Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 1157–1175 | Cite as

Low dissolved ions may limit secondary invasion of inland waters by exotic round gobies and dreissenid mussels in North America

  • Brad S. Baldwin
  • Matthew Carpenter
  • Kristin Rury
  • Erin Woodward
Original Paper

Abstract

Round gobies and dreissenid mussels, exotic species in the North American Great Lakes basin, are euryhaline organisms whose geographic spread and ecological impacts in freshwaters may be limited by low levels of dissolved ions such as calcium (Ca). We measured source populations of these exotics in the St. Lawrence River and found population densities of dreissenids (range of ~1,000–6,400 individuals m−2) and round gobies (6–32 individuals m−2) similar to those in other Great Lake locations from which they have spread inland. However, we found little evidence for their secondary invasion of inland tributary rivers and lakes of northern New York State. Using natural waters collected from inland ecosystems, we ran laboratory bioassays of reproduction, growth, and survival of several life stages of zebra and quagga mussels as well as the round goby. We found little difference in the responses of zebra and quagga mussels, with each species showing moderate reproductive success, growth, and survival at Ca concentrations > 13 mg L−1 and dramatic improvements at >18 mg L−1. Round gobies showed moderate survival in waters with Ca concentrations > 8 mg L−1 and high survival > 18 mg L−1. These bioassays are the first such experiments for quagga mussels and round gobies and show how all three species may be similarly restricted in their ability to invade and permanently colonize significant geographic regions of New York State and perhaps the US.

Keywords

Secondary invasion Round goby Zebra mussel Quagga mussel Specific conductivity Inland waters 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Michael Schuckers for help with statistical analyses, Carol Cady for help preparing Fig. 1, and Doug Brown, John Ashley, Adam Caswell and Jim Yaeger for assistance with scuba surveys. We are also grateful for access to data on surface water chemistry, shared by Dr. Scott Kisbaugh (NYSDEC Division of Water) and Dr. James McKenna (USGS Great Lakes Science Center). We also thank M. Kornis and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. This research was supported by an A. C. Walker Foundation North Country Research Fellowship, a grant from the St. Lawrence River Research and Education fund, and additional financial assistance from St. Lawrence University. The US Environmental Protection Agency did not fund or manage the research described here. It has not been subject to Agency review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency. No official endorsement should be inferred.

References

  1. Ackerman JD, Sim B, Nichols SJ, Claudi R (1994) A review of the early life history of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha): comparisons with marine bivalves. Can J Zool 72:1169–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen YC, Ramcharan CW (2001) Dreissena distribution in commercial waterways of the US: using failed invasions to identify limiting factors. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:898–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bain MB (1999) Interpreting chemical data. In: Bain MB, Stevenson NJ (eds) Aquatic habitat assessment: common methods. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 181–192Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin BS, Newell RIE (1995) Feeding rate responses of oyster larvae (Crassostrea virginica) to seston quantity and composition. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 189:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin BS, Black M, Sanjur O, Gustafson R, Lutz RA, Vrijenhoek RC (1996) A diagnostic molecular marker for zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and potentially co-occurring bivalves: mitochondrial COI. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 5:9–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldwin BS, Mayer M, Dayton J, Pau N, Moore A, Mendill J, Sullivan M, Ma AMT, Mills E (2002) Comparative growth and feeding in zebra and quagga mussels: implications for North American lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:680–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barreto RE, Volpato GL (2004) Caution for using ventilatory frequency as an indicator of stress in fish. Behav Process 66:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bode RW, Novak MA, Abele LE, Heitzman DL, Smith AJ (2002) Quality assurance work plan for biological stream monitoring in New York State. Stream Biomonitoring Unit, Division of Water, NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation. Albany, 54 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Bossenbroek JM, Johnson LE, Peters B, Lodge DM (2007) Forecasting the expansion of zebra mussels in the United States. Conserv Biol 21:800–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown JE, Stepien CA (2009) Invasion genetics of the Eurasian round goby in North America: tracing sources and spread patterns. Mol Ecol 18:64–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Casper AF, Johnson LE (2010) Contrasting shell/tissue characteristics of Dreissena polymorpha and Dreissena bugensis in relation to environmental heterogeneity in the St. Lawrence River. J Great Lakes Res 36:184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charlebois PM, Marsden JE, Goettel RG, Wolfe RK, Jude DJ, Rudnika S (1997) The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas), a review of European and North American literature. Ill Nat Hist Surv Special Publ 20:1–76Google Scholar
  13. Chase ME, Bailey RC (1999) The ecology of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the lower Great Lakes of North America: I. Population dynamics and growth. J Great Lakes Res 25:107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiarenzelli J, Bregani A, Cady C, Whitney B, Lock R (2011) Variation in multi-element chemistry related to bedrock buffering: an example from the Adirondack region of northern New York, USA. Environ Earth Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  15. Chotkowski MA, Ellen Marsden J (1999) Round goby and mottled sculpin predation on lake trout eggs and fry: field predictions from laboratory experiments. J Great Lakes Res 25:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Claxton WT, Wilson AB, Mackie GL, Boulding EG (1998) A genetic and morphological comparison of shallow- and deep-water populations of the introduced dreissenid bivalve Dreissena bugensis. Can J Zool 76:1269–1276Google Scholar
  17. Cohen AN, Weinstein A (2001) Zebra mussel’s calcium threshold and implications for its potential distribution in North America. San Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond. http://www.sfei.org/bioinvasions/Reports/2001-Zebramusselcalcium356.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2011
  18. Cooke GD, Welch EB, Peterson SA, Newroth PR (1993) Restoration and management of lakes and reservoirs, 2nd edn. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  19. Corkum LD, Sapota MR, Skora KE (2004) The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus, a fish invader on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Biol Invasions 6:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dennis TE, MacAvoy SE, Steg MB, Bulger AJ (1995) The association of water chemistry variables and fish condition in streams of Shenandoah National Park (USA). Water Air Soil Pollut 85:365–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dermott R, Bonnell R, Carou S, Dow J, Jarvis P (2003) Spatial distribution and population structure of the mussels Dreissena polymorpha and Dreissena bugensis in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, 1998 and 2000. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 2479:58Google Scholar
  22. Drake JM, Bossenbroek JM (2004) The potential distribution of zebra mussels in the United States. Bioscience 54:931–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Drake JM, Bossenbroek JM (2009) Profiling ecosystem vulnerability to invasion by zebra mussels with support vector machines. Theor Ecol 2:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ellis S, MacIsaac HJ (2009) Salinity tolerance of Great Lakes invaders. Freshw Biol 54:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Farrell JM, Holeck K, Mills E, Hoffman C, Patil V (2010) Recent ecological trends in lower trophic levels of the international section of the St. Lawrence River: a comparison of the 1970s to the 2000s. Hydrobiologia 647:21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. French JRP, Black MG (2009) Maximum length and age of round gobies (Apollonia melanostomus) in Lake Huron. J Freshw Ecol 24:173–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frischer ME, McGrath BR, Hansen AS, Vescio PA, Wyllie JA, Wimbush J, Nierzwicki-Bauer S (2005) Introduction pathways, differential survival of adult and larval zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha), and possible management strategies, in an Adirondack lake, Lake George, NY. Lake Reserv Manage 21:391–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harper L (2006) Surveys of the Grasse River and Wilson Hill Wildlife Management Area for the Presence of Non-Native Dreissenid Mussels. Final Report for the St. Lawrence-FDR Power Project, New York Power Authority, New York, 22 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Haynes JM, Tisch NA, Mayer CM, Rhyne RS (2005) Benthic macroinvertebrate communities in southwestern Lake Ontario following invasion of Dreissena and Echinogammarus: 1983 to 2000. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:148–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hickey B, Fowlie A (2005) First occurrence of the round goby, Neogobius melanostomus, in the St. Lawrence River at Cornwall, Ontario. Can Field Nat 119:582–583Google Scholar
