Skip to main content
Log in

The intra-firm knowledge transfer in the outward M&A of EMNCs: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the intra-firm transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge in the post-acquisition integration stage in the outward mergers and acquisitions (M&A) of multinational corporations from emerging economies (EMNCs). It also explores rationales underlying the tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in the cross-cultural context. Drawing from the empirical evidence of three Chinese firms’ outward M&A in three European countries, we argue the Chinese acquiring firms emphasized the transfer of explicit over tacit knowledge in the post-acquisition integration in their outward M&A. This can be attributed to complementarity in explicit knowledge, home market advantage, scarcity of key staff and cultural differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term “nature of knowledge” refers to the tacit/explicit knowledge continuum (Michailova & Mustaffa, 2012).

  2. For example, M&A to Japanese firms were excluded in this research.

  3. Interviews with the members of staff of the acquired firms, recommended by their counterparts in the headquarters, were conducted by telephone. It would have been very costly in terms of time and money to travel to the various countries to conduct face-to-face interviews within these acquired firms

  4. Although failing to access the CEO of acquired Firm C, we interviewed his secretary and personal interpreter.

  5. The overall abilities of the Chinese acquirers were examined by the Chinese government through a number of bureaucratic approval procedures before the acquisition, and by the acquired Western firms (Tan & Ai, 2010). This is also the reason why most Chinese acquirers are industry leaders in their domestic market.

  6. Unlike Luo and Wang’s (2012) concept of home country effects which focus on the influence of home country environment parameters, home market advantages in this study also emphasize the impact of the huge Chinese market.

  7. Cultural differences in the paper are on both organizational and national levels. Although organizational culture may include features that are distinctively different from the national cultural characteristics, they are partly embedded in national cultures in international acquisition (Vaara, Sarala, Stahl, & Björkman, 2012). Therefore, both national and cultural differences are wider in EMNCs’ outward M&A.

  8. Both national and cultural differences may create problems for transferring knowledge across units by undermining the relevant absorptive capacities (Van Wijk et al., 2008), because commonalities make it easier to identify, acquire, and assimilate knowledge in the other unit (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990). National cultural differences may undermine the absorptive capacity of Chinese acquirers to a greater extent than organizational cultural differences, due to language issues and related communication problems (Ambos & Ambos, 2009).

References

  • Ahammad, M. F., Tarba, S. Y., Liu, Y., & Glaister, K. W. 2016. Knowledge transfer and cross-border acquisition performance: The impact of cultural distance and employee retention. International Business Review, 25(1): 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. 2001. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 197–220.

  • Ambos, T. C., & Ambos, B. 2009. The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multinational corporations. Journal of International Management, 15(1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1): 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becerra, M., Lunnan, R., & Huemer, L. 2008. Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4): 691–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Bresman, H., & Håkanson, L. 2000. Managing the post‐acquisition integration process: How the human iintegration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. Journal of Management Studies, 37(3): 395–425.

  • Birkinshaw, J., Bresman, H., & Nobel, R. 2010. Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions: A retrospective. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(1): 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, I., Stahl, G. K., & Vaara, E. 2007. Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: The mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity, and social integration. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. 1999. Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3): 439–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. 1970. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 1(3): 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., & Lau, C. M. 2008. Asian management research: Status today and future outlook. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3): 636–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Cross, R., Tan, H., & Xin, L. 2008. Historic and emergent trends in Chinese outward direct investment. Management International Review, 48(6): 715–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Glaister, K. W., Klijn, E., & Tan, H. 2009. Knowledge accession and knowledge acquisition in strategic alliances: The impact of supplementary and complementary dimensions. British Journal of Management, 20(4): 598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capron, L. 1999. The long-term performance of horizontal acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 987–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. Y., & Young, M. N. 2010. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies: A principal–principal perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3): 523–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. 2005. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 381–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, J., & Voss, H. 2014. Chinese overseas direct investment into the European Union. In K. Brown (Ed.). China and the EU in context: Insights for business and investors. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1): 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L., & Jiang, F. 2010. Behind ownership decision of Chinese outward FDI: Resources and institutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4): 751–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L., Meyer, K. E., & Hu, H. W. 2014. What drives firms’ intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 488–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D. K. 1991. Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12(4): 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D. K., & Puia, G. 1995. Cross-border acquisitions: An examination of the influence of relatedness and cultural fit on shareholder value creation in US acquiring firms. Management International Review, 35(4): 337–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, P. 2007. Investing for strategic resources and its rationale: The case of outward FDI from Chinese companies. Business Horizons, 50(1): 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, P. 2009. Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion?. Journal of World Business, 44(1): 74–84.

  • Deng, P. 2010. What determines performance of cross-border M&as by Chinese companies? An absorptive capacity perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52(6): 509–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, P. 2012. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A critical review and future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4): 408–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, P., & Yang, M. 2015. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by emerging market firms: A comparative investigation. International Business Review, 24(1): 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S. P., & Craig, C. S. 2007. Collaborative and iterative translation: An alternative approach to back translation. Journal of International Marketing, 15(1): 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Empson, L. 2001. Fear of exploitation and fear of contamination: Impediments to knowledge transfer in mergers between professional service firms. Human Relations, 54(7): 839–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. 2009. An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.

  • Gao, L., Liu, X., & Zou, H. 2013. The role of human mobility in promoting Chinese outward FDI: A neglected factor?. International Business Review, 22(2): 437–449.

  • Ghauri, P. 2004. Designing and conducting case studies in international business research. Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, 109–124.

  • Gibbert, M., & Ruigrok, W. 2010. The “what” and “how” of case study rigor. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4): 710–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. 2008. What passes as a rigorous case study?. Strategic Management Journal, 29(13): 1465–1474.

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

  • Gomes, E., Angwin, D. N., Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. 2013. Critical success factors through the mergers and acquisitions process: Revealing pre-and post-M&A connections for improved performance. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(1): 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4): 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haspeslagh, P. C., & Jemison, D. B. 1991. Managing acquisitions: Creating value through corporate renewal. New York: Free Press.

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., & Peng, M. W. 2013. Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: The influence of institutions and factor markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7): 1295–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junni, P., & Sarala, R. M. 2013. The role of absorptive capacity in acquisition knowledge transfer. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(4): 419–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, S. 2011. India-focused publications in leading international business journals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(2): 427–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, R., & Finkelstein, S. 1999. Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization Science, 10(1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebedev, S., Peng, M. W., Xie, E., & Stevens, C. E. 2015. Mergers and acquisitions in and out of emerging economies. Journal of World Business, 50(4): 651–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Roberts, J., Yan, Y., & Tan, H. 2013. Knowledge sharing in China–UK higher education alliances. International Business Review, 23(2): 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Giroud, A. 2016. International knowledge flows in the context of emerging-economy MNEs and increasing global mobility. International Business Review, 25(1): 125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Lu, J., Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Wright, M. 2010. Returnee entrepreneurs, knowledge spillovers and innovation in high-tech firms in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7): 1183–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Woywode, M. 2013. Light-touch integration of Chinese cross-border M&A: The influences of culture and absorptive capacity. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(4): 469–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M., Calori, R., Very, P., & Veiga, J. F. 1998. Managing mergers across borders: A two-nation exploration of a nationally bound administrative heritage. Organization Science, 9(6): 670–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Wang, S. L. 2012. Foreign direct investment strategies by developing country multinationals: A diagnostic model for home country effects. Global Strategy Journal, 2(3): 244–261.

  • Makri, M., Hitt, M. A., & Lane, P. J. 2010. Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6): 602–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A. 2006. Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1): 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. 2009. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1): 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michailova, S., & Mustaffa, Z. 2012. Subsidiary knowledge flows in multinational corporations: Research accomplishments, gaps, and opportunities. Journal of World Business, 47(3): 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minbaeva, D. B. 2007. Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 47(4): 567–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. 2003. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6): 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOFCOM. 2015. China outward foreign direct investment statistical bulletin 2014. http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/ae/slfw/201509/20150901116599.shtml, Accessed Mar. 15, 2016.

  • Morosini, P., Shane, S., & Singh, H. 1998. National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, S. R., Demirbag, M., & Mellahi, K. 2015. Reverse knowledge transfer from overseas acquisitions: A survey of Indian MNEs. Management International Review, 55(2): 277–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Nonaka, I., & Von Krogh, G. 2009. Perspective-tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3): 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. 2012. The global strategy of emerging multinationals from China. Global Strategy Journal, 2(2): 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 920–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • Ranft, A. L., & Lord, M. D. 2002. Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: A grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science, 13(4): 420–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reus, T. H. 2012. A knowledge-based view of mergers and acquisitions revisited: Absorptive capacity and combinative capability. Advances in Mergers & Acquisitions, 11: 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rui, H., & Yip, G. S. 2008. Foreign acquisitions by Chinese firms: A strategic intent perspective. Journal of World Business, 43(2): 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rui, H., Zhang, M., & Shipman, A. 2016. Relevant knowledge and recipient ownership: Chinese MNCS’ knowledge transfer in Africa. Journal of World Business, 51(5): 713–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarala, R. M., Junni, P., Cooper, C. L., & Tarba, S. Y. 2014. A socio-cultural perspective on knowledge transfer in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Management, 42(5): 1230–1249.

  • Sarala, R. M., & Vaara, E. 2010. Cultural differences, convergence, and crossvergence as explanations of knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8): 1365–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. K., Angwin, D. N., Very, P., Gomes, E., Weber, Y., Tarba, S. Y., ... & Yildiz, E. 2013. Sociocultural integration in mergers and acquisitions: Unresolved paradoxes and directions for future research. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(4): 333–356.

  • Sun, S. L., Peng, M. W., Ren, B., & Yan, D. 2012. A comparative ownership advantage framework for cross-border M&As: The rise of Chinese and Indian MNEs. Journal of World Business, 47(1): 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H., & Ai, Q. 2010. China’s outward mergers and acquisitions in the 21st century: Motivations, progress and the role of the Chinese government. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 9: 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teerikangas, S. 2012. Dynamics of acquired firm pre-acquisition employee reactions. Journal of Management, 38(2): 599–639.

  • UNCTAD. 2015. World investment report 2015: Reforming international investment governance. New York: UNCTAD.

  • UNCTAD. 2016. World investment report 2015: Inverstor nationality: Policy challenges. New York: UNCTAD.

  • Vaara, E., Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Ehrnrooth, M., & Koveshnikov, A. 2014. Attributional tendencies in cultural explanations of M&A performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9): 1302–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., Sarala, R., Stahl, G. K., & Björkman, I. 2012. The impact of organizational and national cultural differences on social conflict and knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J., & Lyles, M. A. 2008. Inter-and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4): 830–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. 2001. Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 457–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. 2010. Perspective-absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21(4): 931–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. 2007. Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1): 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Y., & Fried, Y. 2011. Guest editors’ note: The dynamic of employees’ reactions during postmerger integration process. Human Resource Management, 50(6): 777–781.

  • Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. 2011. Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5): 740–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, T. G., & Shaw, V. 2005. Knowledge transfers in acquisitions-an exploratory study and model. Management International Review, 45: 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Y., Tylecote, A., & Liu, J. 2013. Why not greater catch-up by Chinese firms? The impact of IPR, corporate governance and technology intensity on late-comer strategies. Research Policy, 42(3): 749–764.

  • Xing, Y., & Liu, Y. 2016. Linking leaders’ identity work and human resource management involvement: The case of sociocultural integration in Chinese mergers and acquisitions. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(20): 2550–2577.

  • Yin, R. K. 2002. Case study research: Design and methods, Vol. 5: Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Zaheer, A., Hernandez, E., & Banerjee, S. 2010. Prior alliances with targets and acquisition performance in knowledge-intensive industries. Organization Science, 21(5): 1072–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, U., & Zander, L. 2010. Opening the grey box: Social communities, knowledge and culture in acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(1): 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, N., Wei, Y., Zhang, Y., & Yang, J. 2016. In search of strategic assets through cross-border merger and acquisitions: Evidence from Chinese multinational enterprises in developed economies. International Business Review, 25(1): 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M., & Meier, D. 2008. What is M&A performance?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3): 55–77.

  • Zollo, M., & Singh, H. 2004. Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: Post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in US bank mergers. Strategic Management Journal, 25(13): 1233–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Jing Li and the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions, which served to improve this article substantially.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Ai.

Additional information

Dr. Hui Tan is also a visiting professor of Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan, China.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Interview questionnaire

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ai, Q., Tan, H. The intra-firm knowledge transfer in the outward M&A of EMNCs: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Asia Pac J Manag 35, 399–425 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9518-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9518-z

Keywords

Navigation