Skip to main content
Log in

Polarization characteristics of scattered light from macroscopically rough surfaces

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Optical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The polarization status of in- and out-of-plane scattered light from macroscopically rough surfaces was measured and expressed in a scattering coordinate system. In this coordinate system, the direction of the scattered light was decided by the transverse and longitudinal scattering angles, both of which are defined by using the incident ray and its section plane as the fundamental axis and plane. The polarization characteristics of scattering, which consist of patterns of polarization degrees and the Stokes of the scattered light in terms of transverse and longitudinal scattering angles, was presented and investigated. The Stokes patterns of scattered light exhibited independence from the transverse scattering angle. Furthermore, the ellipsometric parameters of samples, which were deduced from the polarization status of full scattering, showed the validity as well as limitations of the facet model for macroscopically rough surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stover, J.C.: Optical scattering: measurement and analysis. SPIE Optical Engineering Press, Bellingham, Washington, USA (1995)

  2. Torrance, K.E., Sparrow, E.M.: Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 1105–1112 (1967)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maxwell, J.R., Beard, J., Weiner, S., Ladd, D.: “Bidirectional reflectance model validation and utilization,” Technical Report AF AL–TR–73–303, Environmental Research Institute of Michigan (ERIM), October (1973)

  4. He, X.D., Torrance, K.E., Sillion, F.X., Greenberg, D.P.: A comprehensive physical model for light reflection. Comput. Graph. 25, 175–186 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, H., Torrance, K.E.: An experimental study of the correlation between surface roughness and light scattering for rough metallic surfaces. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5878, p. 58780V (2005)

  6. Jafolla, J.C., Thomas, D.J., Hilgers, J.W., Reynolds, W.R., Blasband, C.: Theory and measurement of bidirectional reflectance for signature analysis. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3699, pp. 2–15 (1999)

  7. Priest, R., Germer, T.: Polarimetric BRDF in the microfacet model; theory and measurements. In: Proceedings of the 2000 meeting of the Military Sensing Symposia Specialty Group on passive sensors, Infrared Information Analysis Center, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 169–181 (2000)

  8. Renhorn, I.G., Boreman, G.D.: Analytical fitting model for rough-surface BRDF. Opt. Express 16, 12892–12898 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hyde IV, M.W., Schmidt, J.D., Havrilla, M.J.: A geometrical optics polarimetric bidirectional reflectance distribution function for dielectric and metallic surfaces. Opt. Express 17, 22138–22153 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rhenhorn, I.G., Hallberg, T., Bergstrom, D., Boreman, G.D.: Four-parameter model for polarization-resolved rough-surface BRDF. Opt. Express 19, 1027–1036 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Videen, G., Hsu, J., Bickel, W.S., Wolfe, W.L.: Polarized light scattered from rough surfaces. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1111–1118 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin, L., Kasahara, M., Gelloz, B., Takizawa, K.: Polarization properties of scattered light from macrorough surfaces. Opt. Lett. 35, 595–597 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin, L., Takizawa, K.: Stokes parameters of reflected and scattered light by a rough surface. Proc. SPIE 7432, 74320B (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jin, L., Tsutaki, T., Gelloz, B.: Polarization analysis of scattering light using a facet model. In: Proceedings SPIE 8160, (2011)

  15. Barrick, D.E.: Rough surface scattering based on the specular point theory. IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop. AP-16, pp. 449–454 (1968)

  16. Mendez, E.R., O’Donnell, K.A.: Observation of depolarization and backscattering enhancement in light scattering from Gaussian random surfaces. Opt. Commun. 61, 91–95 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Donnell, K.A., Mendez, E.R.: Experimental study of scattering from characterized random surfaces. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1194–1205 (1987)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Sant, A.J., Dainty, J.C., Kim, M.J.: Comparison of surface scattering between identical, randomly rough metal and dielectric diffusers. Opt. Lett. 14, 1183–1185 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tompkins, H.G., Irene, E.A.: Handbook of ellipsometry. William Andrew, Newyork (2005)

  20. Tompkins, H.G.: A user’s guide to ellipsometry. Dover Publications, Newyork (2006)

  21. Stankevicha, D., Istominaa, L., Shkuratova, Y., Videen, G.: The scattering matrix of random media consisting of large opaque spheres calculated using ray tracing and accounting for coherent backscattering enhancement. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiative Transfer 106, 509–519 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lianhua Jin.