  31. Hincks SS, Mackie GL (1997) Effects of pH, calcium, alkalinity, hardness, and chlorophyll on the survival, growth, and reproductive success of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in Ontario lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:2049–2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Irons KS, McClelland MA, Pegg MA (2006) Expansion of round goby in the Illinois Waterway. Am Midl Nat 156:198–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson TB, Allen M, Corkum LD, Lee VA (2005) Comparison of Methods Needed to Estimate Population Size of Round Gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) in Western Lake Erie. J Great Lakes Res 31:78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones L, Ricciardi A (2005) Influence of physicochemical factors on the distribution and biomass of invasive mussels (Dreissena polymorpha and Dreissena bugensis) in the St. Lawrence River. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:1953–1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jude DJ, Reider RH, Smith GR (1992) Establishment of Gobiidae in the Great Lakes Basin. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:416–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Padilla DK (1998) Physical factors that limit the distribution and abundance of Dreissena polymorpha (Pall.). J Shellfish Res 17:1219–1235Google Scholar
  37. Karatayev AY, Boltovskoy D, Padilla DK, Burlakova LE (2007) The invasive bivalves Dreissena polymorpha and Limnoperna fortunei: parallels, contrasts, potential spread and invasion impacts. J Shellfish Res 26:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kilgour BW, Mackie GL, Baker MA, Keppel R (1994) Effects of salinity on the condition and survival of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha). Estuaries 17:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klauda RJ, Palmer RE, Lenkevich MJ (1987) Sensitivity of early life stages of blueback herring to moderate acidity and aluminium in soft freshwater. Estuaries 10:44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kornis MS, Vander Zanden MJ (2010) Forecasting the distribution of the invasive round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in Wisconsin tributaries to Lake Michigan. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67:553–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koutnik MA, Padilla DK (1994) Predicting the spatial distribution of Dreissena polymorpha (zebra mussel) among inland lakes of Wisconsin: modeling with a GIS. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51:1189–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kraft CE, Johnson LE (2000) Regional differences in rates and patterns of North America inland lake invasions by zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:993–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Krakowiak PJ, Pennuto CM (2008) Fish and macroinvertebrate communities in tributary streams of eastern Lake Erie with and without round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus, Pallas 1814). J Great Lakes Res 34:675–689Google Scholar
  44. Lederer A, Massart J, Janssen J (2006) Impact of round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) on Dreissenids (Dreissena polymorpha and Dreissena bugensis) and the Associated Macroinvertebrate Community Across an Invasion Front. J Great Lakes Res 32:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lozano SJ, Scharold JV, Nalepa TF (2001) Recent declines in benthic macroinvertebrate densities in Lake Ontario. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:518–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ludyanskiy ML, McDonald D, MacNeill D (1993) Impact of the zebra mussel, a bivalve invader. Dreissena polymorpha is rapidly colonizing hard surfaces throughout waterways of the United States and Canada. Bioscience 43:533–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. MacInnis A, Corkum LD (2000) Age and growth of round goby Neogobius melanostomus in the Upper Detroit River. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:852–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marmorek DR, Lacroix GL, Korman J, Parnell I, Watt WD (1998) Assessing the impacts of acidification on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): a simple model of stream chemistry. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:2117–2126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McMahon RF (1996) The physiological ecology of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, in North America and Europe. Am Zool 36:339–363Google Scholar
  50. Mellina E, Rasmussen J (1994) Patterns in the distribution and abundance of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in rivers and lakes in relation to substrate and other physiochemical factors. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51:1024–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller S, Haynes JM (1997) Factors limiting colonization of western New York creeks by the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). J Freshw Ecol 12:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mills E, Dermott R, Roseman E, Dustin D, Mellina E, Conn D, Spidle A (1993) Colonization, ecology, and population structure of the “quagga” mussel (Bivalvia: Dreissenidae) in the lower Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:2305–2314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mills EL, Rosenberg G, Spidle AP, Ludyanskiy M, Pligin Y, May B (1996) A review of the biology and ecology of the quagga mussel (Dreissena bugensis), a second species of freshwater dreissenid introduced to North America. Am Zool 36:271–286Google Scholar
  54. Mills EL, Chrisman J, Baldwin B, Owens R, O’ Gorman R, Howell T, Roseman E, Raths M (1999) Changes in dreissenid community in the Lower Great Lakes with emphasis on southern Lake Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 25:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moskal’kova KI (1996) Ecological and morphophysiological prerequisites to range extension in the round goby Neogobius melanostomus under conditions of anthropogenic pollution. J Ichthyol 36:584–590Google Scholar
  56. Nalepa T, Wojcik J, Fanslow D, Lang G (1995) Initial colonization of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron: population recruitment, density, and size structure. J Great Lakes Res 21:417–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Neary B, Leach J (1992) Mapping the potential spread of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Ontario. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:406–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ojaveer H (2006) The round goby Neogobius melanostomus is colonising the NE Baltic Sea. Aquat Invasions 1:44–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Phillips EC, Washek ME, Hertel AW, Niebel BM (2003) The round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in Pennsylvania tributary streams of Lake Erie. J Great Lakes Res 29:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Poos M, Dextrase AJ, Schwalb AN, Ackerman JD (2010) Secondary invasion of the round goby into high diversity Great Lakes tributaries and species at risk hotspots: potential new concerns for endangered freshwater species. Biol Invasions 12:1269–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ramcharan CW, Padilla DK, Dodson SI (1992) A multivariate model for predicting population fluctuations of Dreissena polymorpha in North American lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ray WJ, Corkum LD (2001) Habitat and Site Affinity of the Round Goby. J Great Lakes Res 27:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reid D, Orlova M (2002) Geological and evolutionary underpinnings for the success of Ponto-Caspian species invasions in the Baltic Sea and North American Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1144–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ricciardi A, MacIsaac HJ (2000) Recent mass invasion of the North American Great Lakes by Ponto–Caspian species. Trends Ecol Evol 15:62–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schaner T, Fox MG, Taraborelli AC (2009) An inexpensive system for underwater video surveys of demersal fishes. J Great Lakes Res 35:317–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schneider DW, Ellis C, Cummings K (1998) A transportation model assessment of the risk to native mussel communities from zebra mussel spread. Conserv Biol 12:788–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Setzler-Hamilton EM, Wright DA, Magee JA (1997) Growth and spawning of laboratory-reared zebra mussels in lower mesohaline salinities. In: D’Itri FM (ed) Zebra mussels and aquatic nuisance species. Lewis Publishers/CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 141–154Google Scholar
  68. Sinnich T, Mendenhall W (2003) A second course in statistics: regression analysis, 6th edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  69. Sprung M (1987) Ecological requirements of developing Dreissena polymorpha eggs. Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie Supplement 79:69–86Google Scholar
  70. Stoeckmann A (2003) Physiological energetics of Lake Erie dreissenid mussels: a basis for the displacement of Dreissena polymorpha by Dreissena bugensis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Taraborelli AC, Fox MG, Schaner T, Johnson TB (2009) Density and habitat use by the round goby (Apollonia melanostoma) in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 35:266–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. USEPA (1987) Handbook of methods for acid deposition studies: laboratory analysis for surface water chemistry. EPA 600/4–87-026. Office of Science and Technology and Office of Water, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  73. USEPA (1991) Data user’s guide to the US Environmental Protection Agency’s long-term monitoring project: quality assurance plan and data dictionary. EPA600/3e91/072. Office of Science and Technology and Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  74. USEPA (2011) Great Lakes environmental database, United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/monitoring/data_proj/glenda/glenda_query_index.html. Accessed 12 Mar 2011
  75. USGS (2011a) Zebra and quagga mussel sightings distribution. United States Geological Survey. http://nas.er.usgs.gov/taxgroup/mollusks/zebramussel/maps/current_zm_quag_map.jpg. Accessed 21 Apr 2011
  76. USGS (2011b) Round goby sightings distribution. United States Geological Survey. http://nas2.er.usgs.gov/viewer/omap.aspx?SpeciesID=713 Accessed 21 Apr 2011
  77. USGS (2011c) Generate a nonindigenous species list. United States Geological Survey. http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/SpSearch.aspx Accessed 21 Apr 2011
  78. Vinogradov GA, Smirnova NF, Sokolov VA, Bruznitsky AA (1993) Influence of chemical composition of the water on the mollusk Dreissena polymorpha. In: Nalepa TF, Schloesser DW (eds) Zebra mussels: biology, impacts, and control. Lewis Publishers/CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 283–293Google Scholar
  79. Warren DR, Mineau MM, Ward EJ, Kraft CE (2010) Relating fish biomass to habitat and chemistry in headwater streams of the northeastern United States. Environ Biol Fishes 88:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Whittier TR, Ringold P, Herlihy A, Pierson S (2008) A calcium-based invasion risk assessment for zebra and quagga mussels (Dreissena spp). Frontiers Ecol Environ 6:180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wright DA, Setzler-Hamilton EM, Magee JA, Kennedy VS, McIninch SP (1996) Effect of salinity and temperature on survival and development of young zebra (Dreissena polymorpha) and quagga (Dreissena bugensis) mussels. Estuaries 19(3):619–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhulidov A, Pavlov D, Nalepa TF, Scherbina G, Zhulidov D, Gurtovaya T (2004) Relative distributions of Dreissena bugensis and Dreissena polymorpha in the lower Don River system, Russia. Int Rev Hydrobiol 89:326–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brad S. Baldwin
    • 1
  • Matthew Carpenter
    • 1
  • Kristin Rury
    • 2
  • Erin Woodward
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiologySt. Lawrence UniversityCantonUSA
  2. 2.Health Effects DivisionEnvironmental Protection AgencyWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Rodeph Sholom SchoolNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations