Abstract
A fundamental aspect of the quantum-to-classical limit is the transition from a non-commutative algebra of observables to commutative one. However, this transition is not possible if we only consider unitary evolutions. One way to describe this transition is to consider the Gamow vectors, which introduce exponential decays in the evolution. In this paper, we give two mathematical models in which this transition happens in the infinite time limit. In the first one, we consider operators acting on the space of the Gamow vectors, which represent quantum resonances. In the second one, we use an algebraic formalism from scattering theory. We construct a non-commuting algebra which commutes in the infinite time limit.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antoine JP (1969) Dirac formalism and symmetry problems in quantum mechanics. I. General Dirac formalism. J Math Phys 10:53–69
Antoniou I, Laura R, Suchanecki Z, Tasaki S (1997) Intrinsic irreversibility of quantum systems with diagonal singularity. Phys A 241:737–772
Antoniou IE, Gadella M, Pronko GP (1998) Gamow vectors for degenerate scattering resonances. J Math Phys 39:2459–2475
Antoniou I, Gadella M, Suchanecki Z (1998) Some general properties of Liouville spaces. In: Bohm A, Doebner HD, Kielanowski P (eds) Irreversibility and causality. Lecture notes in physics, vol 504. Springer, Berlin, pp 38–56
Birkhoff G, von Neumann J (1936) The logic of quantum mechanics. Ann Math 37:823–843
Bleistein N, Handelsman R (1986) Asymptotic expansion of integrals. Dover Inc., New York
Bohm A (1978) The rigged Hilbert space and quantum mechanics. Springer lecture notes in physics, vol 78. Springer, New York
Bohm A (1981) Resonance poles and Gamow vectors in the rigged Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics. J Math Phys 22:2813–2823
Bohm A (1993) Quantum mechanics: foundations and applications. Springer, Berlin
Bohm A, Gadella M (1989) Dirac kets, Gamow vectors and Gelfand triplets. Springer lecture notes in physics, vol 348. Springer, New York
Bohm A, Erman F, Uncu H (2011) Resonance phenomena and time asymmetric quantum mechanics. Turk J Phys 35:209–240
Castagnino M, Fortin S (2013) Formal features of a general theoretical framework for decoherence in open and closed systems. Int J Theor Phys 52:1379–1398
Castagnino M, Gadella M (2006) The problem of the classical limit of quantum mechanics and the role of self-induced decoherence. Found Phys 36:920–952
Castagnino M, Lombardi O (2005) Self-induced decoherence and the classical limit of quantum mechanics. Philos Sci 72:764–776
Castagnino M, Gadella M, Gaioli F, Laura R (1999) Gamow vectors and time asymmetry. Int J Theor Phys 38:2823–2865
Castagnino M, Gadella M, Betán RI, Laura R (2001) Gamow functionals on operator algebras. J Phys A Math Gen 34:10067–10083
Castagnino M, Fortin S, Lombardi O (2010) The effect of random coupling coefficients on decoherence. Mod Phys Lett A 25:611–617
Celeghini E, Gadella M, del Olmo MA (2016) Applications of rigged Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics and signal processing. J Math Phys 57:072105
Celeghini E, Gadella M, del Olmo MA (2017) Lie algebra representations and rigged Hilbert spaces: the SO(2) case. Acta Polytech (Prag) 57:379–384
Celeghini E, Gadella M, del Olmo MA (2018) Spherical harmonics and rigged Hilbert spaces. J Math Phys 59:053502
Civitarese O, Gadella M (2004) Physical and mathematical aspects of Gamow states. Phys Rep 396:41–113
Dalla Chiara ML, Giuntini R, Greechie R (2004) Reasoning in quantum theory. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Exner P (1984) Open quantum systems and Feynman integrals. Reidel, Dordrecht
Fischer MC, Gutiérrez-Medina B, Reizen MG (2001) Observation of the quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno effects in an unstable system. Phys Rev Lett 87:40402
Fonda L, Ghirardi GC, Rimini A (1978) Decay theory of unstable quantum systems. Rep Prog Phys 41:587–631
Fortin S, Vanni L (2014) Quantum decoherence: a logical perspective. Found Phys 44:1258–1268
Fortin S, Holik F, Vanni L (2016) Non-unitary evolution of quantum logics. In: Bagarello F, Passante R, Trapani C (eds) Non-hermitian Hamiltonians in quantum physics. Springer proceedings in physics, vol 184. Springer, Cham
Friedrichs KO (1948) On the perturbation of continuous spectra. Commun Appl Math 1:361–406
Gadella M (2014) Quantum resonances: theory and models. In: Kielanowski P, Bieliavsky P, Odesskii A, Odzijewicz A, Schlichenmaier M, Voronov T (eds) Geometric methods in physics, XXXII workshop Bialowieza. Springer Basel AG, Poland, pp 99–118
Gadella M (2015) A discussion on the properties of Gamow states. Found Phys 45:177–197
Gadella M, Gómez F (2002) A unified mathematical formalism for the Dirac formulation of quantum mechanics. Found Phys 32:815–869
Gadella M, Gómez F (2003) On the mathematical basis of the Dirac formulation of quantum mechanics. Int J Theor Phys 42:2225–2254
Gadella M, Laura R (2001) Gamow dyads and expectation values. Int J Quantum Chem 81:307–320
Gadella M, de la Madrid R (1999) Resonances and time reversal operator in rigged Hilbert spaces. Int J Theor Phys 38:93–113
Gadella M, Pronko GP (2011) The Friedrichs model and its use in resonance phenomena. Fortschr Phys 59:795–859
Gadella M, Kuru Ş, Negro J (2017) The hyperbolic step potential: antibound states, SUSY partners and Wigner time delays. Ann Phys 379:86–101
Gelfand IM, Vilenkin NY (1964) Generalized functions: applications to harmonic analysis. Academic, New York
Gell-Mann M, Hartle JB (1990) Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology. In: Zurek WH (ed) Complexity, entropy and the physics of information. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Gell-Mann M, Hartle JB (1993) Classical equations for quantum systems. Phys Rev D 47:3345–3382
Griffiths RB (2002) Consistent quantum theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Horvath J (1966) Topological vector spaces and distributions. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Khalfin LA (1972) CPT invariance of CP-noninvariant theory of K0 and Kbar0 Mesons and permissible mass distributions of the KS and KL Mesons. JETP Lett 15:388–392
Kiefer C, Polarski D (2009) Why do cosmological perturbations look classical to us? Adv Sci Lett 2:164–173
Losada M, Fortin S, Holik F (2018) Classical limit and quantum logic. Int J Theor Phys 57:465–475
Losada M, Fortin S, Gadella M, Holik F (2018) Dynamics of algebras in quantum unstable systems. Int J Mod Phys A 33:1850109
Melsheimer O (1974) Rigged Hilbert space formalism as an extended mathematical formalism for quantum systems. I. General theory. J Math Phys 15:902–916
Misra B, Sudarshan ECG (1977) The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory. J Math Phys 18:756–763
Mondragón A, Hernández E (1993) Degeneracy and crossing of resonance energy surfaces. J Phys A Math Gen 26:5595–5611
Nakanishi N (1958) A theory of clothed unstable particles. Progr Theor Phys 19:607–621
Nussenzveig HM (1972) Causality and dispersion relations. Academic Press, New York
Omnès R (1999) Understanding quantum mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Ramírez R, Reboiro M (2019) Dynamics of finite dimensional non-hermitian systems with indefinite metric. J Math Phys 60:012106
Ramírez R, Reboiro M (2019) Optimal spin squeezed steady state induced by the dynamics of non-hermitian Hamiltonians. Phys Scr 94:085220
Reed M, Simon B (1978) Analysis of operators. Academic Press, New York
Reed M, Simon B (1981) Functional analysis. Academic Press, New York
Roberts JE (1966) Rigged Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics. Commun Math Phys 3:98–119
Rothe C, Hintschich SI, Monkman AP (2006) Violation of the exponential-decay law at long times. Phys Rev Lett 96:163601
Schlosshauer M (2007) Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. Springer, Berlin
Urbanowski K (2009) General properties of the evolution of unstable states at long times. Eur Phys J D 54:25–29
Wigner EP (1967) Symmetries and reflections. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 38–39
Wigner EP (1994) Group theoretical concepts and methods in elementary particle physics. Gordon and Breach, New York, pp 37–38
Zurek WH (2009) Quantum darwinism. Nat Phys 5:181–188
Acknowledgements
M. Gadella acknowledges partial financial support to the Spanish Government Grant MTM2014-57129-C2-1-P, the Junta de Castilla y León Grants BU229P18, VA137G18. S. Fortin, F. Holik and M. Losada wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Universidad de Buenos Aires, the Grant PICT-2014-2812 from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas of Argentina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Communicated by F. Holik.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Let us show that formulas (41) and (42) are not equivalent. For simplicity, we shall assume that there is only one resonance so that dim \({\mathcal {H}}^G=2\). The vector \(|\psi )\) being arbitrary is a linear combination of \(|\psi ^D\rangle \) and \(|\psi ^G\rangle \), so that it may be written as a column vector as \(\left( \begin{array}{l} a\\ b\\ \end{array} \right) \) with a and b complex. Then,
Similar calculations yield (we have written \(\sqrt{-1}=-i\)):
This gives (41). To obtain (42), we need the following calculation:
Taken \(\sqrt{-1}=-i\), we easily find that \((\psi ^D|T|\psi )=(\psi ^G|T|\psi )\). From the other terms, we write
Similarly, we obtain that
The obvious conclusion is that (41) and (42) do not coincide. The first and third identities in (67) are not a surprise due to the properties of the time reversal operator T.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fortin, S., Gadella, M., Holik, F. et al. Evolution of quantum observables: from non-commutativity to commutativity. Soft Comput 24, 10265–10276 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04546-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04546-7