Abstract
To investigate the distribution of antibodies against H5N2 influenza virus in humans living in Ibaraki prefecture, Japan, 266 single serum samples were collected to perform serological tests. Results were compared to investigate the relationship between positive results and several factors. The number of positive serum neutralization antibody titers (≥40) against avian influenza virus A/H5N2 was significantly greater (P < 0.05) among poultry workers, in comparison to a Japanese healthy population. The geometric mean titers of serum neutralization antibody against A/H5N2 were significantly higher (P < 0.05) among Ibaraki inhabitants and poultry workers (P < 0.0001) when compared to a Japanese healthy population. Seropositivity against A/H5N2 virus was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with age (≥50 years old) in poultry workers. These results suggest that seropositivity against H5N2 virus in Ibaraki specimens is significantly higher than those of a Japanese healthy population and that the surveillance of avian influenza viruses is very important to evaluate the invasion or emergence of new pandemic influenza viruses from species other than humans.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Influenza viruses belong to family Orthomyxoviridae, and they are divided into influenza A, B, and C types [8]. Influenza A virus contains eight genes that code for structural or non-structural components, including the surface glycoproteins, hemagglutinin (HA), and neuraminidase (NA), both of which are important components that allow the virus to adhere to host-cell receptors. Influenza A virus is thought to infect a variety of species of mammals and birds, including humans, pigs, waterfowl, and poultry [29].
Until recently, humans were infected by only a limited number of influenza viruses subtypes, such as H1N1 [21], H1N2 [6], H2N2 [10], H3N2 [4], H5N1 [25], H7N3 [28], H7N7 [7], and H9N2 [20]. Infection with H5N1 influenza A virus occurred in humans in 1997 in Hong Kong, causing deaths and leading to severe problems [25]. The infection was considered as a rare event; however, H5N1 influenza infection in humans is currently on the increase [32], suggesting that an influenza pandemic caused by H5N1 or another subtype will occur in the human population someday [30]. On the other hand, the H5N2 subtype of influenza virus has been shown to be virulent in poultry, but humans do not seem to be susceptible to it [1]. In a previous study, no detectable anti-H5 antibody was found in human sera, and no viruses were isolated from humans when an H5N2 influenza outbreak occurred in poultry in Italy [5]. In 2005, the same subtype of virus, A/H5N2, was isolated from chickens raised on a farm in Ibaraki prefecture, Japan [14]. The genetic properties of these viruses were very similar to those of strains obtained from Latin America [9]. This outbreak resulted in the culling of almost six million chickens, and it took almost 1 year to suppress this outbreak [15].
In previous experiments, the results of serological tests have suggested that some employees engaged in epidemic control might have anti-H5 antibodies. It is expected that these employees were exposed to or infected by the H5N2 influenza virus; this was the first case that suggested the possibility of infection by H5N2 virus in humans [13, 17]. Unlike the case of H5N1 infection, a “routine” protocol for serological diagnosis of H5N2 virus infection in humans has not yet been developed, suggesting that an established method for detecting anti-H5N2 antibody in humans is required. One possible candidate method for detecting anti-H5 antibody is a microneutralization (MN) test (MNT), because of its high specificity and sensitivity for detecting H5N1 virus infection in humans [19]. However, an examination conducted previously revealed positive results in an MNT, i.e., viral agents were not isolated from these employees; therefore, unknown agents, including the characteristics of the patients or other unknown agents, may influence the MN titer by unknown mechanisms. In this study, MNT and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests were performed, and the results were compared for three human populations: (1) general inhabitants of the geographical area where the H5N2 outbreak occurred, (2) general inhabitants of Japan, and (3) employees who worked in or were engaged with the poultry industry or had jobs related to it. The serological data on these three populations were analyzed to investigate the relationship between several factors.
Materials and methods
Sera
A total of 114 serum specimens were collected from inhabitants living in Ibaraki prefecture from May to August 2006. Through a questionnaire, it was verified that these inhabitants were not in direct contact with birds, including poultry. To represent the Japanese healthy population, 100 human serum samples were provided from the Serum Bank of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (Tokyo, Japan). They were taken from healthy Japanese people living outside of Ibaraki prefecture during 2005. In addition, 52 serum samples were collected from employees working at H5-influenza-free poultry farms located in Ibaraki prefecture during August 2006. Their age distribution and genders are shown in Table 1. Before serological examination, sera were treated with receptor-destroying enzyme (RDE II; Denka seiken, Tokyo, Japan) to remove factors that cause non-specific reactions.
Cells and viruses
Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were used for MNT. Cells were grown and maintained in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (E-MEM, Invitrogen, California, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 2 mM l-glutamine (Invitrogen), 100 U/ml penicillin–streptomycin (Invitrogen), and 0.25 μg/ml fungizone (Invitrogen). For MNT, viruses were grown in E-MEM supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine, 10 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES; Invitrogen), 1% bovine albumin (SIGMA, St Louis, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin–streptomycin, and 10 μg/ml acetylated trypsin (SIGMA). The influenza virus strain A/chicken/Ibaraki/1/2005 (H5N2) was provided by the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, National Institute of Animal Health (Ibaraki, Japan). The virus was propagated in 10-day-old hen eggs.
MNT
MNT was carried out according to methods described elsewhere [31]. Treated sera were mixed with equal volumes of virus antigens [prepared at 1.0 × 102, 50% tissue culture infection dose (TCID50)/50 μl], and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The mixture was transferred onto MDCK cells prepared on 96-well flat-bottom plates (Greiner GmBH, Germany) and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 96 h. After incubation, infected cells were fixed with PBS(−)-10% formalin and stained with naphthol black (Sigma) solution. The optical density was determined by measuring the absorbance at 630 nm using a microplate reader (Model No. 680; Bio-Rad Laboratories, California, USA). Neutralization titer was expressed at the highest dilution of serum that protected TCID50. Examinations were repeated at least twice.
HI test
The HI test was performed according to methods described previously [31] with 0.75% horse erythrocytes in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS(−)] supplemented with 0.01% gelatin, 0.5% chicken erythrocytes in PBS(−), and 0.5% turkey erythrocytes in PBS(−). The erythrocytes were purchased from Nippon Bio-test Laboratories Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). HI titer was expressed at the highest dilution of serum that showed hemagglutination inhibition. Examinations were repeated at least twice.
Statistical analysis
MN and HI titers below the lower limit of these assays were given an arbitrary intermediate value of five [24]. Differences between each population and differences in gender were compared by Fischer’s exact probability test, and differences in age were tested by Mann–Whitney’s U test. Probability (P) values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
Informed consent and human experimental guidelines
Before this study was implemented, a research committee was established in the Ibaraki Prefectural Government, and informed consent was obtained from each subject.
Results
MNT
To investigate the distribution of anti-H5N2 influenza neutralizing antibody, MNT was performed using human sera collected for this study. Among Ibaraki inhabitants (II, n = 114), eight samples showed an MN titer of ≥40 (male = 6, female = 2). Among the healthy Japanese population, the national average (NA, n = 100), four samples showed an MN titer of ≥40 (male = 1, female = 3). Further, among poultry workers (PW, n = 52), eight samples showed anMN titer of ≥40 (male = 5, female = 3). The highest titer, 160, was observed in two samples (Table 2).
HI test
HI tests were performed to investigate the existence and distribution of anti-H5 hemagglutination inhibiting antibody using horse erythrocytes. Among II, nine samples showed an HI titer of ≥40 (male = 6, female = 3). Among NA, two samples showed an HI titer of ≥40 (male = 1, female = 1), and among PW, two samples showed a titer of ≥40 (male = 1, female = 1). In this examination, the highest titer, 80, was observed in two individuals (Table 3).
Statistical analysis of serological data
Table 4 describes the geometric mean titers (GMTs) of the MNT and HI tests of human sera samples. In II, GMTs of the MNT and HI tests were 12.45 and 16.46, respectively. In PW, GMTs were 11.58 in MNT and 8.99 in the HI test. In NA, GMTs were 7.90 in MNT and 10.21 in the HI test.
A recent investigation demonstrated that the cutoff value for the anti-H5 influenza MN titer to be judged as positive was ≥40 [18, 27]. Based on these findings, MNT titer of ≥40 was designated as positive. In this study, positive MNT results were found in 7.0% in IP, 4.0% in NA, and 15.3% in PW. The data were analyzed to investigate the relationship between seropositivity in the MNT and variable factors, as shown in Table 5. In PW, seropositivity was related to age (≥50 years old) with statistical significance (P = 0.038). Gender was not related to seropositivity. In II and NA, seropositive results were not related to age or gender.
Serological assays of specimens showed an MN titer of ≥40
Twenty specimens (eight from II, four from NA, and eight from PW) showed an MN titer of ≥40; these specimens were designated as seropositive in this study. Table 6 describes the result of Chi-square analysis of II and NA, and PW and NA. The number of positives in PW in comparison to that in NA was statistically significant (P = 0.018). Table 7 shows the comparison of MN and HI tests for each positive specimen. Among these specimens, the HI titer with horse erythrocytes ranged between <10 and 40. Specimens II-18 and II-83 showed a titer of 40 with turkey and chicken erythrocytes; however, the remaining specimens showed a titer of <10.
Discussion
In an H5N2 virus outbreak among poultry farm chickens in Ibaraki, Japan, the results of MNT suggested that some people who engaged in epidemic control had anti-H5 antibody [27]. This was the first case that suggested H5N2 virus infection in humans [13, 17]. It resulted in the culling of about six million chickens [17] and raised serious concerns with regard to human health.
In this study, it was shown that HI titers of human samples in assays with horse erythrocytes, were higher than those of avian species. When HI titers with horse and avian species were compared (Table 7), the difference between the titers with horse erythrocytes and those with avian erythrocytes was statistically significant in PW (P = 0.0156 with respect to turkey and chicken erythrocytes, respectively, as determined by Wilcoxon signed rank test). However, the difference was not significant in II, possibly due to the presence of HI titers higher than those with horse erythrocytes. Interestingly, II-18 and II-83 showed a titer of 40 in HI tests with turkey and chicken erythrocytes; these values were higher than those obtained with horse erythrocytes. The reason why these specimens yielded higher titers is not clear. One possible explanation is that RDE treatment of serum samples was insufficient; however, this explanation requires further examination using techniques such as western blotting or H5-specific ELISA with purified antigens.
In a previous study, Rowe et al. [19] suggested that the MN test was more sensitive and specific than HI tests when H5N1 influenza viruses were used as antigens, and Stephenson et al. [23] showed that, in an HI test, titers with horse erythrocytes were higher than those with turkey erythrocytes when H5N3 subtype was used as antigen. In this study, it was shown that the MN titer was higher than that of the HI test when H5N2 virus was used as antigen and that the HI titer with horse erythrocytes was higher than that with avian erythrocytes. This is the first report that suggests the occurrence of the phenomenon described above with H5N2 influenza virus. A previous study showed that detectable antibody responses were not observed when other subtypes of influenza viruses such as H4, H6, and H10 were inoculated to human volunteers, but viruses were recovered from them [2]. The results presented in this study also suggest that the occurrence of these phenomena may be related to specific interactions between H5 viruses and immune responses in humans; however, further study is required to confirm this. In Table 4, it is shown that the GMTs of the MNT and HI data obtained from II (P < 0.0001 in MNT and P < 0.05 in the HI test, respectively), in MNT from PW (P < 0.05) were significantly higher than that of NA. These results suggest that inhabitants and poultry workers living in Ibaraki prefecture may possess higher levels of neutralizing antibody or hemagglutination inhibiting antibody than the Japanese healthy population. Furthermore, these results also showed that 20 specimens had an MN titer of ≥40 (Tables 6, 7) and also indicated that the number of positive serum neutralization antibody titers against avian influenza virus was significantly higher (P = 0.018) in PW than in NA (Table 6). These results suggest that PW may possess a higher MN titer and might be exposed to the H5 subtype of influenza virus. It has been epidemiologically suggested that individuals working in specific occupations, such as swine farmers, poultry workers, and veterinarians, are exposed to some subtype of influenza virus [3, 12, 16]. It has also been suggested that people living in southeastern China might be affected by or exposed to several subtypes of influenza virus [22]. These results suggest that the specific occupations described above or geographic factors may influence the exposure to some subtypes of influenza virus. In Ibaraki prefecture, it has been estimated that about 11.9 million laying chickens are raised [26]. Of these, about two million are chickens and ten million are hens. This value was the greatest in Japan in 2004. This would suggest the possibility that inhabitants living in this region may come into contact with or be exposed to chickens or other fowl more frequently. There is also the possibility for inhabitants being exposed to chickens or other fowl being higher than that for others living in other regions in Japan. However, the increase in antibody titer should be examined with other examinations to determine whether the results are “positive” or “false-positive”. This suggests that further study will be required to demonstrate the presence of anti-H5 antibodies in human specimens.
Our data show that age (≥50 years old) was related to seropositivity with statistical significance (P = 0.038, Table 5). However, in previous studies, age was not related to elevated antibody titers in the HI test [11] or in MNT [12]. These findings suggest that our data may be influenced by an insufficient number of specimens or by other unknown factors. It is suggested that further study will be needed to confirm these results—for instance, by increasing the number of specimens.
The results shown in this study suggest that antibodies specific for H5 influenza viruses were present in non-exposed human sera. A previous study using an MN test and single radial haemolysis (SRH) showed that anti-H5 antibodies were not present in human sera. The failure of isolation of viruses from humans showed that avian-to-human transmission of virus did not occur [5]. However, it is believed that avian-derived viruses may be able to replicate in humans when they are inoculated at high doses [2], suggesting that the invasion of H5N2 viruses into humans could occur: this also suggests that further laboratory-based surveillance is required. This would enable the detection of “infection” or “exposure” in humans with viruses unrelated to human strains, including avian influenza viruses. For further study, the evaluation of serological results should be confirmed by other assays, i.e., western blotting and specific ELISA using purified antigens. It is strongly suggested that isolation of H5N2 viruses from humans must also be carried out, which would be sufficient for confirming infection in humans.
References
Bean WJ, Kawaoka Y, Wood JM, Pearson JE, Webster RG (1985) Characterization of virulent and avirulent A/chicken/Pennsylvania/83 influenza A viruses: potential role of defective interfering RNAs in nature. J Virol 54:151–160
Beare AS, Webster RG (1991) Replication of avian influenza viruses in humans. Arch Virol 119:37–42
Buxton Bridges C, Katz JM, Seto WH, Chan PK, Tsang D, Ho W, Mak KH, Lim W, Tam JS, Clarke M, Williams SG, Mounts AW, Bresee JS, Conn LA, Rowe T, Hu-Primmer J, Abernathy RA, Lu X, Cox NJ, Fukuda K (2000) Risk of influenza A (H5N1) infection among health care workers exposed to patients with influenza A (H5N1), Hong Kong. J Infect Dis 181:344–348
Coleman MT, Dowdle WR, Pereira HG, Schild GC, Chang WK (1968) The Hong Kong-68 influenza A2 variant. Lancet 2:1384–1386
Donatelli I, Campitelli L, Di Trani L, Puzelli S, Selli L, Fioretti A, Alexander DJ, Tollis M, Krauss S, Webster RG (2001) Characterization of H5N2 influenza viruses from Italian poultry. J Gen Virol 82:623–630
Guo YJ, Xu XY, Cox NJ (1992) Human influenza A (H1N2) viruses isolated from China. J Gen Virol 73(Pt 2):383–387
Koopmans M, Wilbrink B, Conyn M, Natrop G, van der Nat H, Vennema H, Meijer A, van Steenbergen J, Fouchier R, Osterhaus A, Bosman A (2004) Transmission of H7N7 avian influenza A virus to human beings during a large outbreak in commercial poultry farms in The Netherlands. Lancet 363:587–593
Lamb RA, Krug RM (2001) Orthomyxoviridae: the viruses and their replication. In: Howley DMKaPM (ed) Fields virology. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1487–1531
Lee CW, Senne DA, Suarez DL (2004) Effect of vaccine use in the evolution of Mexican lineage H5N2 avian influenza virus. J Virol 78:8372–8381
Meyer HM Jr, Hilleman MR, Miesse ML, Crawford IP, Bankhead AS (1957) New antigenic variant in far east influenza epidemic 1957. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 95:609–616
Myers KP, Olsen CW, Setterquist SF, Capuano AW, Donham KJ, Thacker EL, Merchant JA, Gray GC (2006) Are swine workers in the United States at increased risk of infection with zoonotic influenza virus? Clin Infect Dis 42:14–20
Myers KP, Setterquist SF, Capuano AW, Gray GC (2007) Infection due to 3 avian influenza subtypes in United States veterinarians. Clin Infect Dis 45:4–9
Ogata T, Yamazaki Y, Okabe N, Nakamura Y, Tashiro M, Nagata N, Itamura S, Yasui Y, Nakashima K, Doi M, Izumi Y, Fujieda T, Yamato S, Kawada Y (2008) Human H5N2 avian influenza infection in japan and the factors associated with high H5N2-neutralizing antibody titer. J Epidemiol 18:160–166
Okamatsu M, Saito T, Mase M, Tsukamoto K, Yamaguchi S (2007) Characterization of H5N2 influenza A viruses isolated from chickens in Japan. Avian Dis 51:474–475
Okamatsu M, Saito T, Yamamoto Y, Mase M, Tsuduku S, Nakamura K, Tsukamoto K, Yamaguchi S (2007) Low pathogenicity H5N2 avian influenza outbreak in Japan during the 2005–2006. Vet Microbiol 124:35–46
Olsen CW, Brammer L, Easterday BC, Arden N, Belay E, Baker I, Cox NJ (2002) Serologic evidence of H1 swine influenza virus infection in swine farm residents and employees. Emerg Infect Dis 8:814–819
ProMED-mail (2006) Avian influenza H5N2, human—Japan (Ibaraki) (02). ProMED-mail 2006: 2006 0110.0090
ProMED-mail (2006) Avian influenza H5N2, human—Japan (Ibaraki) (04). ProMED-mail: 2006,0112.0111
Rowe T, Abernathy RA, Hu-Primmer J, Thompson WW, Lu X, Lim W, Fukuda K, Cox NJ, Katz JM (1999) Detection of antibody to avian influenza A (H5N1) virus in human serum by using a combination of serologic assays. J Clin Microbiol 37:937–943
Saito T, Lim W, Suzuki T, Suzuki Y, Kida H, Nishimura SI, Tashiro M (2001) Characterization of a human H9N2 influenza virus isolated in Hong Kong. Vaccine 20:125–133
Shope RE (1958) Influenza: history, epidemiology, and speculation. Public Health Rep 73:165–178
Shu LL, Zhou NN, Sharp GB, He SQ, Zhang TJ, Zou WW, Webster RG (1996) An epidemiological study of influenza viruses among Chinese farm families with household ducks and pigs. Epidemiol Infect 117:179–188
Stephenson I, Wood JM, Nicholson KG, Zambon MC (2003) Sialic acid receptor specificity on erythrocytes affects detection of antibody to avian influenza haemagglutinin. J Med Virol 70:391–398
Stephenson I, Wood JM, Nicholson KG, Charlett A, Zambon MC (2004) Detection of anti-H5 responses in human sera by HI using horse erythrocytes following MF59-adjuvanted influenza A/duck/Singapore/97 vaccine. Virus Res 103:91–95
Subbarao K, Klimov A, Katz J, Regnery H, Lim W, Hall H, Perdue M, Swayne D, Bender C, Huang J, Hemphill M, Rowe T, Shaw M, Xu X, Fukuda K, Cox N (1998) Characterization of an avian influenza A (H5N1) virus isolated from a child with a fatal respiratory illness. Science 279:393–396
The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (2006) Statistical examination of stockbreeding, as of 1 February 2004; a tendency of domestication for pigs and hens in Japan. In: Statistics of agriculture, forestry and fisheries. Available from: http://www.maff.go.jp/toukei/sokuhou/data/tikusan2004-02/tikusan2004-02.pdf. Cited 30 April 2008
The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan (2006). The experimental results as of 10 January 2006; serological testing of anti-H5 influenza antibodies in human sera in Ibaraki and Saitama prefectures, Japan. Available from: http://www/mhlw.go.jp/houdou/2006/01/h0110-4.html. Cited 30 April 2008
Tweed SA, Skowronski DM, David ST, Larder A, Petric M, Lees W, Li Y, Katz J, Krajden M, Tellier R, Halpert C, Hirst M, Astell C, Lawrence D, Mak A (2004) Human illness from avian influenza H7N3, British Columbia. Emerg Infect Dis 10:2196–2199
Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, Chambers TM, Kawaoka Y (1992) Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Rev 56:152–179
Webster RG, Govorkova EA (2006) H5N1 influenza—continuing evolution and spread. N Engl J Med 355:2174–2177
World Health Organization (2002) WHO manual on animal influenza diagnosis and surveillance. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_CDS_CSR_NCS_2002.5.pdf. Cited 30 April 2008
World Health Organization (2008) Cumulative number of confirmed human cases of avian influenza A/(H5N1) reported to the WHO. Available from: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/country/cases_table_2008_04_30/en/index.html. Cited 30 April 2008
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank members of the Department of Virology III, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan, for providing positive control sera. The author would also like to thank members of National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, National Institute of Animal Health, Ibaraki, Japan, for donating the influenza virus strain.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have disclosed any conflict of interest related to this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamazaki, Y., Doy, M., Okabe, N. et al. Serological survey of avian H5N2-subtype influenza virus infections in human populations. Arch Virol 154, 421–427 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-009-0319-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-009-0319-7