Climatic Change

, Volume 154, Issue 3–4, pp 435–451 | Cite as

Seasonal effects of climate change on intra-day electricity demand patterns

  • Francisco Ralston FonsecaEmail author
  • Paulina Jaramillo
  • Mario Bergés
  • Edson Severnini


Climate change threatens all parts of the US electric power system, from electricity generation to distribution. An important dimension of this issue is the impact on electricity demand. While many studies have looked at these impacts, few have tried to represent this effect at higher temporal resolutions (such as daily or sub-daily) or to analyze its seasonal aspects. Our study expands on previous work to improve our understanding of how climate change can affect patterns of hourly electricity demand, the differences in these effects over different seasons, and how this in turn could affect the operations of the power system. For this analysis, we combine a linear regression model, a simplified economic dispatch model, and projections from twenty different climate models to analyze how climate change may affect seasonal demand patterns and, consequently, power plants dispatch. We use this method to analyze a case study of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The results suggest that climate change can result in an average increase in annual electricity consumption in the TVA region of 6% by the end of the century and an increase in the frequency of peak demand values (the maximum quantity of electricity demanded during an hour). However, this increase is not uniformly distributed throughout the year. During summer, total electricity consumption can increase on average by 20% while during winter, it may decrease on average by 6% by the end of the century. Such changes in demand could result in changes in the typical dispatch patterns of TVA’s power plants. Estimated summer time capacity factors would increase (8 to 37% for natural gas and 71 to 84% for coal) and winter time capacity factor decrease (3% to virtually zero for natural gas and 67 to 60% for coal). Such results could affect the decision-making process of planning agents in the power sector.



The authors would like to thank Prof. Alex Davis in the Engineering and Public Policy Department at Carnegie Mellon University for his suggestions on the model formulation. We also thank Bart Nijssen and Yifan Cheng at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in the University of Washington for sharing their climate model data with us and their help processing the data using MTCLIM. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) as part of the Resilient Interdependent Infrastructure Processes and Systems (RIPS) program via Grant Number EFRI-1441131.

Compliance with ethical standards


The results and conclusions of this paper are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not represent the views of the funding sources.

Supplementary material

10584_2019_2413_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2.8 mb)
(PDF 2.76 MB)


  1. Abatzoglou JT (2013) Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling. Int J Climatol 33(1):121–131Google Scholar
  2. Abatzoglou JT, Brown TJ (2012) A comparison of statistical downscaling methods suited for wildfire applications. Int J Climatol 32(5):772–780Google Scholar
  3. Allen MR, Fernandez SJ, Fu JS, Olama MM (2016) Impacts of climate change on sub-regional electricity demand and distribution in the southern United States. Nature Energy 1:16,103Google Scholar
  4. Amato AD, Ruth M, Kirshen P, Horwitz J (2005) Regional energy demand responses to climate change: methodology and application to the commonwealth of massachusetts. Clim Chang 71(1-2):175–201Google Scholar
  5. Aroonruengsawat A, Auffhammer M (2011) Impacts of climate change on residential electricity consumption: evidence from billing data. The Economics of climate change: Adaptations Past and PresentGoogle Scholar
  6. Auffhammer M, Hsiang SM, Schlenker W, Sobel A (2013) Using weather data and climate model output in economic analyses of climate change. Rev Environ Econ Policy 7(2):181–198Google Scholar
  7. Auffhammer M, Baylis P, Hausman CH (2017) Climate change is projected to have severe impacts on the frequency and intensity of peak electricity demand across the United States. Proc the National Academy Sci 114(8):1886–1891Google Scholar
  8. Belzer DB, Scott MJ, Sands RD (2007) Climate change impacts on U.S. Commercial building energy consumption: an analysis using sample survey data. Energy Sources 18(2):177–201Google Scholar
  9. Blumsack S, Samaras C, Hines P (2008) Long-term electric system investments to support plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. In: Energy Society General Meeting, IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  10. Bohn TJ, Livneh B, Oyler JW, Running SW, Nijssen B, Lettenmaier DP (2013) Global evaluation of MTCLIM and related algorithms for forcing of ecological and hydrological models. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 176:38–49Google Scholar
  11. Chaturvedi V, Eom J, Clarke LE, Shukla PR (2014) Long term building energy demand for India: Disaggregating end use energy services in an integrated assessment modeling framework. Energy Policy 64:226–242Google Scholar
  12. Clarke L, Eom J, Marten EH, Horowitz R, Kyle P, Link R, Mignone BK, Mundra A, Zhou Y (2018) Effects of long-term climate change on global building energy expenditures. Energy Economics 72:667–677Google Scholar
  13. Craig MT, Jaramillo P, Hodge BM (2018) Carbon dioxide emissions effects of grid-scale electricity storage in a decarbonizing power system. Environ Res Lett 13 (1):014,004Google Scholar
  14. Daly C, Halbleib M, Smith JI, Gibson WP, Doggett MK, Taylor GH, Curtis J, Pasteris PP (2008) Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int J Climatol 28(15):2031–2064Google Scholar
  15. Dell M, Jones BF, Olken BA (2014) What do we learn from the weather? The new climate-economy literature ‡. J Econ Lit 52(3):740–798Google Scholar
  16. Dirks JA, Gorrissen WJ, Hathaway JH, Skorski DC, Scott MJ, Pulsipher TC, Huang M, Liu Y, Rice JS (2015) Impacts of climate change on energy consumption and peak demand in buildings: a detailed regional approach. Energy 79:20–32Google Scholar
  17. DOE (2016) Climate change and the electricity sector: guide for climate change resilience planning. Tech. rep., U.S. Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
  18. Eom J, Clarke L, Kim SH, Kyle P, Patel P (2012) China’s building energy demand: long-term implications from a detailed assessment. Energy 46(1):405–419Google Scholar
  19. FERC (2016) Form No. 714 - Annual Electric Balancing Authority Area and Planning Area ReportGoogle Scholar
  20. Franco G, Sanstad AH (2008) Climate change and electricity demand in California. Clim Chang 87(1):139–151Google Scholar
  21. Hadley SW, Tsvetkova AA (2009) Potential impacts of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on regional power generation. Electr J 22(10):56–68Google Scholar
  22. Hadley SW, Erickson DJ III, Hernandez JL, Broniak CT, Blasing TJ (2006) Responses of energy use to climate change: a climate modeling study. Geophys Res Lett 33(17):270Google Scholar
  23. Hittinger ES, Azevedo IML (2015) Bulk energy storage increases United States electricity system emissions. Environ Sci Technol 49(5):3203–3210Google Scholar
  24. Holladay JS, Davis RJ (2016) Energy intensity and electricity consumption in tennessee. Tech. rep., Howard H. Baker Jr. Center for Public PolicyGoogle Scholar
  25. Hor CL, Watson SJ, Majithia S (2005) Analyzing the impact of weather variables on monthly electricity demand. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(4):2078–2085Google Scholar
  26. Isaac M, van Vuuren DP (2009) Modeling global residential sector energy demand for heating and air conditioning in the context of climate change. Energy Policy 37 (2):507–521Google Scholar
  27. Labriet M, Joshi SR, Vielle M, Holden PB, Edwards NR, Kanudia A, Loulou R, Babonneau F (2013) Worldwide impacts of climate change on energy for heating and cooling. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20(7):1111–1136Google Scholar
  28. Lueken R, Apt J, Sowell F (2016) Robust resource adequacy planning in the face of coal retirements. Energy Policy 88:371–388Google Scholar
  29. Mathieu JL, Price PN, Kiliccote S, Piette MA (2011) Quantifying changes in building electricity use, with application to demand response. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2(3):507–518Google Scholar
  30. McFarland J, Zhou Y, Clarke L, Sullivan P, Colman J, Jaglom WS, Colley M, Patel P, Eom J, Kim SH, Kyle GP, Schultz P, Venkatesh B, Haydel J, Mack C, Creason J (2015) Impacts of rising air temperatures and emissions mitigation on electricity demand and supply in the United States: a multi-model comparison. Clim Chang 131(1):111–125Google Scholar
  31. Melillo JM, Richmond TTC, Yohe GW (eds.) (2014) Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program.,
  32. Mirasgedis S, Sarafidis Y, Georgopoulou E, Kotroni V, Lagouvardos K, Lalas DP (2007) Modeling framework for estimating impacts of climate change on electricity demand at regional level: case of Greece. Energy Convers Manag 48 (5):1737–1750Google Scholar
  33. Mitchell KE, Lohmann D, Houser PR, Wood EF, Schaake JC, Robock A, Cosgrove BA, Sheffield J, Duan Q, Luo L, Higgins RW, Pinker RT, Tarpley JD, Lettenmaier DP, Marshall CH, Entin JK, Pan M, Shi W, Koren V, Meng J, Ramsay BH, Bailey AA (2004) The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J Geophys Res: Atmospheres 109(D7):7449Google Scholar
  34. Parkpoom SJ, Harrison GP (2008) Analyzing the impact of climate change on future electricity demand in thailand. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(3):1441–1448Google Scholar
  35. PRISM Climate Group (2004) PRISM Climate DataGoogle Scholar
  36. Roberts D (2018) After rising for 100 years, electricity demand is flat. Utilities are freaking out. VoxGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruth M, Lin AC (2006) Regional energy demand and adaptations to climate change: methodology and application to the state of Maryland, USA. Energy Policy 34 (17):2820–2833Google Scholar
  38. Sailor DJ (1997) Sensitivity of electricity and natural gas consumption to climate in the U.S.A.—Methodology and results for eight states. Energy 22(10):987–998Google Scholar
  39. Sailor DJ (2003) Air conditioning market saturation and long-term response of residential cooling energy demand to climate change. Energy 28(9):941–951Google Scholar
  40. Scott MJ, Wrench LE, Hadley DL (2007) Effects of climate change on commercial building energy demand. Energy Sources 16(3):317–332Google Scholar
  41. Siler-Evans K, Azevedo IL, Morgan MG (2012) Marginal emissions factors for the U.S. electricity system. Environ Sci Technol 46(9):4742–4748Google Scholar
  42. Siler-Evans K, Azevedo IL, Morgan MG, Apt J (2013) Regional variations in the health, environmental, and climate benefits of wind and solar generation. Proc National Academy Sci 110(29):11,768–11,773Google Scholar
  43. Stern N (2009) Economics, ethics and climate change. In: The economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–45Google Scholar
  44. Tamayao MAM, Michalek JJ, Hendrickson C, Azevedo IML (2015) Regional variability and uncertainty of electric vehicle life cycle CO2 Emissions across the united states. Environ Sci Technol 49(14):8844–8855Google Scholar
  45. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Taylor KE, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. dxdoiorg 93(4):485–498Google Scholar
  46. Thatcher MJ (2007) Modelling changes to electricity demand load duration curves as a consequence of predicted climate change for Australia. Energy 32(9):1647–1659Google Scholar
  47. US Energy Information Agency (2016a) Form EIA-923 detailed data with previous form data (EIA-906/920)Google Scholar
  48. US Energy Information Agency (2016b) Winter residential electricity consumption expected to increase from last winter. Tech. rep.Google Scholar
  49. US Environmental Protection Agency (2015) Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID)Google Scholar
  50. US IAWG (2010) Technical support document: social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under executive order 12866. Tech. rep., Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of CarbonGoogle Scholar
  51. Venkatesh A, Jaramillo P, Griffin WM, Matthews HS (2012) Implications of Near-Term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions. Environ Sci Technol 46(18):9838–9845Google Scholar
  52. Yu S, Eom J, Zhou Y, Evans M, Clarke L (2014) Scenarios of building energy demand for China with a detailed regional representation. Energy 67:284–297Google Scholar
  53. Zhou Y, Eom J, Clarke L (2013) The effect of global climate change, population distribution, and climate mitigation on building energy use in the U.S. and China. Clim Chang 119(3-4):979–992Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering and Public PolicyCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Civil and Environmental EngineeringCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Heinz CollegeCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations