Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The socio-economic vulnerability of the Australian east coast grazing sector to the impacts of climate change

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research that projects biophysical changes under climate change is more advanced than research that projects socio-economic changes. There is a need in adaptation planning for informed socio-economic projections as well as analysis of how these changes may exacerbate or reduce vulnerability. Our focus in this paper is on the delivery of time-sensitive socio-economic information that can better support anticipatory adaptation planning approaches. Using a ‘multiple lines of evidence’ approach based on Australian Bureau of Statistics’ data (2010/2011), we examine the socio-economic vulnerability of the grazing sector located on Australia’s east coast. We profile the east coast grazing sector through an overview of the composition of its workforce and the value of grazing commodities produced. We then assess the potential vulnerability of the grazing sector using spatial snapshots of five factors known to shape socio-economic vulnerability in New South Wales and Queensland: (1) reliance on agriculture, (2) geographic remoteness, (3) socio-economic disadvantage, (4) economic diversity and (5) age. Our assessment of the east coast grazing sector reveals six subregions characterised by high potential socio-economic vulnerability to the impacts of climate change. We find high percentages of labour forces employed in agriculture, geographic remoteness and age (high percentages of owner/managers and employees in younger age groups) to be drivers of vulnerability. Finally, we evaluate the ways in which these vulnerabilities may be exacerbated or reduced in light of emerging environmental, economic and social trends. This approach complements demographic projection methods to deliver time-sensitive socio-economic information to support anticipatory adaptation planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2:

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Australia’s 55 mainland NRM regions are part of a regionalised framework for environmental governance that gained momentum during the 1980s and 1990s. These arrangements re-configured the relationships between government, business and civil society for environmental governance by devolving responsibility for NRM to community-based regional entities (Wallington and Lawrence 2008; Gunningham 2009). The structural and governance arrangements differ between states and territories as a result of individual bilateral agreements between the federal government and the respective state/territory government. These organisations also differ markedly in terms of their environmental and demographic characteristics, operational capacities and the land area for which they are responsible (Moore and Rockloff 2006; Robins and Dovers 2007; Robins and Kanowski 2011).

  2. The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation’s (CSIRO) climate change projections cited here are the most comprehensive projections ever released for Australia and were developed specifically for NRM regions. Up to 40 global climate models were used for the simulations. Detailed projections are available for four of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). Further information is available online at http://www.climatechangeinaustralia.gov.au/en/.

  3. This knowledge gap is not unique to assessments of the vulnerability of the grazing sector. For example, a recent systematic review of research examining the impact of climate change on the transmission of Ross River Virus reveals that studies seldom include non-climatic factors, particularly socio-economic factors (e.g. migration patterns, population growth and urbanisation). Consequently, identifying vulnerable communities and formulating comprehensive and sustainable programmes to manage Ross River Virus transmission is inhibited (Yu et al. 2014).

  4. Statistical areas are the geographic units used in the ABS’ Australian Statistical Geography Standard (effective from July 2011). SA 1s represent regions with populations in the range of 200–800. SA 2s are the next largest geographic unit which represents regions with populations in the range of 3000–25,000.

  5. No directly comparable analysis is available for the Northern Rivers (now renamed the North Coast Local Land Services Region).

  6. The Smailes et al. (2014) study spanned only the states of New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia. No comparable analysis is available for the Fitzroy NRM region.

References

  • Arthurson K, Baum S (2015) Making space for social inclusion in conceptualising climate change vulnerability. Local Environ Int J Justice Sustain 20:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.818951

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Census of population and housing

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012) Agricultural census 2010–11. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/7101.0main+features2Dec%202012

  • Barnett J, Graham S, Mortreux C, Fincher R, Waters E, Hurlimann A (2014) A local coastal adaptation pathway. Nat Clim Chang 4:1103–1108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr N (2014) New entrants to Australian agricultural industries: where are the young farmers? Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum S, Horton S, Choy DL (2008) Local urban communities and extreme weather events: mapping social vulnerability to flood. Aust J Reg Stud 14:251

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown PR, Nelson R, Jacobs B, Kokic P, Tracey J, Ahmed M, DeVoil P (2010) Enabling natural resource managers to self-assess their adaptive capacity. Agric Syst 103:562–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown PR, Hochman Z, Bridle KL, Huth NI (2015) Participatory approaches to address climate change: perceived issues affecting the ability of South East Queensland graziers to adapt to future climates. Agric Hum Values 32:689–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9584-0

  • Clemens SL, Berry HL, McDermott BM, Harper CM (2013) Summer of sorrow: measuring exposure to and impacts of trauma after Queensland’s natural disasters of 2010–2011. Med J Aust 199:552–555. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja13.10307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobon DH, Stone GS, Carter JO, Scanlan JC, Toombs NR, Zhang X, Willcocks J, McKeon GM (2009) The climate change risk management matrix for the grazing industry of northern Australia. Rangel J 31:31–49. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ08069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins M, Knutti R, Arblaster J, Dufresne J-L, Fichefet T, Friedlingstein P, Gao X, Gutowski WJ, Johns T, Krinner G, Shongwe M, Tebaldi C, Weaver AJ, Wehner M (2013) Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1092–1136

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimp SJ, Stokes CJ, Howden SM, Moore AD, Jacobs B, Brown PR, Ash AJ, Kokic P, Leith P (2010) Managing Murray-Darling Basin livestock systems in a variable and changing climate: challenges and opportunities. Rangel J 32:293–304. https://doi.org/10.1071/rj10039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovers SR, Hezri AA (2010) Institutions and policy processes: the means to the ends of adaptation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1:212–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowdy A, Abbs D, Bhend J, Chiew F, Church J, Ekstrom M, Kirono D, Lenton A, Lucas C, McInnes K, Moise A, Monselesan D, Mpelasoka F, Webb L, Whetton P (2015) East Coast cluster report, climate change in Australia. Projections for Australia’s Natural Resource Management Regions. CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology, Australia

  • Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Perseus Book Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang 16:293–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnaut R (2008) The Garnaut climate change review: final report. Cambridge University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghahramani A, Moore AD (2013) Climate change and broadacre livestock production across southern Australia. 2. Adaptation options via grassland management. Crop Pasture Sci 64:615–630. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavac SM, Hastings PA, Childs IR (2003) Demographic projection as a tool for analysing trends of community vulnerability. Aust J Emerg Manag 18:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham N (2009) Environment law, regulation and governance: shifting architectures. J Environ Law 21:179–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqp011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haasnoot M, Kwakkel JH, Walker WE, ter Maat J (2013) Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Glob Environ Chang 23:485–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz SA, Cook H, Littleboy A (2012) Our future world: global megatrends that will change the way we live. The 2012 revision. CSIRO, Canberra. https://doi.org/10.4225/08/584ee9706689b

    Google Scholar 

  • Harle KJ, Howden SM, Hunt LP, Dunlop M (2007) The potential impact of climate change on the Australian wool industry by 2030. Agric Syst 93:61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel J (2011) Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: towards a clarification of the science-policy interface. Glob Environ Chang 21:198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking C, Mills M, Lovelock CE (2014a) Climate change and agriculture: a study for the Fitzroy Basin Association. https://www.terranova.org.au/repository/east-coast-nrm-collection/climate-change-and-agriculture-a-study-for-the-fitzroy-basin-association. Accessed 4 May 2015

  • Hosking C, Mills M, Lovelock CE (2014b) Climate change and agriculture: a study for the Hunter Local Land Services. https://www.terranova.org.au/repository/east-coast-nrm-collection/climate-change-and-agriculture-a-study-for-the-hunter-local-land-services/. Accessed 4 May 2015

  • Jacobs B, Lee C, Watson S, Dunford S, Coutts-Smith A (2016) Adaptation planning process and government adaptation architecture support regional action on climate change in New South Wales, Australia. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Innovation in climate change adaptation. Springer, Berlin, pp 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25814-0_2

  • Lawrence J, Reisinger A, Mullan B, Jackson B (2013) Exploring climate change uncertainties to support adaptive management of changing flood-risk. Environ Sci Pol 33:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughnan ME, Tapper NJ, Phan T, Lynch K, McInnes JA (2013) A spatial vulnerability analysis of urban populations during extreme heat events in Australian capital cities. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughnan M, Tapper N, Phan T (2014) Identifying vulnerable populations in subtropical Brisbane, Australia: a guide for heatwave preparedness and health promotion. ISRN Epidemiol 2014:12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/821759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mach KJ, Planton S, von Stechow C (2014) Annex II: glossary. In: Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning M, Lawrence J, King D, Chapman R (2015) Dealing with changing risks: a New Zealand perspective on climate change adaptation. Reg Environ Chang 15:581–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0673-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA (2010) Understanding social resilience to climate variability in primary enterprises and industries. Glob Environ Chang 20:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA (2011) Assessing resource dependency on the rangelands as a measure of climate sensitivity. Soc Nat Resour 24:1105–1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2010.509856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA, Marshall PA (2007) Conceptualizing and operationalizing social resilience within commercial fisheries in northern Australia. Ecol Soc 12:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA, Stokes CJ, Webb NP, Marshall PA, Lankester AJ (2014) Social vulnerability to climate change in primary producers: a typology approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 186:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin P, Thompson T, Phillips P, Bowen B. (2012) Farm performance: Broadacre and dairy farms, 2009-10 to 2011-12 Agricultural Commodities. 2: 129–164.

  • McKeon GM, Flood N, Carter J, Stone G, Crimp S, Howden M (2008) Simulation of climate change impacts on livestock carrying capacity and production: report for the Garnaut climate change review. Queensland Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore AD, Ghahramani A (2013) Climate change and broadacre livestock production across southern Australia. 1. Impacts of climate change on pasture and livestock productivity, and on sustainable levels of profitability. Glob Chang Biol 19:1440–1455. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore SA, Rockloff SF (2006) Organizing regionally for natural resource management in Australia: reflections on agency and government. J Environ Policy Plan 8:259–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080600915600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Kokic P, Crimp S, Meinke H, Howden SM (2010) The vulnerability of Australian rural communities to climate variability and change: part II—integrating impacts with adaptive capacity. Environ Sci Pol 13:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Outbacknow (2013) Outback Aussie Eventures Launched. http://www.outbacknow.com.au/index.php/articles/blog_news/outback_aussie_eventures_launched

  • Park SE, Marshall NA, Jakku E, Dowd AM, Howden SM, Mendham E, Fleming A (2012) Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Glob Environ Chang 22:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink B (2013a) Socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA) 2011: technical report. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink B (2013b) Australian statistical geography standard (ASGS): volume 5—remoteness structure. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard B, Tonts M (2011) Market efficiency, agriculture and prosperity in rural Australia. In: Tonts M, Siddique M (eds) Globalisation, agriculture and development: perspectives from the Asia-Pacific. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, England, pp 29–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Regional Australia Institute (2014) Talking point: an ageing (regional) Australia and the rise of the super boomer. Regional Australia Institute, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisinger A, Kitching RL, Chiew F, Hughes L, Newton PCD, Schuster SS, Tait A, Whetton P (2014) Australasia. In: Barros VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, Maccracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1371–1438

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickards L, Howden SM (2012) Transformational adaptation: agriculture and climate change. Crop Pasture Sci 63:240–250. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP11172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins L, Dovers S (2007) NRM regions in Australia: the ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots’. Geogr Res 45:273–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00460.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins L, Kanowski P (2011) ‘Crying for our country’: eight ways in which ‘Caring for our Country’ has undermined Australia’s regional model for natural resource management. Aust J Environ Manag 18:88–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2011.566158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roiko A, Mangoyana R, McFallan S, Carter R, Oliver J, Smith T (2012) Socio-economic trends and climate change adaptation: the case of South East Queensland Australasian. J Environ Manag 19:35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2011.646754

  • Smailes P, Griffin T, Argent N (2014) Demographic change, differential ageing, and public policy in rural and regional Australia: a three-state case study. Geogr Res 52:229–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745–5871.12067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith EF, Pritchard B (2014) Water reform in the 21st century: the changed status of Australian agriculture. In: Dufty-Jones R, Connell J (eds) Rural change in Australia: population, economy and environment. Ashgate, Surrey, pp 169–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith EF, Keys N, Lieske SN, Smith TF (2015) Assessing socio-economic vulnerability to climate change impacts and environmental hazards in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Geogr Res 53:451–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12137

  • Smith EF, Lieske SN, Keys N, Smith TF (2016) Rapid regional-scale assessments of socio-economic vulnerability to climate change. Environ Res Lett 11:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034016

  • Solangaarachchi D, Griffin AL, Doherty MD (2012) Social vulnerability in the context of bushfire risk at the urban-bush interface in Sydney: a case study of the Blue Mountains and Ku-ring-gai local council areas. Nat Hazards 64:1873–1898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0334-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson T, Martin P (2012) Australian beef: financial performance of beef cattle producing farms, 2009–10 to 2011–12. ABARES

  • Thomsen DC, Smith T, Stephenson C (2012) Sustainability indicators: annual sustainability trends for the sunshine coast. Report prepared for the Sunshine Coast Council, Queensland, Australia. Sustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs

  • Vaneckova P, Hart MA, Beggs PJ, De Dear RJ (2008) Synoptic analysis of heat-related mortality in Sydney, Australia, 1993–2001. Int J Biometeorol 52:439–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-007-0138-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallington TJ, Lawrence G (2008) Making democracy matter: responsibility and effective environmental governance in regional Australia. J Rural Stud 24:277–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb NP, Stokes CJ, Scanlan JC (2012) Interacting effects of vegetation, soils and management on the sensitivity of Australian savanna rangelands to climate change. Clim Chang 112:925–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0236-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whish GL, Cowley RA, Pahl LI, Scanlan JC, MacLeaod ND (2014) Impacts of projected climate change on pasture growth and safe carrying capacities for 3 extensive grazing land regions in northern Australia. Trop Grasslands - Forrajes Trop 2:151–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White N, Sutherst RW, Hall N, Whish-Wilson P (2003) The vulnerability of the Australian beef industry to impacts of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) under climate change. Clim Chang 61:157–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026354712890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu W, Dale P, Turner L, Tong S (2014) Projecting the impact of climate change on the transmission of Ross River virus: methodological challenges and research needs. Epidemiol Infect 142:2013–2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268814000399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This article received funding from the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency as part of the Natural Resource Management Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Research Grants Program, under the Natural Resource Management Planning for Climate Change Fund—A Clean Energy Future Initiative (Australia). The views expressed herein are not necessarily the views of the Commonwealth of Australia, and the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for any information or advice contained herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin F. Smith.

Additional information

Editor: Jamie Pittock.

Electronic supplementary material

Online Resource 1

(DOCX 33 kb)

Online Resource 2

(DOCX 1077 kb)

Online Resource 3

(DOCX 979 kb)

Online Resource 4

(DOCX 921 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, E.F., Lieske, S.N., Keys, N. et al. The socio-economic vulnerability of the Australian east coast grazing sector to the impacts of climate change. Reg Environ Change 18, 1185–1199 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1251-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1251-0

Keywords

Navigation