The re-emergence of psychiatric neurosurgery: insights from a cross-national study of newspaper and magazine coverage
Surgical approaches to treat psychiatric disorders have made a comeback. News media plays an essential role in exposing the public to trends in health care such as the re-emergence of therapeutic interventions in psychiatric neurosurgery that were set aside for decades, and in shaping attitudes and acceptance to them.
We conducted an analysis of media articles covering all types of psychiatric neurosurgery published in Canada, USA, Germany, and Spain between the years 1960 and 2015. We applied both quantitative and qualitative methods to elucidate patterns of reporting for conditions, themes and tone, across geographic regions, time, and for type of intervention.
Coverage of psychiatric neurosurgery has surged since 2001 and is largely consistent across the countries examined. It focuses on depression and deep brain stimulation, and is explicit about historical context. The tone of coverage becomes more positive for Canada, USA and Spain over time; the tone of coverage from Germany remains cautious. Identity and privacy are among the few ethical and philosophical issues raised, notably in the German press.
The focused and optimistic attention to contemporary psychiatric neurosurgery in the media, but inattention to ethical issues, places an extra burden on functional neurosurgeons, psychiatrists, and other frontline health professionals to attend to queries from patients and policy makers about the full range of relevant emergent and emerging interventions and the mental health issues to which they may beneficially apply.
KeywordsPsychiatric neurosurgery International media coverage Neuroethics Medical ethics Deep brain stimulation
We would like to acknowledge the support of ERA-NET NEURON Team Grant: Ethical, Legal and Social (ELS) Issues #ERN-144241 and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (01GP1621A). We also thank the other members of the ERA-NET NEURON psychiatric neurosurgery team, including functional neurosurgeons and legal scholars, for their insightful comments regarding this subproject. We would also thank Julia Porter for data collection for Fig. 1. A reference list of the articles included in the sample can be obtained from the corresponding author.
We would like to acknowledge the support of ERA-NET NEURON Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Team Grant: Ethical, Legal and Social (ELS) Issues #ERN-144241 (JI) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (01GP1621A; SM). The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research. JI is Canada Research Chair in Neuroethics.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Burzaco-Santurntun JA (2005) Neurosurgery in the field of psychiatric illness. In: López-Ibor J, Leal Cercós C, Carbonell Masiá C (eds) Images of Spanish psychiatry. Glosa, Barcelona, pp 1–23Google Scholar
- 4.Delgado JM (1969) Physical control of the mind. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 8.Fram SM (2013) The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. Qual Rep 18(1):1–25Google Scholar
- 9.Gilbert F, Ovadia D (2011) Deep brain stimulation in the media: over-optimistic portrayals call for a new strategy involving journalists and scientists in ethical debates. Front Integr Neurosci 5(16):1–6Google Scholar
- 11.Gildenberg PL, Krauss JK (2009) History of stereotactic surgery. In: Lozano AM, Gildenberg PL, Tasker RR (eds) Textbook of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. Springer, Berlin, pp 53–58Google Scholar
- 15.Mack N, Woodsong C, MacQueen KM, Guest G, Namey E (2005) Qualitative research methods: a data collectors field guide. Available at: https://www.k4health.org/toolkits/measuring-success/qualitative-research-methods-data-collectors-field-guide. Last accessed 5 July 2017
- 18.Mitchell A, Gottfried J, Barthel M, Shearer E (2016) The modern news consumer. Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/the-modern-news-consumer/
- 20.Müller S, Riedmüller R, van Oosterhout A (2015) Rivaling paradigms in psychiatric neurosurgery: adjustability versus quick fix versus minimal-invasiveness. Front Integr Neurosci 9(27):1–5Google Scholar
- 22.Nobel Foundation (1964) Nobel lectures: physiology or medicine, 1942–1962. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 25.O’Reardon JP, Cristancho P, Peshek AD (2006) Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and treatment of depression: to the brainstem and beyond. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 3(5):54Google Scholar
- 27.Pressman JD (1998) Last resort: psychosurgery and the limits of medicine. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 33.Valenstein ES (1986) Great and desperate cures: the rise and decline of psychosurgery and other radical treatments for mental illness. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 34.Valenstein ES (1997) History of neurosurgery. In: A history of neurosurgery. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Park Ridge, pp 499–516Google Scholar
- 36.Zamiska N (2007) In China, brain surgery is pushed on the mentally ill. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119393867164279313. Last accessed 23 Aug 2017