Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 118, Issue 5, pp 979–988 | Cite as

Forearm vasodilator responses to environmental stress and reactive hyperaemia are impaired in young South Asian men

  • Natalie G. Ormshaw
  • Rehan T. Junejo
  • Janice M. Marshall
Open Access
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is greater in South Asians (SAs) than White Europeans (WEs). Endothelial dysfunction and blunted forearm vasodilatation to environmental stressors have been implicated in CVD. We investigated whether these features are present in young SA men.

Methods

In 15 SA and 16 WE men (19–23 years), we compared changes in forearm blood flow, arterial blood pressure (ABP), forearm vascular conductance (FVC), heart rate, and electrodermal resistance (EDR; sweating) following release of arterial occlusion (reactive hyperaemia endothelium-dependent) and 5 single sounds at 5–10 min intervals (stressors).

Results

All were normotensive. Peak reactive hyperaemia was smaller in SAs than WEs (FVC increase: 0.36 ± 0.038 vs 0.44 ± 0.038 units; P < 0.05). Furthermore, in WEs, mean FVC increased at 5, 15, and 20 s of each sound (vasodilatation), but increased at 5 s only in SAs, decreasing by 20 s (vasoconstriction). This reflected a smaller proportion of SAs showing forearm vasodilatation at 15 s (5/15 SAs vs 11/16 WEs: P < 0.01), the remainder showing vasoconstriction. Concomitantly, WEs showed greater bradycardia and EDR changes. Intra-class correlation analyses showed that all responses were highly reproducible over five sounds in both WEs and SAs. Moreover, sound-evoked changes in ABP and FVC were negatively correlated in each ethnicity (P < 0.01). However, WEs showed preponderance of forearm vasodilatation and depressor responses; SAs showed preponderance of vasoconstriction and pressor responses.

Conclusions

Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation is blunted in young SA men. This could explain their impaired forearm vasodilatation and greater pressor responses to repeated environmental stressors, so predisposing SAs to hypertension and CVD.

Keywords

Reactive hyperaemia Forearm dilatation Mental stress South Asian 

Abbreviations

ABP

Arterial blood pressure

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

CVD

Cardiovascular disease

EDR

Electrodermal response

FBF

Forearm blood flow

FMD

Flow-mediated dilatation

FVC

Forearm vascular conductance

HR

Heart rate

ICC

Intra-class correlation

MSNA

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity

NO

Nitric oxide

NOS

Nitric oxide synthase

PGs

Prostaglandins

PSS

Perceived Stress Scale

S

Sound

SA

South Asian

WE

White European

Introduction

Population studies in the UK, Canada and USA indicate that South Asians (SAs) with ethnic roots in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, or Nepal, have a 2–3-fold greater risk of death from all cardiovascular disease (CVD) than those of White European origin (WE; Gupta et al. 2006; Rana et al. 2014; Wild et al. 2007). Moreover, SAs present at younger age with coronary artery disease and heart failure and have higher prevalence of hypertension, the common forerunner of CVD (Agyemand and Bhopal 2006; Gupta et al. 2006). The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is also higher in SAs than WE (Gupta et al. 2006). However, SA men and women (20–60 years) in the USA, who were non-diabetic and normotensive had higher plasma insulin and showed blunted brachial artery vasodilatation to insulin relative to age-matched WEs (Raji et al. 2004). Furthermore, non-diabetic, normotensive SA men (20–40 years) resident in the UK showed higher plasma insulin, smaller flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and smaller tonic dilator influence of nitric oxide (NO) than WEs (Murphy et al. 2007). These findings suggest that endothelial dilator function deteriorates at an earlier age in SA than WE men and may precede development of hypertension and diabetes.

It is widely accepted that psychosocial stress is an important “modifiable” risk factor for CVD as identified in the INTERHEART study of acute myocardial infarction in 52 countries (Yusuf et al. 2004). Consistent with this, meta-analysis of longitudinal studies of cardiovascular responses to laboratory mental stress and future cardiovascular status demonstrated that greater pressor reactivity to mental stress in young individuals predicted future development of hypertension (Chida and Steptoe 2010). Whether enhanced pressor responses to mental stress and hypertension are causally linked is controversial (Fonkoue and Carter 2015; Lambert and Schlaich 2004; Oparil et al. 2003). However, in normotensives, a single episode of mental stress attenuated endothelium-dependent dilatation in forearm for at least 4 h (Ghiadoni et al. 2002). Furthermore, the pattern of vascular response evoked by acute mental stress includes muscle vasodilatation (Brod et al. 1959; Halliwill et al. 1997; Hilton 1982) and this vasodilatation is labile in a way that seems likely to facilitate development of hypertension in some individuals. Thus, muscle vasodilator responses evoked by stress tests habituated on repetition and reversed to vasoconstriction in some individuals (Edwards et al. 1998, 1999; Zbrozyna and Westwood 1988). Furthermore, a decrease in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) occurred in ~ 50% of individuals and habituated on repetition of the stress stimulus. Recurrent increases in MSNA occurred in the remainder and they showed larger and more persistent increases in arterial blood pressure (Donadio et al. 2002, 2012). Similarly, young borderline hypertensives with hypertensive parents showed greater pressor responses to mental stress and smaller decreases in MSNA than young normotensive men with normotensive parents (Matsukawa et al. 1991; Fonkoue et al. 2016). Moreover, mental stress evoked smaller forearm vasodilator responses in young borderline hypertensives than normotensives, while muscle vasodilator responses habituated in young normotensives with hypertensive parents and in borderline hypertensives (Schneider et al. 2003; Schwartz et al. 2011; Zbrozyna and Krebbel 1985).

In view of these findings, we hypothesised that the forearm vasodilator response to a recognised sound stress stimulus (see Edwards et al. 1998, 1999) would be smaller and habituate more readily on repetition in young SAs than young WEs, while other components would be larger. We also hypothesised that endothelium-dependent, reactive hyperaemia in forearm would be smaller in SAs than WEs. A brief account of our results has been published in abstract form (Ormshaw et al. 2016).

Methods

The study was performed on 31 male subjects aged 20.80 ± 0.16 years (mean ± SEM, range 19–23) of either South Asian (SA, n = 15), or White European (WE, n = 16) ethnicity. Ethnicity was self-reported (Office for National Statistics 2018); all were UK residents with both parents of the same ethnicity. One subject in each ethnic group had type 1 diabetes; otherwise, they had no known medical condition. They were all non-smokers, except one in each group who had quit smoking for at least 12 months. All experiments were performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the University of Birmingham Ethics Committee. Subjects were recruited from students of the University of Birmingham, UK and gave written, informed consent.

Each subject attended a preliminary session during which he was familiarized with the recording equipment, completed Cohen’s Perceived Stress Scale questionnaire (PSS; Cohen et al. 1983) and a questionnaire dealing with personal characteristics. We used a semi-quantitative scoring system based on the UK Diabetes and Diet Questionnaire (UKDDQ) for fresh fruit and vegetable consumption, as an index of anti-oxidant vitamin C intake. Alcohol consumption was scored as units/week. Level of elective physical activity was assessed according to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short version, allowing subjects to indicate time spent in moderate and vigorous exercise per week and scored as MET min/week (The IPAQ Group 2015). Time spent in dynamic exercise (e.g., running, jogging) vs resistance exercise (e.g., press-ups, dumbbell lift) was calculated as percentage of total time. In addition, measurements of resting arterial blood pressure (ABP) were taken with a sphygmomanometer.

Experimental protocol

Subjects were asked to refrain from consuming alcohol, a heavy meal and undertaking vigorous exercise for at least 24 h prior to the experiment. Experiments were performed in a quiet room with the subject sitting on a couch, with the backrest inclined at 45° and facing away from the equipment to avoid distractions. Both arms were supported at heart level. ABP was continuously recorded from the right middle finger using a Finapres (Ohmeda 2300, BOC Health Care). Forearm blood flow (FBF) was recorded by venous occlusion plethysmography (strain gauge and gadolinium-filled silastic tubing; EC6, Hokanson Inc.) following inflation of a cuff around the upper arm cuff to 50 mmHg using a rapid inflation system (AG101 Cuff Inflator Air Source; E20 Rapid Cuff Inflator Hokanson Inc.). Values of FBF were computed off-line as the slope over the first two heartbeats following venous occlusion. A second cuff wrapped around the wrist was inflated to 200 mmHg immediately prior to each recording of FBF to exclude blood flow to the hand. Forearm vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FBF/mean ABP. Electrodermal response (EDR) was recorded as an index of sweating, via an Amplifier (GSR Amp FE116; AD Instruments), by electrodes (MLT116; AD Instruments) attached to the first and third finger of the right hand, as maximum change from the baseline. Mean ABP and heart rate (HR) generated from the Finapres recordings, FBF and EDR were recorded to a computer via MacLab software (PowerLab/85P, AD instruments).

Reactive hyperaemia

After a stabilization period of 15 min, four baseline measurements of FBF were taken at 30 s intervals. The upper arm cuff was then inflated to 200 mmHg for 2 min. At 2 min, the upper arm cuff was rapidly deflated: FBF was measured immediately and at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 s post-occlusion.

Repeated sounds

The subject closed his eyes for this part of the protocol to prevent anticipatory stress that might have been triggered by the subject seeing the experimenter initiate the sound stimulus. Five consecutive sounds (S1–S5: 100 dB, 1.5 kHz; Edwards et al. 1998) each of 30 s duration were delivered through headphones by an audiometer (Maico MA40, Graystad, Medical), at randomized intervals of 5–10 min. FBF was recorded at 5, 15, and 20 s into each sound: 5 s was the earliest timepoint at which we could measure and gave us an index of the very early part of the response when ABP is rising; 15 s is the timepoint we have used before when ABP and skin vasoconstriction have reached their peak (Edwards et al. 1998); a measurement at 20 s was included to indicate whether the forearm vascular response stabilised. The subject rated each sound on a scale of 0–10, 10 being the most stressful.

Statistical analyses

Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Baseline comparisons between ethnicities were made with Student’s un-paired t test. Proportions of subjects with hypertensive vs normotensive parents, those born in UK vs non-UK and time spent in dynamic vs resistance exercise were compared by Fisher’s exact test. For reactive hyperaemia, within and between group analyses were performed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Responses evoked by sound were compared by mixed model ANOVA with repeated measures. Post-hoc comparisons were made with Tukey’s HSD for multivariate comparisons. Individuals were divided into “vasodilators” and “vasoconstrictors” according to the direction of change in FVC at 15 s into S1 when the evoked change in ABP and cutaneous vasoconstriction reach their maximum (Edwards et al. 1998). The proportions of vasodilators and vasoconstrictors amongst WEs and SAs were compared by Fisher’s exact test. The consistency of changes evoked in each variable at 15 s into the five sounds was tested by intra-class correlation (ICC) analysis; the coefficient of consistency [Cronbach’s alpha (α) value] is reported with two-tailed P values. Relationships between variables within individuals of each ethnicity were investigated by linear regression analysis using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) and coefficient of determination (r2). P < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Baseline characteristics

There were no significant differences between the ethnic groups for anthropometric data and lifestyle variables except caffeine intake, which was greater in WEs (Table 1); it should be noted that all subjects refrained from caffeine intake for at least 24 h before the experiment. There were also no differences between ethnic groups for resting ABP, or cardiovascular baselines recorded at the beginning of the experimental protocol (Table 2).

Table 1

Characteristics of South Asians and White Europeans

 

South Asians (n = 15)

White Europeans (n = 16)

P value

Age (years)

20.6 ± 0.214

21.1 ± 0.232

0.155

BMI (kg/m2)

22.5 ± 0.754

21.9 ± 0.578

0.529

Exercise (MET min/week)

2702.2 ± 435.526

2094 ± 278.779

0.257

Dynamic: resistive exercise (%)

74:26

79:21

0.094

Vit C-containing portions/day

5.87 ± 0.274

6.69 ± 0.463

0.117

Caffeine intake (cups/day)

0.533 ± 0.236

1.81 ± 0.410

0.003

Parental hypertension (Y/N)

4/11

3/13

0.291

UK birth (Y/N)

12/3

15/1

0.239

SBP (mmHg)

124 ± 2.55

122 ± 1.78

0.578

DBP (mmHg)

74.6 ± 1.76

73.0 ± 1.73

0.536

MABP (mmHg)

90.8 ± 1.93

89.8 ± 1.55

0.399

HR (beats/min)

78.2 ± 2.88

70.7 ± 3.19

0.0843

All values are mean ± SEM unless otherwise stated. P value: WEs vs SAs. For further description of scoring systems see text

BMI body mass index, HR heart rate, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, MABP mean arterial blood pressure, exercise elective physical activity scored as MET min/week spent in moderate exercise and vigorous exercise, Vit C-containing portions high vitamin C-containing fruit and vegetable portions

Table 2

Baseline values recorded in South Asians and White Europeans

 

South Asians

White Europeans

P value

MABP (mmHg)

82.1 ± 3.4

88.8 ± 3.5

0.184

HR (beats/min)

66.5 ± 2.3

67.8 ± 2.4

0.703

FBF (ml 100/ml/min)

6.90 ± 0.724

6.16 ± 0.661

0.461

FVC (CU)

0.088 ± 0.012

0.069 ± 0.007

0.166

P value: WEs vs SAs

MABP mean arterial blood pressure, HR heart rate, FBF forearm blood flow, FVC forearm vascular conductance, CU conductance units

Reactive hyperaemia

In SAs and WEs, FVC was increased at time 0 and returned to baseline by 2 min following release of occlusion (P < 0.01 in each case). The increase in FVC was significantly greater in the WEs than SAs at 0 and 15 s (P = 0.012; 0.014, respectively, Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Reactive hyperaemia evoked in forearm of White Europeans (WEs) and South Asians (SAs). Solid black symbols: SAs. Grey filled symbols: WEs. *P < 0.05 WEs vs SAs

Responses evoked by sound

Considering group mean values (Fig. 2), the variability was high in both groups, but the pattern of response evoked by each sound stimulus (S1–S5) differed significantly between SAs and WEs (P < 0.05 for all variables except ABP). Thus, WEs showed a mean increase in FVC at 5, 15, and 20 s into each sound, whereas SAs showed a mean increase in FVC at 5 s, with a decrease in FVC by 20 s (P = 0.007 for WE vs SA across S1–S5; P < 0.05 for each sound). There was no significant difference between WE and SA for change in ABP across S1–S5 (P = 0.74), but WEs showed a greater decrease in HR across S1–S5 (P = 0.01; P < 0.05 for each sound). EDR was consistently greater in WEs than SAs (P = 0.01 across S1–S5; P < 0.05 for each sound).

Fig. 2

Cardiovascular and sweating responses evoked in response to sounds 1–5 in South Asians (SAs) and White Europeans (WEs). Cardiovascular variables were measured at 5, 15, and 20 s into each sound, whereas sweating (EDR) was averaged over 30 s (for further details, see text). Solid black columns: SAs. Cross-hatched columns: WEs. *WE vs SA, P < 0.05

Despite the group variability, changes evoked by S1–S5 within individuals were reproducible. The majority of WEs and SAs showed an increase in FVC at 5 s (11/16 and 11/15, respectively). However, by 15 s of S1, a greater proportion of WEs than SEs showed an increase in FVC (dilatation; 11/16 vs 5/15, respectively, Fisher’s exact test: P = 0.006). Correspondingly, a greater proportion of SAs showed a decrease in FVC (constriction; 10/15 vs 5/16). ICC analysis revealed that the reproducibility of responses at 15 s was high in individuals amongst both WEs and SAs: Cronbach’s α for WEs and SAs, respectively, were 0.94 and 0.80 for FVC, 0.94 and 0.86 for ABP, 0.87and 0.88 for HR, and 0.98 and 0.92 for EDR (P < 0.001 in each case). In other words, there was no obvious habituation of forearm vascular response with repetition of sounds in either WEs or SAs; within group comparisons for effect of sound repetition on change in FVC; P = 0.975 and P = 0.938, respectively. In fact, only two WEs who showed an increase in FVC at S1, switched to a substantial decrease in FVC by S4 and S5, consistent with habituation of forearm vasodilatation (Edwards et al. 1998, 1999; Zbrozyna and Westwood 1988); no vasodilator SAs showed such behaviour.

When WEs and SAs were categorized as “vasodilators” or “vasoconstrictors” by the direction of change in FVC at 15 s, baselines were not significantly different between the subgroups apart from HR, which was lower in vasoconstrictors (Table 3). However, the pattern of response evoked by S1–S5 was different between vasodilators and vasoconstrictors (see Fig. 3, for S1); data for S2–S5 are not shown, but consistent with the ICC values, and these responses were highly comparable to those of S1. Changes in FVC between the vasodilator and vasoconstrictor subgroups were not compared, because we chose to separate individuals into subgroups on this basis. However, the changes in ABP and EDR differed between vasodilators and constrictors when WEs and SAs were considered together (P < 0.001 and P = 0.045, respectively, across S1–S5). Mean ABP fell by ~ 5–10 mmHg at 15 s in vasodilators (Fig. 3), but showed a trend to increase by up to 5 mmHg in vasoconstrictors (Fig. 3). EDR responses were greater in vasodilators; any apparent trend for EDR responses to be greater in WEs than SAs was not statistically significantly (P = 0.197, 0.153 for vasodilators, vasoconstrictors, respectively).

Table 3

Baseline values in South Asian and White European constrictor and dilator subgroups

 

South Asians

White Europeans

P value

Dilators (n = 5)

Constrictors (n = 10)

Dilators (n = 11)

Constrictors (n = 5)

MABP (mmHg)

81.0 ± 4.61

82.7 ± 4.75

88.4 ± 4.29

83.6 ± 3.37

0.330

HR (beats/min)

69.6 ± 4.95

65.0 ± 2.57

71.3 ± 2.68

60.2 ± 2.79

0.023

FBF (ml 100/ml/min)

6.08 ± 0.951

7.31 ± 0.982

5.90 ± 0.837

6.74 ± 1.13

0.238

FVC (CU)

0.076 ± 0.014

0.094 ± 0.017

0.063 ± 0.007

0.082 ± 0.015

0.089

P value: dilators vs constrictors

MABP mean arterial blood pressure, HR heart rate, FBF forearm blood flow, FVC forearm vascular conductance, CU conductance units

Fig. 3

Cardiovascular and sweating responses evoked in response to sound 1 in vasodilator and vasoconstrictor SAs and WEs (left, right, respectively). Solid black columns: SAs. Cross-hatched columns: WEs. Abbreviations and timing of measurements as in Fig. 2. #P < 0.05 for changes evoked by S1 in vasodilators vs changes evoked by S1 in vasoconstrictors

Across S1–S5, the preponderance of repeated forearm vasodilator responses and falls in ABP amongst WEs, but repeated forearm vasoconstrictor responses and rises in ABP amongst SAs was also evident when change in ABP was plotted against change in FVC for each sound in each individual (Fig. 4). In both WEs and SAs, changes in ABP at 15 s were negatively correlated with changes in FVC (r = 0.70, r2 = 0.49; P < 0.001 and r = 0.43, r2 = 0.18; P = 0.001, respectively).

Fig. 4

Relationship between evoked change in FVC and ABP in response to each of sounds S1–S5 in individual SAs (left) and WEs (right). In each ethnicity, subjects were categorized as vasoconstrictors (VCs) or vasodilators (VDs) by direction of change in FVC at 15 s into S1

Sound stress rating and perceived stress score

Sound stress ratings were greater in WEs than SAs across S1–S5 (P = 0.039; mean sound stress rating across S1–S5: 6.19 ± 0.17 vs 5.76 ± 0.19, respectively). The PSS showed a trend to be greater in WEs than SAs (12.5 ± 1.74 vs 8.73 ± 1.17, respectively; P = 0.101). There was no correlation between SS score and change in FVC at 15 s in WEs or SAs (WEs: r = 0.13, r2 = 0.02; P = 0.26; SAs: r = 0.19, r2 = 0.03; P = 0.13).

Discussion

The new findings of the present study are first that young SA men showed blunted reactive hyperaemia in forearm relative to young WE men. Second, repeated sound stimuli evoked repeatable, maintained forearm vasodilator response in the majority of WEs, whereas most SAs consistently showed transient forearm vasodilatation, which waned to vasoconstriction.

These disparities are noteworthy, because both the SAs and WEs were from a young age range (19–23 years) with no obvious signs of hypertension or other CVD. They had BMI values below those considered a risk for type 2 diabetes and CVD (23 and 25 kg/m2, respectively; NICE Guidance 2014). They were also recreationally active, with alcohol consumption well below the recommended limit. The great majority were born in the UK and similar small proportions had hypertensive parents (4/15 SAs; 3/16 WEs). Thus, the only clear difference between these young SA and WEs was their ethnicity.

Reactive hyperaemia

The blunted reactive hyperaemia in young SA men relative to WE men is fully consistent with our hypothesis. Reactive hyperaemia is attributed to myogenic dilatation, augmented, and maintained by endothelium-dependent vasodilators generated by hypoxia and shear stress (Carlsson et al. 1987; Engelke et al. 1996). It has been reported that NO contributes to peak reactive hyperaemia in normal subjects, but its contribution is attenuated in patients at high risk of CVD (Dakak et al. 1998). Other deduced prostaglandins (PGs), adenosine, and vascular hyperpolarization contribute to the peak, while NO helps maintain reactive hyperaemia (Carlsson et al. 1987; Engelke et al. 1996; Crecelius et al. 2013; Tagawa et al. 1994). Collectively, these findings are consistent with adenosine, PGs and NO acting interdependently (Carlsson et al. 1987; Ray et al. 2002). The tonic vasodilator influence of NO in forearm was attenuated in SAs aged 20–40 years relative to WEs (Murphy et al. 2007). Thus, it seems likely blunted reactive hyperaemia in young SA men reflects blunted contributions of NO, adenosine and/or PGs. Clearly, these proposals should be investigated.

Interestingly, in a longitudinal study of fit, healthy men in the USA, peak reactive hyperaemia in forearm was shown to be a better prognostic indicator of future CVD than FMD of the brachial artery (Anderson et al. 2011). FMD was not depressed in SAs aged 20–40 years (Murphy et al. 2007). Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that the blunted reactive hyperaemia we describe in young SA men may be an early predictor of increased risk of CVD.

Responses evoked by repeated sound

Vasodilatation in limb muscle is a characteristic component of the behavioural and autonomic pattern of the alerting or defence response to environmental and mental stressors (Brod et al. 1959; Hilton 1982). Accordingly, the group mean data of the present study indicate that young normotensive WE men who were naïve to the sound stimulus, generally showed well-maintained forearm vasodilator responses to repeated sounds with no habituation within session. This compares favorably with our findings on normotensive WE subjects of wider age range (21–70, mean 39 years) who were similarly naïve, but mainly female: the majority showed forearm vasodilatation at 15 s which habituated over 3 sessions, but not within the first session (Edwards et al. 1998).

On the other hand, judging from group mean data, young SA men generally showed only transient forearm vasodilatation that waned to vasoconstriction with each sound. This agrees with our hypothesis that young SA men would show blunted forearm vasodilatation relative to WEs. It was reported that normotensive black African Americans aged ~ 42 years, showed blunted forearm vasodilatation to mental stress relative to White Americans (Cardillo et al. 1998a). We believe that ours is the first evidence that forearm vasodilatation evoked by environmental stress is blunted in young normotensive SA men relative to WE men.

In our previous study, WEs showed a rise in ABP and tachycardia with each sound (Edwards et al. 1998) as is typical of the alerting response (Brod et al. 1959; Hilton 1982), whereas in the present study, young WE men and SA men showed no net pressor response and a trend for bradycardia. This disparity seems likely to reflect the unpleasantness of the stimulus: a lower frequency (1.5 kHz) in the present study vs 2 kHz (Edwards et al. 1998). Thus, low intensity sounds evoked vagal bradycardia, and higher intensity sounds evoked sympathetic tachycardia (Gianaros and Quigley 2001; Turpin et al. 1999). Variable HR responses were also reported to electric shocks, bradycardia being more common (Donadio et al. 2002).

Limb vascular responses in individuals

The majority of young WE and SA men showed an increase in FVC (vasodilatation) at 5 s into each sound, but diverged thereafter. Thus, we divided them into “vasodilators” and “vasoconstrictors” according to the direction of change in FVC at 15 s when ABP and cutaneous vasoconstriction reach their peak (Edwards et al. 1998). This revealed the proportion of vasodilators was much smaller in SAs than WEs: ~ one-third vs two-thirds, respectively. However, importantly, within each ethnicity, the direction of change in FVC was highly consistent within individuals from the first to the fifth sound; just two vasodilator WEs showed habituation of the vasodilatation within session. As far as we are aware, this is the first evidence that forearm vascular responses to stress stimuli are reproducible on repetition in any ethnic group. However, it is reminiscent of the finding that when normotensive subjects were categorized on the basis of whether their MSNA decreased, or increased in response to an electric shock: 50–60% showed a decrease in MSNA, some showing habituation on repetition and the remainder showed an increase in MSNA. Furthermore, the direction of change in MSNA was reproducible between electric shock and mental stress and when electric shocks were repeated after several months (Donadio et al. 2002, 2012).

The question arises as to why more SAs than WEs were vasoconstrictors? The EDR (sweating) response and stress ratings for the sound stimuli were lower in SAs than WEs and SAs tended to report lower perceived stress scores for everyday life. Thus, the dominance of vasoconstrictors amongst SAs was not associated with greater responsiveness to, or perception of, mental stress. This was worth considering because some, but not all studies showed a positive correlation between intensity of perceived stress and increase in MSNA (Callister et al. 1992; Carter and Ray 2009; Donadio et al. 2012). In addition, the higher proportion of vasoconstrictors in SAs cannot be explained by family history of hypertension (Matsukawa et al. 1991) for a similar, small number SAs and WEs had hypertensive parents.

It seems more likely the disparity reflects the mechanisms that underlie the forearm vascular response. In many individuals, a sudden electric shock evoked a decrease in MSNA within one cardiac cycle (Donadio et al. 2002). Thus, a decrease in MSNA may well have contributed to the forearm vasodilatation that occurred at 5 s into the sound in the majority of WEs and SAs. Maintained forearm vasodilatation evoked by mental stress lasting 5 min has been reported to be accompanied by a long-lasting decrease in forearm MSNA (Halliwill et al. 1997), or by a progressive increase in forearm MSNA (Carter et al. 2005). Thus, it could be a higher proportion of SAs than WEs switched from a decrease in MSNA at 5 s, to an increase in MSNA by 15 s, so explaining the forearm vasoconstriction at 15 and 20 s. This seems unlikely given evidence that changes in MSNA evoked by short and longer-lasting stressors are consistent within individuals (Donadio et al. 2002, 2012).

An alternative explanation is that the disparity reflects a blunted contribution of endothelium-dependent dilatation to the forearm vascular response in SAs. The forearm vasodilatation of mental stress is highly dependent on shear stress-induced release of NO and the β2-adrenoceptor effect of adrenaline, which is NO-dependent (Dietz et al. 1994; Halliwill et al. 1997; Seddon et al. 2008). The NO-dependent component of stress-induced forearm vasodilatation was impaired in those with hypertensive parents, in hypertensives and in black African Americans (Cardillo et al. 1998a, b; Schlach et al. 2002; Khan et al. 2015). Thus, it is reasonable to propose that the majority of young SA men showed forearm vasoconstriction because their NO-dependent, and β2-adrenoceptor mediated dilatation was blunted. The few vasodilator SAs may have been those who showed greater stress-induced release of adrenaline and consequent NOS activation. This agrees with our finding that the vasodilators of both ethnicities showed larger sweating responses than the vasoconstrictors.

Relationships between forearm vascular responses and ABP

In both WEs and SAs, sound-evoked increases in FVC in vasodilators were associated with repeated falls in ABP. This suggests that in these individuals, vasodilatation occurred in both forearms and possibly leg muscles and made a major contribution to the fall in ABP, for any change in HR was small and the alerting response includes generalized vasoconstriction except in muscle (Brod et al. 1959; Hilton 1982). On the other hand, the trend for ABP to increase repeatedly in the vasoconstrictor WEs and SAs suggests that they showed repeated vasoconstrictor responses in forearms and legs. Similarly, those in whom MSNA decreased in response to short and longer-lasting stressors showed a fall, or smaller rise in ABP than those in whom MSNA increased (Donadio et al. 2002, 2012). Indeed, the negative relationship between sound-evoked changes in ABP and FVC in young WE and SA men is consistent with the positive relationship between stressor-evoked changes in MSNA and ABP (Donadio et al. 2012).

From a wider perspective, the repeatability of FVC responses to stressor stimuli and the dominance of forearm vasoconstrictor responses in SAs indicate that more young SA, than WE men are exposed to the vasoconstrictor, pressor effects of environmental stressors in everyday life. Given the evidence that repeated stress-induced vasoconstriction promotes vascular hypertrophy and development of hypertension (Oparil et al. 2003) and that heightened pressor responsiveness to laboratory stressors is predictive of future CVD (Chida and Steptoe 2010), our findings indicate that young men of SA ethnicity are preferentially exposed to these effects. The presence of high levels of stress in everyday life would be expected to further exacerbate the tendency of SA men to develop hypertension, particularly as acute stress impairs endothelial vasodilator function (Ghiadoni et al. 2002).

Study limitations

A larger study is required to indicate whether our findings hold for a wider population of young SA men, or encompass young SA women, while longitudinal studies would be required to test whether young vasoconstrictor SAs are indeed at higher risk of hypertension and CVD. Self-reporting of diet and physical activity allowed the study to be non-invasive and facilitated recruitment of subjects. However, blood samples would have allowed assay markers of oxidative stress, lipid profile and insulin resistance, while a standard exercise test would have allowed better comparison of functional capacity. Such tests may have indicated whether young SAs showed higher risk factors for CVD than WEs. Self-reporting may also have led to underestimation of family history of hypertension.

We focused on forearm vasodilator response to repeated sounds as this component of the alerting response is labile and a recognised marker for CVD; recordings of skin blood flow would have indicated whether the vasoconstrictor components also differ between SAs and WEs. Finally, as we used a short, physical stressor, it will be important to establish whether our findings can be extrapolated to longer lasting, psychosocial, or cognitive stressors.

