Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 133, Issue 2, pp 223–234 | Cite as

Entrepreneurial Orientation and Corruption

  • Tobias Karmann
  • René Mauer
  • Tessa C. Flatten
  • Malte Brettel
Article

Abstract

Organizational corruption is a wide-spread negative aspect of economic activity, and a seemingly never-ending series of corruption scandals has been made public around the globe. Although research is performed in a broad variety of disciplines, ranging from psychology to management to law, a fully satisfactory explanation for the causes of organizational corruption has not been found. By looking at organizational factors as potential triggers for corruptive behavior, this study draws upon the concept of entrepreneurial orientation (EO). Diverse studies have shown that EO, as an antecedent to company performance, has a positive effect. Recent EO literature, however, indicates that EO has not only positive but also negative consequences. In this line of reasoning, this study builds upon principal agent theory and makes a first step in exploring the impact of EO on a negative aspect of business behavior, namely organizational corruption. We gathered survey data and publicly available data from 411 firms, inquiring for both acts of corruption from within the top management team over the last 3 years and the level of entrepreneurial orientation within the organization. Results show diverging effects along the individual dimensions of EO; they point to risk orientation as the dark side of EO, as it significantly increases the likelihood of corrupt behavior in companies. In contrast, innovation orientation, to a certain extent, counterbalances by reducing the likelihood of corrupt behavior.

Keywords

Antecedents to corruption Corruption Empirical research Entrepreneurial orientation Entrepreneurship 

