Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How much does geography contribute? Measuring inequality of opportunities using a bespoke neighbourhood approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To what extent an individual is successful in a variety of outcomes is the result of multiple factors such as (but not limited to) parental background, level of education, discrimination and business cycles. Factors like these also indicate that the success in life can be attributable to factors that both take individual-level merits into account but also to structural factors such as discrimination and contextual effects. Over the last decades, a growing interest in decomposing and categorising factors that affect the life chances of individuals has led to the formation of inequality of opportunity as a research field. This paper builds upon this growing literature, which amounts to quantify the contribution of factors that lie beyond the control of individuals to the total inequality observed in different spheres of life. Using rich Swedish longitudinal register data, we are able to follow individuals over time and their educational attainment during upbringing and later labour market outcomes. In difference from other inequality of opportunity studies, we make use of an egocentric neighbourhood approach to integrate the socio-economic composition of the parental neighbourhood in an inequality model and illustrate its contribution to the total inequality in both outcomes quantitatively. Using multilevel regression analyses, we show that the parental neighbourhood is highly influential in educational attainment and remains so for market outcomes even years after exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Source: https://www.scb.se/Grupp/Hitta_statistik/Regional%20statistik/Kartor/_Dokument/SKL-Kommungrupp.pdf.

  2. Kriging was conducted in ARCInfo using the ordinary spherical semivariogram method, \(\hbox {k}=12\)

  3. see Jusot et al. (2013) for other approaches

  4. Multilevel regression showed a negative association with the disposable income of individuals and their parental education. To correct this, we used a classification that sorted municipalities by the degree of industrialisation, population density, commuting and remoteness

References

  • Andersson E (2004) From valley of sadness to hill of happiness: the significance of surroundings for socioeconomic career. Urban Stud 41(3):641–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson E, Subramanian S (2006) Explorations of neighbourhood and educational outcomes for young Swedes. Urban Stud 43(11):2013–2025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson Roger, Musterd Sako (2010) What scale matters? Exploring the relationships between individuals’ social position, neighbourhood context and the scale of neighbourhood. Geogr Ann Ser B Hum Geogr 92(1):23–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson EK, Malmberg B (2015) Contextual effects on educational attainment in individualised, scalable neighbourhoods: differences across gender and social class. Urban Stud 52(12):2117–2133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Barros RP (2009) Measuring inequality of opportunities in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank Publications, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • de Barros RP, Vega JRM, Saavedra J (2008) Measuring inequality of opportunities for children. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Björklund A, Jäntti M, Roemer JE (2012) Equality of opportunity and the distribution of long-run income in Sweden. Soc Choice Welf 39(2–3):675–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw J, Mayhew E (2011) The measurement of extreme poverty in the European Union. European Commission, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazil Noli, Clark William AV (2017) Residential mobility and dynamic neighborhood change during the transition to adulthood. Adv Life Course Res 33:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon F, Ferreira FH, Menendez M (2007) Inequality of opportunity in Brazil. Rev Income Wealth 53(4):585–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunori P, Ferreira FH, Peragine V (2013) Inequality of opportunity, income inequality, and economic mobility: some international comparisons. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Checchi D, Peragine V (2010) Inequality of opportunity in Italy. J Econ Inequal 8(4):429–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checchi D, Peragine V, Serlenga L (2010) Fair and unfair income inequalities in Europe. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5025. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1634492

  • Chetty R, Hendren N, Katz LF (2015) The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: new evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Clark WA, Ledwith V (2006) Mobility, housing stress, and neighborhood contexts: evidence from Los Angeles. Environ Plan A 38(6):1077–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogneau D, Mesplé-Somps S (2008) Inequality of opportunity for income in five countries of Africa. Res Econ Inequal 16:99–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane J (1991) The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing. Am J Sociol 96(5):1226–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen IG, Turner MA (1997) Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Hous Policy Debate 8(4):833–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira FH, Gignoux J (2011) The measurement of inequality of opportunity: theory and an application to Latin America. Rev Income Wealth 57(4):622–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira FH, Gignoux J, Aran M (2010) Inequality of economic opportunity in Turkey: an assessment using asset indicators and women’s background variables. State Planning Organization of the Republic of Turkey and World Bank Welfare and Social Policy Analytical Work Program Working Paper (3)

  • Ferreira FH, Gignoux J, Aran M (2011) Measuring inequality of opportunity with imperfect data: the case of Turkey. J Econ Inequal 9(4):651–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galster G (2001) On the nature of neighbourhood. Urban Stud 38(12):2111–2124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galster G, Andersson R, Musterd S, Kauppinen TM (2008) Does neighborhood income mix affect earnings of adults? New evidence from Sweden. J Urban Econ 63(3):858–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner CL, Raudenbush SW (1991) Neighborhood effects on educational attainment: a multilevel analysis. Sociol Educ 64(4):251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass TA, Bilal U (2016) Are neighborhoods causal? Complications arising from the ’stickiness’ of zna. Soc Sci Med 166:244–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedman L, Manley D, Van Ham M, Östh J (2015) Cumulative exposure to disadvantage and the intergenerational transmission of neighbourhood effects. J Econ Geogr 15(1):195–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston D (2005) Employability, skills mismatch and spatial mismatch in metropolitan labour markets. Urban Stud 42(2):221–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston Ron, Jones Kelvyn, Burgess Simon, Propper Carol, Sarker Rebecca, Bolster Anne (2004) Scale, factor analyses, and neighborhood effects. Geogr Anal 36(4):350–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jusot F, Tubeuf S, Trannoy A (2013) Circumstances and efforts: How important is their correlation for the measurement of inequality of opportunity in health? Health Econ 22(12):1470–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kain JF (1968) Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. Q J Econ 82(2):175–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kain JF (1992) The spatial mismatch hypothesis: three decades later. Hous Policy Debate 3(2):371–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz J, Page ME, Solon G (2003) Are point-in-time measures of neighborhood characteristics useful proxies for children’s long-run neighborhood environment? Econ Lett 79(2):231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J (2000) The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychol Bull 126(2):309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig J (1999) Information and inner city educational attainment. Econ Educ Rev 18(1):17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig J, Duncan GJ, Gennetian LA, Katz LF, Kessler RC, Kling JR, Sanbonmatsu L (2013) Long-term neighborhood effects on low-income families: evidence from moving to opportunity. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Moran PA (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37(1/2):17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musterd Sako, Ostendorf Wim, De Vos Sjoerd (2003) Neighbourhood effects and social mobility: a longitudinal analysis. Hous Stud 18(6):877–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musterd S, Andersson R (2006) Employment, social mobility and neighbourhood effects: the case of Sweden. Int J Urban Reg Res 30(1):120–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. Geo Abstracts University of East Anglia, East Anglia

    Google Scholar 

  • Östh J (2014) Introducing the equipop software-an application for the calculation of k-nearest neighbour contexts/neighbourhoods

  • Östh J, Clark WA, Malmberg B (2015) Measuring the scale of segregation using k-nearest neighbor aggregates. Geogr Anal 47(1):34–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östh J, Türk U (2019) Integrating infrastructure and accessibility in measures of bespoke neighbourhoods. In: Musterd S (ed) Handbook on Urban segregation Edward Elgar. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Östh J, Shuttleworth I, Niedomysl T (2018) Spatial and temporal patterns of economic segregation in Sweden’s metropolitan areas: a mobility approach. Environ Plan A Econ Space 50(4):809–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page ME, Solon G (2003) Correlations between brothers and neighboring boys in their adult earnings: the importance of being urban. J Labor Econ 21(4):831–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peragine V, Serlenga L (2008) Higher education and equality of opportunity in Italy. Res Econ Inequal 16:67–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quillian L (2003) How long are exposures to poor neighborhoods? The long-term dynamics of entry and exit from poor neighborhoods. Popul Res Policy Rev 22(3):221–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raaum O, Salvanes KG, Sørensen EØ (2006) The neighbourhood is not what it used to be*. Econ J 116(508):200–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos X, Van de Gaer D (2012) Empirical approaches to inequality of opportunity: principles, measures, and evidence

  • Roemer JE (1998) Theories of distributive justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer JE, Trannoy A (2016) Equality of opportunity: theory and measurement. J Econ Lit 5(4):1288–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross JL, Iannotta JG et al (2002) Equality of opportunity and the importance of place: summary of a workshop. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey P, Faber JW (2014) Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annu Rev Sociol 40:559–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A (2012) Inequality of opportunity in earnings and consumption expenditure: the case of Indian men. Rev Income Wealth 58(1):79–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders T, Bosker R (1999) Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and applied multilevel analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Türk U (2019) Socio-economic determinants of student mobility and inequality of access to higher education in Italy. Netw Spat Econ 43(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban S (2009) Is the neighbourhood effect an economic or an immigrant issue? A study of the importance of the childhood neighbourhood for future integration into the labour market. Urban Stud 46(3):583–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ham M, Manley D, Bailey N, Simpson L, Maclennan D (2012) Neighbourhood effects research: new perspectives. In: Neighbourhood effects research: new perspectives, Springer, pp 1–21

  • Van Ham M, Hedman L, Manley D, Coulter R, Östh J (2014) Intergenerational transmission of neighbourhood poverty: an analysis of neighbourhood histories of individuals. Trans Inst Br Geogr 39(3):402–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Klaauw B, Van Ours JC (2003) From welfare to work: Does the neighborhood matter? J Public Econ 87(5):957–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartanian TP (1999) Adolescent neighborhood effects on labor market and economic outcomes. Soc Serv Rev 73(2):142–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Abdullah Gül University, Sumer Campus, 38030, Kayseri, Turkey

    Umut Türk

  2. Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University, Box 513, SE-751 20, Uppsala, Sweden

    John Östh

Authors
  1. Umut Türk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Östh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umut Türk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Türk, U., Östh, J. How much does geography contribute? Measuring inequality of opportunities using a bespoke neighbourhood approach. J Geogr Syst 21, 295–318 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-019-00297-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-019-00297-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation