, Volume 125, Issue 1, pp 133–148 | Cite as

Effect of sediment grain size and bioturbation on decomposition of organic matter from aquaculture

  • Elena Martinez-Garcia
  • Marita Sundstein Carlsson
  • Pablo Sanchez-Jerez
  • José Luis Sánchez-Lizaso
  • Carlos Sanz-Lazaro
  • Marianne Holmer


Sediment grain size plays a major role in sediment biogeochemistry and sediments with different grain size are expected to react differently to organic enrichment. Through a mesocosm approach we tested the behavior of sediments with two types of predominant grain size (sandy and muddy sediments) under two levels of organic enrichment, related to mussel and fish farming. The polychaete Hediste diversicolor was used to simulate macrofauna bioturbation and bioirrigation. H. diversicolor stimulated organic matter (OM) mineralization and nutrient recycling. Muddy sediments had more OM from nature, resulting in higher sulfate reduction rates than sandy sediments. Under low levels of organic enrichment grain size did not have any effect on benthic fluxes (sediment oxygen uptake, total CO2, ammonium, nitrate, nitrite and phosphate). However, at high levels of organic enrichment, sandy sediments accumulated less OM, less sulfide and less ammonium than muddy sediments, while sediment oxygen uptake and total CO2 showed similar levels between sandy and muddy sediments. Thus, grain size should be considered a key parameter for site selection of fish farming facilities when aiming for a sustainable aquaculture industry.


Aquaculture Organic enrichment Benthic fluxes Sediment biogeochemistry Hediste diversicolor 



We thank Ecolab of University of Southern Denmark, the Marine Biological Research Centre in Kerteminde (Denmark), Alevines de Guardamar SL and Centro de Invesigación Marina de Santa Pola (Spain) for the usage of their facilities. We are grateful to Irene Aragoneses, José Luis Villar and David Izquierdo for assistance during the experiments and Javier Aguilar for helping with nutrient analyses. We also appreciate the comments of two anonymous reviewer, which have improved the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10533_2015_119_MOESM1_ESM.docx (267 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 267 kb)


  1. Andersen FO, Helder W (1987) Comparison of oxygen microgradients, oxygen flux rates and electron transport system activity in coastal marine sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 37:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banta GT, Holmer M, Jensen MH, Kristensen E (1999) Effects of two polychaete worms, Nereis diversicolor and Arenicola marina, on aerobic and anaerobic decomposition in a sandy marine sediment. Aquat Microb Ecol 19:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks KM, Mahnken CVW (2003) Interactions of atlantic salmon in the pacific northwest environment. II. organic wastes. Fish Res 62:255–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlsson MS, Holmer M, Petersen JK (2009) Seasonal and spatial variations of benthic impacts of mussel longline farming in a eutrophic danish fjord, limfjorden. J Shellfish Res 28(4):791–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlsson MS, Glud RN, Petersen JK (2010) Degradation of mussel (Mytilus edulis) fecal pellets released from hanging long-lines upon sinking and after settling at the sediment. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67:1376–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlsson MS, Engström P, Odd Lindahl O, Ljungqvist L, Petersen SL, Holmer M (2012) Effects of mussel farms on the benthic nitrogen cycle on the Swedish west coast. Aquacult Environ Interact 2:177–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen B, Vedel A, Kristensen E (2000) Carbon and nitrogen fluxes in sedimentinhabited by suspension-feeding (Nereis diversicolor) and non-suspension feeding (N. virens) polychaetes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 192:203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen PB, Glud RN, Gillespie P (2003) Impacts of longline mussel farming on oxygen and nitrogen dynamics and biological communities of coastal sediments. Aquaculture 218:567–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cline JD (1969) Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogensulfide in natural waters. Limnol Oceanogr 14:454–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conley DJ, Carstensen J, Vaquer-Sunyer R, Duarte CM (2009) Ecosystem thresholds with hypoxia. Hydrobiologia 629:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cromey CJ, Thetmeyer H, Lampadariou N, Black KD, Kögeler J, Karakassis I (2012) MERAMOD: predicting the deposition and benthic impact of aquaculture in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Aquacult Environ Interact 2:157–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fossing H, Jørgensen BB (1989) Measurement of bacterial sulfate reduction in sediments: evaluation of the single-step chromium reduction method. Biogeochemistry 8:205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glud RN (2008) Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments. Mar Biol Res 4:243–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray JS, Wu RS, Or YY (2002) Effects of hypoxia and organic enrichment on the coastal marine environment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 238:249–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall POJ, Aller RC (1992) Rapid, small volume flow injectionanalysis for ∑CO2 and NH4 + in marine and freshwaters. Limnol Oceanogr 37:1113–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hargrave BT, Holmer M, Newcombe CP (2008) Towards a classification of organic enrichment in marine sediments based on biogeochemical indicators. Mar Pollut Bull 56:810–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heilskov AC, Alperin M, Holmer M (2006) Benthic fauna bio-irrigation effects on nutrien regeneration in fish farm sediments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 339:204–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holmer M, Kristensen E (1992) Impact of marine fish cage farming on metabolism and sulfate reduction of underlying sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 80:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holmer M, Duarte CM, Heilskov A, Olesen B, Terrados J (2003) Biogeochemical conditions in sediments enriched by organic matter from net-pen fish farms in the Bolinao área, Philippines. Mar Pollut Bull 46:1470–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holmer M, Duarte CM, Marba N (2005) Iron additions reduce sulphate reduction rates and improve seagrass growth on organic-enriched carbonate sediments. Ecosystems 8:721–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Islam MS (2005) Nitrogen and phosphorus budget in coastal and marine cage aquaculture and impacts of effluent loading on ecosystem: review and analysis towards model development. Mar Pollut Bull 50:48–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalantzi I, Karakassis I (2006) Benthic impacts of fish farming: meta-analysis of community and geochemical data. Mar Pollut Bull 52:484–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanaya G (2014) Recolonization of macroozoobenthos on defaunated sediments in a hypertrophic brackish lagoon: effects of sulfide removal and sediment grain size. Mar Environ Res 95:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kristensen E (1988) Benthic fauna and biogeochemical processes in marine sediments: microbial activities and fluxes. In: Blackburn TH, Sørensen J (eds) Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine environments. Wiley, Chichester, pp 275–299Google Scholar
  25. Kristensen E, Holmer M (2001) Decomposition of plant materials in marine sediment exposed to different electron acceptors (O2, NO3 and SO4 2−), with emphasis on substrate origin, degradation kinetics, and the role of bioturbation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 65(3):419–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kristensen E, Kostka JE (2005) Mangrove-microbe-soil relations. In: Kristensen E, Haese RR, Kostka JE (eds) Coastal and estuarine studies: interactions between macro- and microorganisms in marine sediments. American Geophysical Union, EEUU, Washington, DC, pp 125–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kristensen E, Hjorth Jensen M, Aller RC (1991) Direct measurement of dissolved inorganic nitrogen exchange and denitrification in individual polychaete (Nereis virens) burrows. J Mar Res 49:355–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kristensen E, Penha-Lopes G, Delefosse M, Valdemarsen T, Quintana CO, Banta GT (2012) What is bioturbation? The need for a precise definition for fauna in aquatic sciences. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 446:285–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martinez-Garcia E, Pablo Sanchez-Jerez P, Aguado-Giménez F, Ávila P, Guerrero A, Sánchez-Lizaso JL, Fernandez-Gonzalez V, González N, Gairin JI, Carballeira C et al (2013) A meta-analysis approach to the effects of fish farming on soft bottom polychaeta assemblages in temperate regions. Mar Pollut Bull 69:165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McKindsey CM, Thetmeyer H, Landry T, Silvert W (2006) Review of recent carrying capacity models for bivalve culture and recommendations for research and management. Aquaculture 261:451–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nizzoli D, Welsh DT, Fano EA, Viaroli P (2006) Impact of clam and mussel farming on benthic metabolism and nitrogen cycling, with emphasis on nitrate reduction pathways. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 315:151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Papageorgiou N, Ioanna Kalantzi I, Karakassis I (2010) Effects of fish farming on the biological and geochemical properties of muddy and sandy sediments in the mediterranean sea. Mar Environ Res 69:326–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Papaspyrou S, Thessalou-Legaki M, Kristensen E (2010) The influence of infaunal (Nereis diversicolor) abundance on degradation of organic matter in sandy sediments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 393:148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parsons T, Maita Y, Lalli C (1984) A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Pergamon Press Ltd, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Pearson TH, Rosenberg R (1978) Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 16:229–331Google Scholar
  36. Pelegri SP, Nielsen LP, Blackburn TH (1994) Denitrification in estuarine sediment stimulated by the irrigation activity of the amphipod corophium volutator. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 105:285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Piedecausa MA, Aguado-Gimenez F, Cerezo-Valverde J, Llorente MDH, Garcia-Garcia B (2012) Influence of fish food and faecal pellets on short-term oxygen uptake, ammonium flux and acid volatile sulphide accumulation in sediments impacted by fish farming and non-impacted sediments. Aquacult Res 43:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Preisler A, de Beer D, Lichtschlag A, Lavik G, Boetius A, Barker Jorgensen B (2007) Biological and chemical sulphide oxidation in a Beggiatoa inhabited marine sediment. ISME J 1:341–353Google Scholar
  39. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3- 900051-07-0.
  40. Sandrini-Neto L and Camargo MG (2014) GAD: An R package for ANOVA designs from general principles, available on CRANGoogle Scholar
  41. Sanz-Lazaro C, Marin A (2008) Assessment of finfish aquaculture impact on the benthic communities in the Mediterranean sea. In: Russo R (ed) Aquaculture I. Dynamic biochemistry, process biotechnology and molecular biology 2 (special issue 1), Global Science Books, Ikenobe, pp 21–32. ISBN 978-4-903313-16-0Google Scholar
  42. Sanz-Lázaro C, Marín A (2011) Diversity patterns of benthic macrofauna caused by marine fish farming. Diversity 3:176–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scaps P (2002) A review of the biology, ecology and potential use of the common ragworm Hediste diversicolor (O.F. müller) (annelida: Polychaeta). Hydrobiologia 470:203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stadmark J, Conley DJ (2011) Mussel farming as a nutrient reduction measure in the Baltic sea: consideration of nutrient biogeochemical cycles. Mar Pollut Bull 62:1385–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stigebrandta A, Aureb J, Ervikb A, Hansenb PK (2004) Regulating the local environmental impact of intensive marine fish farming III. A model for estimation of the holding capacity in the Modelling-Ongrowing fish farm-Monitoring system. Aquaculture 234:239–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sundby B, Gobeil C, Silverberg N, Mucci A (1993) The phosphorus cycle in coastal marine sediments bjøorn. Hydrobiologia 253:320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sweetman A, Norling K, Gunderstad C, Haugland T, Dale T (2014) Benthic ecosystem functioning beneath fish farms in different hydrodynamic environments. Limmol Oceanogr 59(4):1139–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thamdrup B, Dalsgaard T (2000) The fate of ammonium in anoxic manganese oxide-rich marine sediment. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:4157–4164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in Ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Valdemarsen T, Kristensen E, Holmer M (2009) Metabolic threshold and sulfide-buffering in diffusion controlled marine sediments impacted by continuous organic enrichment. Biogeochemistry 95:335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wildish DJ, Pohle G (2005) Benthic macrofaunal changes resulting from finfish mariculture. In: Hargrave BT (ed) Environmental effects of marine finfish aquaculture. Handbook of environmental chemistry, vol Vol 5M. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wildish DJ, Akagi HM, Hamilton N, Hargrave BT (1999) A recommended method for monitoring sediments to detect organic enrichment from mariculture in the Bay of Fundy. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 2286:iii+31pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Martinez-Garcia
    • 1
  • Marita Sundstein Carlsson
    • 2
  • Pablo Sanchez-Jerez
    • 1
  • José Luis Sánchez-Lizaso
    • 1
  • Carlos Sanz-Lazaro
    • 1
  • Marianne Holmer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Marine Sciences and Applied BiologyUniversity of AlicanteAlicanteSpain
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark

Personalised recommendations