Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective strict no-arbitrage and the fundamental theorem of asset pricing under transaction costs

  • Published:
Finance and Stochastics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In discrete-time markets with proportional transaction costs, Schachermayer (Math. Financ. 14:19–48, 2004) showed that robust no-arbitrage is equivalent to the existence of a strictly consistent price system. In this paper, we introduce the concept of prospective strict no-arbitrage that is a variant of the strict no-arbitrage property from Kabanov et al. (Finance Stoch. 6:371–382, 2002). The prospective strict no-arbitrage condition is slightly weaker than the robust no-arbitrage condition, and it implies that the set of portfolios attainable from zero initial endowment is closed in probability. A weak version of prospective strict no-arbitrage turns out to be equivalent to the existence of a consistent price system. In contrast to the fundamental theorem of asset pricing of Schachermayer (Math. Financ. 14:19–48, 2004), the consistent frictionless prices may lie on the boundary of the bid–ask spread. On the technical level, a crucial difference to Schachermayer (Math. Financ. 14:19–48, 2004) and Kabanov et al. (Finance Stoch. 7:403–411, 2003) is that we prove closedness without having at hand that the null-strategies form a linear space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aliprantis, C., Border, K.: Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouchard, B.: No-arbitrage in discrete-time markets with proportional transaction costs and general information structure. Finance Stoch. 10, 276–297 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalang, R.C., Morton, A., Willinger, W.: Equivalent martingale measures and no-arbitrage in stochastic securities market models. Stoch. Stoch. Rep. 29, 185–201 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. De Vallière, D., Kabanov, Y., Stricker, C.: No-arbitrage criteria for financial markets with transaction costs and incomplete information. Finance Stoch. 11, 237–251 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Delbaen, F., Schachermayer, W.: A general version of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing. Math. Ann. 300, 463–520 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Delbaen, F., Schachermayer, W.: The Mathematics of Arbitrage. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Grigoriev, P.: On low dimensional case in the fundamental asset pricing theorem with transaction costs. Stat. Decis. 23, 33–48 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Harrison, J.M., Pliska, S.R.: Martingales and stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading. Stoch. Process. Appl. 11, 215–260 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacka, S., Berkaoui, A., Warren, J.: No arbitrage and closure results for trading cones with transaction costs. Finance Stoch. 12, 583–600 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kabanov, Y., Rásonyi, M., Stricker, C.: No-arbitrage criteria for financial markets with efficient friction. Finance Stoch. 6, 371–382 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kabanov, Y., Rásonyi, M., Stricker, C.: On the closedness of sums of convex cones in \(L^{0}\) and the robust no-arbitrage property. Finance Stoch. 7, 403–411 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kabanov, Y., Safarian, M.: Markets with Transaction Costs: Mathematical Theory. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kabanov, Y., Sticker, C.: A teacher’s note on no-arbitrage criteria. In: Azéma, J., et al. (eds.) Séminaire de Probabilités XXXV. Lect. Notes Math., vol. 1755, pp. 149–152. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kabanov, Y., Stricker, C.: The Harrison–Pliska arbitrage pricing theorem under transaction costs. J. Math. Econ. 35, 185–196 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kramkov, D., Schachermayer, W.: The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab. 9, 904–950 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kühn, C.: How local in time is the no-arbitrage property under capital gains taxes? Math. Financ. Econ. 13, 329–358 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lépinette, E., Zhao, J.: A complement to the Grigoriev theorem for the Kabanov model. Theory Probab. Appl. (2019), in press. Available online at https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01666860v6

  18. Penner, I.: Arbitragefreiheit in Finanzmärkten mit Transaktionskosten (2001). Diplomarbeit, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Unpublished

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rockafellar, R., Wets, R.: Variational Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Rokhlin, D.B.: A constructive no-arbitrage criterion with transaction costs in the case of finite discrete time. Theory Probab. Appl. 52, 93–107 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Schachermayer, W.: A Hilbert space proof of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing in finite discrete time. Insur. Math. Econ. 11, 249–257 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Schachermayer, W.: The fundamental theorem of asset pricing under proportional transaction costs in finite discrete time. Math. Finance 14, 19–48 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We should like to thank the editor, Prof. Martin Schweizer, an anonymous Associate Editor and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions from which the manuscript greatly benefitted.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Kühn.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kühn, C., Molitor, A. Prospective strict no-arbitrage and the fundamental theorem of asset pricing under transaction costs. Finance Stoch 23, 1049–1077 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-019-00403-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-019-00403-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

JEL Classification

Navigation