References

  1. Aguilera, R., & Vadera, A. (2008). The dark side of authority: Antecedents, mechanisms, and outcomes of organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(4), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anokhin, S., & Schulze, W. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B., Gioia, D., Robinson, S., & Treviño, L. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.Google Scholar
  6. Baucus, M. (1994). Pressure, opportunity and predisposition: A multivariate model of corporate illegality. Journal of Management, 20(4), 699–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baucus, M. S., & Baucus, D. A. (1997). Paying the piper: An empirical examination of longer-term financial consequences of illegal corporate behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baucus, M., & Near, J. (1991). Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baucus, M. S., Norton, W. I., Baucus, D. A., & Human, S. E. (2008). Fostering creativity and innovation without encouraging unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumol, W. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beamish, T. (2000). Accumulating trouble: Complex organization, a culture of silence, and a secret spill. Social Problems, 47(4), 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernardi, R., Witek, M., & Melton, M. (2009). A four-country study of the associations between bribery and unethical actions. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhide, A. (1996). The questions every entrepreneur must answer. Harvard Business Review, 74, 120–130.Google Scholar
  14. Bishara, N., & Schipani, C. (2009). Strengthening the ties that bind: Preventing corruption in the executive suite. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 765–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cecchini, M., Aytug, H., Koehler, G., & Pathak, P. (2010). Detecting management fraud in public companies. Management Science, 56(7), 1146–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Churchill, G. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins, J., Uhlenbruck, K., & Rodriguez, P. (2008). Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Covin, J., & Lumpkin, G. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 855–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Covin, J., & Slevin, D. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Daboub, A., Rasheed, A., Priem, R., & Gray, D. (1995). Top management team characteristics and corporate illegal activity. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 138–170.Google Scholar
  23. Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Jong, G., Tu, P., & van Ees, H. (2012). Which entrepreneurs bribe and what do they get from it? Exploratory evidence from Vietnam. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 323–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dollinger, M. J. (1999). Entrepreneurship: Strategies and resources. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Duncan, J. B., Flesher, D. L., & Stocks, M. H. (1999). Internal control systems in US churches: An examination of church size and denomination on systems of internal control. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12(2), 142–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1985). Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31(2), 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
  29. Engelen, A., Flatten, T. C., Thalmann, J., & Brettel, M. (2013). The effect of organizational culture on entrepreneurial orientation: A comparison between Germany and Thailand. Journal of Small Business Management. doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12052.
  30. Fadahunsi, A., & Rosa, P. (2002). Entrepreneurship and illegality: Insights from the Nigerian cross-border trade. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(17), 397–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29(2), 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. George, B., & Marino, L. (2011). The epistemology of entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual formation, modeling, and operationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 989–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goll, I., & Rasheed, A. (2005). The relationship between top management demographic characteristics, rational decision making, environmental munificence, and firm performance. Organization Studies, 26(7), 999–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Greve, H., Palmer, D., & Pozner, J. (2010). Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. The Academy of Management, 4(1), 53–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hair, J. E., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  36. Hansen, J., McDonald, J., Messier, W., & Bell, T. (1996). A generalized qualitative-response model and the analysis of management fraud. Management Science, 42(7), 1022–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harris, J., Sapienza, H., & Bowie, N. (2009). Ethics and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill, C., Kelley, P., Agle, B., Hitt, M., & Hoskisson, R. (1992). An empirical examination of the causes of corporate wrongdoing in the United States. Human Relations, 45(10), 1055–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaptein, M. (2010). Toward effective codes: Testing the relationship with unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lange, D. (2008). A multidimensional conceptualization of organizational corruption control. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 710–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Longenecker, J., McKinney, J., & Moore, C. (1988). Egoism and independence: Entrepreneurial ethics. Organizational Dynamics, 16(3), 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.Google Scholar
  43. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luo, Y. (2005). An organizational perspective of corruption. Management and Organisation Review, 1(1), 119–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mathews, J., Goodpaster, K., & Nash, L. (1998). Policies and persons: A casebook in business ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  46. McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. McKendall, M. A., & Wagner, J. A. (1997). Motive, opportunity, choice, and corporate illegality. Organization Science, 8(6), 624–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw- Hill.Google Scholar
  49. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1978). Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 24(9), 921–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mishina, Y., Dykes, B., Block, E., & Pollock, T. (2010). Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 701–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
  53. Newman, D. (2003). Longitudinal modeling with randomly and systematically missing data: A simulation of ad hoc, maximum likelihood, and multiple imputation techniques. Organizational Research Methods, 6(3), 328–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Noonan, J. (1984). Bribes. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. Pinto, J., Leana, C., & Pil, F. (2008). Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. The Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 685–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rabl, T. (2011). The impact of situational influences on corruption in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rae, K., & Subramaniam, N. (2008). Quality of internal control procedures: Antecedents and moderating effect on organisational justice and employee fraud. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(2), 104–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1975). The economics of corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 4(2), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosenblatt, V. (2012). Hierarchies, power inequalities, and organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schnatterly, K. (2003). Increasing firm value through detection and prevention of white-collar crime. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 587–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stetz, P., Howell, R., Stewart, A., Blair, J., & Fottler, M. (2000). Multidimensionality of entrepreneurial firm-level processes: Do the dimensions covary? In R. D. Reynolds, E. Autio, C. G. Brush, W. D. Bygrave, S. Manigart, H. J. Sapienza, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 459–469). Wellesley: Babson College.Google Scholar
  64. Tirole, J. (1996). A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality). Review of Economic Studies, 63(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tonoyan, V., Strohmeyer, R., Habib, M., & Perlitz, M. (2010). Corruption and entrepreneurship: How formal and informal institutions shape small firm behavior in transition and mature market economies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 803–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Transparency International. (2012). Retrieved April 26, 2013 from http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2012/results/.
  67. Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35(8), 942–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wiklund, J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
  69. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2011). Where to from here? EO as experimentation, failure, and distribution of outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 925–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Winslow, E., & Solomon, G. (1993). Entrepreneurs: Architects of innovation, paradigm pioneers and change. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 27(2), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yadav, M., Prabhu, J., & Chandy, R. (2007). Managing the future: CEO attention and innovation outcomes. Journal of Marketing, 71, 84–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zahra, S., & Covin, J. (1995). Contextual influence on the corporate entrepreneurship—Performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Google Scholar
  75. Zahra, S., Priem, R., & Rasheed, A. (2005). The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. Journal of Management, 31(6), 803–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tobias Karmann
    • 1
  • René Mauer
    • 1
  • Tessa C. Flatten
    • 1
  • Malte Brettel
    • 1
  1. 1.RWTH AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations