciously providing access to streams on their properties.

References

  1. Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell PublishingGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen PJ, Amos W, Pomeroy PP, Twiss SD (1995) Microsatellite variation in grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) shows evidence of genetic differentiation between two British breeding colonies. Mol Ecol 4:653–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avise JC (2004) Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Baerwald M, May B (2004) Characterization of microsatellite loci for five members of the minnow family Cyprinidae found in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and its tributaries. Mol Ecol Notes 4:385–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (2003) GENETIX version 4.04, logiciel sous WindowsTM pour la genetique des populations. Laboratoire Genome, Populations, Interactions: CNRS UMR. 5000, Universite de Montpellier II, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  6. Bills FT, Bond CE (1980) A new subspecies of tui chub (Pisces: Cyprinidae) from Cow Head Lake, California. Copeia 1980:320–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonnell ML, Selander RK (1974) Elephant seals: genetic variation and near extinction. Science 184:908–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Y, Parmenter S, May B (2007) Introgression between Lahontan and endangered Owens tui chubs and apparent discovery of a new tui chub in the Owens Valley, California. Conserv Genet 8:221–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cope ED (1883) On the fishes of recent and Pliocene lakes of the western part of the Great Basin, and of the Idaho Pliocene lake. Proc Philadelphia Acad Nat Sci 35:134–166Google Scholar
  10. Echelle AA (1991) Conservation genetics and genetic diversity in freshwater fishes of western North America. In: Minckley WL, Deacon JE (eds) Battle against extinction: native fish management in the American West. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, pp 141–153Google Scholar
  11. El Mousadik A, Petit RJ (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco. Theor Appl Genet 92:832–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Excoffier L, Smouse P, Quattro J (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
  14. Franklin IR (1980) Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Soule ME, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology, an evolutionary–ecology perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 135–149Google Scholar
  15. Glaubitz JC (2004) CONVERT (version 1.2): a user-friendly program to reformat diploid genotypic data for commonly used population genetic software packages. Mol Ecol Notes 4:309–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT version 1.2: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
  17. Harris PM (2001) Systematic studies of the genus Siphateles (Ostariophysi: Cyprinidae) from western North America. Ph.D. Dissertation, Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. Hubbs CL, Miller RR (1948) Correlation between fish distribution and hydrographic history in the desert basins of western United States. In: The Great Basin, with emphasis on glacial and postglacial times. Bulletin of the University of Utah, 38:17–166Google Scholar
  19. Hubbs CL, Follett WI, Dempster LJ (1979) List of the fishes of California. Occas Pap Calif Acad Sci 133:1–51Google Scholar
  20. Irwin DW, Kocher TD, Wilson AC (1991) Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. J Mol Evol 32:128–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer SA, Edwards SV, Paabo S, Villablanca FX, Wilcon AC (1989) Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animal’s amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6196–6200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meredith E, May B (2002) Microsatellite loci in the Lahontan tui chub, Gila bicolor obesa, and their utilization in other chub species. Mol Ecol Notes 2:156–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Minckley WL, Douglas ME (1991) Discovery and extinction of western fishes: a blink in the eye of geologic time. In: Minckley WL, Deacon JE (eds) Battle against extinction: native fish management in the American West. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, pp 7–17Google Scholar
  24. Moyle PB (2002) Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  25. Moyle PB, Daniels RA (1982) Fishes of the Pit River system, McCloud River system, and Surprise Valley region. Univ Calif Publ Zool 115:1-82Google Scholar
  26. Moyle PB, Williams JE (1990) Biodiversity loss in the temperate zone: decline of the native fish fauna of California. Conserv Biol 4:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Negrini RM (2002) Pluvial lake sizes in the Northwestern Great Basin throughout the quaternary period. In: Hershler R, Madsen DB, Currey DR (eds) Great Basin aquatic systems history. Smithsonian contributions to the earth sciences no. 23, pp 11–52Google Scholar
  28. O’Brien SJ, Wildt DE, Goldman D, Merril CR, Bush M (1983) The cheetah is depauperate in genetic variation. Science 221:459–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reid SB (2007) Consideration of the common name for Gila (Siphateles) bicolor vaccaceps, a tui chub in the Cow Head basin of northeastern California. Calif Fish Game 93:49–51Google Scholar
  30. Roy SM, Geffen E, Smith D, Ostrander EA, Wayne RK (1994) Patterns of differentiation and hybridization in North American wolflike canids, revealed by analysis of microsatellite loci. Mol Biol Evol 11:553–570PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rutter C (1908) The fishes of the Sacramento-San Joaquin basin, with a study of their distribution and variation. Bull US Bur Fish 27:103-152Google Scholar
  32. Ruzzante DE, Taggart CT, Doyle RW, Cook D (2001) Stability in the historical pattern of genetic structure of Newfoundland cod (Gadus morhua) despite the catastrophic decline in population size from 1964 to 1994. Conserv Genet 2:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scoppettone GG, Rissler PH (2006) Distribution of tui chub in the Cow Head Basin, Nevada and California. Calif Fish Game 92:106–112Google Scholar
  34. Sigler WF, Sigler JW (1987) Fishes of the Great Basin: a natural history. University of Nevada Press, Reno, NevadaGoogle Scholar
  35. Snyder JO (1908) Relationships of the fish fauna of the lakes of southeastern Oregon. Bull US Bur Fish 27:69–102Google Scholar
  36. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1998) Proposal to list the Cow Head Lake tui chub as an endangered species under the endangered species. Act Fed Regist 63:15152–15158Google Scholar
  37. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2006) Withdrawal of the proposed rule to list the Cow Head Tui Chub endangered. Fed Regist 71:59700–59711Google Scholar
  38. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotype errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wayne RK, Morin PA (2004) Conservation genetics in the new molecular age. Front Ecol Environ 2:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams JE, Bond CE (1981) A new subspecies of tui chub (Osteichthyes, Cyprinidae) from Guano basin, Nevada and Oregon. Southwest Nat 26:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams JE, Johnson JE, Hendrickson DA, Contreras-Bladeras S, Williams JD, Navarro-Mendoza M, McAllister DE, Deacon JE (1989) Fishes of North America endangered threatened, or of special concern:1989. Fisheries 14:2–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Genomic Variation Laboratory, Department of Animal ScienceThe University of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA
  3. 3.Western FishesAshlandUSA

Personalised recommendations