A Study of Codes of Ethics for Mexican Microfinance Institutions
- 580 Downloads
Most scholarly interest in codes of ethics or conduct has focused on traditional companies. Little is known about the codes of social enterprises or hybrid organizations such as microfinance institutions (MFIs). Our paper provides a comparative case study of the codes of a Mexican microfinance network and seven MFIs. Using the corporate integrity model, we analyze the content of MFIs’ codes compared to those of traditional organizations. We then examine to what extent some specific features of MFIs such as their mission, target group, and applied credit methodologies, are factors that determine the content of their code. We find that MFIs’ codes, like those of traditional companies, include traditional stakeholder principles. Nevertheless, they put greater emphasis on ‘socially-oriented’ principles or on terms such as ‘people’ and ‘common good’. MFIs’ codes differ with respect to the items they include and exclude and the size of the covered sections. We also find that these codes attempt to address prevailing concerns in microfinance but rarely tackle two critical debates, namely levels of interest rates and of profitability. We finally argue that it is difficult to move toward a global code, owing to regional disparities and the variety of organizational models and missions.
KeywordsCodes of ethics Codes of conduct Microfinance Social enterprise Hybrid organization Mexico Compartamos
We thank Boudewijn de Bruin, Carine Roenen Laroche, Compartamos Banco, Elisabeth Johnson, José Roberto Flores Athie, Laura Galindo, Pilar Ramirez, and Roxane Julien for the interviews. We also thank Olga Biosca for their very useful comments on a draft version of the paper. This research has been carried out by one of the authors in the framework of an “Interuniversity Attraction Pole” on social enterprise, funded by the Belgian Science Policy (SOCENT).
- Allet, M., & Hudon, M. (2013). Green microfinance: Characteristics of microfinance institutions involved in environmental management. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1942-5.
- Alter, K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. Seattle: Virtue Ventures LLC. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from http://www.4lenses.org/setypology.
- Armendáriz, B., & Morduch, J. (2005). The economics of Microfinance (1st ed.). MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Armendáriz, B., & Morduch, J. (2010). The economics of microfinance (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Chiu, T.-K. (2014). Putting responsible finance to work for citi microfinance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 219–234. Google Scholar
- Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- de Bruin, B., & Dolfsma, W. (2013) Oaths and codes in economics and business—introducing the special issue. Review of Social Economy, 71(2), 135–139.Google Scholar
- de Sousa-Shields, M. (2008). Microfinance and the double bottom line in the post-social enterprise era. microReport #112. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar
- Department of Trade and Industry. (2002). Social enterprise: A strategy for success. London: Department of Trade and Industry. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from http://www.seeewiki.co.uk/~wiki/images/5/5a/SE_Strategy_for_success.pdf.
- Drake, D., & Rhyne, E. (2002). The commercialization of microfinance: Balancing business and development. Bloomfield, CT, USA: Kumarian.Google Scholar
- Economist Intelligence Unit. (2012). Global microscope on the microfinance business environment 2012. London: The Economist.Google Scholar
- Fernando, N. (2006). Understanding and dealing with high interest rates on microcredit. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
- Ghate, P. (2007). Consumer protection in indian microfinance: Lessons from Andhra Pradesh and the microfinance bill. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(13), 1176–1184.Google Scholar
- Giné, X., Jakiela, P., Karlan, D., & Morduch, J. (2010). Microfinance games. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3), 60–95.Google Scholar
- Hudon, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). The ethical crisis in microfinance: Issues and findings. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(4), 561–589.Google Scholar
- IFC. (2012). IFC invests $1.9 million in financiamiento progresemos to expand microlending in Mexico. Retrieved April, 11, 2013 from http://www.ifc.org/ifcext%5Cpressroom%5CIFCPressRoom.nsf%5C0%5C342A35915A84E5E485257A8A00641A3F.
- Krell, M. (2013). MIX microfinance world: State of social performance in Mexico. Washington, DC: MIX Market.Google Scholar
- Lewis, J. C. (2008). Microloan sharks. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(3), 54–59.Google Scholar
- Lützenkirchen, C., & Weistroffer, C. (2012). Microfinance in evolution: An industry between crisis and advancement. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: DB Research.Google Scholar
- McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, I. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538.Google Scholar
- MIX Market. (2012). Microfinance in Mexico: Country profile. Retrieved April 4, 2013, from http://www.mixmarket.org/mfi/country/Mexico.
- MIX Market. (2013). MFI report Compartamos Banco. Retrieved April 1, 2013 from http://www.mixmarket.org/mfi/compartamos-banco/report.
- Muhammad, A. (2009). Grameen and microcredit: A tale of corporate success. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(35), 35–42.Google Scholar
- Nair, T. S. (2011). Microfinance: Lessons from a crisis. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(6), 23–26.Google Scholar
- Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2001). Codes of corporate conduct: Expanded review of their contents, working papers on international investment, 2001/6. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
- Perdomo, M. (2008). Consumer protection: A client perspective, GFEP research note, Davis, CA, USA: Freedom from Hunger.Google Scholar
- Reed, L. R. (2013). Vulnerability: The state of the microcredit summit campaign report 2013. Washington, DC: Microcredit Summit Campaign.Google Scholar
- Reille, X. (2010). SKS IPO success and excess. Retrieved April 1, 2013, from http://www.cgap.org/blog/sks-ipo-success-and-excess.
- Roodman, D. (2012). Due diligence: An impertinent inquiry into microfinance. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, R. (2007). CGAP reflections on compartamos initial public offering: A case study on microfinance interest rates and profits. CGAP focus note 42. Washington, DC: CGAP.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, R., Gonzalez, A., & Narain, S. (2009). The new moneylenders: Are the poor being exploited by high microcredit interest rates? CGAP occasional paper 15. Washington, DC: CGAP.Google Scholar
- Symbiotics. (2012). Symbiotics 2012 MIV survey report: Market data and peer group analysis. Geneva: Symbiotics.Google Scholar
- The Smart Campaign. (2013). About the campaign: Frequently asked questions. Retrieved April 5, 2013, from http://www.smartcampaign.org/about-the-campaign/frequently-asked-questions .
- World Bank. (2013). Mexico overview. Retrieved April 5, 2013, from http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/mexico/overview.