Skip to main content
Log in

How I do it? Oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L5S1(OLIF51)

  • How I Do it - Spine degenerative
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

OLIF51 retains the advantages of traditional ALIF procedure with good fusion rates and improvement in radiographic parameters and reduces its drawbacks. It has the added advantage of being a minimal access technique.

Methods

Preoperative analysis of the vascular anatomy using CT angiography is mandatory. OLIF51 is done in right lateral position using specialized retractor blades and Thompson retractor system. The procedure is similar to OLIF at other levels except for the differences described here. The instruments are specialized for OLIF at L5S1.

Conclusion

OLIF51 provides an excellent alternative to traditional ALIF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chang J, Kim JS, Jo H (2017) Ventral dural injury after oblique lumbar interbody fusion. World Neurosurg 98:881–8e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Drake RL, Vogl AW, Mitchell AW (2014) Abdomen. In: Gray’s Anatomy for Student, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, Philadephia, pp 280–291

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fung DA, Molinares DM, Davis TT (2014) Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs: an MRI study. Spine J 14(11):S10–S11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jin C, Jaiswal MS, Jeun SS, Ryu KS, Hur JW, Kim JS (2018) Outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease in patients under or over 65 years of age. J Orthop Surg Res 13(1):38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim JS, Kim DH, Lee SH, Park CK, Hwang JH, Cheh G et al (2010) Comparison study of the instrumented circumferential fusion with instrumented anterior lumbar interbody fusion as a surgical procedure for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. World Neurosurg 73(5):565–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee HJ, Kim JS, Ryu KS, Park CK (2017) Ureter injury as a complication of oblique lumbar interbody fusion. World Neurosurg 102:693–6e7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Daly D, Rao PJ, Lennox A (2015) Approach-related complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: results of a combined spine and vascular surgical team. Global Spine J 6(2):147–154

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Molloy S, Butler JS, Benton A, Malhotra K, Selvadurai S, Agu O (2016) A new extensile anterolateral retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1: a prospective series with clinical outcomes. Spine J 16(6):786–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Woods KR, Billys JB, Hynes RA (2017) Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1–L5 (OLIF25) and at L5–S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates. Spine J 17(4):545–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zairi F, Sunna TP, Westwick HJ, Weil AG, Wang Z, Boubez G, Shedid D (2017) Mini-open oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach for multi-level discectomy and fusion involving L5–S1: preliminary experience. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(2):295–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Sung Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (name of institute/committee) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Key points

i. OLIF51 provides an excellent alternative to ALIF as a minimally invasive option [4, 9, 10], retaining its advantages including sagittal balance correction and large fusion area [5]

ii. Careful evaluation of the vascular structures is essential for case selection

iii. Lateral positioning makes the abdominal contents move away from the surgical field making retraction easier. This translates into a lower chance of hypogastric plexus injury [7].

iv. The self-retaining retractor system is an indispensable component of the procedure

v. The iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves should be safeguarded during exposure

vi. Bipolar cautery usage minimizes plexus injury near the disc

vii. The extent of discectomy can be aided by C-arm and Iobrix dye

viii. OLIF51 can be combined with OLIF25 for multilevel conditions

ix. Vascular injury is a conceivable and ghastly complication. Avoid at all costs.

x. Posterior instrumentation with pedicular screws should be supplemented for a better rigidity of the construct

Authors’ declaration

The authors declare that the article has not been submitted, in part or whole, elsewhere for review.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Spine degenerative

Electronic supplementary material

Video: A description of the technique is provided in the video (WMV 34819 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, JS., Sharma, S.B. How I do it? Oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L5S1(OLIF51). Acta Neurochir 161, 1079–1083 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03918-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03918-0

Keywords

Navigation