Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Design of Individual Components of the Prosthesis for Revision Hip Replacement

  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope

The number of cases with extensive and complex bone defects undergoing revision endoprosthetization continues to increase. We tested a reendoprosthetization method for hip joints with severe bone tissue deficits using individualized endoprosthesis components in four patients. Clinical data showed that use of a personalized approach to reendoprosthetization of hip joints with severe bone tissue deficit provided complete filling of defects in the acetabulum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Park, B., Liporace, F., and Marwin, S., “Managing acetabular defects in total hip arthroplasty,” Bull. Hosp. Jt. Dis., 75, No. 1, 37-46 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shon, W. Y., Santhanam, S. S., and Choi, J. W., “Acetabular reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty,” Hip Pelvis, 28, No. 1, 1-14 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Villatte, G., Erivan, R., Salles, G., Pereira, B., Galvin, M., Descamps, S., and Boisgard, S., “Acetabular bone defects in THA revision: Reconstruction using morsellised virus-inactivated bone allograft and reinforcement ring. Seven-year outcomes in 95 patients,” Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res., 103, No. 4, 543-548 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abolghasemian, M., Sadeghi Naini, M., Tangsataporn, S., Lee, P., Backstein, D., Safir, O., Kuzyk, P., and Gross, A. E., “Reconstruction of massive uncontained acetabular defects using allograft with cage or ring reinforcement: An assessment of the graft’s ability to restore bone stock and its impact on the outcome of re-revision,” Bone Joint J., 96-B, No. 3, 319-324 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Flecher, X., Appy, B., Parratte, S., Ollivier, M., and Argenson, J. N., “Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips,” Int. Orthop., 41, No. 5, 911-916 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jenkins, D. R., Odland, A. N., Sierra, R. J., Hanssen, A. D., and Lewallen, D. G., “Minimum five-year outcomes with porous tantalum acetabular cup and augment construct in complex revision total hip arthroplasty,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 99, No. 10, e49 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Waddell, B. S. and Della Valle, A. G., “Reconstruction of non-contained acetabular defects with impaction grafting, a reinforcement mesh and a cemented polyethylene acetabular component,” Bone Joint J., 99-B, No. 1, Supplement A, 25-30 (2017).

  8. Huang, C., Qin, L., Yan, W., Weng, X., and Huang, X., “Clinical evaluation following the use of mineralized collagen graft for bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty,” Regen. Biomater., 2, No. 4, 245-249 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kostensalo, I., Seppänen, M., Virolainen, P., Mokka, J., Koivisto, M., and Mäkelä, K. T., “Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and cemented polyethylene socket in total hip revision arthroplasty,” Scand. J. Surg., 104, No. 4, 267-272 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia-Rey, E., Madero, R., and Garcia-Cimbrelo, E., “THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 473, No. 12, 3882-3891 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hourscht, C., Abdelnasser, M. K., Ahmad, S. S., Kraler, L., Keel, M. J., Siebenrock, K. A., and Klenke, F. M., “Reconstruction of AAOS type III and IV acetabular defects with the Ganz reinforcement ring: High failure in pelvic discontinuity,” Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 137, No. 8, 1139-1148 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brüggemann, A., Fredlund, E., Mallmin, H., and Hailer, N. P., “Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings?,” Acta Orthop., 88, No. 1, 35-40 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jain, S., Grogan, R. J., and Giannoudis, P. V., “Options for man-aging severe acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. A systematic review,” Hip Int., 24, No. 2, 109-122 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, H., Qu, X., Mao, Y., Dai, K., and Zhu, Z., “Custom acetabular cages offer stable fixation and improved hip scores for revision THA with severe bone defects,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 474, No. 3, 731-740 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mao, Y., Xu, C., Xu, J., Li, H., Liu, F., Yu, D., and Zhu, Z., “The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects,” Int. Orthop., 39, No. 10, 2023-2030 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berasi, C. C., 4th, Berend, K. R., Adams, J. B., Ruh, E. L., and Lombardi, A. V., Jr., “Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss?,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 473, No. 2, 528-535 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baauw, M., van Hellemondt, G. G., and Spruit, M. A., “Custom-made acetabular implant for Paprosky type 3 defects,” Orthopedics, 40, No. 1, e195-e198 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baauw, M., van Hellemondt, G. G., van Hooff, M. L., and Spruit, M., “The accuracy of positioning of a custom-made implant within a large acetabular defect at revision arthroplasty of the hip,” Bone Joint J., 97-B, No. 6, 780-785 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gubin, A. V., Kuznetsov, V. P., Borzunov, D. Yu., Koryukov, A. A., Reznik, A. V., and Chevardin, A. Yu., “Problems and perspectives in the introduction of customized implants made using additive technologies into traumatology and orthopedics,” Med. Tekh., No. 4, 52-55 (2016).

  20. Esipova, A. A., “Use of geodesic domes in construction: Advantages and drawbacks,” Nauk Sovremen., No. 38, 8-11 (2015).

  21. Romanovich, A. N., “Geodesic domes. Characteristics of use and computations,” Sovremen. Innov., 8, No. 6, 22-23 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. N. Ovchinnikov.

Additional information

Translated from Meditsinskaya Tekhnika, Vol. 53, No. 3, May-Jun., 2019, pp. 16-19.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chegurov, O.K., Ovchinnikov, E.N., Stogov, M.V. et al. Design of Individual Components of the Prosthesis for Revision Hip Replacement. Biomed Eng 53, 172–175 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-019-09902-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-019-09902-3

Navigation