Entrepreneurial Orientation and Corruption
- 1.1k Downloads
Organizational corruption is a wide-spread negative aspect of economic activity, and a seemingly never-ending series of corruption scandals has been made public around the globe. Although research is performed in a broad variety of disciplines, ranging from psychology to management to law, a fully satisfactory explanation for the causes of organizational corruption has not been found. By looking at organizational factors as potential triggers for corruptive behavior, this study draws upon the concept of entrepreneurial orientation (EO). Diverse studies have shown that EO, as an antecedent to company performance, has a positive effect. Recent EO literature, however, indicates that EO has not only positive but also negative consequences. In this line of reasoning, this study builds upon principal agent theory and makes a first step in exploring the impact of EO on a negative aspect of business behavior, namely organizational corruption. We gathered survey data and publicly available data from 411 firms, inquiring for both acts of corruption from within the top management team over the last 3 years and the level of entrepreneurial orientation within the organization. Results show diverging effects along the individual dimensions of EO; they point to risk orientation as the dark side of EO, as it significantly increases the likelihood of corrupt behavior in companies. In contrast, innovation orientation, to a certain extent, counterbalances by reducing the likelihood of corrupt behavior.
KeywordsAntecedents to corruption Corruption Empirical research Entrepreneurial orientation Entrepreneurship
- Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.Google Scholar
- Bhide, A. (1996). The questions every entrepreneur must answer. Harvard Business Review, 74, 120–130.Google Scholar
- Daboub, A., Rasheed, A., Priem, R., & Gray, D. (1995). Top management team characteristics and corporate illegal activity. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 138–170.Google Scholar
- Dollinger, M. J. (1999). Entrepreneurship: Strategies and resources. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
- Engelen, A., Flatten, T. C., Thalmann, J., & Brettel, M. (2013). The effect of organizational culture on entrepreneurial orientation: A comparison between Germany and Thailand. Journal of Small Business Management. doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12052.
- Hair, J. E., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.Google Scholar
- Mathews, J., Goodpaster, K., & Nash, L. (1998). Policies and persons: A casebook in business ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw- Hill.Google Scholar
- Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
- Noonan, J. (1984). Bribes. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Stetz, P., Howell, R., Stewart, A., Blair, J., & Fottler, M. (2000). Multidimensionality of entrepreneurial firm-level processes: Do the dimensions covary? In R. D. Reynolds, E. Autio, C. G. Brush, W. D. Bygrave, S. Manigart, H. J. Sapienza, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 459–469). Wellesley: Babson College.Google Scholar
- Transparency International. (2012). Retrieved April 26, 2013 from http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2012/results/.
- Wiklund, J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
- Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Google Scholar