Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Enneagram: An Enhancement to Family Therapy

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The enneagram (pronounced any-a-gram) is an ancient tool consisting of nine points depicting personality styles. It is a tool that can be integrated into different theoretical approaches. The enneagram is adaptable to the unique style of each client and can aid a counselor in conceptualizing a client or family. This manuscript includes the enneagram theory integrated within a family systems framework. To demonstrate the enneagram’s compatibility with family systems perspective, the enneagram is presented to facilitate therapy with a couple. A case study is provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the enneagram as a tool to promote awareness in the counseling relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi, I. S. (2017). Personality and marital relationships: Developing a satisfactory relationship with an imperfect partner. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(3), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9414-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almaas, A. H. (2002). Facet of unity: The enneagram of holy ideas. Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, K. B. (2008). Attachment styles and enneagram types: Development and testing of an integrated typology for use in marriage and family therapy. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, D. F. (2014). Integrative clinical social work practice: A contemporary perspective. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0351-1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. (2003). The enneagram field guide. Portland, OR: The Enneagram Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, M. (2005). Polyamory and gay men: A family systems approach. Journal of LGBT Family Studies, 1, 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1300/J461v01n01_07.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, A. (2010). The enneagram: A review of the empirical and transformational literature. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 49(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1939.2010.tb00084.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleibreu, J. (1982). Interviews with oscar ichazo. New York: Arica Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. (2017). Using the enneagram in psychotherapy. Retrieved from http://www.carolcampbellmft.com/using_the_enneagram_in_psychotherapy.html.

  • Carpenter, D. G. (2015). Resonating personality types for couples: An enneagram application for predicting marital satisfaction. (Dissertation, Walden University). Retrieved at http://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations.

  • Choucroun, P. (2012). An exploratory study of the enneagram typology in couple counseling: A qualitative analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas, San Antonio, TX.

  • Cohen, M. C. (2007). Applications of the enneagram to psychological assessment. Retrieved from http://www.enneagram.com/pdf_enneagraminpsychologicalassessment.pdf.

  • D’Aniello, C. (2013). Contemporary MFT models’ alignment with relational common factors. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35, 673–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9260-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aniello, C. (2015). Common factors as a road map to MFT model integration: Implications for training therapists. Contemporary Family Therapy, 37, 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1059-015-9338-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, D. (2016). The power of the enneagram as a therapy tool. Retrieved from https://www.psychotherapynetworker.org/blog/details/782/the-power-of-the-enneagram-as-a-therapy-tool.

  • Daniels, D., & Price, V. (2000). The essential enneagram: The definitive personality test and self-discovery guide. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, P., & Berg, I. K. (2008). Interviewing for solutions (3rd edn.). Belmont: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, D. (2002). The couple’s enneagram questionnaire (CEQ). The Family Journal, 10, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480702101019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, H., & Goldenberg, I. (2012). Family therapy an overview. Thousand Oaks: Cengage Learning, Brookscole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J., & DeClaire, J. (2002). The relationship cure. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurdjieff, G. I. (1973). Views from the real world. New York: E.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. C. (2011). Policy learning and policy failure in sustainable tourism governance: From first- and second-order to third-order change? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 649–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.555555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helson, R., & Roberts, B. W. (1994). Ego development and personality change in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholgy, 66(5), 911–920. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, J. M. (2000). Personality’s priorities in couples counseling. In R. Watts & J. Carlson (Eds.), Techniques in marriage and family counseling (pp. 25–32). Alexandria: American Counseling Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichazo, O. (1972). The arica psycho-catalyzers/holy ideas/mind catalyzers. Dobbs Ferry: Arica Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, M. E., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchur, M. (2005). The strategic developmental model for EMDR. In R. Shapiro (Ed.), EMDR solutions (pp. 8–56). New York: W. W. Norton and Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitri, S. (2005). The enneagram of passions and virtues. New York: Penguin Books, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandara, J. (2003). The typological approach in child and family psychology: A review of theory, methods, and research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023734627624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matise, M. (2007). The enneagram: An innovative approach. Journal of Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory, and Research, 35(1).

  • Miller, S., Hubble, M., & Duncan, B. (1996). Handbook of solution-focused brief therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1993). Family healing: Strategies for hope and understanding. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo, C. (1990). Enneatype structures: Self-analysis for the seeker. Prescott: Hohm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo, C. (1994). Character and neurosis: An integrative view. Nevada City: Gateways/ IDHHB, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (2001). The essentials of family therapy. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoll, M. (1985). Psychological commentaries on the teaching of gurdjieff and Ouspensky (Vol. 1). Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouspensky, P. D. (1957). The fourth way: A record of talks and answers to questions based on the teaching of g.i. gurdjieff. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, H. (1988). The enneagram: Understanding yourself and the others in your life. San Francisco: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, H. (1991). The enneagram: Understanding youself and the others in your life. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, H., & Brown, P. B. (1997). The enneagram advantage: Using the nine personality types at work. New York: Harmony Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pare, D. (1995). Of families and other cultures: The shifting paradigm of family therapy. Family Process, 34, 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1995.00001.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richo, D. (1999). Shadow dance: Liberating the power and creativity of your dark side. Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riso, D. R. (1990). Understanding the enneagram: The practical guide to personality types. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riso, D. R., & Hudson, R. (1999). The wisdom of the enneagram: The complete guide to psychological and spiritual growth for the nine personality types. New York, NY: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riso, D. R., & Hudson, R. (2000). Understanding the enneagram. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riso, D. R., & Hudson, R. (2010). The riso-hudson enneagram type indicator 5, (version 2). New York: The Enneagram Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riso, D. R., & Hudson, R. (1996). Personality types: Using the enneagram for self-discovery. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, T. (1995). What really matters: Searching for wisdom in America. New York, NY: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment theory and research: Resurrection of the psychodynamic approach to personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., & Makkar, A. (2014). Self and partner personality in relationship satisfaction. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 5(12), 1483–1486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, A. (2012). “But is it real?” A review of research on the enneagram. Enneagram Journal, 5, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapp, K., & Engebretson, K. (2010). Using the enneagram for client insight and transformation: A type eight illustration. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 5(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401381003627277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totton, N., & Jacobs, M. (2001). Character and personality types. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. P. (1988). Two windows on the self: The enneagram and the Myers-Briggs. Kansas City: National Catholic Reporter Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J.P., and Walker, R.E. (1983). Reliability and validity study of a sufi personality typology: The enneagram. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 712–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldberg, M. (1973). Gurdjieff: An approach to his ideas. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner-Wilson and Winter. (2010). What factors influence therapy drop out? Contemporary Family Therapy, 32, 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1059-010-9131-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (2004). Folk psychology and narrative practice. In L. E. Angus & J. McLeod (Eds.), The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy: Practice, theory, and research (pp. 15–52). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuercher, S. (2008). Using the enneagram in prayer: A contemplative guide. Notre Dame, Ind: Ave Maria Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Troy University, 81 Beal Pkwy, SE, Fort Walton Beach, FL, 32548, USA

    Miles Matise

Authors
  1. Miles Matise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miles Matise.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

See Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Derived from Palmer (1988) and Riso and Hudson (1996) models

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matise, M. The Enneagram: An Enhancement to Family Therapy. Contemp Fam Ther 41, 68–78 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-018-9471-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-018-9471-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation