Abstract
Avian influenza viruses circulating in birds have caused outbreaks of infection in poultry and humans, thereby threatening public health. Recently, a highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus (H5N8) of clade 2.3.4.4 emerged in Korea and other countries and caused multiple outbreaks in domestic and wild birds, with concerns for human infection. To combat HPAI viral infections, novel vaccines are likely to be the most effective approach. Therefore, in this study, we generated H5N8 vaccine candidate viruses based on a Korean isolate (A/broiler duck/Korea/Buan2/2014). The vaccine candidate viruses were 2:6 reassortants expressing the two surface glycoproteins of A/broiler duck/Korea/Buan2/2014 on an A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (PR8) backbone generated by using an eight-plasmid-based reverse genetics system with or without replacement of the multi-basic amino acid cleavage motif (MBCM, a crucial pathogenic factor in HPAI virus) with a bi-basic amino acid cleavage motif (BBCM) in their HA. An H5N8 vaccine candidate virus containing the BBCM showed attenuated pathogenesis in embryonated eggs and exhibited less virulence in the infected mice compared with the wild H5N8 virus containing an MBCM. Vaccination with an inactivated preparation of the vaccine candidate virus protected mice from lethal H5N8 viral challenge. This is the first report of the development and evaluation of H5N8 vaccine strains (with an MBCM or BBCM) of HA clade 2.3.4.4 as vaccine candidates. Our findings suggest that H5N8 strains with a BBCM instead of an MBCM might be considered for H5N8 vaccine seed virus development or as a reference vaccine against H5N8 viral strains.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of the H5N1 subtype with hemagglutinin (HA) of A/goose/Guangdong/ 96-like (GD/96) have been continually observed in wild and domestic bird populations since their re-emergence in 2003 [1]. Outbreaks of these HPAI viruses have caused high mortality in domestic poultry, resulting in economic losses in the poultry industry and related industries [2,3,4]. In addition to birds and animals, these H5N1 viruses can also infect humans and have a high fatality rate of approximately 53% [5].
Since 2010, new viruses of the H5Nx subtype having neuraminidase (NA) subtypes other than N1, including H5N2, H5N3, H5N6, and H5N8, have emerged in wild and domestic birds in China [1]. Notably, all of these H5Nx reassortants belong to the HA clade 2.3.4.4 [1]. In 2010, the reassortant HPAI H5N8 virus (A/duck/Jiangsu/k1203/2010) belonging to the HA clade 2.3.4.4 of the GD/96 lineage was isolated from swabs taken from mallard ducks in a bird market of eastern China [6]. In 2013, an H5N8 virus of the HA clade 2.3.4.4 was identified in domestic ducks through surveillance of live-poultry markets in eastern China [7], and it has spread to Europe, the western and central USA, and Canada, where it has been detected in wild and domestic birds [8, 9]. In early 2014, HPAI H5N8 viruses were detected and caused outbreaks in poultry and wild birds in South Korea [10]. Despite control measures on HPAI-H5N8-infected poultry farms with culling of several million fowl, South Korea experienced sporadic outbreaks of H5N8 in wild and domestic birds from 2014 to 2015 [11]. During 2016–2017, clade 2.3.4.4 HPAI H5N8 viruses re-emerged in wild birds and poultry in South Korea, affecting at least 76 poultry farms [12]. In January 2017, clade 2.3.4.4 HPAI H5N8 viruses were isolated from a grey heron, and phylogenetic analysis confirmed that it was a novel reassortant virus of clade 2.3.4.4 H5N8 introduced by migratory birds from Qinghai Lake and Western Siberia [13].
Wild birds (ducks, geese, and terrestrial avian species) are thought to a play crucial role as a source of influenza A viruses. Moreover, wild birds are the primary reservoir in which influenza A virus reassortment occurs and from which the viruses flow into domestic fowl [14, 15]. Eradication of these viral reservoirs in nature is impossible because many wild birds and other animals are asymptomatically infected [14]. Furthermore, reports of human infections with H5N1, H7N2, H7N3, H7N7, H9N2, and H10N7 avian influenza viruses have provided clear evidence that avian influenza A viruses can be directly transmitted to humans [16,17,18,19,20].
Although cases of human infection with H5N8 have not been reported, circulation of H5N8 viruses may re-occur in future winter seasons, with a potential for human or pandemic infection by adaptive mutations and/or reassortment events with human or other avian influenza virus strains [21]. Therefore, active surveillance and monitoring of HPAI H5Nx viruses, along with continuous research and development of HPAI H5Nx vaccines, are the best strategies for the prevention and control of HPAI infections and pandemics in humans.
To facilitate this approach, we generated H5N8 vaccine candidate strains based on reassortant viruses possessing the HA and NA gene segments from the H5N8 Korean isolate A/broiler duck/Korea/Buan2/2014 and a safe A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (PR8) backbone of internal gene segments [22,23,24]. The presence of a multi-basic amino acid cleavage motif (MBCM) in the connecting peptide between HA1 and HA2 of HA in HPAI H5 and H7 viruses is associated with embryo-lethality and high pathogenesis in animals because it increases the tissue infection spectrum of these viruses, resulting in viral replication in multiple organs and consequent systemic disease and fatality in animals [25]. This presence of an MBCM in the HAs of H5- and H7-subtype viruses distinguishes HPAI viruses from low-pathogenic avian influenza viruses [26].
In this study, we aimed to obtain safer and more suitable H5N8 vaccine candidate strains for production in embryonated eggs by replacing the MBCM of H5H8 HA with a bi-basic amino acid cleavage motif (BBCM) in two out of three H5N8 vaccine candidate strains, in addition to reassortment with PR8. Using a Korean H5N8 isolate, we assessed the growth properties of three H5N8 vaccine candidates in embryonated eggs and in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. In addition, we evaluated the pathogenesis of the vaccine candidates and the Korean isolate in a mouse model. Finally, we tested vaccine efficacy using a vaccine candidate strain with a BBCM instead of an MBCM. Our results provide important insights into the development of a reference vaccine against H5N8 viral strains.
Materials and methods
Viruses and cells
H5N8 Korean isolates (A/broiler duck/Korea/Buan2/2014 and A/breeder duck/Korea/Gochang1/2014, designated as Buan-wild and Gochang-wild, respectively, in Table 1) and the PR8 and H5N8 reassortants (Table 1) were propagated in the allantoic cavities of 10- to 11-day-old embryonated chicken eggs at 37°C. At 24–48 hours postinfection (hpi), the allantoic fluid was harvested and stored at –80°C until use. A tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50) assay was performed using monolayers of MDCK cells cultured in MEM with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). 293T cells for transfection assays were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS. All experiments using H5N8 viruses, including work with mice, were performed using biosafety level 3 containment procedures and facilities.
Plasmids for reverse genetics
H5N8 reassortant viruses were generated using the eight-plasmid-based reverse genetics system with pHW2000 [27, 28]. Using Buan-wild viral RNA, the HA and NA genes of H5N8 were amplified by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and incorporated into the pHW2000 plasmid. In addition, six internal genes from the PR8 virus were amplified by RT-PCR and cloned into pHW2000. The modified HA genes for Buan-LRET and -QRET were amplified in two parts by RT-PCR from Buan-wild viral RNA, using primers designed to replace the MBCM with a BBCM, as indicated in Fig. 1 (sequences available upon request). The PCR products were cloned into pHW2000 using ligation reactions as described previously [28]. All cloned plasmids were sequenced to ensure the absence of unwanted mutations.
Generation of H5N8:PR8 (2:6) reassortant viruses
The H5N8 reassortant viruses were generated by transfection with plasmid DNAs as described previously [27,28,29].
The viruses that were generated were 6:2 reassortants consisting of six genes from PR8 in conjunction with NA from H5N8 Buan and either the Buan-wild HA (Buan-Full) or a modified HA (Buan-LRET and Buan-QRET). 293T cells were transfected with the eight-plasmid mixture using Lipofectamine 2000 (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. At 3–4 days post-transfection, culture supernatants and cell lysates were collected in the presence of 1 μg of l-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone–treated trypsin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) per mL and used to inoculate specific-pathogen-free (SPF) embryonated eggs. The harvested fluids from the first passage in eggs were injected into fresh eggs; the H5N8 reassortant viruses were identified in the allantoic fluids from the second egg passage by limiting dilution in eggs as reported previously [29].
Viral growth curve in vitro and viral titration
To generate viral replication curves in MDCK cells and embryonated eggs, monolayers of MDCK cells and SPF embryonated eggs were inoculated with the designated viruses at 1.45 × 10−2 TCID50 per cell (equivalent to a multiplicity of infection [MOI] of 0.01) and 145 TCID50 per egg (equivalent to 100 pfu per egg) at 37°C, respectively, as reported previously [30]. Supernatants were harvested at 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 hpi for viral titration in MDCK cells. Allantoic fluids were collected at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hpi for viral titration in embryonated eggs. Amounts of virus in the supernatants and allantoic fluids were determined by HA assays with 0.5% turkey red blood cell suspensions (50 μL) and checked using the 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50/ml) in MDCK cells based on the method of Reed-Muench [31]. For eggs, lethality was also observed during the inoculation.
HA and HA inhibition (HAI) assays
Fifty microliters of 0.5% turkey RBC suspension in PBS was added to 50 μL of a twofold dilution of the indicated virus in PBS, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min to 1 h. HA titers were calculated as the reciprocal value of the highest virus dilution that caused complete hemagglutination of RBCs. For HAI assays, sera from mice were collected at the indicated times after vaccination and stored at –80°C until use. HAI assays were carried out as described previously [32]. In brief, mouse sera were treated with receptor-destroying enzyme to inactivate nonspecific inhibitors, with a final serum dilution of 1:10. The enzyme-treated sera were serially diluted twofold, and an equal volume of virus (8 HA units/50 μL) was added to each well in the microplates. The microplates were incubated at room temperature for 30 min to 1 h, followed by the addition of 0.5% turkey RBCs. The mixtures in the plates were gently mixed and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. HAI titers were determined as the reciprocal of the last dilution that contained turkey RBCs with no agglutination.
Microneutralization assays
Sequential twofold dilutions of the indicated heat-inactivated mouse sera were tested in microneutralization assays to measure the highest dilutions (neutralizing titers) of the antibodies that were able to neutralize the infectivity of 100 TCID50 of the indicated viral strains on MDCK cells in 96-well plates as described previously [33]. After 3 days of incubation at 35°C, the cells were observed for the presence of cytopathic effects, and neutralizing titers were defined as the highest dilution to retain a confluent cell monolayer. Neutralizing titers below the limit of detection (< 1:10) were assigned a value of 1:5 (Table 2).
Pathogenicity of H5N8 viruses in mice
Six- to eight-week-old female BALB/c mice (Orient Bio, South Korea) were infected intranasally with 50 μL of H5N8 wild and H5N8 reassortant viruses individually under anesthetization with Avertin. The 50% murine lethal dose (mLD50) and 50% murine infectious dose (MID50) were calculated by inoculating 10 mice per group with serial tenfold dilutions, from 5 × 10−1 to 5 × 104 TCID50, of the viruses. Three days after virus inoculation, after euthanasia, the lungs of four mice from each group were collected, and viral titers were measured by TCID50 assay to calculate the MID50 in MDCK cells. Body weight changes and mortality rates in the remaining six mice were monitored daily for 14 days to calculate the mLD50. Mice that lost more than 20% of their initial body weight were scored as dead and were euthanized according to institutional guidelines. MID50 and mLD50 were calculated by the Reed–Muench method [31]. All animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the KCDC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Preparation of inactivated virus concentrates for vaccination
H5N8 reassortant and PR8 viruses amplified in embryonated chicken eggs were incubated at 4°C for 7 days after the addition of 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde to each sample to obtain a final paraformaldehyde concentration of 0.025%. After 7 days, inactivated viruses were purified by ultracentrifugation at 140,000 × g in a swing rotor at 4°C for 120 min. The virus pellets were washed gently with PBS, reconcentrated by ultracentrifugation, and resuspended in an appropriate volume of PBS as reported previously, with minor modifications [29, 30]. The protein amounts in the virus concentrates were determined by the Bradford method. A complete loss of viral infectivity was confirmed by incubation of the virus concentrates in embryonated eggs.
Immunogenicity and protective effects of vaccination with inactivated H5N8 reassortant virus in mice
Six- to eight-week-old female BALB/c mice (n = 10) were vaccinated intramuscularly with 30 μg/dose (100 μL) of each vaccine (inactivated virus concentrate of Buan-LRET or PR8) with 50 μL of aluminum hydroxide adjuvant, or mock vaccinated (PBS plus aluminum hydroxide adjuvant, 100 μL per dose). Two weeks after the individual vaccinations, sera (n = 3, pooled from 10 mice per group) were collected from the mice to evaluate the immunogenicity of the Buan-LRET vaccine against H5N8 wild viruses by HAI and microneutralization assays. In addition, 21 days after two vaccinations at 2-week intervals, mice were challenged with H5N8 wild virus (100 mLD50 of Buan-wild or 50 mLD50 of Gochang-wild). Mice infected with H5N8 wild virus were monitored daily for morbidity, as assessed by measuring body weight loss and survival for up to 15 days postinfection (dpi). Mice that lost more than 20% of their initial body weight were euthanized. To determine lung viral titers in infected mice, lung tissues were collected at 3 dpi and homogenized in 1 mL of MEM containing 1% antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin). The titers of the infectious virus in lung homogenates were estimated by TCID50 assay.
Results
Generation of H5N8 reassortant viruses
After the cloning of HAs and NAs of H5N8 wild virus and PR8 internal genes into pHW2000 plasmids, the H5N8:PR8 (2:6) reassortant viruses were successfully rescued by transfection with the plasmids, based on plasmid-based reverse genetics (Fig. 1 and Table 1), and reassortant virus clones were purified and propagated by limiting dilution in embryonated eggs, yielding virus stocks with titers of 1.00–6.03 × 106 TCID50/mL (Table 1). Buan-wild and Buan-Full, which had MBCMs in their HAs, yielded higher TCID50 titers in egg cultivation than did H5N8 reassortants (Buan-LRET and Buan–QRET) with BBCMs (Table 1). The identities of the reassortant viruses were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and HAI assays with ferret serum, which inhibits the hemagglutination of H5N8 wild virus and neutralizes H5N8 wild virus, as described previously [34]. Briefly, the HA and NA sequences of the reassortant viruses were identical to those of the corresponding pHW2000 plasmids. The antigenicity of the H5N8 reassortant viruses was not significantly altered by modifications in the HA gene or reassortment when compared with that of the Buan-wild virus. Post-infection ferret antisera raised against the H5N8 wild viruses specifically showed HAI titers (mostly 1:40) against H5N8 wild and reassortant viruses, whereas antisera against H1N1, H5N1, and H7N9 did not elicit antigenicity against the H5N8 wild and reassortant viruses (data not shown).
In-vitro and in-ovo characterization of H5N8 reassortant viruses in comparison with Buan-wild virus
To characterize the growth properties of the viruses, their growth kinetics were evaluated in embryonated eggs and MDCK cells. In the eggs, four strains (PR8, Buan-wild, Buan-Full, and Buan-QRET) reached peak titers (of 211, 210.5, 210, and 29, respectively) at 24 hpi, whereas Buan-LRET showed a peak titer (of 29.5) at 48 hpi (Fig. 2A) instead of 24 hpi. Growth curves and HA units of Buan-wild virus were approximately equivalent to those of PR8 at all time points during egg cultivation. Buan-Full and Buan-QRET exhibited lower HA titers than Buan-wild and PR8 at 24 and 48 hpi.
During cultivation of the viruses in embryonated eggs, embryonic lethality was also observed to determine whether the removal or replacement of the MBCM affected embryo survival in embryonated eggs, which are required for the development of egg-based vaccines. At 48 hpi, Buan-wild, which has an MBCM, killed 50% of the embryos in the eggs, whereas the other viruses did not kill any embryos (Fig. 2B). At 72 hpi, Buan-wild and Buan-Full, which have MBCMs in their HAs, killed 100% and 83.3% of the egg embryos, respectively, whereas Buan-LRET and Buan-QRET, which have BBCMs in their HAs, killed 0% and 16.7% of the egg embryos, respectively (Fig. 2B). PR8 virus killed 50% of the embryos at 72 hpi (Fig. 2B). These results verified that removal of the MBCM decreases the embryonic lethality of influenza viruses. Furthermore, Buan-LRET is likely to be suitable as an H5N8 vaccine candidate strain because it did not kill egg embryos and grew well, with comparable HA titers (29.5) at 48 hpi in embryonated eggs.
In MDCK cells, H5N8 Buan-wild virus exhibited higher HA titers than reassortant viruses at 18–72 hpi, regardless of HA titers with turkey RBCs (Fig. 2C). In contrast to Buan-wild, Buan-LRET (BBCM) exhibited higher HA titers than Buan-Full (MBCM) and Buan-QRET (BBCM) at 24 hpi. At 72 hpi, the reassortant viruses replicated to HA titers of 24–25, approximately 3 log lower than that of Buan-wild (Fig. 2C).
Alternatively, cell-infectious titers were determined with MDCK virus cultures by TCID50 assays. The patterns of the growth curves (Fig. 2D) on the basis of cell infectious titers were completely different from those generated on the basis of HA titers (Fig. 2C and D). At 12 hpi, Buan-LRET and Buan-QRET, which have BBCMs, exhibited the highest and second-highest titers (103.7 and 102.8), respectively, when compared with the titers (101.6 and 101.3) of other viruses with MBCMs in their HAs (Fig. 2D). However, viruses with MBCMs exhibited titers similar to those of viruses without MBCM at 18 hpi (Fig. 2D). Finally, Buan-wild exhibited the highest titers (105.2-105.6) at 24, 48, and 72 hpi when compared with other viruses (104.3-105.2) (Fig. 2D).
Pathogenicity of H5N8 reassortant viruses in mice
To investigate whether replacement of the MBCM with a BBCM in the HAs of H5N8 viruses reduces virus pathogenicity and replication in mice, as well as to select the least pathogenic H5N8 reassortant for production of a safe vaccine against H5N8 viral infection, the mLD50 and MID50 of H5N8 wild and reassortant viruses were determined in a mouse model of influenza viral infection. To this end, BALB/c mice were infected intranasally with serially increasing doses of the viruses. Mice that received high doses (5 × 103 or 5 × 104 TCID50) of Buan-wild and Buan-Full showed obvious body weight loss and high mortality (Fig. 3A, B, E, and F) accompanying clear clinical signs of influenza virus infection (ruffled fur, lethargy, and shivering). Therefore, as shown in Fig. 3A, B, E and F, H5N8 viruses (Buan-wild and Buan-Full) with MBCMs in their HAs were lethal in mice at doses of more than 5 × 103 or 5 × 104 TCID50. Consequently, mLD50 values were 5 × 102 and 2.8 × 103 TCID50, respectively. However, H5N8 reassortants (Buan-QRET and Buan-LRET) with BBCM exhibited no lethality in mice at any of the tested doses (mLD50 > 5 × 104 TCID50).
Similar to the mLD50 values in the infected mice, H5N8 reassortants (Buan-QRET and -LRET, having BBCMs), showed higher MID50 values (1.6 × 103 and 9.0 × 104 TCID50, respectively) than H5N8 viruses (Buan-wild and -Full, having MBCMs, MID50 = 1.5 × 102 and 8.5 × 102 TCID50, respectively) (Fig. 3A–D). Collectively, these data indicated that the presence of the BBCM or removal of the MBCM in the H5N8 virus reduced viral pathogenesis and replication in mice (Fig. 3). Moreover, Buan-LRET exhibited the highest mLD50 and MID50 values in our study, implying that Buan-LRET showed the lowest pathogenicity of all of the tested H5N8 viruses (Fig. 2 and 3).
Antigenicity of and protection by vaccination with inactivated H5N8 reassortant virus as a vaccine in mice
To evaluate whether vaccination with the Buan-LRET virus elicited antibodies that could efficiently neutralize H5N8 wild viruses, mice were vaccinated with formalin-inactivated whole Buan-LRET, PR8 of H1N1 subtype, and PBS plus alum (as a negative control). Sera from each group were isolated at 2 weeks after the first and second vaccinations, and HAI and neutralizing titers of the sera were determined (Table 2). After the second vaccination with Buan-LRET, sera exhibited higher HAI and neutralizing titers (> 320 HAI and neutralizing titers) to H5N8 wild viruses than after the first vaccination, whereas sera collected from mice vaccinated with PR8 and PBS did not show any HAI or neutralizing activity toward H5N8 viruses (Table 2).
To investigate whether vaccination with the reassortant virus could protect mice from H5N8 viral challenge, mice were vaccinated with formalin-inactivated whole Buan-LRET, PR8, or PBS plus alum, challenged intranasally with 100 or 50 mLD50 of Buan- or Gochang-wild viruses, and were monitored for weight loss and survival for 15 days. Buan-LRET vaccination provided strong protection against lethal challenge with Buan- and Gochang-wild. In contrast, mice vaccinated with PBS plus alum succumbed to Buan and Gochang wild infections by day 7 and 5, respectively (Fig. 4B and E). Additionally, mice vaccinated with PR8 plus alum were killed at 7 and 8 dpi with Buan- and Gochang-wild viruses, respectively, although PR8 vaccination resulted in a slightly higher survival rate (1/6, 16%) following challenge with Buan-wild virus and delayed death following challenge with Gochang-wild virus, compared to mock vaccination (Fig. 4B and E). Buan-LRET-vaccinated mice showed an absence of virus in the lung at 3 dpi, whereas mice vaccinated with PBS and PR8 exhibited high lung viral titers at 3 dpi (Fig. 4C and F). These results correlated well with HAI and neutralizing titers against H5N8 viruses in vaccinated mice (Table 2).
Discussion
Since early 2014, several outbreaks caused by H5N8 viruses of novel reassortant HPAI (HA clade 2.3.4.4) have been reported in domestic and wild birds in South Korea, China, and Japan [1]. Furthermore, HPAI H5N8 viruses were detected in poultry holdings and various species of wild birds in numerous countries in Europe, North America, and Asia from 2014 to 2016 [9, 35]. Although no cases of human infection with H5N8 viruses have been reported worldwide [36] and H5N8 viruses are not transmitted efficiently in ferrets [37], the possibility of human infection with H5N8 viruses has not been excluded, and it should be noted that human infections with H5N6 viruses belonging to the HA 2.3.4.4 clade, such as H5N8, have been identified in China [38]. In addition, human population immunity against the recently detected H5Nx viruses of the HA clade 2.3.4.4 may be trivial or minimal. Thus, it is necessary to investigate whether vaccines may be effective countermeasures against viruses of this subtype or clade if they were to emerge as pandemic strains by obtaining further mutations or reassortments [21].
In this study, H5N8 vaccine candidate strains were generated by eight-plasmid-based reverse genetics [27, 39]. The H5N8 viruses used as vaccine candidates in this study expressed H5 HAs and N8 NAs of a Korean isolate of H5N8 (Buan-wild), and the remaining internal proteins and genes were derived from PR8. Viruses with the PR8 backbone are known to be generally safe for humans and birds and are not transmitted efficiently among mammals [22,23,24]. In some of the H5N8 viruses with the PR8 backbone in our study, the MBCM in their HA was replaced with a BBCM (Fig. 1) to yield a safer vaccine strain, because the MBCM in the HA of H5 subtype viruses, a crucial molecular marker of HPAI viruses, is an important determinant of pathogenicity in chickens and other animals [40]. Our results confirmed that the removal of the MBCM in HA of influenza H5 subtype viruses reduced viral pathogenesis in both mice and eggs. Alternatively, removal of MBCMs from HAs of vaccine strains increased the safety of the influenza vaccine strains, consistent with previous studies [29, 41, 42].
Our study suggested that removal of the MBCM from H5 HA of clade 2.3.4.4 reduced the pathogenicity and replication efficiency of H5Nx viruses in embryonic eggs and mice, as has been shown for H5N1 viruses. Furthermore, H5N8 viruses (Buan-LRET and Buan-QRET) with BBCMs (replacing the MBCMs) exhibited different pathogenic, viral growth, and replication mechanisms in eggs and mice. This suggests that amino acid sequences in the connecting region (containing the cleavage site) between HA1 and HA2 may be important factors for determining the pathological and virological characteristics of H5Nx viruses. This also indicated that suitable and safe vaccine strains of the H5 subtype are likely to be generated by elaborate modifications of the connecting region by introducing alterations in the amino acid sequences in addition to replacement of a MBCM with the BBCM. Accordingly, the most suitable H5N8 virus, Buan-LRET, which has a BBCM and showed low pathogenicity and embryocidal activity in eggs, and low pathogenicity in mice, was selected as a vaccine candidate strain and subsequenctly used for successive vaccination of mice in our study (Fig. 4).
Following a single dose of vaccination with a formalin-inactivated concentrate of the selected vaccine candidate strain (Buan-LRET) and alum as an adjuvant, a few mice showed seroprotective HAI titers (1:40) against H5N8 wild viruses. Two-dose vaccination with the inactivated concentrates was required to elicit robust seroprotective HAI titers in mice. These results are consistent with previous reports on various H5 HA vaccines in which multiple doses and adjuvants were required to obtain seroprotective HAI titers and sufficient antibody responses against H5 HA subtype viruses in humans and animals [43,44,45,46,47,48] because H5 and H7 HA proteins intrinsically show low immunogenicity compared with H1 HA [49, 50]. Therefore, further studies are required to determine whether formalin-inactivated vaccines generated from H5N8 will be immunogenic in humans and can be used for industrial and commercial vaccine production. In addition, vaccine safety in ferrets and stability over multiple passages in embryonated eggs should be evaluated before commercialization of the H5N8 vaccine candidate strain is contemplated. Further, additional studies of the safety, immunogenicity, and dose-dependent responses of formalin-inactivated H5N8 vaccines in humans are needed for the preparation of vaccines to protect the human population from pandemic influenza. In conclusion, the establishment of a reliable H5N8 vaccine candidate strain described in this study will be beneficial for future development of H5N8 vaccines.
Abbreviations
- BBCM:
-
Bi-basic amino acid cleavage motif
- HA:
-
Hemagglutinin
- HAI:
-
Hemagglutination inhibition
- Hpi:
-
Hours postinfection
- MBCM:
-
Multi-basic amino acid cleavage motif
- MDCK:
-
Madin-Darby canine kidney
- MID50:
-
50% murine infectious dose
- mLD50:
-
50% murine lethal dose
- NA:
-
Neuraminidase
- PBS:
-
Phosphate-buffered saline
- PR8:
-
A/Puerto Rico/8/34
- RBC:
-
Red blood cells
- SPF:
-
Specific-pathogen-free
- TCID:
-
Tissue culture infectious dose
References
Claes F, Morzaria SP, Donis RO (2016) Emergence and dissemination of clade 2.3.4.4 H5Nx influenza viruses—how is the Asian HPAI H5 lineage maintained. Curr Opin Virol 16:158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2016.02.005
Shortridge KF, Zhou NN, Guan Y, Gao P, Ito T, Kawaoka Y, Kodihalli S, Krauss S, Markwell D, Murti KG, Norwood M, Senne D, Sims L, Takada A, Webster RG (1998) Characterization of avian H5N1 influenza viruses from poultry in Hong Kong. Virology 252(2):331–342. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1998.9488
Poovorawan Y, Pyungporn S, Prachayangprecha S, Makkoch J (2013) Global alert to avian influenza virus infection: from H5N1 to H7N9. Pathog Glob Health 107(5):217–223. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047773213Y.0000000103
Swayne D, Suarez D (2000) Highly pathogenic avian influenza. Rev Sci Tech 19(2):463–475
WHO (2017) Cumulative number of confirmed human cases of avian influenza A (H5N1) reported to WHO, 2003-2017. http://www.who.int/influenza/human_animal_interface/2017_07_25_tableH5N1.pdf
Zhao K, Gu M, Zhong L, Duan Z, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Zhao G, Zhao M, Chen Z, Hu S, Liu W, Liu X, Peng D, Liu X (2013) Characterization of three H5N5 and one H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in China. Vet Microbiol 163(3):351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.12.025
Wu H, Peng X, Xu L, Jin C, Cheng L, Lu X, Xie T, Yao H, Wu N (2014) Novel reassortant influenza A(H5N8) viruses in domestic ducks, Eastern China. Emerg Infect Dis 20(8):1315–1318. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2008.140339
Jhung MA, Nelson DI, Control CfD, Prevention (2015) Outbreaks of avian influenza A (H5N2),(H5N8), and (H5N1) among birds—United States, December 2014–January 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 64(4):111
Lee D-H, Torchetti MK, Winker K, Ip HS, Song C-S, Swayne DE (2015) Intercontinental spread of Asian-origin H5N8 to North America through Beringia by migratory birds. J Virol 89(12):6521–6524. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00728-15
Lee Y-J, Kang H-M, Lee E-K, Song B-M, Jeong J, Kwon Y-K, Kim H-R, Lee K-J, Hong M-S, Jang I, Choi K-S, Kim J-Y, Lee H-J, Kang M-S, Jeong O-M, Baek J-H, Joo Y-S, Park YH, Lee H-S (2014) Novel reassortant influenza A (H5N8) viruses, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis 20(6):1087–1089. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2006.140233
Si Y-J, Choi WS, Kim Y-I, Lee I-W, Kwon H-I, Park S-J, Kim E-H, Sm Kim, Kwon J-J, Song M-S, Kim C-J, Choi Y-K (2016) Genetic characteristics of highly pathogenic H5N8 avian influenza viruses isolated from migratory wild birds in South Korea during 2014-2015. Arch Virol 161(10):2749–2764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-016-2979-4
World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (2017) http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/temp/reports/en_fup_0000025168_20171120_170003.pdf
Woo CKJ-H, Kwon JH, Lee D-H, Kim Y, Lee K, Jo S-D, Son KD, Oem J-K, Wang S-J, Kim Y, Shin J, Song C-S, Jheong W, Jeong J (2017) Novel reassortant. Arch Virol. 162(12):3887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-017-3547-2
Shortridge KF (1995) The next pandemic influenza virus? Lancet 346(8984):1210–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92906-1
Webster RG, Peiris M, Chen H, Guan Y (2006) H5N1 outbreaks and enzootic influenza. Biodiversity 7(1):51–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2006.9712795
To KKW, Ng KHL, Que T-L, Chan JMC, Tsang K-Y, Tsang AKL, Chen H, Yuen K-Y (2012) Avian influenza A H5N1 virus: a continuous threat to humans. Emerg Microbes Infect 1:e25. https://doi.org/10.1038/emi.2012.24
Koopmans M, Wilbrink B, Conyn M, Natrop G, van der Nat H, Vennema H, Meijer A, van Steenbergen J, Fouchier R, Osterhaus A, Bosman A (2004) Transmission of H7N7 avian influenza A virus to human beings during a large outbreak in commercial poultry farms in the Netherlands. Lancet 363(9409):587–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15589-X
Ostrowsky B, Huang A, Terry W, Anton D, Brunagel B, Traynor L, Abid S, Johnson G, Kacica M, Katz J, Edwards L, Lindstrom S, Klimov A (2003) Uyeki TM (2012) Uyeki TM (2012) Low pathogenic avian influenza A (H7N2) virus infection in immunocompromised adult, New York, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 18(7):1128–1131. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1807.111913
Tweed SA, Skowronski DM, David ST, Larder A, Petric M, Lees W, Li Y, Katz J, Krajden M, Tellier R, Halpert C, Hirst M, Astell C, Lawrence D, Mak A (2004) Human Illness from Avian Influenza H7N3, British Columbia. Emerg Infect Dis 10(12):2196–2199. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1012.040961
Arzey GG, Kirkland PD, Arzey KE, Frost M, Maywood P, Conaty S, Hurt AC, Deng Y-M, Iannello P, Barr I, Dwyer DE, Ratnamohan M, McPhie K, Selleck P (2012) Influenza virus A (H10N7) in chickens and poultry abattoir workers, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis 18(5):814–816. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1805.111852
De Jong J, Claas E, Osterhaus A, Webster R, Lim W (1997) A pandemic warning? Nature 389(6651):554. https://doi.org/10.1038/39218
Campbell PJ, Danzy S, Kyriakis CS, Deymier MJ, Lowen AC, Steel J (2014) The M segment of the 2009 pandemic influenza virus confers increased neuraminidase activity, filamentous morphology, and efficient contact transmissibility to A/Puerto Rico/8/1934-based reassortant viruses. J Virol 88(7):3802–3814. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.03607-13
Matsuoka Y, Chen H, Cox N, Subbarao K, Beck J, Swayne D (2003) Safety evaluation in chickens of candidate human vaccines against potential pandemic strains of influenza. Avian Dis 47(s3):926–930. https://doi.org/10.1637/0005-2086-47.s3.926
Rodriguez A, Pérez-González A, Hossain MJ, Chen L-M, Rolling T, Pérez-Breña P, Donis R, Kochs G, Nieto A (2009) Attenuated strains of influenza A viruses do not induce degradation of RNA polymerase II. J Virol 83(21):11166–11174. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01439-09
Senne D, Panigrahy B, Kawaoka Y, Pearson J, Süss J, Lipkind M, Kida H, Webster R (1996) Survey of the hemagglutinin (HA) cleavage site sequence of H5 and H7 avian influenza viruses: amino acid sequence at the HA cleavage site as a marker of pathogenicity potential. Avian Dis 40(2):425–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/1592241
Alexander DJ (2007) An overview of the epidemiology of avian influenza. Vaccine 25(30):5637–5644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.10.051
Hoffmann E, Krauss S, Perez D, Webby R, Webster RG (2002) Eight-plasmid system for rapid generation of influenza virus vaccines. Vaccine 20(25):3165–3170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00268-2
Hoffmann E, Stech J, Guan Y, Webster R, Perez D (2001) Universal primer set for the full-length amplification of all influenza A viruses. Arch Virol 146(12):2275–2289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007050170002
Subbarao K, Chen H, Swayne D, Mingay L, Fodor E, Brownlee G, Xu X, Lu X, Katz J, Cox N, Matsuoka Y (2003) Evaluation of a genetically modified reassortant H5N1 influenza A virus vaccine candidate generated by plasmid-based reverse genetics. Virology 305(1):192–200. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.2002.1742
Wohlbold TJ, Hirsh A, Krammer F (2015) An H10N8 influenza virus vaccine strain and mouse challenge model based on the human isolate A/Jiangxi-Donghu/346/13. Vaccine 33(9):1102–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.026
Reed LJ, Muench H (1938) A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am J Epidemiol 27(3):493–497. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118408
Palmer DF, Dowdle WR, Coleman MT, Schild GC (1975) Hemagglutination-inhibition test. In: Advanced laboratory techniques for influenza diagnosis: procedural guide. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Atlanta, GA, pp 25–62
Grund S, Adams O, Wählisch S, Schweiger B (2011) Comparison of hemagglutination inhibition assay, an ELISA-based micro-neutralization assay and colorimetric microneutralization assay to detect antibody responses to vaccination against influenza A H1N1 2009 virus. J Virol Methods 171(2):369–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.11.024
Kim HM, Kim C-K, Lee N-J, Chu H, Kang C, Kim K, Lee J-Y (2015) Pathogenesis of novel reassortant avian influenza virus A (H5N8) Isolates in the ferret. Virology 481:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2015.02.042
Verhagen JH, Herfst S, Fouchier RA (2015) How a virus travels the world. Science 347(6222):616–617. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa6724
Arriola CS, Nelson DI, Deliberto TJ, Blanton L, Kniss K, Levine MZ, Trock SC, Finelli L, Jhung MA, the HIG (2015) Infection risk for persons exposed to highly pathogenic avian influenza A H5 virus-infected birds, United States, December 2014–March 2015. Emerg Infect Dis 21(12):2135–2140. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2112.150904
Pan M, Gao R, Lv Q, Huang S, Zhou Z, Yang L, Li X, Zhao X, Zou X, Tong W, Mao S, Zou S, Bo H, Zhu X, Liu L, Yuan H, Zhang M, Wang D, Li Z, Zhao W, Ma M, Li Y, Li T, Yang H, Xu J, Zhou L, Zhou X, Tang W, Song Y, Chen T, Bai T, Zhou J, Wang D, Wu G, Li D, Feng Z, Gao GF, Wang Y, He S, Shu Y (2016) Human infection with a novel, highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N6) virus: virological and clinical findings. J Infect 72(1):52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2015.06.009
Chen T, Zhang R (2015) Symptoms seem to be mild in children infected with avian influenza A (H5N6) and other subtypes. J Infect 71(6):702–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2015.09.004
Neumann G, Watanabe T, Ito H, Watanabe S, Goto H, Gao P, Hughes M, Perez DR, Donis R, Hoffmann E (1999) Generation of influenza A viruses entirely from cloned cDNAs. PNAS 96(16):9345–9350. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.16.9345
Bogs J, Veits J, Gohrbandt S, Hundt J, Stech O, Breithaupt A, Teifke JP, Mettenleiter TC, Stech J (2010) Highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses carry virulence determinants beyond the polybasic hemagglutinin cleavage site. PLoS One 5(7):e11826. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011826
Li S, Liu C, Klimov A, Subbarao K, Perdue ML, Mo D, Ji Y, Woods L, Hietala S, Bryant M (1999) Recombinant influenza a virus vaccines for the pathogenic human A/Hong Kong/97 (H5N1) viruses. J Infect Dis 179(5):1132–1138. https://doi.org/10.1086/314713
Suguitan AL Jr, McAuliffe J, Mills KL, Jin H, Duke G, Lu B, Luke CJ, Murphy B, Swayne DE, Kemble G (2006) Live, attenuated influenza A H5N1 candidate vaccines provide broad cross-protection in mice and ferrets. PLoS Med 3(9):e360. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030360
Lin J, Zhang J, Dong X, Fang H, Chen J, Su N, Gao Q, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Wang Z, Yang M, Sun R, Li C, Lin S, Ji M, Liu Y, Wang X, Wood J, Feng Z, Wang Y, Yin W (2006) Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated adjuvanted whole-virion influenza A (H5N1) vaccine: a phase I randomised controlled trial. Lancet 368(9540):991–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69294-5
Bresson J-L, Perronne C, Launay O, Gerdil C, Saville M, Wood J, Höschler K, Zambon MC (2006) Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated split-virion influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1) vaccine: phase I randomised trial. Lancet 367(9523):1657–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68656-X
Ehrlich HJ, Müller M, Oh HM, Tambyah PA, Joukhadar C, Montomoli E, Fisher D, Berezuk G, Fritsch S, Löw-Baselli A (2008) A clinical trial of a whole-virus H5N1 vaccine derived from cell culture. N Engl J Med 358(24):2573–2584. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa073121
Cox RJ, Pedersen G, Madhun AS, Svindland S, Sævik M, Breakwell L, Hoschler K, Willemsen M, Campitelli L, Nøstbakken JK, Weverling GJ, Klap J, McCullough KC, Zambon M, Kompier R, Sjursen H (2011) Evaluation of a virosomal H5N1 vaccine formulated with Matrix M™ adjuvant in a phase I clinical trial. Vaccine 29(45):8049–8059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.042
Geeraedts F, Goutagny N, Hornung V, Severa M, de Haan A, Pool J, Wilschut J, Fitzgerald KA, Huckriede A (2008) Superior immunogenicity of inactivated whole virus H5N1 influenza vaccine is primarily controlled by Toll-like receptor signalling. PLoS Pathog 4(8):e1000138. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000138
Prabakaran M, Velumani S, He F, Karuppannan AK, Geng GY, Yin LK, Kwang J (2008) Protective immunity against influenza H5N1 virus challenge in mice by intranasal co-administration of baculovirus surface-displayed HA and recombinant CTB as an adjuvant. Virology 380(2):412–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2008.08.002
Couch RB, Decker WK, Utama B, Atmar RL, Niño D, Feng JQ, Halpert MM, Air GM (2012) Evaluations for in vitro correlates of immunogenicity of inactivated influenza a H5, H7 and H9 vaccines in humans. PLoS One 7(12):e50830. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050830
De Groot AS, Ardito M, Terry F, Levitz L, Ross T, Moise L, Martin W (2013) Low immunogenicity predicted for emerging avian-origin H7N9: implication for influenza vaccine design. Hum Vaccine Immunother 9(5):950–956. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.24939
Acknowledgements
The two Korean H5N8 isolates (A/broiler duck/Korea/Buan2/ 2014 and A/breeder duck/Korea/Gochang1/2014) were kindly provided by the Avian Disease Division of the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (QIA) of South Korea. The vector plasmid pHW2000 was kindly provided by Robert Webster, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This research was supported by a fund (grant number 2014-NI43003-00) by Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Animal experiments were authorized by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Korea Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (approved numbers: KCDC-168-14-2A) and all experiments were performed according to the guidelines of this committee.
Additional information
Handling Editor: William G Dundon.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, MS., Jang, E., Cho, J. et al. Development and comparison of two H5N8 influenza A vaccine candidate strains. Arch Virol 164, 127–136 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-018-4062-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-018-4062-9