Conclusions

Our novel findings indicate that even in young adulthood, SA men resident in Europe who are physically active with no overt CVD, already show impaired reactive hyperaemia and forearm vasodilator responses to environmental stress relative to matched WE men. We suggest that this largely reflects blunted endothelium-dependent dilatation in young SA men and results in dominant forearm vasoconstrictor responses to stress. Blunted forearm vasodilatation may be an early indication of endothelium dysfunction that increases the risk of SA men developing hypertension and CVD in later life. Moreover, repeated limb vasoconstriction to stressors in everyday life may, over time, exacerbate the pressor response to stress in SA men, facilitating development of hypertension and further CVD.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the students who volunteered and generously gave their time to take part in this study.

Author contributions

JMM conceived the study. RTJ provided much of the laboratory training for NGO and supported her in performing the studies. NGO, RTJ, and JMM each played a part in data extraction, statistical analyses, and interpretation. NGO and JMM played major roles in writing the draft of the MS and all authors contributed to and approved the final MS.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no source of funding or conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Agyemand C, Bhopal RS (2002) Is the blood pressure of South Asian adults in the UK higher or lower than that in European white adults? A review of cross-sectional data. J Hum Hypertens 16:739–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson TJ, Charbonneau F, Title LM, Buithieu J, Rose MS, Conradson H, Hildebrand K, Fung M. Verma S, Lonn EM (2011) Microvascular function predicts cardiovascular events in primary prevention: long-term results from the Firefighters and Their Endothelium (FATE) study. Circulation 123:163–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brod J, Fencl V, Hejl Z, Jirka J (1959) Circulatory changes underlying blood pressure elevation during acute emotional stress (mental arithmetic) in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Clin Sci 18:269–279PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Callister R, Suwarno NO, Seals DR (1992) Sympathetic activity is influenced by task difficulty and stress perception during mental challenge in humans. J Physiol 454:373–387CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Cardillo C, Kilcoyne CM, Canon RO III, Panza JA (1998a) Racial differences in the nitric oxide–mediated vasodilator response to mental stress in the forearm circulation. Hypertension 31:1235–1239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardillo C, Kilcoyne CM, Cannon RO, Panza JA (1998b) Impairment of the nitric oxide–mediated vasodilator response to mental stress in hypertensive but not in hypercholesterolemic patients. JACC 32:1207–1213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlsson I, Sollevi A, Wennmalm A (1987) The role of myogenic relaxation, adenosine and prostaglandins in human forearm reactive hyperaemia. J Physiol 389:147–161CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Carter JR, Ray CA (2009) Sympathetic neural responses to mental stress: responders, nonresponders and sex differences. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 296:H847-853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter JR, Kupiers NT, Ray CA (2005) Neurovascular response to mental stress. J Physiol 564:321–327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Chida Y, Steptoe A (2010) Greater cardiovascular responses to laboratory mental stress are associated with poor subsequent cardiovascular risk status: a meta-analysis of prospective evidence. Hypertension 55:1026–1032CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R (1983) A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 24:385–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Crecelius AR, Richards JC, Luckasen GJ, Larson DG, Dienno FA (2013) Reactive hyperemia occurs via activation of inwardly rectifying potassium channels and Na+/K+-ATPase in humans. Circ Res 113:1023–1032CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dakak N, Husain S, Mulcahy D, Andrews NP, Panza JA, Waclawiw M, Schenke W, Quyyumi AA (1998) Contribution of nitric oxide to reactive hyperemia impact of endothelial dysfunction. Hypertension 32:9–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dietz NM, Rivera JM, Eggener SE, Fix RT, Warner DO, Joyner MJ (1994) Nitric oxide contributes to the rise in forearm blood flow during mental stress in humans. J Physiol 480:361–368CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Donadio V, Karlsson T, Elam M, Wallin BG (2002) Interindividual differences in sympathetic and effector responses to arousal in humans. J Physiol 544:293–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Donadio V, Liguori R, Elam M, Karlsson T, Giannoccaro MP, Pegenius G, Giambattistelli F, Wallin BG (2012) Muscle sympathetic response to arousal predicts neurovascular reactivity during mental stress. J Physiol 590:2885–2896CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards CM, Marshall JM, Pugh M (1998) Lack of habituation of the pattern of cardiovascular response evoked by sound in subjects with primary Raynaud’s disease. Clin Sci 95:249–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Edwards CM, Marshall JM, Pugh M (1999) Cardiovascular responses evoked by mild cool stimuli in primary Raynaud’s disease: the role of endothelin. Clin Sci 96:577–588PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Engelke KA, Halliwill JR, Proctor DN, Dietz NM, Joyner MJ (1996) Contribution of nitric oxide and prostaglandins to reactive hyperemia in the human forearm. J Appl Physiol 81:1807–1814CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fonkoue IT, Carter JR (2015) Sympathetic neural reactivity to mental stress in humans: test–retest reproducibility. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 309:R1380–R1386CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Fonkoue IT, Wang M, Carter JR (2016) Sympathetic neural reactivity to mental stress in offspring of hypertensive parents: 20 years revisited. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 311:H426–H432CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghiadoni L, Donald AE, Cropley M, Mullen MJ, Oakley G, Taylor M, O’Connor G, Betteridge J, Klein N, Steptoe A, Deanfield JE (2002) Mental stress induces transient endothelial dysfunction in humans. Circulation 102:2473–2478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gianaros PJ, Quigley KS (2001) Autonomic origins of a nonsignal stimulus-elicited bradycardia and its habituation in humans. Psychophysiology 38:540–547CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Gupta M, Singh N, Verma S (2006) South Asians and cardiovascular risk: what clinicians should know. Circulation 113:924–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Halliwill JR, Lawler LA, Eickhoff TJ, Dietz DM, Naus LA, Joyner MJ (1997) Forearm sympathetic withdrawal and vasodilatation during mental stress in humans. J Physiol 504:211–220CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Hilton SM (1982) The defence-arousal system and its relevance for circulatory and respiratory control. J Exp Biol 100:159–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Khan SG, Geer A, Fok HW, Shabeeh H, Brett SE, Shah AM, Chowienczyk PJ (2015) Impaired neuronal nitric oxide synthase–mediated vasodilator responses to mental stress in essential hypertension. Hypertension 65:903–909CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lambert EA, Schlaich MP (2004) Reduced sympathoneural responses to the cold pressor test in individuals with essential hypertension and in those genetically predisposed to hypertension. No support for the “pressor reactor” hypothesis of hypertension development. Am J Hypertens 17:863–868PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Matsukawa T, Gotoh E, Uneda S, Miyajima E, Shionoiri H, Tochikubo O, Ishii M (1991) Augmented sympathetic nerve activity in response to stressors in young borderline hypertensive men. Acta Physiol Scand 141:157–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Murphy C, Kanaganayagam GS, Jiang B, Chowienczyk PJ, Zbinden R, Saha M, Rahman S, Shah AM, Marber MS, Kearney MT (2007) Vascular dysfunction and reduced circulating endothelial progenitor cells in young healthy UK South Asian men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27:936–942CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. NICE Guidance [LGB13] (2014) Body mass index thresholds for intervening to prevent ill health among black, Asian and other minority ethnic groups. http://publications.nice.org.uk/lgb13. Accessed 2 Mar 2018
  32. Office for National Statistics (2018) Guidance and methodology: ethnic group (online). http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/measuring-equality/equality/ethnic-nat-identity-religion/ethnic-group/index.html#8. Accessed 2 Mar 2018
  33. Oparil S, Zaman MA, Calhoun DA (2003) Pathogenesis of hypertension. Ann Intern Med 139:761–776CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ormshaw N, Junejo J, Marshall JM (2016) Both endothelium-dependent dilator responses and muscle vasodilator responses to environmental stressors are impaired in young South Asians and may predispose to hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 29:644 PD03Google Scholar
  35. Raji A, Gerhard-Herman MD, Warren M, Silverman SG, Raptopoulos V, Mantzoros CS, Simonson DC (2004) Insulin resistance and vascular dysfunction in nondiabetic Asian Indians. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:3965–3972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rana A, de Souza RJ, Kandasamy S, Lear SA, Anand SS (2014) Cardiovascular risk among South Asians living in Canada: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ Open 2:E183-191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ray CJ, Abbas MR, Coney AM, Marshall JM (2002) Interactions of adenosine, prostaglandins and nitric oxide in hypoxia-induced vasodilatation: in vivo and in vitro studies. J Physiol 544:195–209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Schlach MP, Ahlers BA, Parnell MM, Kaye DM (2002) β­Adrenoceptor-mediated, nitric-oxide-dependent vasodilatation is abnormal in early hypertension: restoration by l-arginine. J Hypertens 22:1917–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schneider GM, Jacobs DW, Gevirtz RN, O’Connor DT (2003) Cardiovascular haemodynamic response to repeated mental stress in normotensive subjects at genetic risk of hypertension: evidence of enhanced reactivity, blunted adaptation and delayed recovery. J Hum Hypertens 17:829–840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwartz CE, Durocher JJ, Carter JR (2011) Neurovascular responses to mental stress in prehypertensive humans. J Appl Physiol 110:76–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Seddon MD, Chowienczyk PJ, Brett SE, Casadei B, Shah AM (2008) Neuronal nitric oxide synthase regulates basal microvascular tone in humans in vivo. Circulation 117:1991–1996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tagawa T, Imaizumi T, Endo T, Shiramoto M, Harasawa Y, Takeshita A (1994) Role of nitric oxide in reactive hyperemia in human forearm vessels. Circulation 90:2285–2290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. The IPAQ Group (2015) Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. http://www.ipaq.ki.se. Accessed 2 Mar 2018
  44. Turpin G, Schaefer F, Boucsein W (1999) Effects of stimulus intensity, risetime, and duration on autonomic and behavioral responding: Implications for the differentiation of orienting, startle, and defense responses. Psychophysiology 36:453–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wild SH, Fischbacher C, Brock A, Griffiths C, Bhopal R (2007) Mortality from all causes and circulatory disease by country of birth in England and Wales 2001–2003. J Public Health (Oxf) 29:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, McQueen M, Budaj A, Pais P, Vargios J, Lisheng L (2004) Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case–control study. Lancet 364:937–952CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Zbrozyna AW, Krebbel F (1985) Habituation of the cold pressor response in normo- and hypertensive human subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 54:136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zbrozyna A, Westwood D (1988) Habituation of vasodilatation in the calf elicited by repeated sensory stimulation in man. Eur J Appl Physiol 58:284–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalie G. Ormshaw
    • 1
  • Rehan T. Junejo
    • 1
  • Janice M. Marshall
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Cardiovascular Science, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, The Medical SchoolUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations