Skip to main content
Log in

Therapist Use-of-Self Orientations Questionnaire: A Reliability and Validity Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes the development of the Therapist Use-of-Self Orientation Questionnaire (TUSO-Q), an instrument designed to measure therapists’ use-of-self orientations while working with clients. A total of 373 therapists participated in this study. Exploratory factor analysis in the structural equation modeling context revealed three different therapist use-of-self orientations: Transpersonal, Contextual, and Instrumental. The final model provided an excellent fit to the data. TUSO-Q scores exhibited satisfactory evidence of internal consistency reliability and construct validity. Implications for the scale’s use in clinical research and training are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ESEM was recently implemented in MPlus 5.1 statistical program (Muthén and Muthén 2007).

  2. Each of the three one-factor models (corresponding to the three TUSO-Q factors) provided an adequate fit to the data. Contextual factor model: χ 2(5) = 8.13, p < .15, RMSEA = .041, SRMR = .021, CFI = .992, TLI = .983. Transpersonal factor model: χ 2(9) = 19.76, p < .02, RMSEA = .057, SRMR = .026, CFI = .983, TLI = .972. Instrumental factor model: χ 2(5) = 7.20, p < .98, RMSEA = .034, SRMR = .020, CFI = .994, TLI = .987.

References

  • Anderson, S. A., & Holmes, S. (2007). Personal mythologies: A framework for dealing with therapeutic and supervisory impasses. In S. Krippner, M. Bova, & L. Gray (Eds.), Healing stories: The use of narrative in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 126–139). San Juan: Puente Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aponte, H. J. (1994). How personal can training get? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 20, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aponte, H. J., Powell, F. D., Brooks, S., Watson, M. F., Litzke, C., Lawless, J., et al. (2009). Training the person of the therapist in an academic setting. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35, 381–394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aponte, H. J., & Winter, J. E. (2000). The person and practice of the therapist: Treatment and training. In M. Baldwin (Ed.), The use of self in therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(3), 397–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachelor, A., & Horvath, A. O. (1999). The therapeutic relationship. In M. A. Hubble, B. L. Duncan, & S. D. Miller (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 133–178). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, M. (1987). Interview with Carl Rogers on the use of self in therapy. Journal of Psychotherapy and the Family, 3(1), 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett-Levy, J. (2006). Therapist skills: A cognitive model of their acquisition and refinement. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34, 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beutler, L. E., Malik, M. L., Alimohamed, S., Harwood, T. M., Talebi, H., et al. (2004). Therapist variables. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 227–306). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blow, A. J., Sprenkle, D. H., & Davis, S. D. (2007). Is who delivers the treatment more important than the treatment itself? The role of the therapist in common factors. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 298–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, S. (1984). Family of origin as a training resource for family therapists. The Clinical Supervisor, 2(2), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Kreswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 211–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D. (2004). Theoretical evaluation self-test (TEST): A preliminary validation study. Social Work Research, 28, 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, J. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, A. S., & Adams, R. S. (2000). On Satir’s use of self. Journal of Couples Therapy, 9(3/4), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCarlo, L. T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2(3), 292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, N. (1996). Breakdown and breakthrough. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1910). The future prospects of psycho-analytic therapy (Standard ed., Vol. 11, pp. 139–152). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, M., Košutić, I., McDowell, T., & Anderson, S. (2009). A critical supervision framework: Critical consciousness within supervisory systems of difference. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 21, 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehart, D. R., & McCollum, E. E. (2007). Engaging suffering: Towards a mindful re-visioning of family therapy practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 214–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grunebaum, H. (2006). On wisdom. Family Process, 45, 117–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haarhoff, B. A. (2007). The importance of identifying and understanding therapist schema in cognitive therapy training and supervision. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35, 126–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, R. (1990). From handicap to handy capable: Training systemic therapists in use of self. Family Process, 29, 375–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J. (1976). Problem solving therapy. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, P. J., & Vaughn, M. (2009). Differentiation of self and spirituality: Empirical explorations. Counseling and Values, 53, 82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottler, J. A. (2003). On being a therapist (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J. (2004). Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M. M., Stoltenberg, C. D., McNeill, B. W., & Eichenfield, G. A. (1997). Self-efficacy and counselor development: Testing the integrated developmental model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 37, 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, R. (2009). Resistance: An emotional schema (EST) therapy approach. In S. Gregoris (Ed.), Cognitive behavior therapy: A guide for the practicing clinician (Vol. 2, pp. 187–204). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looney, S. W. (1995). How to use tests for univariate normality to assess multivariate normality. The American Statistician, 49(1), 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahrer, A. R. (1996). The complete guide to experiential psychotherapy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallinckrodt, B. (1993). Session impact, working alliance, and treatment outcome in brief counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., et al. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(3), 439–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascaro, N., Rosen, D. H., & Morey, L. C. (2004). The development, construct validity, and clinical utility of the spiritual meaning scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 845–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeorge, C. R., Carlson, T. S., Erickson, M. J., & Guttormson, H. E. (2007). Creating and evaluating a feminist-informed social justice couple and family therapy training model. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 18(3), 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGoldrick, M. (1982). Through the looking glass: Supervision of a trainee’s trigger family. In R. Whiffen & J. Byng-Hall (Eds.), Family therapy supervision: Recent developments in practice. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, D., Mulvey, T., & Kohout, J. (2010). 2008 APA survey of psychology health service providers. Retrieved March 3, 2011, from http://research.apa.org/workforce/publications/08-hsp/report.pdf.

  • Mutchler, M., & Anderson, S. A. (2010). Therapist personal agency: A model for examining the training context. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36(4), 511–525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northey, W. F. (2002). Characteristics and clinical practices of marriage and family therapists: A national survey. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 487–494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponterotto, J. G., Gretchen, D., Utsey, S. O., Rieger, B. P., & Austin, R. (2002). A revision of the multicultural counseling awareness scale. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 30, 153–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T. (2009). Evaluation of scale reliability for unidimensional measures using latent variable modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42(3), 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivett, M., & Street, E. (2001). Connections and themes of spirituality in family therapy. Family Process, 40, 459–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rober, P. (1999). The therapist’s inner conversation in family therapy practice: Some ideas about the self of the therapist, therapeutic impasse, and the process of reflection. Family Process, 38(2), 209–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roote, K. H., Jankowski, P. J., & Sandage, S. J. (2009). Bowen Family Systems and spirituality: Exploring the relationship between triangulation and religious questing. Contemporary Family Therapy, 32(2), 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, J., & Jacobs, M. (2002). The therapist’s use of self. Maidenhead, Great Britain: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir, V. (1983). Conjoint family therapy. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir, V. (1987). The therapist story. Journal of Psychotherapy and the Family, 3(1), 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, D. (1994). The wounded healer: Countertransference from a Jungian perspective. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, G. M. (2006). The heart of the matter: A proposal for placing the self of the therapist at the center of family therapy research and training. Family Process, 45, 331–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, G. M. (2007). The heart of the matter: Continuing the conversation. Journal of Family Therapy, 29, 100–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, D. H., & Blow, A. J. (2007). The role of the therapist as the bridge between common factors and therapeutic change: More complex than congruency with a worldview. Journal of Family Therapy, 29, 109–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timm, T. M., & Blow, A. J. (1999). Self-of-the-therapist work: A balance between removing restraints and identifying resources. Contemporary Family Therapy, 21, 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titelman, P. (1987). The therapist’s own family: Toward the differentiation of self. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, C. A., & Bumberry, W. M. (1988). Dancing with the family: A symbolic-experiential approach. New York: Brunner/Mazel, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wosket, V. (1999). The therapeutic use of self. New York: Brunner/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, A. (1987). Multivariate exploratory data analysis: A perspective on exploratory factor analysis. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (2003). Young schema questionnaire. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 165–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen A. Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, S.A., Sanderson, J. & Košutić, I. Therapist Use-of-Self Orientations Questionnaire: A Reliability and Validity Study. Contemp Fam Ther 33, 364–383 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-011-9146-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-011-9146-6

Keywords

Navigation