Appendix

Appendix

The Stokes of the reflected lights are related to the polarization state of the incident light (right circularly polarized in this work), and given by [19],

$$S_{0} = r_{p}^{2} + r_{s}^{2} ,$$
(A-1)
$$S_{1} = r_{p}^{2} - r_{s}^{2} = - \cos 2\varPsi ,$$
(A-2)
$$S_{2} = 2r_{p} r_{s} \cos (\Delta + 90^\circ ) = - \sin 2\varPsi \sin \Delta ,$$
(A-3)
$$S_{3} = 2r_{p} r_{s} \sin (\Delta + 90^\circ ) = \sin 2\varPsi \cos \Delta ,$$
(A-4)

where Δ is the phase difference of p and s polarized light by reflection, and Ψ is the ratio of p and s polarized light. The phase 90° in Eqs. (A-3) and (A-4) is invoked due to the right circularly polarized incident light.

Fresnel reflection coefficients r p and r s are reflection layer related factors. For the reflection at a single interface between medium 1 (refractive index N 1) and medium 3 (refractive index N 3), the coefficients become,

$$r_{p}^{13} = \frac{{N_{1} \sin \frac{{\theta_{\text{ls}} }}{2} - N_{3} \left[ {1 - (N_{1} /N_{3} )^{2} \cos^{2} \frac{{\theta_{\text{ls}} }}{2}} \right]^{1/2} }}{{N_{1} \sin \frac{{\theta_{\text{ls}} }}{2} + N_{3} \left[ {1 - (N_{1} /N_{3} )^{2} \cos^{2} \frac{{\theta_{\text{ls}} }}{2}} \right]^{1/2} }} ,$$
(A-5)
$$r_{s}^{13} = \frac{{N_{3} \sin \frac{{\theta_{\text{ls}} }}{2} - N_{1} \left[ {1 - (N_{1} /N_{3} )^{2} \cos^{2} \frac{{\theta_{\text{ls}} }}{2}} \right]^{1/2} }}{{N_{3} \sin \frac{{\theta_{\text{ls}} }}{2} + N_{1} \left[ {1 - (N_{1} /N_{3} )^{2} \cos^{2} \frac{{\theta_{\text{ls}} }}{2}} \right]^{1/2} }} .$$
(A-6)

For the successive reflection from two interfaces between medium 1, medium 2 (refractive index N 2), and medium 3, the total reflection coefficients will be [20],

$$r_{p}^{123} = \frac{{r_{p}^{12} + r_{p}^{23} \exp ( - j2\beta )}}{{1 + r_{p}^{12} r_{p}^{23} \exp ( - j2\beta )}} ,$$
(A-7)
$$r_{s}^{123} = \frac{{r_{s}^{12} + r_{s}^{23} \exp ( - j2\beta )}}{{1 + r_{s}^{12} r_{s}^{23} \exp ( - j2\beta )}} ,$$
(A-8)

where the subscript “12” and “23” denote that the coefficients are for interfaces between medium 1 and medium 2, and medium 2 and medium 3, respectively. β is the phase thickness of the medium 2 and is given by [20]

$$\beta = \frac{2\pi d}{\lambda }N_{2} \left[ {1 - (N_{1} /N_{2} )^{2} \cos^{2} \frac{{\theta_{\text{ls}} }}{2}} \right]^{1/2} ,$$
(A-9)

where d is the thickness of medium 2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, L., Yamaguchi, K., Watanabe, M. et al. Polarization characteristics of scattered light from macroscopically rough surfaces. Opt Rev 22, 511–520 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-015-0117-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-015-0117-2

Keywords

Navigation