, Volume 115, Issue 1–3, pp 23–32 | Cite as

Estimating the oxidative ratio of the global terrestrial biosphere carbon

  • Fred Worrall
  • Gareth D. Clay
  • Caroline A. Masiello
  • Gabriel Mynheer
Synthesis and Emerging Ideas


The oxidative ratio (OR) is the amount of CO2 sequestered in the terrestrial biosphere for each mol of O2 produced. The OR governs the efficiency of a terrestrial biome’s O2 production and it has been used to calculate the balance of terrestrial and oceanic carbon sinks across the globe. However, the value used in carbon cycle calculations comes from only one study of one environment. Here we perform a meta-analysis of studies of soil organic matter and vegetation composition to calculate the first global ecosystem OR value. We use data from 138 samples across 31 studies covering 9 USDA global soil orders, 7 global biomes and 5 continents and combine this information as a weighted average based upon biome land area or organic carbon content of the soil order. Organic matter fractions could not be shown to be reliable proxies for whole soil or vegetation OR. The resulting analysis suggests that although the presently used value of 1.1 is within the range of natural occurrence, it is not the most accurate choice, representing between the 97th and 99th percentile value. Our study yields a global terrestrial OR = 1.04 ± 0.03. This value of OR means that the sink of anthropogenic carbon fluxes to land has been underestimated (and the sink to the ocean overestimated) by up to 14 %. Recalculating with our OR value, the fossil fuel carbon flux to land is 1.48 ± 0.04 Gt C/year and flux to oceans is 2.02 ± 0.03 Gt C/year.


Global carbon budget Terrestrial biosphere Oxidative ratio 


  1. Achard F, Eva HD, Stibig HJ, Mayaux P, Gallego J, Richards T, Malingreau JP (2002) Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science 297:999–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akramov Y (1981) Changes in organic matter in reclaimed solonchaks. Pochvovedeniye 3:87–93Google Scholar
  3. Allard B (2006) A comparative study on the chemical composition of humic acids from forest soil, agricultural soil and ignite deposit bound lipid, carbohydrate and amino acid distributions. Geoderma 130:77–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagautdinov FY, Khaziyev FK, Shcherbukhin VD (1984) Polysaccharide fraction of humic substances from a typical chernozem and a gray forest soil. Pochvovedeniye 10:28–32Google Scholar
  5. Baldock JA, Masiello CA, Gelinas Y, Hedges JI (2004) Cycling and composition of organic matter in terrestrial and marine ecosystems. Mar Chem 92:39–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battle M, Bender ML, Tans PP, White JWC, Ellis JT, Conway T, Francey RJ (2000) Global carbon sinks and their variability inferred from atmospheric O-2 and delta C-13. Science 287(5462):2467–2470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Celi L, Schnitzer M, Negre M (1997) Analysis of carboxyl groups in soil humic acids by a wet chemical method, fourier-transform infrared spectrophotometry, and solution-state carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance. A comparative study. Soil Sci 162:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clay GD, Worrall F, Rose R (2010) Carbon budgets of an upland blanket bog managed by prescribed fire—evidence for enhanced carbon storage under managed burning. JGR-Biogeosci 115:G04037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis WD, Erickson CT, Johnston CT, Delfino JJ, Porter JE (1999) Quantitative Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic investigation of humic substance functional group composition. Chemosphere 38:2913–2928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eswaran H, Van den Berg E, Reich P (1993) Organic carbon in soil of the World. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:192–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaudinski JB, Trumbore SE, Davidson EA, Zheng S (2000) Soil carbon cycling in a temperate forest: radiocarbon based estimates of residence times, sequestration rates and partitioning fluxes. Biogeochemistry 51:33–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grishina A, Morgun LV (1985) Elementary composition of humic acids in cultivated sod-podzolic soils. Pochvovedeniye 10:31–39Google Scholar
  13. Hartnett HE, Keil RG, Hedges JI, Devol AH (1998) Influence of oxygen exposure time on organic carbon preservation in continental marine sediments. Nature 391:572–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayes TM, Hayes MHB, Skjemstad JO, Swift RS (2008) Compositional relationships between organic matter in a grassland soil and its drainage waters. Eur J Soil Sci 59:603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hockaday WC, Masiello CA, Randerson JT, Smernik RJ, Baldock JA, Chadwick OA, Harden JW (2009) Measurement of soil carbon oxidation state and oxidative ratio by C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance. J Geophys Res 114:G02014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2007) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Jenkinson DS, Rayner JH (1983) Turnover of soil organic matter in some of Rothamsted classical experiments. Soil Sci 123(5):298–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keeling RF, Shertz SR (1992) Seasonal and interannual variations in atmospheric oxygen and implications for the global carbon cycle. Nature 358:723–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keeling RF, Piper SC, Heimann M (1996) Global and hemispheric CO2 sinks deduced from changes in atmospheric O-2 concentration. Nature 381:218–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleber M (2010) What is recalcitrant soil organic matter? Environ Chem 7:320–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuz’Menio T, Pavlova MP (1981) Distribution of organic matter and macroelements in floodplain meadow biogeocenosis. Pochvovedeniye 6:16–26Google Scholar
  22. Langenfelds RL, Francey RJ, Steele LP, Battle M, Keeling RF, Budd WF (1999) Partitioning of the global fossil CO2 sink using a 19 year trend in atmospheric O2. Geophys Res Lett 26(13):1897–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loveland TR, Belward AS (1997) The international geosphere biosphere programme data and information system global land cover data set (DISCover). Acta Astronaut 41:681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maie N, Watanabe A, Kimura M (2004) Chemical characteristics and potential source of fulvic acids leached from the plow layer of paddy soil. Geoderma 120:309–3232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mao JD, Schmidt-Rohr K, Davies G, Ghabbour EA, Xing B (2000) Quantitative characterisation of humic substances by solid-state carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance. Soil Sci Am J 64:873–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin M, Celi L, Bonifacio E, Nardi S, Barberis E (2006) Characteristics of soil organic matter in a limnic histosol of the alpine morainic system. Soil Sci 171:527–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Masiello CA, Gallagher ME, Randerson JT, Deco RM, Chadwick OA (2008) Evaluating two experimental approaches for measuring ecosystem carbon oxidation state and oxidative ratio. J Geophysl Res 113:G3, G03010Google Scholar
  28. Neves-Fernandes A, Giovanela M, Esteves VI, Marta M, Sierra S (2010) Elemental and spectral properties of peat and soil samples and their respective humic substances. J Mol Struct 971:33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olson JS, Watts JA, Allison LT (2001) Major world ecosystem complexes ranked by carbon in live vegetation: a database. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  30. Patti AF, Verheyen TV, Douglas L, Wang X (1992) Nitrohumic acids from Victorian brown coal. Sci Total Environ 113:49–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Randerson JT, Masiello CA, Still CJ, Rahn T, Poorter H, Field CB (2006) Is carbon within the global terrestrial biosphere becoming more oxidized? Implications for trends in atmospheric O2. Glob Change Biol 12:260–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Russell JD, Vaughn DJ, Jones D, Fraser AR (1989) An IR spectroscopic study of soil humin and its relationship to other soil humic substances and fungal pigments. Geoderma 29:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schnitzer M, Preston M (1986) Analysis of humic acids by solution and solid-state carbon 13 NMR. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:326–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seibt U, Brand WA, Heimann M, Lloyd J, Severinghaus JP, Wingate L (2004) Observations of O2/CO2 exchange ratios during ecosystem gas exchange. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 18: GB4024Google Scholar
  35. Severinghaus JP (1995) Studies of the terrestrial O2 and carbon cycles in sand dunes gases and in Biosphere 2. PhD thesis, Columbia UniversityGoogle Scholar
  36. Shurygina EA, Larina NK, Chubarova MA, Kononova MM (1971) Differential thermal analysis (DTA) and thermogravimetry (TG) of soil humus substances. Geoderma 6:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skrzypek G, Jezierski P, Szynkiewicz A (2010) Preservation of primary stable isotope signatures of peat forming plants during early decomposition—observation along an altitudinal transect. Chem Geol 273:238–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steinbach J, Gerbig C, Rodenbeck C, Karstens U, Minejima C, Mukai H (2011) The CO2 release and oxygen uptake from fossil fuel emission estimate (COFFEE) dataset: effects from varying oxidative ratios. Atmos Chem Phys 11:6855–6870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stephens BB, Keeling RF, Heimann M, Six KD, Murnane R, Caldeira K (1998) Testing global ocean carbon cycle models using measurements of atmospheric O2 and CO2 concentration. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 12(2):213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tonoco P, Almendros G, Sanz J, Gonzalez-Vazquez R, Gonzalez-Vila JJ (2006) Molecular descriptors of the effect of fire on soils under pine forests in two continental Mediterranean soils. Org Chem 37:1995–2018Google Scholar
  41. Ussiri DAN, Johnson CE (2003) Characterization of organic matter in a northern hardwood forest soil by 13C NMR spectroscopy and chemical methods. Geoderma 111:123–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fred Worrall
    • 1
  • Gareth D. Clay
    • 2
  • Caroline A. Masiello
    • 3
  • Gabriel Mynheer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of DurhamDurhamUK
  2. 2.Geography, School of Environment and DevelopmentUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.Department of Earth ScienceRice UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations