Abstract
This paper focuses on improving the precision and simplifying the structure of fuzzy systems. A new type of fuzzy systems that using a proposed pyramid membership function (PMF) is constructed. The original compound of fuzzy rule antecedents is replaced by PMF. Specifically, the commonly used one-dimensional triangular membership functions are generalized to three kinds of two-dimensional PMFs. Cone fuzzy systems (CFSs) with the proposed rectangular pyramid, circular cone and triangular mesh pyramid membership functions are, respectively, given. Approximation properties of CFS, including universal approximation property and approximation accuracy, are proved theoretically. It is shown that, rectangular pyramid fuzzy system and triangular mesh pyramid fuzzy system are capable of achieving first-order and second-order accuracy, respectively. Two experimental examples are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of CFS. Both theoretical and numerical results illustrate that CFS is capable of obtaining good accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akram M, Shahzad S, Butt A, Khaliq A (2013) Intuitionistic fuzzy logic control for heater fans. Math Comput Sci 7(3):367–378
Akram M, Habib S, Javed I (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy logic control for washing machines. Indian J Sci Technol 7(5):654–661
Atanassov KT, Rangasamy P (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96
Castillo O, Alanis A, Garcia M, Arias H (2007) An intuitionistic fuzzy system for time series analysis in plant monitoring and diagnosis. Appl Soft Comput J 7(4):1227–1233
Celikyilmaz A, Burhan Turksen I (2008) Enhanced fuzzy system models with improved fuzzy clustering algorithm. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(3):779–794
Chen CH, ChenWH (2016) United-based imperialist competitive algorithm for compensatory neural fuzzy systems [J]. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 46(9):1180–1189
Chen W, Saif M (2005) A novel fuzzy system with dynamic rule base. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13(5):569–582
Chen B, Lin C, Liu X, Liu K (2015) Observer-based adaptive fuzzy control for a class of nonlinear delayed systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 46(1):1–1
El-Zonkoly AM, Khalil AA, Ahmied NM (2009) Optimal tunning of lead-lag and fuzzy logic power system stabilizers using particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):2097–2106
Frayman Y, Wang L (2002) A dynamically-constructed fuzzy neural controller for direct model reference adaptive control of multi-input–multi-output nonlinear processes. Soft Comput 6(3–4):244–253
Frayman Y,Wang L (1998) Data mining using dynamically constructed recurrent fuzzy neural networks. In: Pacific-Asia conference on research and development in knowledge discovery and data mining. Springer-Verlag, pp 122–131
Hájek P, Olej V (2012) Adaptive intuitionistic fuzzy inference systems of Takagi–Sugeno type for regression problems. Springer, Berlin
Hajek P, Olej V (2014) Defuzzification methods in intuitionistic fuzzy inference systems of Takagi–Sugeno type: the case of corporate bankruptcy prediction. In: International conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery, pp 232–236
Hájek P, Olej V (2015) Intuitionistic fuzzy neural network: the case of credit scoring using text information
Hao Y, Chenb G (1997) Necessary conditions for some typical fuzzy systems as universal approximators. Automatica 33(7):1333–1338
Hsueh YC, Su SF, Chen MC (2014) Decomposed fuzzy systems and their application in direct adaptive fuzzy control. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(10):1772–1783
Intarapaiboon P (2014) An application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in text classification. In: International conference on information science, electronics and electrical engineering, pp 604–608
Jiang MZ, Zhang CL, Yuan XH, Li HX et al (2016) Fuzzy inference modeling method based on T-S fuzzy System [M]. In: Fuzzy systems & operations research and management. Springer, pp 51–61
Jiang MZ, Yuan XH (2017) A fuzzy inference modeling method for nonlinear systems by using triangular pyramid fuzzy system [J]. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33(2):1–10
Juang CF, Hsiao CM, Hsu CH (2010) Hierarchical cluster-based multispecies particle-swarm optimization for fuzzy-system optimization. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 18(1):14–26
Karnik NN, Mendel JM, Liang Q (2000) Type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 7(6):643–658
Kumar M, Insan A, Stoll N et al (2016) Stochastic fuzzy modeling for ear imaging based child identification [J]. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 46(9):1265–1278
Li H (1998) Interpolation mechanism of fuzzy control. Sci China Technol Sci 41(3):312–320
Li HX, Wang J, Miao Z (2002) Modelling on fuzzy control systems. Sci China Ser A 45(12):1506–1517
Liu P, Li H (2005) Hierarchical ts fuzzy system and its universal approximation. Inf Sci 169(3C4):279–303
Liu Q, Yin J, Leung VCM, Zhai JH, Cai Z, Lin J (2016) Applying a new localized generalization error model to design neural networks trained with extreme learning machine. Neural Comput Appl 27(1):59–66
Lu H, Pi E, Peng Q, Wang L, Zhang C (2009) A particle swarm optimization-aided fuzzy cloud classifier applied for plant numerical taxonomy based on attribute similarity. Expert Syst Appl 36(5):9388–9397
Luo Q, Yang W, Yi D (2008) Kernel shapes of fuzzy sets in fuzzy systems for function approximation. Inf Sci 178(3):836–857
Ma X, Jin Y, Dong Q (2017) A generalized dynamic fuzzy neural network based on singular spectrum analysis optimized by brain storm optimization for short-term wind speed forecasting. Appl Soft Comput 54:296–312
Mansoori EG, Zolghadri MJ, Katebi SD (2008) SGERD: a steady-state genetic algorithm for extracting fuzzy classification rules from data. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(4):1061–1071
Mao ZH, Li YD, Zhang XF (1997) Approximation capability of fuzzy systems using translations and dilations of one fixed function as membership functions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 5(3):468–473
Marquez FA, Peregrin A, Herrera F (2008) Cooperative evolutionary learning of linguistic fuzzy rules and parametric aggregation connectors for mamdani fuzzy systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1162–1178
Mitaim S, Kosko B (2001) The shape of fuzzy sets in adaptive function approximation. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 9(4):637–656
Olej V, Hájek P (2011) Comparison of fuzzy operators for IF-inference systems of Takagi–Sugeno type in ozone prediction. Springer, Berlin
Ren P, Xu Z, Gou X (2016) Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput 42:246–259
Rubio JJ (2015) Adaptive least square control in discrete time of robotic arms. Soft Comput 19(12):3665–3676
Rubio JJ (2016) Least square neural network model of the crude oil blending process. Neural Netw 78(C):88–96
Wang LX (1992) Fuzzy systems are universal approximators. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, pp 1163–1170
Wang LX (1996) A course in fuzzy systems and control. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River
Wang L, Frayman Y (2002) A dynamically generated fuzzy neural network and its application to torsional vibration control of tandem cold rolling mill spindles. Eng Appl Artif Intell 15(6):541–550
Wang LX, Mendel JM (1992) Fuzzy basis functions, universal approximation, and orthogonal least-squares learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(5):807–814
Wang LX, Wei C (2000) Approximation accuracy of some neuro-fuzzy approaches. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(4):470–478
Wi C, Wang LX (2000) A note on universal approximation by hierarchical fuzzy systems. Inf Sci 123(3–4):241–248
Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Meeting, pp 57–61
Ye J (2011) Cosine similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Math Comput Modell 53(1C2):91–97
Ying H (1994) Sufficient conditions on general fuzzy systems as function approximators. Automatica 30(3):521–525
Ying H (1998a) General siso Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy systems with linear rule consequent are universal approximators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 6(4):582–587
Ying H (1998b) General Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy systems with simplified linear rule consequent are universal controllers, models and filters. Inf Sci 108(1–4):91–107
Ying H (1998c) Sufficient conditions on uniform approximation of multivariate functions by general Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy systems with linear rule consequent. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 28(4):515–520
Ying H, Ding Y, Li S, Shao S (1999) Comparison of necessary conditions for typical Takagi–Sugeno and mamdani fuzzy systems as universal approximators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 29(5):508–514
Yuan XH, Hong-Xing LI, Sun KB (2011) Fuzzy systems and their approximation capability based on parameter singleton fuzzifier methods. Tien Tzu Hsueh Pao/acta Electronica Sinica 39(10):2372–2377
Yuan XH, Li HX, Yang X (2013) Fuzzy system and fuzzy inference modeling method based on fuzzy transformation. Tien Tzu Hsueh Pao/acta Electronica Sinica 41(4):674–680
Zeng XJ, Singh MG (1996a) Approximation accuracy analysis of fuzzy systems as function approximators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 4(1):44–63
Zeng XJ, Singh MG (1996b) A relationship between membership functions and approximation accuracy in fuzzy systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern A Publ IEEE Syst Man Cybern Soc 26(1):176–180
Zeng K, Zhang NY, Xu WL (2000) A comparative study on sufficient conditions for Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy systems as universal approximators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(6):773–780
Zheng YJ, Sheng WG, Sun XM, Chen SY (2016) Airline passenger profiling based on fuzzy deep machine learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst PP(99):1–13
Zheng YJ, Chen SY, Xue Y, Xue JY (2017) A pythagorean-type fuzzy deep denoising autoencoder for industrial accident early warning. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst PP(99):1–1
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief, the Associate Editor, and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped greatly improve the presentation of this paper. This work was supported by National Science Foundations of China (No. 61473327, 61773088).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare that he/she has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by A. Di Nola.
Appendices
Appendix A: Different types of cone fuzzy systems
(1) Rectangular pyramid fuzzy system
From (23) and (9)–(12), the expressions of RPFS can be represented by:
in the domain \(D_1\),
in the domain \(D_2\),
in the domain \(D_3\),
in the domain \(D_4\),
(2) Circular cone fuzzy system
From (23) and (13)–(16), the general expressions of CCFS can be deduced:
In the domain \(U_1\): \(S(x,y)=\frac{m_1}{n_1}\), where
In the domain \(U_2\): \(S(x,y)=\frac{m_2}{n_2}\), where
In the domain \(U_3\): \(S(x,y)=\frac{m_3}{n_3}\), where
In the domain \(U_4\): \(S(x,y)=\frac{m_4}{n_4}\), where
In the domain \(U_5\): \(S(x,y)=\frac{m_5}{n_5}\), where
In the domain \(V_1\):
In the domain \(V_2\):
In the domain \(V_3\):
In the domain \(V_4\):
(3) Triangular mesh pyramid fuzzy system
From (24) and (17)–(22), the expressions of the output of a TPFS model are derived as follows:
in the domain \(E_1\):
in the domain \(E_2\):
Appendix B: Proofs of theorems
Proof of Theorem 3
Without losing generality, the proof is discussed on one partition of the domain D. We can now prove the theorem with the help of interpolation property of CFS.
Using Taylor expansion (Rubio 2016; Liu et al. 2016; Rubio 2015) with Lagrange remainder, there exist \(({{\xi }_{1}},{{\eta }_{1}})\) and \(({{\xi }_{2}},{{\eta }_{2}})\) which both belong to \(\left( {{x}_{i}},{{x}_{i+1}} \right) \times \left( {{y}_{j}},{{y}_{j+1}} \right) \) such that
where \(h=\max \{ |x-{{x}_{i}}|,|y-{{y}_{j}}| \}\).
As \(\left( |\frac{\partial S}{\partial x}| _{({\xi }_{1},{\eta }_{1})}|+| \frac{\partial S}{\partial y}| _{({\xi }_{1},{\eta }_{1})}|+| \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}| _{({\xi }_{2},{\eta }_{2})} |+| \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}| _{({\xi }_{2},{\eta }_{2})} | \right) \) is a constant, when h is sufficiently small, for any \(\varepsilon >0\), it is evident that the following inequality can be obtained:
Then
The proof is complete.\(\square \)
Proof of Theorem 4
The proofs of this theorem in the domains \(D_1\)–\(D_4\) are similar, so we only discuss the case of domain \(D_1\).
To utilize the property of triangular membership functions, we denote \(A_i(x)\), \(A_{i+1}(x)\), \(B_j(y)\) and \(B_{j+1}(y)\) as triangular membership functions with the peak points \(x_i\), \(x_{i+1}\), \(y_j\) and \(y_{j+1}\). For \(x\in [x_i,x_{i+1}]\) and \(y\in [y_j,y_{j+1}]\), we have
For \(\forall (x,y) \in [{x_i},{x_{i + 1}}] \times [{y_j},{y_{j + 1}}]\), the expression of RPFS can be rewritten as follows:
Let \(\bar{S}(x,y)\) be defined by (3). We first estimate the following absolute difference. Note that the triangular membership functions have the properties, i.e., \({A_i}(x) + {A_{i + 1}}(x) = 1\), \({B_j}(y) + {B_{j + 1}}(y) = 1\), \(A_i(x)\le 1\), \(A_{i+1}(x)\le 1\), \(B_j(y)\le 1\) and \(B_{j+1}(y)\le 1\). It follows that
According to the approximation property of \(\bar{S}(x,y)\) given by Theorem 2, the difference between \(\bar{S}(x,y)\) and f(x, y) can be expressed as
which ends the proof.\(\square \)
Proof of Theorem 5
Take the TPFS in \(E_2\) as an example and define the error as
Using first-order Taylor series expansion around an arbitrary point (z, w), the error expands to
where r(x, y, z, w) is the remainder term defined by
Note that S(x, y) is a linear function of two variables. It follows that
Substituting Eq. (46) into Eq. (45) yields
The interpolation property of a TPFS implies that \(\varepsilon (x,y)\) is equal to zero at the points \((x_i, y_j)\), \((x_{i+1}, y_j)\) and \((x_{i+1}, y_{j+1})\). It then follows that
For simplicity, the remainder terms of Eqs. (47)–(49) are denoted by \(r_1\), \(r_2\), \(r_3\) in the following derivations. Then Eqs. (47)–(49) can be rewritten as:
Equations (5051)–(52) can be regarded as a linear system with respect to \(\varepsilon (z,w)\), \(\frac{{\partial \varepsilon }}{{\partial x}}\left| {_{(z,w)}} \right. \), and \(\frac{{\partial \varepsilon }}{{\partial y}}\left| {_{(z,w)}} \right. \). Define the column vectors \({\varvec{\varepsilon }} = {(\varepsilon (z,w),\frac{{\partial \varepsilon }}{{\partial x}}\left| {_{(z,w)}} \right. ,\frac{{\partial \varepsilon }}{{\partial y}}\left| {_{(z,w)}} \right. )^T}\) and \({\mathbf{r}} = {( - {r_1}, - {r_2}, - {r_3})^T}\), and the coefficient matrix
The linear system Eqs. (5051)–(52) can be rewritten in a compact form by
Define d and \(d_1\) as follows:
According to Cramer’s rule, it holds that \(\varepsilon (z,w) = {d_1}/d\). Furthermore, it can be observed that
and
It then follows that
Since the point (z, w) is arbitrarily selected, it can be finally claimed that
which completes the proof. \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, M., Yuan, X. A new type of fuzzy systems using pyramid membership functions (PMFs) and approximation properties. Soft Comput 22, 7103–7118 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2984-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2984-x